<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poltergeist To Haunt New Audiences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/poltergeist-to-haunt-new-audiences.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/poltergeist-to-haunt-new-audiences.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:33:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/poltergeist-to-haunt-new-audiences.php/comment-page-1#comment-110489</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=14321#comment-110489</guid>
		<description>I totally disagree with this. I guess they will learn just as they did when they decided to remake Psycho. Two Classics (Psycho &amp; Poltergeist), two remakes, two mistakes! These people make all this money, and they have to do remakes? Creative forces in hollywood must be gone, no wonder the industry&#039;s quality of movies have been heading in the downward spiral.  Earn your money and start releasing good movies again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally disagree with this. I guess they will learn just as they did when they decided to remake Psycho. Two Classics (Psycho &amp; Poltergeist), two remakes, two mistakes! These people make all this money, and they have to do remakes? Creative forces in hollywood must be gone, no wonder the industry&#8217;s quality of movies have been heading in the downward spiral.  Earn your money and start releasing good movies again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/poltergeist-to-haunt-new-audiences.php/comment-page-1#comment-202356</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=14321#comment-202356</guid>
		<description>I totally disagree with this. I guess they will learn just as they did when they decided to remake Psycho. Two Classics (Psycho &amp; Poltergeist), two remakes, two mistakes! These people make all this money, and they have to do remakes? Creative forces in hollywood must be gone, no wonder the industry&#039;s quality of movies have been heading in the downward spiral.  Earn your money and start releasing good movies again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally disagree with this. I guess they will learn just as they did when they decided to remake Psycho. Two Classics (Psycho &amp; Poltergeist), two remakes, two mistakes! These people make all this money, and they have to do remakes? Creative forces in hollywood must be gone, no wonder the industry&#8217;s quality of movies have been heading in the downward spiral.  Earn your money and start releasing good movies again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will C</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/poltergeist-to-haunt-new-audiences.php/comment-page-1#comment-108169</link>
		<dc:creator>Will C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=14321#comment-108169</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious about this film, but not too hopeful. The series really tanked after the first film. While the second was good, the third was a dog turd. 

Does this franchise really need another chapter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about this film, but not too hopeful. The series really tanked after the first film. While the second was good, the third was a dog turd. </p>
<p>Does this franchise really need another chapter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will C</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/poltergeist-to-haunt-new-audiences.php/comment-page-1#comment-202355</link>
		<dc:creator>Will C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=14321#comment-202355</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious about this film, but not too hopeful. The series really tanked after the first film. While the second was good, the third was a dog turd. 

Does this franchise really need another chapter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about this film, but not too hopeful. The series really tanked after the first film. While the second was good, the third was a dog turd. </p>
<p>Does this franchise really need another chapter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 257/263 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-13 18:06:54 -->
