<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Poltergeist&#8217; Remake to Go Ahead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/poltergeist-remake-to-go-ahead.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/poltergeist-remake-to-go-ahead.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:33:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/poltergeist-remake-to-go-ahead.php/comment-page-1#comment-87044</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/poltergeist-remake-to-go-ahead.php#comment-87044</guid>
		<description>Hollywood is also continuing Classic sequels. What&#039;s next? Remakes of sequels.

 Movie Fan:  &quot;But, I&#039;ve seen the Empire Strikes Back already.&quot;  

Junior Movie Exec: &quot;Not with Matt Damon as Luke Skywalker and Ben Affleck as Han Solo you haven&#039;t!&quot;

Movie Fan: &quot;Nooooooooo! It&#039;s not possible!&quot;

Junior Movie Exec: &quot;We&#039;re negotiating Jennifer Garner to play Princess Leia. We could also make her a man to up the pic&#039;s teenage girl appeal.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hollywood is also continuing Classic sequels. What&#8217;s next? Remakes of sequels.</p>
<p> Movie Fan:  &#8220;But, I&#8217;ve seen the Empire Strikes Back already.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Junior Movie Exec: &#8220;Not with Matt Damon as Luke Skywalker and Ben Affleck as Han Solo you haven&#8217;t!&#8221;</p>
<p>Movie Fan: &#8220;Nooooooooo! It&#8217;s not possible!&#8221;</p>
<p>Junior Movie Exec: &#8220;We&#8217;re negotiating Jennifer Garner to play Princess Leia. We could also make her a man to up the pic&#8217;s teenage girl appeal.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/poltergeist-remake-to-go-ahead.php/comment-page-1#comment-182529</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/poltergeist-remake-to-go-ahead.php#comment-182529</guid>
		<description>Hollywood is also continuing Classic sequels. What&#039;s next? Remakes of sequels.

 Movie Fan:  &quot;But, I&#039;ve seen the Empire Strikes Back already.&quot;  

Junior Movie Exec: &quot;Not with Matt Damon as Luke Skywalker and Ben Affleck as Han Solo you haven&#039;t!&quot;

Movie Fan: &quot;Nooooooooo! It&#039;s not possible!&quot;

Junior Movie Exec: &quot;We&#039;re negotiating Jennifer Garner to play Princess Leia. We could also make her a man to up the pic&#039;s teenage girl appeal.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hollywood is also continuing Classic sequels. What&#8217;s next? Remakes of sequels.</p>
<p> Movie Fan:  &#8220;But, I&#8217;ve seen the Empire Strikes Back already.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Junior Movie Exec: &#8220;Not with Matt Damon as Luke Skywalker and Ben Affleck as Han Solo you haven&#8217;t!&#8221;</p>
<p>Movie Fan: &#8220;Nooooooooo! It&#8217;s not possible!&#8221;</p>
<p>Junior Movie Exec: &#8220;We&#8217;re negotiating Jennifer Garner to play Princess Leia. We could also make her a man to up the pic&#8217;s teenage girl appeal.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 214/220 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-13 19:00:04 -->
