Orci and Kurtzman Respond to Claims of Racism in ‘Transformers 2′

Posted by Dr. Cole Abaius (cole.abaius@filmschoolrejects.com) on June 24, 2009

Skids and Mudflap

It’s been an odd couple of days with the reviews for Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen coming in like mad – some of them thoughtful pieces on why the film sucked, some insightful arguments about why it didn’t, some simple attacks on Michael Bay for being successful at making a mindless movie with a lot of things blowing up. But perhaps the strangest element to come out of the film is the cries of racism (or just plain lazy writing) being flaunted around the internet.

It all revolves around two characters – Skids and Mudflap – who are decidedly moronic side characters that resemble, well, they resemble some pretty awful black stereotypes. One has a gold tooth, they both talk in a crass urban slang, and apparently most people are shocked to the hilt in a scene where both characters appear to be illiterate. CHUD labeled them “Little Black Sambots,” and I think that’s the most succinct, clever way to put it. Especially because the visual look of them is fairly close to the old-school style of subversive stereotypical caricatures of black people made popular back in the 1920s.

I had a chance to speak with screenwriters Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman about the issue, and they had some surprising things to say. They’ve already claimed in other interviews that the gold tooth and several other elements were Michael Bay’s idea, but when I talked to them, they moved beyond that to claim they were disappointed by the characters.

Cole: I heard that the gold tooth was Michael Bay’s idea, but do you have any response to those who found The Twins offensive?

Orci: Number one, we sympathize. Yes, the gold tooth was not in the script, that’s true.

Kurtzman: It’s really hard for us to sit here and try to justify it.I think that would be very foolish, and if someone wants to be offended by it, it’s their right. We were very surprised when we saw it, too, and it’s a choice that was made. If anything, it just shows you that we don’t control every aspect of the movie.

Cole: Were you offended by them?

Kurtzman: I wasn’t thrilled. I certainly wasn’t thrilled.

Orci: Yeah, same reaction. I’m not easily offended, but when I saw it, I thought, ‘Someone’s gonna write about that.’”

A fairly level-headed response, I’d say. It will be interesting to see if the outrage about the characters continues, but it’s interesting to know that even the screenwriters of the project were none too happy about the portrayal of those characters within the film.

What do you think?


Read more articles by Dr. Cole Abaius

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Jay
    Yeah - mudflap & skids were prettymuch this franchise's Jar-Jar Binks for me... I was chuffed when it seemed that Devastator ate one of them... But alas, he survived.

    And you know damn well that Bay thought they'd "connect with the kids in the audience"...
  • Meh the Screenwriters should have known they would be none too happy, come on it was Michael Bay at the controls what else did they expect? Essentially everyone know that means he tosses any creative writing to the way side and just blows some stuff. Pretty sure I read someplace that Michael Bay’s plans for part III revolve around simply putting Megan Fox up front the whole time in different states of undress in different provocative poses and having huge explosions going on behind her. (Get your mind out of the gutter you know what I mean).

    But to touch on the actual subject a bit, I think maybe like a lot of things it might be blown a bit out of proportion just a bit. I say that basically because I’m sure Mr. Bay did not do it to insult or hurt anyone. He is not so much racist as just stupid and that is not his fault. Never the less if someone feels as though they are hurt by it they are entitled to feel that way. As stated fairly level-headed response by the screenwriters and it is hard to disagree with them.
  • Mack41
    I would eagerly pay double admission to see that megan fix movie in imax

    And I find it weird people were offended by the twins. They were really annoying and it's pretty obvious that no one acts like that. The twins were really just dumb and annoying characters that were completely unnessacery.

    (p.s. Sorry for any spelling errors. I just got back from seeing the movie and feel much less intelligent than before it started. Hopefully this will wear off)
  • Mack41
    Crap. I meant megan fox. I'm typing this on my iPod and I must have messed up
  • DP
    Some of the stereotypes about black people are that they are annoying and dumb, which is why alot of people were offended by the characters. I know that no one is really like that, but its that fact that some people believe these stereotypes that gets me. Michael Bay is wrong for making them like that.
  • Imdopetastic
    I also belive its some what of ingnorance but also consider the only robot to die in the first film was also protrade black. Which goes back to saying that they always kill off the black ppl in movies and I'm starting to see a history coming to questions.
  • Ryan
    But they did write them....and yeah it sounds like Bay changed a thing or two....They didn't know what to expect while they were writing them? I don't really know how to put it. I guess what I'm trying to say is how come they didn't understand those characters until they saw the film?

    I don't know the whole story, but it just sounds like they are saying this to appear as the shocked good guys and take the side of the public.....
  • yintagh
    Yeah Orci Kurtzman and now Kruger couldn't write their way out of tinkle-soaked bag.
    And now those douchebags are trying to play innocents to this horrid bodge of a movie?
    Don't get me started on the way they screwed up Star Trek.
    Slaggin' no-talent hacks!
  • Rukkai
    Star Trek could have been way, way, waaaay worse. I was pleasantly surprised at the direction they took with it, actually. It was different, and it gave us more to look for than what the series gave us.

    But I do agree that if you are a writer, and you write those kinds of characters, you obviously know what you're putting into it. Changing one thing, like the gold tooth on Bay's part, does not necessarily change a whole character. Gold tooth or not, those robots were godawful and just bad for the movie in general, IMO.
  • It's a tough call because there really should have been someone along the production line that thought 'hmmmmmmmm.....not to sure about those two' so there's no way this is one persons doing its a catalog of mini screw ups.
blog comments powered by Disqus