<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Teaser for &#8216;Angels and Demons&#8217; Teases With a Mullet-less Tom Hanks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: For the love of books</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php/comment-page-1#comment-119757</link>
		<dc:creator>For the love of books</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20935#comment-119757</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve said it before and I&#039;ll say it again, the books are ALWAYS better than the movies...

And when a movie is based on a book, it damn well better stay faithful to the book... It just pisses me off if it doesn&#039;t...

Finally, since when is a movie with a lot of dialog a bad thing? Even having read the book, I was hanging on every word of dialog in The Da Vinci Code movie... because I thought the plot was fascinating and exciting and awesome! I expect Angels and Demons will be the same...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said it before and I&#8217;ll say it again, the books are ALWAYS better than the movies&#8230;</p>
<p>And when a movie is based on a book, it damn well better stay faithful to the book&#8230; It just pisses me off if it doesn&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
<p>Finally, since when is a movie with a lot of dialog a bad thing? Even having read the book, I was hanging on every word of dialog in The Da Vinci Code movie&#8230; because I thought the plot was fascinating and exciting and awesome! I expect Angels and Demons will be the same&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: For the love of books</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php/comment-page-1#comment-208435</link>
		<dc:creator>For the love of books</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20935#comment-208435</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve said it before and I&#039;ll say it again, the books are ALWAYS better than the movies...

And when a movie is based on a book, it damn well better stay faithful to the book... It just pisses me off if it doesn&#039;t...

Finally, since when is a movie with a lot of dialog a bad thing? Even having read the book, I was hanging on every word of dialog in The Da Vinci Code movie... because I thought the plot was fascinating and exciting and awesome! I expect Angels and Demons will be the same...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said it before and I&#8217;ll say it again, the books are ALWAYS better than the movies&#8230;</p>
<p>And when a movie is based on a book, it damn well better stay faithful to the book&#8230; It just pisses me off if it doesn&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
<p>Finally, since when is a movie with a lot of dialog a bad thing? Even having read the book, I was hanging on every word of dialog in The Da Vinci Code movie&#8230; because I thought the plot was fascinating and exciting and awesome! I expect Angels and Demons will be the same&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senseless Babble</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php/comment-page-1#comment-117810</link>
		<dc:creator>Senseless Babble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20935#comment-117810</guid>
		<description>The &quot;revenge&quot; line struck me as Darth Maul in the teaser for Episode I.  Are catholic priests Jedi, and this movie is about the return of their &quot;Sith&quot;?   If it is, I&#039;ll go see it! - Senseless Babble</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;revenge&#8221; line struck me as Darth Maul in the teaser for Episode I.  Are catholic priests Jedi, and this movie is about the return of their &#8220;Sith&#8221;?   If it is, I&#8217;ll go see it! &#8211; Senseless Babble</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senseless Babble</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php/comment-page-1#comment-208434</link>
		<dc:creator>Senseless Babble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20935#comment-208434</guid>
		<description>The &quot;revenge&quot; line struck me as Darth Maul in the teaser for Episode I.  Are catholic priests Jedi, and this movie is about the return of their &quot;Sith&quot;?   If it is, I&#039;ll go see it! - Senseless Babble</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;revenge&#8221; line struck me as Darth Maul in the teaser for Episode I.  Are catholic priests Jedi, and this movie is about the return of their &#8220;Sith&#8221;?   If it is, I&#8217;ll go see it! &#8211; Senseless Babble</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aneda</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php/comment-page-1#comment-117734</link>
		<dc:creator>Aneda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 23:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20935#comment-117734</guid>
		<description>i liked the books both da vinci code and angels &amp; demons but i didn&#039;t like the movie it was like the book only fast forward messy and skipping a lot
so i will probably watch it but what i am waiting for is Dan Browns new book</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i liked the books both da vinci code and angels &amp; demons but i didn&#8217;t like the movie it was like the book only fast forward messy and skipping a lot<br />
so i will probably watch it but what i am waiting for is Dan Browns new book</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aneda</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php/comment-page-1#comment-208433</link>
		<dc:creator>Aneda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20935#comment-208433</guid>
		<description>i liked the books both da vinci code and angels &amp; demons but i didn&#039;t like the movie it was like the book only fast forward messy and skipping a lot
so i will probably watch it but what i am waiting for is Dan Browns new book</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i liked the books both da vinci code and angels &amp; demons but i didn&#8217;t like the movie it was like the book only fast forward messy and skipping a lot<br />
so i will probably watch it but what i am waiting for is Dan Browns new book</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php/comment-page-1#comment-117705</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 17:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20935#comment-117705</guid>
		<description>Angels &amp; Demons was a great book, but if you have read both this one and Da Vinci Code, you can tell that Da Vinci followed almost the exact same formula as Angels.  It was like Angels was practice and Da Vinci was a second chance at perfecting the formula.  As for the movies, Da Vinci was just OK.  It was very faithful to the book but maybe it was too much so.  It kind of plodded along with too much talking.  Tom Hanks was never at his most uncharismatic and boring. Angels might prove to be a better movie because the book seems to have less puzzles and riddles that require verbal exposition.  It&#039;s a little more straightforward with more action.  We&#039;ll see...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angels &amp; Demons was a great book, but if you have read both this one and Da Vinci Code, you can tell that Da Vinci followed almost the exact same formula as Angels.  It was like Angels was practice and Da Vinci was a second chance at perfecting the formula.  As for the movies, Da Vinci was just OK.  It was very faithful to the book but maybe it was too much so.  It kind of plodded along with too much talking.  Tom Hanks was never at his most uncharismatic and boring. Angels might prove to be a better movie because the book seems to have less puzzles and riddles that require verbal exposition.  It&#8217;s a little more straightforward with more action.  We&#8217;ll see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php/comment-page-1#comment-208432</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20935#comment-208432</guid>
		<description>Angels &amp; Demons was a great book, but if you have read both this one and Da Vinci Code, you can tell that Da Vinci followed almost the exact same formula as Angels.  It was like Angels was practice and Da Vinci was a second chance at perfecting the formula.  As for the movies, Da Vinci was just OK.  It was very faithful to the book but maybe it was too much so.  It kind of plodded along with too much talking.  Tom Hanks was never at his most uncharismatic and boring. Angels might prove to be a better movie because the book seems to have less puzzles and riddles that require verbal exposition.  It&#039;s a little more straightforward with more action.  We&#039;ll see...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angels &amp; Demons was a great book, but if you have read both this one and Da Vinci Code, you can tell that Da Vinci followed almost the exact same formula as Angels.  It was like Angels was practice and Da Vinci was a second chance at perfecting the formula.  As for the movies, Da Vinci was just OK.  It was very faithful to the book but maybe it was too much so.  It kind of plodded along with too much talking.  Tom Hanks was never at his most uncharismatic and boring. Angels might prove to be a better movie because the book seems to have less puzzles and riddles that require verbal exposition.  It&#8217;s a little more straightforward with more action.  We&#8217;ll see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs Beam</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php/comment-page-1#comment-117688</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs Beam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20935#comment-117688</guid>
		<description>I loved the DaVinci Code Ibelieve this will rock as well. These movies are for people with a taste for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the DaVinci Code Ibelieve this will rock as well. These movies are for people with a taste for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs Beam</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php/comment-page-1#comment-208431</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs Beam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20935#comment-208431</guid>
		<description>I loved the DaVinci Code Ibelieve this will rock as well. These movies are for people with a taste for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the DaVinci Code Ibelieve this will rock as well. These movies are for people with a taste for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php/comment-page-1#comment-117648</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20935#comment-117648</guid>
		<description>love the book, absolutely love the trailer, love the da vinci code movie and book. i absolutely can&#039;t wait for this movie. YESSSS!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love the book, absolutely love the trailer, love the da vinci code movie and book. i absolutely can&#8217;t wait for this movie. YESSSS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php/comment-page-1#comment-208430</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20935#comment-208430</guid>
		<description>love the book, absolutely love the trailer, love the da vinci code movie and book. i absolutely can&#039;t wait for this movie. YESSSS!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love the book, absolutely love the trailer, love the da vinci code movie and book. i absolutely can&#8217;t wait for this movie. YESSSS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php/comment-page-1#comment-117639</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 23:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20935#comment-117639</guid>
		<description>Yeah I love the shot of the demon thing. I also enjoyed The Da Vinci Code book and as such found redeeming value in the film but in no way would I say that its all that good, just watchable due to my immense enjoyment of the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I love the shot of the demon thing. I also enjoyed The Da Vinci Code book and as such found redeeming value in the film but in no way would I say that its all that good, just watchable due to my immense enjoyment of the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davebaxter1989</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php/comment-page-1#comment-208429</link>
		<dc:creator>Davebaxter1989</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 23:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20935#comment-208429</guid>
		<description>Yeah I love the shot of the demon thing. I also enjoyed The Da Vinci Code book and as such found redeeming value in the film but in no way would I say that its all that good, just watchable due to my immense enjoyment of the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I love the shot of the demon thing. I also enjoyed The Da Vinci Code book and as such found redeeming value in the film but in no way would I say that its all that good, just watchable due to my immense enjoyment of the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php/comment-page-1#comment-117635</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 22:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20935#comment-117635</guid>
		<description>Wow the only thing going for this is the new haircut. Haha. 

I&#039;ve never been into this fad,,, 
It looks too much like a Catholic spin on the X-Files.   

 Hey Ron, make some sci-fi, if you can ????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow the only thing going for this is the new haircut. Haha. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never been into this fad,,,<br />
It looks too much like a Catholic spin on the X-Files.   </p>
<p> Hey Ron, make some sci-fi, if you can ????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 790</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/new-teaser-for-angels-and-demons-teases-with-a-mullet-less-tom-hanks.php/comment-page-1#comment-208428</link>
		<dc:creator>790</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 22:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20935#comment-208428</guid>
		<description>Wow the only thing going for this is the new haircut. Haha. 

I&#039;ve never been into this fad,,, 
It looks too much like a Catholic spin on the X-Files.   

 Hey Ron, make some sci-fi, if you can ????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow the only thing going for this is the new haircut. Haha. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never been into this fad,,,<br />
It looks too much like a Catholic spin on the X-Files.   </p>
<p> Hey Ron, make some sci-fi, if you can ????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 510/516 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-14 03:17:50 -->
