New Star Trek Photos Show Cast and Ship Looking Fabulous

Posted by Neil Miller (neil@filmschoolrejects.com) on October 16, 2008

In order to really get the full effect of the title above, you must read it as if you are a judge on America’s Next Top Model. Is this to say that I think that based on the photos that we are about to see below, that J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek looks like something that we might see on The CW? Perhaps.

But lets get to the actual news here, instead of just muddying the waters with my anti-Trekkieisms. A few of our friends and neighbors around the web received some exclusive new photos from the aforementioned Star Trek movie, including our first looks at Chris Pine as James T. Kirk, Zachary Quinto as a very angry, Sylar-ish Spock, and the rest of the USS Enterprises’ young crew. As well, we have a look at Entertainment Weekly’s upcoming cover to the right, which shows the film’s two leading men. Have a look at the images below.

The Enterprise Crew (Anton Yelchin as Checkov, Chris Pine as Kirk, Simon Pegg as Scotty, Karl Urban as Bones McCoy, John Cho as Sulu and Zoe Saldana as Uhura), courtesy of UGO:

Zachary Quinto as Spock, laying down some grip, courtesy of AICN:

Eric Bana as Nero, courtesy of JoBlo:

Captain Kirk and Crew on Deck, courtesy of MTV:

The USS Kelvin takes a shot, courtesy of TrekMovie:

Captain Kirk on ice, courtesy of IGN:

Some likes: If Spock is going to be getting angry and laying down the vulcan death grip, then it affirms that Quinto was just right. Seeing him in full costume is affirming as well, as he looks great. Eric Bana also looks very menacing as Nero.

Dislikes: Chris Pine looks like he is 2-inches of hair short of playing Edward in Twilight and the rest of the cast looks — just okay. As I mentioned above, the film appears to have a very glossy, ‘The CW’ look to it, which could mean absolutely nothing once the characters are put in motion, but might be cause for concern. Also, there is something about the Enterprise bridge (assuming that’s what we are seeing in the third picture from the bottom) that bothers me. Perhaps it is the digital nature of it or the Jetsons-esque furnishings, but something just doesn’t hit me in the right spots.

Ultimately, I still have some faith in J.J. Abrams. If anyone can pull of a successful Star Trek reboot, it would be Abrams. I do feel, however, that this will be a very different movie from the ideal situation that may exist in the heads of many Star Trek fans. Of course, I am reserving any real judgment until we see more, including the trailer that is expected to drop sometime in the next month or so.

Star Trek hits theaters on May 8, 2009.

What do you think of the first look images from J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek?


Read more articles by Neil Miller

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Meh. Not that interested.
  • Gray
    I'm well looking forward to this one. Unfortunately, we in Australia won't be getting to see it
    until May 2009!
    I reckon the cast's looking pretty good, though I'm a little curious as to why Spock appears
    to be choking Kirk in that second shot...
  • Yeah whys Spock taking down Kirk?
  • Mladen
    The production design reminds me of Galaxy Quest...
    This is all very odd.
  • Who cares what it looks like...Its STAR TREK!!!
    Doesn't Karl Urban remind you of a young De Forrest Kelley?
    The pictures look fantastic by the way.
    Zachary Quinto looks amazing as a young Spock.
    Not too sure about Chekov though and Simon Pegg is great in everything.
    Can't wait for this one.
    This is the one that the fanboys are waiting for.
  • Got to say it kinda hurts that in TWO incarnations of 'Scotty' he can't be Scottish. I mean there is a lot of great Scottish actors nowadays that would have been able to fill the role. James McAvoy anyone?
  • Reg
    note to David...James McAvoy is scottish but does not look as Scotty as you might look at Simon Pegg on the first picture. I can't wait to see this even though I'm not a Stark Trek fan...Ok ok I'm. I liked "The Next Generation" series and thats it.
  • Layne
    Zachary Quinto as Spock and Karl Urban as McCoy look okay. But that's just going on looks. As you say, the rest of the cast looks like something off The CW. I hope this doesn't turn out to be "Star Trek: 90210" or "The OC: The Next Generation" or anything like that.

    I'm hanging my hopes on my faith in Abrams!
  • Jason
    I think the problem with these prequel-esque endeavors, like the TV series Enterprise and now this Kirk-and-Spock: The Early Years, is that the tech and the wardrobe don't look retro enough. It doesn't visually fit the timeline. In other words, the stuff in the "past" looks more advanced than the stuff that's coming up in the "future." The bridge in the photos looks more modern-day than in the original series. Their uniforms here have raglan sleeves and a visual texture or pattern, much more detailed than the series. I don't buy it that these things would evolve to what look like more primitive tech and uniforms in the "real" timeline. In some ways, this stuff looks more advanced than The Next Generation. Even if I was a non-fan, this would irk me. That said, Spock, Bones, and Uhura look spot-on. Everyone else, well, I hope they can capture the characters well with their acting so that they transcend the fact that they don't really resemble the original crew.
  • @ Reg

    What do you mean 'look as Scotty'? I'm talking about being Scottish as Scotty is supposed to be.
blog comments powered by Disqus