MPAA Spanks Kevin Smith’s ‘Porno’ with an NC-17 Rating

Posted by Adam Sweeney (adam@filmschoolrejects.com) on July 22, 2008

Zack and Miri Make a Porno

Kevin Smith has never been one to make a discreet film. Even a romantic comedy like Chasing Amy had Jason Lee introducing a child to bestiality magazines. (Kind of makes you wonder what Kevin Smith does late at night.) It seems that Smith may have gone too far in his new film Zach and Miri Make a Porno, and the MPAA is ready to give the film an “NC-17 rating for some graphic sexuality.” A film about porn containing graphic sexuality? No way! Don’t worry, Kevin Smith fans, all hope is not lost. The boys over at View Askew have a bit more detail of how the producers of Zach and Miri are fighting the rating. At the MPAA website it appears the film is “pending appeal.”

According to View Askew, “Pending appeal tells us that the film’s producers have taken the “Clerks” route and have the MPAA taking a closer look, likely without any cuts, in the hopes they’ll be re-assigned an “R”. This isn’t new territory for View Askew, though the first scuffle in some time, as “Clerks II” surprisingly went through the ratings system with an “R” and no objections last time around, with Kevin very vocally expecting otherwise. A verbally graphic “Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back” scene with hookers was excised but eventually made it to DVD.”

The film will probably end up with an R rating, we hope, but this ratings scuffle highlights a serious issue that needs to be addressed. The MPAA really needs to look in the mirror and realize the hypocrisy their ratings system represents. We can’t see sexual intercourse but we can watch a woman bathe in blood in Hostel: Part II.  We can’t see any full frontal nudity but a clerk at Mooby’s can talk about how his girlfriend has a pussy troll named Pillowpants in between her legs. How does it make any sense that any movie showing a maniac eating a woman’s entrails gets a free pass, yet the same thing we see when we take a shower goes on-screen and the MPAA starts a modern day Salem witch hunt?

America fashions themselves to be a trendsetter, yet we have the sexual maturity of an 8 year old who snickers when he hears the word dick. You can just imagine the MPAA making “That’s what she said” jokes in their meetings.

You can check out the rest of News Askew’s opinion on Zach and Miri’s fight to get an R rating here.


Read more articles by Adam Sweeney

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • J Macgon
    "This Film Is Not Yet Rated."
  • Mathieu Lalonde
    Yeah, check out the excellent doc “This Film Is Not Yet Rated” !!!
  • Billy
    That doc certainly put pressure on the MPAA, and since its release they have changed virtually everything that Kirby Dick criticized them about, all except this attitude to sex being more adult than violence. Here in the UK our BBFC is pretty much the other way round. 'Wanted', for example, was rated '18'.

    The biggest problem with the US rating system isn't so much the MPAA anymore I don't think, but just the NC-17 stigma. If NC-17's didn't bomb so badly at the box office, films like this wouldn't have to fight the ratings in the first place.
blog comments powered by Disqus