The Good Shepherd

Posted by Brian C. Gibson (brian@filmschoolrejects.com) on December 22, 2006

The Good ShepherdBased partly on the life of one of the founding fathers of the CIA, James “Jesus” Angelton, The Good Shepherd follows Edward Wilson (Matt Damon) through a thick fog of deception and suspicion. When a man who loves and serves his country with pride is forced to make a decision that would effect the fate of his personal life and the fate of his country, he must decide where his loyalty resides.

The Good Shepherd is not only good, it is one of the year’s best films. When a film has a cast that can fill seats, a good story and a director that can put the pieces together, you get a film like this. Just looking at the film’s roster makes you want to see it, but whether or not it is good or not is another story. Earlier this year there was another film All The King’s Men that had a cast that just screamed Oscar, but thankfully there have been a few other films since that have cast a very large shadow over the undeserved hype that the afore mentioned film may have received. This film may not win everything, or even anything for that matter, but deserves to be in the ranks of the year’s 5 best films.

Rarely behind the camera, Robert De Niro summons knockout performances from his ensemble cast and delivers one of the years best films. Not much can be said for what De Niro could have done better, but one thing that I found to be a bit overdone was the film’s 2 hour 40 minute runtime. One storyline could have been completely cut from the film without affecting the plot and saved the film maybe another 20-30 minutes. Other than the butt-numbing runtime, the film was great entertainment and a good look into our country’s earliest forms of defense.

Matt Damon has displayed performances in the past that have given him attention, but none that truly have shown anything different from the smile and face that have made him famous. Dazzling us with his performance in The Departed, Damon takes his craft to the next level and sells his performance all the way to the credits. An unflinching and rock solid performance from Damon anchored this film, and may give all the other Oscar hopefuls a late run for their money.


Read more articles by Brian C. Gibson

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Bruce Warner
    I agree that the film was way too long--it could have been tightened up with about 30 minutes less run time. While the cast and cinematography was quite good, the plot dragged on at a pace that did not allow for enough suspense and never really got my adrenaline going. I also think that several characters were not given enough development.
  • Phyllis Kunz
    The movie was riveting and chilling,

    But I wish it had been Alec Baldwin in the opening scene. An opening scene should begin with a bang. Alec Baldwin is more bang for the buck.
blog comments powered by Disqus