<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mickey Rourke, Scarlett Johansson Confirmed for Iron Man 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mickey-rourke-scarlett-johansson-confirmed-for-iron-man-2.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mickey-rourke-scarlett-johansson-confirmed-for-iron-man-2.php</link>
	<description>The latest movie news, movie trailers, interviews, rumors, celebrity news, photos and attitude from Film School Rejects the essential online movie magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:21:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mickey rourke</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mickey-rourke-scarlett-johansson-confirmed-for-iron-man-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-141986</link>
		<dc:creator>mickey rourke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=35949#comment-141986</guid>
		<description>im agree with andries price and scarlett johasson great comments. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im agree with andries price and scarlett johasson great comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scarlett johasson</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mickey-rourke-scarlett-johansson-confirmed-for-iron-man-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-141985</link>
		<dc:creator>scarlett johasson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=35949#comment-141985</guid>
		<description>im agree with andries price great comment. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im agree with andries price great comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andries price</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mickey-rourke-scarlett-johansson-confirmed-for-iron-man-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-141984</link>
		<dc:creator>andries price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=35949#comment-141984</guid>
		<description>i will see iron man 2 in theatres may 7th 2010 i like to see mickey rourke and scarlett johasson on iron man 2 that will be great i will see iron man 2 in theatres see ya. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i will see iron man 2 in theatres may 7th 2010 i like to see mickey rourke and scarlett johasson on iron man 2 that will be great i will see iron man 2 in theatres see ya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mickey-rourke-scarlett-johansson-confirmed-for-iron-man-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-134518</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=35949#comment-134518</guid>
		<description>I choked on my starbucks when I heard about Scar-Jo. Does that qualify for a refund from Favreau? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I choked on my starbucks when I heard about Scar-Jo. Does that qualify for a refund from Favreau?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mickey-rourke-scarlett-johansson-confirmed-for-iron-man-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-134517</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 07:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=35949#comment-134517</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree with you about the Mickster.  He&#039;s always had the talent however the best burn themselves out.  Now that life has given him a second chance, this is his time to shine given the right role.  Scar-Jo was a horrid pic.  She&#039;s Woody&#039;s muse and nothing more.  I think he&#039;s reaching with casting her.  I&#039;d much rather see Asia Argento, Anne Parillaud or Paulina Porizkova (mrs. rick ocasek) in the role.  I realize Paulina is a stretch, but who else would you rather have?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with you about the Mickster.  He&#039;s always had the talent however the best burn themselves out.  Now that life has given him a second chance, this is his time to shine given the right role.  Scar-Jo was a horrid pic.  She&#039;s Woody&#039;s muse and nothing more.  I think he&#039;s reaching with casting her.  I&#039;d much rather see Asia Argento, Anne Parillaud or Paulina Porizkova (mrs. rick ocasek) in the role.  I realize Paulina is a stretch, but who else would you rather have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mickey-rourke-scarlett-johansson-confirmed-for-iron-man-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-134497</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=35949#comment-134497</guid>
		<description>RE: Rourke - If he wants the part and wants to put the time in, this could be a great move. (Remember, before the Wrestler he spent the better part of 15 years phoning in roles. This is a big paycheck for him and unless the director is willing to get in his face the way the Wrestlers director did, he might just be collecting his filthy lucre.) 
 
RE: Johansson - Just like Rourke, if she is showing up for the paycheck, she will be fairly dreadful. If she shows up with a desire to shine, she will be great. Maybe it&#039;s only certain directors who can &quot;cater&quot; to her as an actress but when they do, we get great films. When they don&#039;t, she is awful.  
 
I&#039;m hoping for the best.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Rourke &#8211; If he wants the part and wants to put the time in, this could be a great move. (Remember, before the Wrestler he spent the better part of 15 years phoning in roles. This is a big paycheck for him and unless the director is willing to get in his face the way the Wrestlers director did, he might just be collecting his filthy lucre.) </p>
<p>RE: Johansson &#8211; Just like Rourke, if she is showing up for the paycheck, she will be fairly dreadful. If she shows up with a desire to shine, she will be great. Maybe it&#039;s only certain directors who can &quot;cater&quot; to her as an actress but when they do, we get great films. When they don&#039;t, she is awful.  </p>
<p>I&#039;m hoping for the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _Christopher_M</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mickey-rourke-scarlett-johansson-confirmed-for-iron-man-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-134387</link>
		<dc:creator>_Christopher_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=35949#comment-134387</guid>
		<description>to be honest I would have liked it if they had replaced Kristen Dunst with Scarlett as Mary Jane </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to be honest I would have liked it if they had replaced Kristen Dunst with Scarlett as Mary Jane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _Christopher_M</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mickey-rourke-scarlett-johansson-confirmed-for-iron-man-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-134342</link>
		<dc:creator>_Christopher_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=35949#comment-134342</guid>
		<description>it could have been a lot worse...I&#039;m just glad they didn&#039;t hire some flavor of the month television actor to replace Blunt...I&#039;m curious to see if Rourke ends up playing a villain in Spidey 4...since it was mentioned Sony was considering him...he&#039;s the villain in Iron Man 2 and more than likely won&#039;t be returning in the other Marvel Studios films...it would be cool to see him playing Kraven The Hunter...I&#039;m all for The Lizard and Kraven for the next Spidey film... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it could have been a lot worse&#8230;I&#39;m just glad they didn&#39;t hire some flavor of the month television actor to replace Blunt&#8230;I&#39;m curious to see if Rourke ends up playing a villain in Spidey 4&#8230;since it was mentioned Sony was considering him&#8230;he&#39;s the villain in Iron Man 2 and more than likely won&#39;t be returning in the other Marvel Studios films&#8230;it would be cool to see him playing Kraven The Hunter&#8230;I&#39;m all for The Lizard and Kraven for the next Spidey film&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertFure</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mickey-rourke-scarlett-johansson-confirmed-for-iron-man-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-134390</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertFure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=35949#comment-134390</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not all that excited for Rourke.  How threatening is 56 year old washed out boxer?  In The Wrestler I still maintain it was a cake role for him because he was playing a parallel to his own life.  He was great in Sin City, though.  I don&#039;t know, just recently I think The Wrestler has warped what people think of Mickey Rourke and I don&#039;t really see it.   
 
Though his confirmation virtually guarantees that the next villain is going to be another powered armor villain.  Hopefully they can make another Iron on Iron fight good. 
 
As for ScarJo - hate it.  She has a good body for a super hero, but her face is waaaaay too soft for Black Widow.  She is supposed to a gymnast with razor sharp features.  ScarJo is a softy. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m not all that excited for Rourke.  How threatening is 56 year old washed out boxer?  In The Wrestler I still maintain it was a cake role for him because he was playing a parallel to his own life.  He was great in Sin City, though.  I don&#039;t know, just recently I think The Wrestler has warped what people think of Mickey Rourke and I don&#039;t really see it.   </p>
<p>Though his confirmation virtually guarantees that the next villain is going to be another powered armor villain.  Hopefully they can make another Iron on Iron fight good. </p>
<p>As for ScarJo &#8211; hate it.  She has a good body for a super hero, but her face is waaaaay too soft for Black Widow.  She is supposed to a gymnast with razor sharp features.  ScarJo is a softy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _Christopher_M</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mickey-rourke-scarlett-johansson-confirmed-for-iron-man-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-134388</link>
		<dc:creator>_Christopher_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=35949#comment-134388</guid>
		<description>to be honest I would have liked it if they had replaced Kristen Dunst with Scarlett.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to be honest I would have liked it if they had replaced Kristen Dunst with Scarlett&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptainReg0981</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mickey-rourke-scarlett-johansson-confirmed-for-iron-man-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-134383</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptainReg0981</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=35949#comment-134383</guid>
		<description>ScarJo nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ScarJo nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptainReg0981</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mickey-rourke-scarlett-johansson-confirmed-for-iron-man-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-134384</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptainReg0981</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=35949#comment-134384</guid>
		<description>In Spiderman yes not in Iron Man. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Spiderman yes not in Iron Man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _Christopher_M</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mickey-rourke-scarlett-johansson-confirmed-for-iron-man-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-134381</link>
		<dc:creator>_Christopher_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=35949#comment-134381</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always enjoyed Rourke although I didn&#039;t start noticing him until Once Upon A Time In Mexico, Man on Fire,  Sin City and Domino...all movies I own on DVD so I found it a bit weird they said he was back and given a second chance.....lol...all great films and he was in a 1# film with Sin City as one of the leading actors...so it was more successful than The Wrestler was money-wise...he&#039;s such a great character actor I can&#039;t say he&#039;s going to be a leading man again but the man is talented the more movies he&#039;s in the better... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve always enjoyed Rourke although I didn&#039;t start noticing him until Once Upon A Time In Mexico, Man on Fire,  Sin City and Domino&#8230;all movies I own on DVD so I found it a bit weird they said he was back and given a second chance&#8230;..lol&#8230;all great films and he was in a 1# film with Sin City as one of the leading actors&#8230;so it was more successful than The Wrestler was money-wise&#8230;he&#039;s such a great character actor I can&#039;t say he&#039;s going to be a leading man again but the man is talented the more movies he&#039;s in the better&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tenika</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mickey-rourke-scarlett-johansson-confirmed-for-iron-man-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-134377</link>
		<dc:creator>Tenika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=35949#comment-134377</guid>
		<description>Mickey Rourke is a good pick. Scarjo, however, do.not.want.  Mainly because they&#039;re probably going to try and make a Black Widow movie and they&#039;re going to want her in the Avengers movie. Don&#039;t get me wrong the girl is beautiful, but she&#039;s not that great of an actress. This is all my humble opinion of course. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mickey Rourke is a good pick. Scarjo, however, do.not.want.  Mainly because they&#039;re probably going to try and make a Black Widow movie and they&#039;re going to want her in the Avengers movie. Don&#039;t get me wrong the girl is beautiful, but she&#039;s not that great of an actress. This is all my humble opinion of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _Christopher_M</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mickey-rourke-scarlett-johansson-confirmed-for-iron-man-2.php/comment-page-1#comment-134366</link>
		<dc:creator>_Christopher_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=35949#comment-134366</guid>
		<description>I watched M.N.I.B.! sir, and he wasn&#039;t playing an over the top villain in a massive superhero film...I like my Bruce on the big screen not on DVD...granted it was great flick </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched M.N.I.B.! sir, and he wasn&#039;t playing an over the top villain in a massive superhero film&#8230;I like my Bruce on the big screen not on DVD&#8230;granted it was great flick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
