Michael Bay Has Simple Instructions for Megan Fox

Posted by Neil Miller (neil@filmschoolrejects.com) on June 19, 2008

Megan Fox told to look hot

“Look hot.” Check, Mr. Bay. Megan Fox owes much of her current fame to Michael Bay’s simple, somewhat chauvinistic theory that the ladies in his film are there just to look hot — similar to the way that the special effects are all there to make it look “awesome”. In that regard, Bay is a real man’s director — because what red-blooding, unsophisticated American male wouldn’t want to run around with hot chicks in tow, blowing stuff up? Find me one that won’t and bring him here — I’ll bring the vice.

As Ms. Fox told the folks over at MTV today, Bay’s instructions have been incredibly simple on the set of Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, the follow-up to the 2007 summer blockbuster that propelled big badass robots back into the mainstream and Megan Fox into the role of undisputed queen of men’s magazine cover models. And along with her own hotness, Fox promised that along with featuring some “really exotic” locales (like suburban Pennsylvania), the film is “just going to be a badass movie. It’s just going to be a popcorn-visual-spectacle, summer film.”

She also made no bones about the fact that it is going to be “as big as the first movie was, this is 10 times as big, 10 times as many set pieces, explosions, and acrobatic stunts,” she said. “Shia and I make out a little bit; I don’t know if anyone wants to see that.”

I can tell you one person who would like to see that: Shia LaBeouf. As for the rest of the world, there seems to be a definite rift between those who enjoyed the first movie, many of whom are ready for the return of Bay’s awesomeness, and those who are Michael Bay haters. We can’t help those in the latter group — you are really on your own.

No matter which way you look at it, Transformers 2 is not only a film worth making, it is almost a guaranteed hit, despite that fact that as Fox explains, script work is being done on almost a day to day basis. “You know, we’ve been having script meetings, and we’ve been reworking the script, because they wrote it fast because of the writer’s strike,” she explained. “And, we’ve just been going through and trying to do some character stuff for Shia and myself in the middle of this crazy world that they’re in.”

Does that make anyone else just a little nervous?


| MovieBlips: vote it up! | Read more articles by Neil Miller

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Holy crap that's a hot pic. Was there an article beneath it???

    Vic
  • Joe Kizanu
    The fact that they had to rush the script into production means that it will probably be missing the subtleties and sharp social satire of the first installment.
  • Amen, Joe. Clearly you didn't see the social significance of the Backyard Scene. Hint: It's not about Gitmo. However, Explosion #42 is.

    You just have to read between the lines with an auteur like Michael Bay, or as I like to call him - The Thinking Man's Ang Lee.
  • Joe Kizanu
    Cole,

    Do you guys just run rewritten press releases? Because that sort of eliminates you from the possibility of objectivity. I mean, if you're in it for the money and freebies and to be ad whores, that's fine, but maybe you should just have IMDB comments or AICN trackbacks in place of reviews.
  • Ah yes... We should just use IMDB comments and AICN talkbacks in place of reviews. That would be so much easier than formulating our own opinions...

    And I thought copying press releases was the answer.

    Thanks Joe... You are a lifesaver. Now I can go back to catching up on my afternoon naps..
  • Joe's a troll.

    The AICN trackbacks can be kinda funny at times. No way near as funny as reddit comments though.

    In other news... Megan fox is perdy.
  • Joe Kizanu
    "Joe’s a troll."

    Yeah! Anyone who doesn't fall in line is a troll! Sorry, I didn't think this place was called Film School Sycophants. Tell me, Neil et. al, when you guys came up with the name, was it about not kowtowing to the Hollywood system and using the internet to say what you want in the way you wanted? Or were you like, "hey, someday I'm going to run a site where I can kiss the ass of Peter Segal!" Peter Segal? He's like the very reason one would attempt to run a site independently of the system. I'm sure he's a nice guy, but he is the least interesting filmmaker working consistently, and all you guys did was lob softball questions at him. When you get a chance to interview James McAvoy about Wanted, why don't you ask him how hard it was to keep up his American accent? Or you could ask Angelina about how hard it is to maintain household with so many kids. I guess you could change the name to The Three Junketeers.com.

    If you guys interview actors, you know most of them are dopes, and when you ask canned questions, you bore them, and you make them feel smarter than they should be led on to believe. You ask them tough questions, perhaps about their craft, and you don't let them get away with you "I loved working with Jerry Bruckheimer/Michael Bay/Will Smith, he's such a maverick." When they have to think you'll either amusingly find out if the person is an idiot, or if they are in fact really smart, in which case they love being challenged and will warm you to right away, and want to talk to you, and say interesting things that don't show up on the press packet. I'm sure you'd prefer this, as opposed them feeling obligated to talk to you, gritting their teeth as they smile.
  • Joe Kizanu
    "Ah yes… We should just use IMDB comments and AICN talkbacks in place of reviews. That would be so much easier than formulating our own opinions…"

    Let me know when you start formulating your own opinions.

    The reason I asked if this is about the money in a comment above, is because I doubt you guys wanted to start a site derived from so much fanboy nonsense. You love film, otherwise you wouldn't put so much effort into updating and maintaining the site. What would more depressing is if you were movie lovers who ended up with this on purpose, sucking the soul out of your interests, to the point where it becomes like any other mindless job. Wouldn't it be less of a downer if you did the rote and monotonous stuff as part of an uninteresting, but reasonably well paying office job, as opposed to what should be your hobby?
  • "Let me know when you start formulating your own opinions."

    What sort of opinions would you prefer we have there, Joe? It appears that it isn't a lack of opinion that bothers you, but rather the fact that you don't agree with our opinions.

    And as for your entire second paragraph, I'm just not sure how to respond, as I'm not sure what you are trying to say there...
  • And Assault, I wouldn't call Joe a troll... Trolls just spew venom. It appears that Joe is attempting to say something constructive, we just aren't sure what that is yet.
blog comments powered by Disqus