<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MGM: Hobbit, New Robocop Are On the Horizon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:33:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole Abaius</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php/comment-page-1#comment-88191</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole Abaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php#comment-88191</guid>
		<description>Robert - your point is a great one, and it leads perfectly into mine: Why do we need to rehash the titles of old movies instead of just rehashing the concepts? So Sly decides to do some vigilante justice, why does it have to be Death Wish? Is Hollywood that afraid of presenting an old idea dressed up in a new name? Do they have to tread on familiar titles in order to scoot audiences into the seats?

Robocop I can understand, but Fame? Make a movie about people trying to make it to the top - and make it original, title it something different and be done with it. It&#039;s not like there&#039;s much case for copyright infringement if the characters are new with different names in different situations. As far as I can see, the only motivation is to capitalize on an old brand name. Lazy.

And speaking of lazy, it&#039;s good to see you&#039;re still posting Fure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert &#8211; your point is a great one, and it leads perfectly into mine: Why do we need to rehash the titles of old movies instead of just rehashing the concepts? So Sly decides to do some vigilante justice, why does it have to be Death Wish? Is Hollywood that afraid of presenting an old idea dressed up in a new name? Do they have to tread on familiar titles in order to scoot audiences into the seats?</p>
<p>Robocop I can understand, but Fame? Make a movie about people trying to make it to the top &#8211; and make it original, title it something different and be done with it. It&#8217;s not like there&#8217;s much case for copyright infringement if the characters are new with different names in different situations. As far as I can see, the only motivation is to capitalize on an old brand name. Lazy.</p>
<p>And speaking of lazy, it&#8217;s good to see you&#8217;re still posting Fure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole Abaius</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php/comment-page-1#comment-187187</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole Abaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php#comment-187187</guid>
		<description>Robert - your point is a great one, and it leads perfectly into mine: Why do we need to rehash the titles of old movies instead of just rehashing the concepts? So Sly decides to do some vigilante justice, why does it have to be Death Wish? Is Hollywood that afraid of presenting an old idea dressed up in a new name? Do they have to tread on familiar titles in order to scoot audiences into the seats?

Robocop I can understand, but Fame? Make a movie about people trying to make it to the top - and make it original, title it something different and be done with it. It&#039;s not like there&#039;s much case for copyright infringement if the characters are new with different names in different situations. As far as I can see, the only motivation is to capitalize on an old brand name. Lazy.

And speaking of lazy, it&#039;s good to see you&#039;re still posting Fure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert &#8211; your point is a great one, and it leads perfectly into mine: Why do we need to rehash the titles of old movies instead of just rehashing the concepts? So Sly decides to do some vigilante justice, why does it have to be Death Wish? Is Hollywood that afraid of presenting an old idea dressed up in a new name? Do they have to tread on familiar titles in order to scoot audiences into the seats?</p>
<p>Robocop I can understand, but Fame? Make a movie about people trying to make it to the top &#8211; and make it original, title it something different and be done with it. It&#8217;s not like there&#8217;s much case for copyright infringement if the characters are new with different names in different situations. As far as I can see, the only motivation is to capitalize on an old brand name. Lazy.</p>
<p>And speaking of lazy, it&#8217;s good to see you&#8217;re still posting Fure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php/comment-page-1#comment-88189</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php#comment-88189</guid>
		<description>I know some of these 70&#039;s-80&#039;s remakes/sequels are making some bank, but take a chance Hollywood.  Leave Murphy alone. The robocop sequels and T.V shows were punishment enough. The video game was awesome though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know some of these 70&#8242;s-80&#8242;s remakes/sequels are making some bank, but take a chance Hollywood.  Leave Murphy alone. The robocop sequels and T.V shows were punishment enough. The video game was awesome though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php/comment-page-1#comment-187186</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php#comment-187186</guid>
		<description>I know some of these 70&#039;s-80&#039;s remakes/sequels are making some bank, but take a chance Hollywood.  Leave Murphy alone. The robocop sequels and T.V shows were punishment enough. The video game was awesome though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know some of these 70&#8242;s-80&#8242;s remakes/sequels are making some bank, but take a chance Hollywood.  Leave Murphy alone. The robocop sequels and T.V shows were punishment enough. The video game was awesome though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php/comment-page-1#comment-88142</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php#comment-88142</guid>
		<description>Frank Miller must be spinning in Denny Colt&#039;s empty grave over Robocop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank Miller must be spinning in Denny Colt&#8217;s empty grave over Robocop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php/comment-page-1#comment-187185</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php#comment-187185</guid>
		<description>Frank Miller must be spinning in Denny Colt&#039;s empty grave over Robocop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank Miller must be spinning in Denny Colt&#8217;s empty grave over Robocop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fure</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php/comment-page-1#comment-88131</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php#comment-88131</guid>
		<description>Of course Sly Stallone is no Charles Bronson, Abaius, but if you were to keep up with the movie news (You do work for a film website, after all) you would know that Stallone&#039;s version of Death Wish sounds to be violent in the vein of &quot;Rambo.&quot;

Perhaps he should just call it &quot;Kersey.&quot;  And while I&#039;d prefer them not call it &quot;Death Wish&quot; and just made a hardcore revenge flick, perhaps Sly can deliver the goods one more time.  Let us not forget also, that &quot;Death Wish&quot; the novel spawned many sequels of its own unrelated to the movie versions - Kevin Bacon&#039;s &quot;Death Sentence&quot; borrowed some elements and the title.

In closing,  you are a jerk.

(Oh snap I am on fire with these insults.  PEW PEW PEW BABY, PEW PEW PEW)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Sly Stallone is no Charles Bronson, Abaius, but if you were to keep up with the movie news (You do work for a film website, after all) you would know that Stallone&#8217;s version of Death Wish sounds to be violent in the vein of &#8220;Rambo.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps he should just call it &#8220;Kersey.&#8221;  And while I&#8217;d prefer them not call it &#8220;Death Wish&#8221; and just made a hardcore revenge flick, perhaps Sly can deliver the goods one more time.  Let us not forget also, that &#8220;Death Wish&#8221; the novel spawned many sequels of its own unrelated to the movie versions &#8211; Kevin Bacon&#8217;s &#8220;Death Sentence&#8221; borrowed some elements and the title.</p>
<p>In closing,  you are a jerk.</p>
<p>(Oh snap I am on fire with these insults.  PEW PEW PEW BABY, PEW PEW PEW)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fure</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php/comment-page-1#comment-187184</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php#comment-187184</guid>
		<description>Of course Sly Stallone is no Charles Bronson, Abaius, but if you were to keep up with the movie news (You do work for a film website, after all) you would know that Stallone&#039;s version of Death Wish sounds to be violent in the vein of &quot;Rambo.&quot;

Perhaps he should just call it &quot;Kersey.&quot;  And while I&#039;d prefer them not call it &quot;Death Wish&quot; and just made a hardcore revenge flick, perhaps Sly can deliver the goods one more time.  Let us not forget also, that &quot;Death Wish&quot; the novel spawned many sequels of its own unrelated to the movie versions - Kevin Bacon&#039;s &quot;Death Sentence&quot; borrowed some elements and the title.

In closing,  you are a jerk.

(Oh snap I am on fire with these insults.  PEW PEW PEW BABY, PEW PEW PEW)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Sly Stallone is no Charles Bronson, Abaius, but if you were to keep up with the movie news (You do work for a film website, after all) you would know that Stallone&#8217;s version of Death Wish sounds to be violent in the vein of &#8220;Rambo.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps he should just call it &#8220;Kersey.&#8221;  And while I&#8217;d prefer them not call it &#8220;Death Wish&#8221; and just made a hardcore revenge flick, perhaps Sly can deliver the goods one more time.  Let us not forget also, that &#8220;Death Wish&#8221; the novel spawned many sequels of its own unrelated to the movie versions &#8211; Kevin Bacon&#8217;s &#8220;Death Sentence&#8221; borrowed some elements and the title.</p>
<p>In closing,  you are a jerk.</p>
<p>(Oh snap I am on fire with these insults.  PEW PEW PEW BABY, PEW PEW PEW)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole Abaius</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php/comment-page-1#comment-88128</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole Abaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php#comment-88128</guid>
		<description>Wow, Fure. Wow. I&#039;m not sure whether I should attack your lame excuse at insult or your excitement for Sly in Death Wish. For the sake of the children, I&#039;ll stick with the latter.

Case in point: Stallone v. Charles Bronson. There is no contest here. Saying that you&#039;re excited about the new Death Wish is like saying Three Days of the Condor starring The Rock is going to be the must-see movie of the year.

You, sir, need some taste.

Blammo, indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Fure. Wow. I&#8217;m not sure whether I should attack your lame excuse at insult or your excitement for Sly in Death Wish. For the sake of the children, I&#8217;ll stick with the latter.</p>
<p>Case in point: Stallone v. Charles Bronson. There is no contest here. Saying that you&#8217;re excited about the new Death Wish is like saying Three Days of the Condor starring The Rock is going to be the must-see movie of the year.</p>
<p>You, sir, need some taste.</p>
<p>Blammo, indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole Abaius</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php/comment-page-1#comment-187183</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole Abaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php#comment-187183</guid>
		<description>Wow, Fure. Wow. I&#039;m not sure whether I should attack your lame excuse at insult or your excitement for Sly in Death Wish. For the sake of the children, I&#039;ll stick with the latter.

Case in point: Stallone v. Charles Bronson. There is no contest here. Saying that you&#039;re excited about the new Death Wish is like saying Three Days of the Condor starring The Rock is going to be the must-see movie of the year.

You, sir, need some taste.

Blammo, indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Fure. Wow. I&#8217;m not sure whether I should attack your lame excuse at insult or your excitement for Sly in Death Wish. For the sake of the children, I&#8217;ll stick with the latter.</p>
<p>Case in point: Stallone v. Charles Bronson. There is no contest here. Saying that you&#8217;re excited about the new Death Wish is like saying Three Days of the Condor starring The Rock is going to be the must-see movie of the year.</p>
<p>You, sir, need some taste.</p>
<p>Blammo, indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wario</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php/comment-page-1#comment-88117</link>
		<dc:creator>Wario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php#comment-88117</guid>
		<description>Robocop should be Rated-R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robocop should be Rated-R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wario</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php/comment-page-1#comment-187182</link>
		<dc:creator>Wario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php#comment-187182</guid>
		<description>Robocop should be Rated-R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robocop should be Rated-R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fure</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php/comment-page-1#comment-88110</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 06:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php#comment-88110</guid>
		<description>It&#039;d be awesome if it was MORE Robocop instead of REMAKE of Robocop, which I&#039;m sure it will be.  Pink Panther 2 a tentpole?

Death Wish will be written and directed and starring Sylvestor Stallone (so the rumors say) so that may be cool.

Cole you smell.

BLAMMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;d be awesome if it was MORE Robocop instead of REMAKE of Robocop, which I&#8217;m sure it will be.  Pink Panther 2 a tentpole?</p>
<p>Death Wish will be written and directed and starring Sylvestor Stallone (so the rumors say) so that may be cool.</p>
<p>Cole you smell.</p>
<p>BLAMMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fure</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php/comment-page-1#comment-187181</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 06:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/mgm-news-hobbit-new-robocop-sb.php#comment-187181</guid>
		<description>It&#039;d be awesome if it was MORE Robocop instead of REMAKE of Robocop, which I&#039;m sure it will be.  Pink Panther 2 a tentpole?

Death Wish will be written and directed and starring Sylvestor Stallone (so the rumors say) so that may be cool.

Cole you smell.

BLAMMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;d be awesome if it was MORE Robocop instead of REMAKE of Robocop, which I&#8217;m sure it will be.  Pink Panther 2 a tentpole?</p>
<p>Death Wish will be written and directed and starring Sylvestor Stallone (so the rumors say) so that may be cool.</p>
<p>Cole you smell.</p>
<p>BLAMMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 466/472 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-13 18:59:12 -->
