Comments on: Marvel Heads Toward Avengers, DC Heads for Imminent Change http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php A Website About Movies Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: slapnuts http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-105005 slapnuts Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:53:43 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-105005 Dc should just take a story from a graphic novel and put it on the screen. Just like frank miller did with sin city and 300. Marvel is crossing over all their films to show that it is one big connected universe. Can't wait to see a live action wolverine vs hulk or spider man helping the f4. Dc should just take a story from a graphic novel and put it on the screen. Just like frank miller did with sin city and 300.
Marvel is crossing over all their films to show that it is one big connected universe. Can’t wait to see a live action wolverine vs hulk or spider man helping the f4.

]]> By: slapnuts http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-194712 slapnuts Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:53:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-194712 Dc should just take a story from a graphic novel and put it on the screen. Just like frank miller did with sin city and 300. Marvel is crossing over all their films to show that it is one big connected universe. Can't wait to see a live action wolverine vs hulk or spider man helping the f4. Dc should just take a story from a graphic novel and put it on the screen. Just like frank miller did with sin city and 300.
Marvel is crossing over all their films to show that it is one big connected universe. Can’t wait to see a live action wolverine vs hulk or spider man helping the f4.

]]> By: Bryan M http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-101962 Bryan M Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:50:40 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-101962 Here is what I think is wrong with DC; it's tethered to a studio that doesn't understand it's characters. It'd be like if Universal bought Marvel Comics. Marvel made a smart move by creating their own studio, and putting Kevin Feige in charge of it, because he knows the characters and does his best to stay true to them. With Warner Bros., they are a third party, and a major studio at that. When there's a big franchise, they want as much control of the process as possible, which sometimes can lead potentially good ideas to hit the burner because they may not be marketable to a target audience. I think Nolan's Batman revamps have been the closest to the comics they've ever come, but that's because he had David Goyer helping him along the way. Because Goyer's both a screenwriter/filmmaker and a comic book writer, he is able "walk in both worlds" and come up with stories that are true to the character's histories while making something appealing to an audience. My opinion, in short, is if WB wants to enhance the quality of their DC projects, they need to hire the writers of the comic books to write the scripts, or at very least CO-write with someone with a little more hollywood cred. Here is what I think is wrong with DC; it’s tethered to a studio that doesn’t understand
it’s characters. It’d be like if Universal bought Marvel Comics. Marvel made a smart move
by creating their own studio, and putting Kevin Feige in charge of it, because he knows
the characters and does his best to stay true to them.

With Warner Bros., they are a third party, and a major studio at that. When there’s a big
franchise, they want as much control of the process as possible, which sometimes can
lead potentially good ideas to hit the burner because they may not be marketable to a
target audience.

I think Nolan’s Batman revamps have been the closest to the comics they’ve ever come,
but that’s because he had David Goyer helping him along the way. Because Goyer’s both
a screenwriter/filmmaker and a comic book writer, he is able “walk in both worlds” and
come up with stories that are true to the character’s histories while making something
appealing to an audience.

My opinion, in short, is if WB wants to enhance the quality of their DC projects, they need
to hire the writers of the comic books to write the scripts, or at very least CO-write with
someone with a little more hollywood cred.

]]> By: Bryan M http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-194711 Bryan M Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:50:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-194711 Here is what I think is wrong with DC; it's tethered to a studio that doesn't understand it's characters. It'd be like if Universal bought Marvel Comics. Marvel made a smart move by creating their own studio, and putting Kevin Feige in charge of it, because he knows the characters and does his best to stay true to them. With Warner Bros., they are a third party, and a major studio at that. When there's a big franchise, they want as much control of the process as possible, which sometimes can lead potentially good ideas to hit the burner because they may not be marketable to a target audience. I think Nolan's Batman revamps have been the closest to the comics they've ever come, but that's because he had David Goyer helping him along the way. Because Goyer's both a screenwriter/filmmaker and a comic book writer, he is able "walk in both worlds" and come up with stories that are true to the character's histories while making something appealing to an audience. My opinion, in short, is if WB wants to enhance the quality of their DC projects, they need to hire the writers of the comic books to write the scripts, or at very least CO-write with someone with a little more hollywood cred. Here is what I think is wrong with DC; it’s tethered to a studio that doesn’t understand
it’s characters. It’d be like if Universal bought Marvel Comics. Marvel made a smart move
by creating their own studio, and putting Kevin Feige in charge of it, because he knows
the characters and does his best to stay true to them.

With Warner Bros., they are a third party, and a major studio at that. When there’s a big
franchise, they want as much control of the process as possible, which sometimes can
lead potentially good ideas to hit the burner because they may not be marketable to a
target audience.

I think Nolan’s Batman revamps have been the closest to the comics they’ve ever come,
but that’s because he had David Goyer helping him along the way. Because Goyer’s both
a screenwriter/filmmaker and a comic book writer, he is able “walk in both worlds” and
come up with stories that are true to the character’s histories while making something
appealing to an audience.

My opinion, in short, is if WB wants to enhance the quality of their DC projects, they need
to hire the writers of the comic books to write the scripts, or at very least CO-write with
someone with a little more hollywood cred.

]]> By: Jeff http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-101520 Jeff Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:05:52 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-101520 It doesn't matter how bad someone thinks the previous movie is, when i hear the theme music for superman go "dum da da da dum dum,....dum dum dum etc.... I get chills. And I didn't think Roth was a bad superman, in fact I though he was awesome. Lex was a little cheeky (would like to see him dark like in cartoons) but the movie was very good in my opinion. You say you can't relate to DC heroes like superman, maybe its cause there aren't very many people with good character left. I mean, it gave us character in Superman when he must choose between saving lois or metropolis during the earthquake..... the movie also gave us surprises (though not much of one but a pleasant one nonetheless) when Jason creamed skull head with the piano. Turn out superman has a son who he can't just take to a movie when he wants to or fishing or even flying with. Tell me that don't relate to a dad who's been divorced and doesn't get his kids all the time. It showed us a truly powerful but lonely being in superman. I liked how he recharged with the sun and I really liked that he was tough instead of a wimp like in Superman 4. I get sick and tired of enjoying a movie only to have people tell me is sucked. I know what I saw and 300 million at the box office pretty much means others liked it too. I hope the next one does have more action and IS better than the first one, but for crying out loud enjoy it or hate it when it comes out, not 2 yrs before it's even filmed. Now, Batman......Awsome reboot. Nuff said. It doesn’t matter how bad someone thinks the previous movie is, when i hear the theme music for superman go “dum da da da dum dum,….dum dum dum etc…. I get chills. And I didn’t think Roth was a bad superman, in fact I though he was awesome. Lex was a little cheeky (would like to see him dark like in cartoons) but the movie was very good in my opinion. You say you can’t relate to DC heroes like superman, maybe its cause there aren’t very many people with good character left. I mean, it gave us character in Superman when he must choose between saving lois or metropolis during the earthquake….. the movie also gave us surprises (though not much of one but a pleasant one nonetheless) when Jason creamed skull head with the piano. Turn out superman has a son who he can’t just take to a movie when he wants to or fishing or even flying with. Tell me that don’t relate to a dad who’s been divorced and doesn’t get his kids all the time. It showed us a truly powerful but lonely being in superman. I liked how he recharged with the sun and I really liked that he was tough instead of a wimp like in Superman 4. I get sick and tired of enjoying a movie only to have people tell me is sucked. I know what I saw and 300 million at the box office pretty much means others liked it too. I hope the next one does have more action and IS better than the first one, but for crying out loud enjoy it or hate it when it comes out, not 2 yrs before it’s even filmed.

Now, Batman……Awsome reboot. Nuff said.

]]> By: Jeff http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-194710 Jeff Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:05:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-194710 It doesn't matter how bad someone thinks the previous movie is, when i hear the theme music for superman go "dum da da da dum dum,....dum dum dum etc.... I get chills. And I didn't think Roth was a bad superman, in fact I though he was awesome. Lex was a little cheeky (would like to see him dark like in cartoons) but the movie was very good in my opinion. You say you can't relate to DC heroes like superman, maybe its cause there aren't very many people with good character left. I mean, it gave us character in Superman when he must choose between saving lois or metropolis during the earthquake..... the movie also gave us surprises (though not much of one but a pleasant one nonetheless) when Jason creamed skull head with the piano. Turn out superman has a son who he can't just take to a movie when he wants to or fishing or even flying with. Tell me that don't relate to a dad who's been divorced and doesn't get his kids all the time. It showed us a truly powerful but lonely being in superman. I liked how he recharged with the sun and I really liked that he was tough instead of a wimp like in Superman 4. I get sick and tired of enjoying a movie only to have people tell me is sucked. I know what I saw and 300 million at the box office pretty much means others liked it too. I hope the next one does have more action and IS better than the first one, but for crying out loud enjoy it or hate it when it comes out, not 2 yrs before it's even filmed. Now, Batman......Awsome reboot. Nuff said. It doesn’t matter how bad someone thinks the previous movie is, when i hear the theme music for superman go “dum da da da dum dum,….dum dum dum etc…. I get chills. And I didn’t think Roth was a bad superman, in fact I though he was awesome. Lex was a little cheeky (would like to see him dark like in cartoons) but the movie was very good in my opinion. You say you can’t relate to DC heroes like superman, maybe its cause there aren’t very many people with good character left. I mean, it gave us character in Superman when he must choose between saving lois or metropolis during the earthquake….. the movie also gave us surprises (though not much of one but a pleasant one nonetheless) when Jason creamed skull head with the piano. Turn out superman has a son who he can’t just take to a movie when he wants to or fishing or even flying with. Tell me that don’t relate to a dad who’s been divorced and doesn’t get his kids all the time. It showed us a truly powerful but lonely being in superman. I liked how he recharged with the sun and I really liked that he was tough instead of a wimp like in Superman 4. I get sick and tired of enjoying a movie only to have people tell me is sucked. I know what I saw and 300 million at the box office pretty much means others liked it too. I hope the next one does have more action and IS better than the first one, but for crying out loud enjoy it or hate it when it comes out, not 2 yrs before it’s even filmed.

Now, Batman……Awsome reboot. Nuff said.

]]> By: Tom http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-100781 Tom Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:13:39 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-100781 I disagree with you all the way around. I don't see it as a gimmick, I see it providing more entertainment and setting up the future of all these movies. Rumors are already flying that there won't be a Hulk Sequel, that he'll be in Iron Man II. That doesn't bother me at all since IMHO you can only go so far with the Hulk. Adding him to IM would take away one film that frankly could just be more of the same old same old, whuile IM wrangling in the Hulk and then working together to solve a conflict just gets us closer to The Avengers. As for recasting the Joker, IF the character survives this film, I would gladly see it put in the hands of someone that would respect what Ledger did. We already know his performance is going to be stellar and chances are the character, even if he doesn't die in the film, won't return in the film series but if he had to, I think with the right actor in place, it would work. I disagree with you all the way around. I don’t see it as a gimmick, I see it providing more entertainment and setting up the future of all these movies. Rumors are already flying that there won’t be a Hulk Sequel, that he’ll be in Iron Man II. That doesn’t bother me at all since IMHO you can only go so far with the Hulk. Adding him to IM would take away one film that frankly could just be more of the same old same old, whuile IM wrangling in the Hulk and then working together to solve a conflict just gets us closer to The Avengers.

As for recasting the Joker, IF the character survives this film, I would gladly see it put in the hands of someone that would respect what Ledger did.

We already know his performance is going to be stellar and chances are the character, even if he doesn’t die in the film, won’t return in the film series but if he had to, I think with the right actor in place, it would work.

]]> By: Tom http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-194708 Tom Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:13:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-194708 I disagree with you all the way around. I don't see it as a gimmick, I see it providing more entertainment and setting up the future of all these movies. Rumors are already flying that there won't be a Hulk Sequel, that he'll be in Iron Man II. That doesn't bother me at all since IMHO you can only go so far with the Hulk. Adding him to IM would take away one film that frankly could just be more of the same old same old, whuile IM wrangling in the Hulk and then working together to solve a conflict just gets us closer to The Avengers. As for recasting the Joker, IF the character survives this film, I would gladly see it put in the hands of someone that would respect what Ledger did. We already know his performance is going to be stellar and chances are the character, even if he doesn't die in the film, won't return in the film series but if he had to, I think with the right actor in place, it would work. I disagree with you all the way around. I don’t see it as a gimmick, I see it providing more entertainment and setting up the future of all these movies. Rumors are already flying that there won’t be a Hulk Sequel, that he’ll be in Iron Man II. That doesn’t bother me at all since IMHO you can only go so far with the Hulk. Adding him to IM would take away one film that frankly could just be more of the same old same old, whuile IM wrangling in the Hulk and then working together to solve a conflict just gets us closer to The Avengers.

As for recasting the Joker, IF the character survives this film, I would gladly see it put in the hands of someone that would respect what Ledger did.

We already know his performance is going to be stellar and chances are the character, even if he doesn’t die in the film, won’t return in the film series but if he had to, I think with the right actor in place, it would work.

]]> By: Cole Abaius http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-100727 Cole Abaius Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:11:32 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-100727 I'm sure I'll be in the minority here, or totally alone, but I find the crossover stuff a bit gimmicky. Sure, I geek out, but it seems more like a marketing ploy than anything else. They place Tony Stark in Hulk and instantly the fan-base has to see two movies instead of one. Not that these were bad movies (far, far from it), but the marketing is there. They create a need to see two or more movies instead of one in order to be in on the cultural conversation. Which is genius. But as for whether or not characters roll up in each other's movies, I could take it or leave it. As for recasting The Joker (if there's a need) - I don't see it being possible. The risk of destroying the experience for the audience is too great. I’m sure I’ll be in the minority here, or totally alone, but I find the crossover stuff a bit gimmicky. Sure, I geek out, but it seems more like a marketing ploy than anything else.

They place Tony Stark in Hulk and instantly the fan-base has to see two movies instead of one. Not that these were bad movies (far, far from it), but the marketing is there. They create a need to see two or more movies instead of one in order to be in on the cultural conversation.

Which is genius.

But as for whether or not characters roll up in each other’s movies, I could take it or leave it.

As for recasting The Joker (if there’s a need) – I don’t see it being possible. The risk of destroying the experience for the audience is too great.

]]> By: Cole Abaius http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-194707 Cole Abaius Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:11:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-194707 I'm sure I'll be in the minority here, or totally alone, but I find the crossover stuff a bit gimmicky. Sure, I geek out, but it seems more like a marketing ploy than anything else. They place Tony Stark in Hulk and instantly the fan-base has to see two movies instead of one. Not that these were bad movies (far, far from it), but the marketing is there. They create a need to see two or more movies instead of one in order to be in on the cultural conversation. Which is genius. But as for whether or not characters roll up in each other's movies, I could take it or leave it. As for recasting The Joker (if there's a need) - I don't see it being possible. The risk of destroying the experience for the audience is too great. I’m sure I’ll be in the minority here, or totally alone, but I find the crossover stuff a bit gimmicky. Sure, I geek out, but it seems more like a marketing ploy than anything else.

They place Tony Stark in Hulk and instantly the fan-base has to see two movies instead of one. Not that these were bad movies (far, far from it), but the marketing is there. They create a need to see two or more movies instead of one in order to be in on the cultural conversation.

Which is genius.

But as for whether or not characters roll up in each other’s movies, I could take it or leave it.

As for recasting The Joker (if there’s a need) – I don’t see it being possible. The risk of destroying the experience for the audience is too great.

]]> By: Tom http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-100717 Tom Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:15:18 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-100717 I've always had an issue with the Time Warner?DC Comics film situation. This IS a no brainer. make movies that Connect. the one film I remember TRYING to make things connect was Batman Forever when Bruce mentions Metropolis. I DO believe that DC should take a cue from Marvel on this. DC has no excuse not to create a movie Universe regardless whether or not we can relate to the characters. I don't go see movies because I can relate to the characters, I see them because for 2 hours or more, I can forget about the cost of Gas or that my kid lost his glasses at school or that the cat spilled ink on a piece of art I just completed. I go to escape. Superman, IMHO does NOT need a reboot ala Hulk. It just needs a great movie. Singer has already admited to his mistakes w/ Returns and while i liked the movie, it could have been better. DC/TW needs to allow the Whedon WW movie to happen. The man knows how to write a strong female character better then Jane Austin! He has a fan base, throw on top of that 1. The Comics fans 2. The fans of the Character (any little girl qwhen you get down to it) and 3. fans of the gorgeous woman who gets that role. CREATE a Universe. I would like to see Nolan do one more batman after this and Singer do one more Superman and Team up for a World's Finest, 2 part film. Nolan does the Gotham end, Singer the Metropolis side. Pepper in WonderWoman and a few other heroes and next they create a JL film. I'm spoiler free on TDK, but IF the Joker pulls a Scarecrow and survives (IF anyone knows the answer to this, PLEASE don't put it in their response) recast him with a Johnny Depp or Jake Gylanhal (sp?). Make this character the thorn in batman's side he always has been! This isn't rocket science. a good script and a good director can create magic with ANY cast or character. Don't be surprised when Marvel tightens it's grip on their properties (By the way, you are aware that Marvel redid their contract with Sony... don't be shocked if Spidey shows up in The Avengers). I could go on and on, but I agree that DC should wise up to their films and I disagree that they shouldn't look at Marvel's films for what to do... DC's movies, aside from Nolan's Batman films and Superman 1 and 2, are too "What not to do's". I’ve always had an issue with the Time Warner?DC Comics film situation. This IS a no brainer. make movies that Connect. the one film I remember TRYING to make things connect was Batman Forever when Bruce mentions Metropolis.

I DO believe that DC should take a cue from Marvel on this. DC has no excuse not to create a movie Universe regardless whether or not we can relate to the characters. I don’t go see movies because I can relate to the characters, I see them because for 2 hours or more, I can forget about the cost of Gas or that my kid lost his glasses at school or that the cat spilled ink on a piece of art I just completed. I go to escape. Superman, IMHO does NOT need a reboot ala Hulk. It just needs a great movie. Singer has already admited to his mistakes w/ Returns and while i liked the movie, it could have been better.

DC/TW needs to allow the Whedon WW movie to happen. The man knows how to write a strong female character better then Jane Austin! He has a fan base, throw on top of that 1. The Comics fans 2. The fans of the Character (any little girl qwhen you get down to it) and 3. fans of the gorgeous woman who gets that role. CREATE a Universe. I would like to see Nolan do one more batman after this and Singer do one more Superman and Team up for a World’s Finest, 2 part film. Nolan does the Gotham end, Singer the Metropolis side. Pepper in WonderWoman and a few other heroes and next they create a JL film. I’m spoiler free on TDK, but IF the Joker pulls a Scarecrow and survives (IF anyone knows the answer to this, PLEASE don’t put it in their response) recast him with a Johnny Depp or Jake Gylanhal (sp?). Make this character the thorn in batman’s side he always has been!

This isn’t rocket science. a good script and a good director can create magic with ANY cast or character. Don’t be surprised when Marvel tightens it’s grip on their properties (By the way, you are aware that Marvel redid their contract with Sony… don’t be shocked if Spidey shows up in The Avengers).

I could go on and on, but I agree that DC should wise up to their films and I disagree that they shouldn’t look at Marvel’s films for what to do… DC’s movies, aside from Nolan’s Batman films and Superman 1 and 2, are too “What not to do’s”.

]]> By: Tom http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-194706 Tom Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:15:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-194706 I've always had an issue with the Time Warner?DC Comics film situation. This IS a no brainer. make movies that Connect. the one film I remember TRYING to make things connect was Batman Forever when Bruce mentions Metropolis. I DO believe that DC should take a cue from Marvel on this. DC has no excuse not to create a movie Universe regardless whether or not we can relate to the characters. I don't go see movies because I can relate to the characters, I see them because for 2 hours or more, I can forget about the cost of Gas or that my kid lost his glasses at school or that the cat spilled ink on a piece of art I just completed. I go to escape. Superman, IMHO does NOT need a reboot ala Hulk. It just needs a great movie. Singer has already admited to his mistakes w/ Returns and while i liked the movie, it could have been better. DC/TW needs to allow the Whedon WW movie to happen. The man knows how to write a strong female character better then Jane Austin! He has a fan base, throw on top of that 1. The Comics fans 2. The fans of the Character (any little girl qwhen you get down to it) and 3. fans of the gorgeous woman who gets that role. CREATE a Universe. I would like to see Nolan do one more batman after this and Singer do one more Superman and Team up for a World's Finest, 2 part film. Nolan does the Gotham end, Singer the Metropolis side. Pepper in WonderWoman and a few other heroes and next they create a JL film. I'm spoiler free on TDK, but IF the Joker pulls a Scarecrow and survives (IF anyone knows the answer to this, PLEASE don't put it in their response) recast him with a Johnny Depp or Jake Gylanhal (sp?). Make this character the thorn in batman's side he always has been! This isn't rocket science. a good script and a good director can create magic with ANY cast or character. Don't be surprised when Marvel tightens it's grip on their properties (By the way, you are aware that Marvel redid their contract with Sony... don't be shocked if Spidey shows up in The Avengers). I could go on and on, but I agree that DC should wise up to their films and I disagree that they shouldn't look at Marvel's films for what to do... DC's movies, aside from Nolan's Batman films and Superman 1 and 2, are too "What not to do's". I’ve always had an issue with the Time Warner?DC Comics film situation. This IS a no brainer. make movies that Connect. the one film I remember TRYING to make things connect was Batman Forever when Bruce mentions Metropolis.

I DO believe that DC should take a cue from Marvel on this. DC has no excuse not to create a movie Universe regardless whether or not we can relate to the characters. I don’t go see movies because I can relate to the characters, I see them because for 2 hours or more, I can forget about the cost of Gas or that my kid lost his glasses at school or that the cat spilled ink on a piece of art I just completed. I go to escape. Superman, IMHO does NOT need a reboot ala Hulk. It just needs a great movie. Singer has already admited to his mistakes w/ Returns and while i liked the movie, it could have been better.

DC/TW needs to allow the Whedon WW movie to happen. The man knows how to write a strong female character better then Jane Austin! He has a fan base, throw on top of that 1. The Comics fans 2. The fans of the Character (any little girl qwhen you get down to it) and 3. fans of the gorgeous woman who gets that role. CREATE a Universe. I would like to see Nolan do one more batman after this and Singer do one more Superman and Team up for a World’s Finest, 2 part film. Nolan does the Gotham end, Singer the Metropolis side. Pepper in WonderWoman and a few other heroes and next they create a JL film. I’m spoiler free on TDK, but IF the Joker pulls a Scarecrow and survives (IF anyone knows the answer to this, PLEASE don’t put it in their response) recast him with a Johnny Depp or Jake Gylanhal (sp?). Make this character the thorn in batman’s side he always has been!

This isn’t rocket science. a good script and a good director can create magic with ANY cast or character. Don’t be surprised when Marvel tightens it’s grip on their properties (By the way, you are aware that Marvel redid their contract with Sony… don’t be shocked if Spidey shows up in The Avengers).

I could go on and on, but I agree that DC should wise up to their films and I disagree that they shouldn’t look at Marvel’s films for what to do… DC’s movies, aside from Nolan’s Batman films and Superman 1 and 2, are too “What not to do’s”.

]]> By: awesome man http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-100680 awesome man Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:39:09 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-100680 i have to agree that marvel does create more relatable characters, and i believe that is because they do have a history. if you look at spiderman, his backstory is what creates his character into who he is. that's also how dc portrays batman, which puts batman far beyond many other dc characters. you can't just say clark kent grew up on a farm and expect him to be a relatable character. a lot of things are black and white in dc, just like saying there are good guys and bad guys. but if you look at the incredible hulk, he is an uncontrollable beast and tends to walk the line of good and bad in the way people see him (take for instance the 'world war: hulk' story). batman has that same aspect as the dark knight, where as he fights crime as a vigilante and not as a superhero. that is how the watchmen became so popular; by breaking the barrier of "cookie-cutter" superheroes and giving actual life to a story. if dc could put you on the edge of your seat, like marvel does on a consistent basis and maybe put superman in a movie where he doesn't have to fight a green rock and a rich guy, we might have something to look forward to. dc has a lot of pieces to a great puzzle, but doesn't know what to do with it yet. as for the avengers, i like the original team story to keep continuity with the comics, but i think they at least have to make a sequel and put the big guns in there. i'm talking about bringing spiderman and wolverine, and even luke cage and spiderwoman maybe. but favreau has to direct it, because he could give us the spiderman we know and love. i only say that because even in spiderman 3, peter parker was still nerd-version spiderman and didn't make any jokes or sarcastic comments. i liked spiderman 3, but he was still just a college nerd with girl problems and more villains to fight. sam raimi better bring his "a"game if he's going to do spiderman 4. i have to agree that marvel does create more relatable characters, and i believe that is because they do have a history. if you look at spiderman, his backstory is what creates his character into who he is. that’s also how dc portrays batman, which puts batman far beyond many other dc characters. you can’t just say clark kent grew up on a farm and expect him to be a relatable character. a lot of things are black and white in dc, just like saying there are good guys and bad guys. but if you look at the incredible hulk, he is an uncontrollable beast and tends to walk the line of good and bad in the way people see him (take for instance the ‘world war: hulk’ story). batman has that same aspect as the dark knight, where as he fights crime as a vigilante and not as a superhero. that is how the watchmen became so popular; by breaking the barrier of “cookie-cutter” superheroes and giving actual life to a story. if dc could put you on the edge of your seat, like marvel does on a consistent basis and maybe put superman in a movie where he doesn’t have to fight a green rock and a rich guy, we might have something to look forward to. dc has a lot of pieces to a great puzzle, but doesn’t know what to do with it yet. as for the avengers, i like the original team story to keep continuity with the comics, but i think they at least have to make a sequel and put the big guns in there. i’m talking about bringing spiderman and wolverine, and even luke cage and spiderwoman maybe. but favreau has to direct it, because he could give us the spiderman we know and love. i only say that because even in spiderman 3, peter parker was still nerd-version spiderman and didn’t make any jokes or sarcastic comments. i liked spiderman 3, but he was still just a college nerd with girl problems and more villains to fight. sam raimi better bring his “a”game if he’s going to do spiderman 4.

]]> By: awesome man http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-194705 awesome man Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:39:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-194705 i have to agree that marvel does create more relatable characters, and i believe that is because they do have a history. if you look at spiderman, his backstory is what creates his character into who he is. that's also how dc portrays batman, which puts batman far beyond many other dc characters. you can't just say clark kent grew up on a farm and expect him to be a relatable character. a lot of things are black and white in dc, just like saying there are good guys and bad guys. but if you look at the incredible hulk, he is an uncontrollable beast and tends to walk the line of good and bad in the way people see him (take for instance the 'world war: hulk' story). batman has that same aspect as the dark knight, where as he fights crime as a vigilante and not as a superhero. that is how the watchmen became so popular; by breaking the barrier of "cookie-cutter" superheroes and giving actual life to a story. if dc could put you on the edge of your seat, like marvel does on a consistent basis and maybe put superman in a movie where he doesn't have to fight a green rock and a rich guy, we might have something to look forward to. dc has a lot of pieces to a great puzzle, but doesn't know what to do with it yet. as for the avengers, i like the original team story to keep continuity with the comics, but i think they at least have to make a sequel and put the big guns in there. i'm talking about bringing spiderman and wolverine, and even luke cage and spiderwoman maybe. but favreau has to direct it, because he could give us the spiderman we know and love. i only say that because even in spiderman 3, peter parker was still nerd-version spiderman and didn't make any jokes or sarcastic comments. i liked spiderman 3, but he was still just a college nerd with girl problems and more villains to fight. sam raimi better bring his "a"game if he's going to do spiderman 4. i have to agree that marvel does create more relatable characters, and i believe that is because they do have a history. if you look at spiderman, his backstory is what creates his character into who he is. that’s also how dc portrays batman, which puts batman far beyond many other dc characters. you can’t just say clark kent grew up on a farm and expect him to be a relatable character. a lot of things are black and white in dc, just like saying there are good guys and bad guys. but if you look at the incredible hulk, he is an uncontrollable beast and tends to walk the line of good and bad in the way people see him (take for instance the ‘world war: hulk’ story). batman has that same aspect as the dark knight, where as he fights crime as a vigilante and not as a superhero. that is how the watchmen became so popular; by breaking the barrier of “cookie-cutter” superheroes and giving actual life to a story. if dc could put you on the edge of your seat, like marvel does on a consistent basis and maybe put superman in a movie where he doesn’t have to fight a green rock and a rich guy, we might have something to look forward to. dc has a lot of pieces to a great puzzle, but doesn’t know what to do with it yet. as for the avengers, i like the original team story to keep continuity with the comics, but i think they at least have to make a sequel and put the big guns in there. i’m talking about bringing spiderman and wolverine, and even luke cage and spiderwoman maybe. but favreau has to direct it, because he could give us the spiderman we know and love. i only say that because even in spiderman 3, peter parker was still nerd-version spiderman and didn’t make any jokes or sarcastic comments. i liked spiderman 3, but he was still just a college nerd with girl problems and more villains to fight. sam raimi better bring his “a”game if he’s going to do spiderman 4.

]]> By: Lil X http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-100671 Lil X Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:26:48 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-100671 What i like about Marvel is not only are they able to finance their own films, but they distribute them amongs other film companies. Not like DC where they only stick with Warner Bros only. I'm excited about an Avengers movie What i like about Marvel is not only are they able to finance their own films, but they distribute them amongs other film companies. Not like DC where they only stick with Warner Bros only.

I’m excited about an Avengers movie

]]> By: Lil X http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-194704 Lil X Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:26:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-194704 What i like about Marvel is not only are they able to finance their own films, but they distribute them amongs other film companies. Not like DC where they only stick with Warner Bros only. I'm excited about an Avengers movie What i like about Marvel is not only are they able to finance their own films, but they distribute them amongs other film companies. Not like DC where they only stick with Warner Bros only.

I’m excited about an Avengers movie

]]> By: Jazzmin http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-100610 Jazzmin Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:45:31 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-100610 I cant believe what any of you are saying, clearing some of you are on Marvel's side because they have Iron Man. Which was a good movie but not better than The Hulk. It would be stupid if they make a Justice League or Avengers movie, you already have an Iron Man and Hulk movie why do you need to put them together. Same goes with DC, you already have Batman and Superman movies. DC doesnt have as many characters as Marvel but some are related to people. Some people need to stop comparing Tony Stark and Bruce Banner they are different in many ways. What they need to do rather than make a Thor movie or Ant Man movie, they should make a Black Panther movie or another F4 movie. I cant believe what any of you are saying, clearing some of you are on Marvel’s side because they have Iron Man. Which was a good movie but not better than The Hulk. It would be stupid if they make a Justice League or Avengers movie, you already have an Iron Man and Hulk movie why do you need to put them together. Same goes with DC, you already have Batman and Superman movies. DC doesnt have as many characters as Marvel but some are related to people. Some people need to stop comparing Tony Stark and Bruce Banner they are different in many ways. What they need to do rather than make a Thor movie or Ant Man movie, they should make a Black Panther movie or another F4 movie.

]]> By: Jazzmin http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-194703 Jazzmin Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:45:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-194703 I cant believe what any of you are saying, clearing some of you are on Marvel's side because they have Iron Man. Which was a good movie but not better than The Hulk. It would be stupid if they make a Justice League or Avengers movie, you already have an Iron Man and Hulk movie why do you need to put them together. Same goes with DC, you already have Batman and Superman movies. DC doesnt have as many characters as Marvel but some are related to people. Some people need to stop comparing Tony Stark and Bruce Banner they are different in many ways. What they need to do rather than make a Thor movie or Ant Man movie, they should make a Black Panther movie or another F4 movie. I cant believe what any of you are saying, clearing some of you are on Marvel’s side because they have Iron Man. Which was a good movie but not better than The Hulk. It would be stupid if they make a Justice League or Avengers movie, you already have an Iron Man and Hulk movie why do you need to put them together. Same goes with DC, you already have Batman and Superman movies. DC doesnt have as many characters as Marvel but some are related to people. Some people need to stop comparing Tony Stark and Bruce Banner they are different in many ways. What they need to do rather than make a Thor movie or Ant Man movie, they should make a Black Panther movie or another F4 movie.

]]> By: Cole Abaius http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-99169 Cole Abaius Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:08:38 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-99169 I can't believe what I'm hearing. Unrelatable characters? For the most part, the major theme of all DC heroes is a balance between immense responsibility and alienation from humanity. I'll give you that DC characters are (sort of) more prone to being mythic or magical, but Marvel has it's fair share. And suggesting Batman get a drinking problem is ridiculous - the guy has some of the worst (most related) problems in the comic universe. And, Superman did have a crisis of faith in Superman Returns (which most people think sucked apparently). I say DC should stick to what makes DC great and not try to reformulate based on what another comic universe is doing. And I don't even understand that point - Bruce Banner is definitely a humane character, as is Tony Stark, but who else is Marvel going to make relatable? Thor? What I can see is the origin differences. DC uses magic. Marvel uses science. Basically. I can’t believe what I’m hearing. Unrelatable characters? For the most part, the major theme of all DC heroes is a balance between immense responsibility and alienation from humanity. I’ll give you that DC characters are (sort of) more prone to being mythic or magical, but Marvel has it’s fair share.

And suggesting Batman get a drinking problem is ridiculous – the guy has some of the worst (most related) problems in the comic universe. And, Superman did have a crisis of faith in Superman Returns (which most people think sucked apparently).

I say DC should stick to what makes DC great and not try to reformulate based on what another comic universe is doing. And I don’t even understand that point – Bruce Banner is definitely a humane character, as is Tony Stark, but who else is Marvel going to make relatable? Thor?

What I can see is the origin differences. DC uses magic. Marvel uses science. Basically.

]]> By: Cole Abaius http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/marvel-heads-toward-avengers-dc-heads-for-imminent-change.php/comment-page-1#comment-194702 Cole Abaius Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:08:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7714#comment-194702 I can't believe what I'm hearing. Unrelatable characters? For the most part, the major theme of all DC heroes is a balance between immense responsibility and alienation from humanity. I'll give you that DC characters are (sort of) more prone to being mythic or magical, but Marvel has it's fair share. And suggesting Batman get a drinking problem is ridiculous - the guy has some of the worst (most related) problems in the comic universe. And, Superman did have a crisis of faith in Superman Returns (which most people think sucked apparently). I say DC should stick to what makes DC great and not try to reformulate based on what another comic universe is doing. And I don't even understand that point - Bruce Banner is definitely a humane character, as is Tony Stark, but who else is Marvel going to make relatable? Thor? What I can see is the origin differences. DC uses magic. Marvel uses science. Basically. I can’t believe what I’m hearing. Unrelatable characters? For the most part, the major theme of all DC heroes is a balance between immense responsibility and alienation from humanity. I’ll give you that DC characters are (sort of) more prone to being mythic or magical, but Marvel has it’s fair share.

And suggesting Batman get a drinking problem is ridiculous – the guy has some of the worst (most related) problems in the comic universe. And, Superman did have a crisis of faith in Superman Returns (which most people think sucked apparently).

I say DC should stick to what makes DC great and not try to reformulate based on what another comic universe is doing. And I don’t even understand that point – Bruce Banner is definitely a humane character, as is Tony Stark, but who else is Marvel going to make relatable? Thor?

What I can see is the origin differences. DC uses magic. Marvel uses science. Basically.

]]>