<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joss Whedon Not Involved with &#8216;Buffy&#8217; Relaunch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: flameyheadgear</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-141622</link>
		<dc:creator>flameyheadgear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-141622</guid>
		<description>Agreed. I didn&#039;t realize, when this went up, that the film would be far removed from the series. This doesn&#039;t make a hell of a lot of sense. Write a script decent enough to lure back the original cast, and the rest takes care of itself.  
 
(My oldest is 14, and both a Twilight AND a Buffy fan. You make a BtVS without Spike, Angel or Giles, you can just forget it. Besides, she&#039;s still got that sparkly, dirty English kid.) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I didn&#039;t realize, when this went up, that the film would be far removed from the series. This doesn&#039;t make a hell of a lot of sense. Write a script decent enough to lure back the original cast, and the rest takes care of itself.  </p>
<p>(My oldest is 14, and both a Twilight AND a Buffy fan. You make a BtVS without Spike, Angel or Giles, you can just forget it. Besides, she&#039;s still got that sparkly, dirty English kid.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flameyheadgear</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-226883</link>
		<dc:creator>flameyheadgear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-226883</guid>
		<description>Agreed. I didn&#039;t realize, when this went up, that the film would be far removed from the series. This doesn&#039;t make a hell of a lot of sense. Write a script decent enough to lure back the original cast, and the rest takes care of itself.  
 
(My oldest is 14, and both a Twilight AND a Buffy fan. You make a BtVS without Spike, Angel or Giles, you can just forget it. Besides, she&#039;s still got that sparkly, dirty English kid.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I didn&#039;t realize, when this went up, that the film would be far removed from the series. This doesn&#039;t make a hell of a lot of sense. Write a script decent enough to lure back the original cast, and the rest takes care of itself.  </p>
<p>(My oldest is 14, and both a Twilight AND a Buffy fan. You make a BtVS without Spike, Angel or Giles, you can just forget it. Besides, she&#039;s still got that sparkly, dirty English kid.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amaranthisasin</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-141551</link>
		<dc:creator>Amaranthisasin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 22:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-141551</guid>
		<description>After 8 seasons on TV, reruns, and the continuance to comics I think they are going to find that canon for buffy is Joss Whedon&#039;s version. Its been a while since it was on TV with new episodes but not so long that everyone has forgotten. If they can find someone to out-write Whedon then awesome but I wouldn&#039;t take that bet. You&#039;re also going to have to find a cast that can make people forget about the TV cast. This may be easier than out-writing Whedon but I think only slightly. There&#039;s a lot of time invested in this story and a lot of fans there. The real question:  Why the hell would you alienate a built in core like that?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 8 seasons on TV, reruns, and the continuance to comics I think they are going to find that canon for buffy is Joss Whedon&#039;s version. Its been a while since it was on TV with new episodes but not so long that everyone has forgotten. If they can find someone to out-write Whedon then awesome but I wouldn&#039;t take that bet. You&#039;re also going to have to find a cast that can make people forget about the TV cast. This may be easier than out-writing Whedon but I think only slightly. There&#039;s a lot of time invested in this story and a lot of fans there. The real question:  Why the hell would you alienate a built in core like that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amaranthisasin</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-226882</link>
		<dc:creator>Amaranthisasin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-226882</guid>
		<description>After 8 seasons on TV, reruns, and the continuance to comics I think they are going to find that canon for buffy is Joss Whedon&#039;s version. Its been a while since it was on TV with new episodes but not so long that everyone has forgotten. If they can find someone to out-write Whedon then awesome but I wouldn&#039;t take that bet. You&#039;re also going to have to find a cast that can make people forget about the TV cast. This may be easier than out-writing Whedon but I think only slightly. There&#039;s a lot of time invested in this story and a lot of fans there. The real question:  Why the hell would you alienate a built in core like that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 8 seasons on TV, reruns, and the continuance to comics I think they are going to find that canon for buffy is Joss Whedon&#039;s version. Its been a while since it was on TV with new episodes but not so long that everyone has forgotten. If they can find someone to out-write Whedon then awesome but I wouldn&#039;t take that bet. You&#039;re also going to have to find a cast that can make people forget about the TV cast. This may be easier than out-writing Whedon but I think only slightly. There&#039;s a lot of time invested in this story and a lot of fans there. The real question:  Why the hell would you alienate a built in core like that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flameyheadgear</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-141515</link>
		<dc:creator>flameyheadgear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-141515</guid>
		<description>My kids are Buffy snobs, they&#039;ll be most unhappy. I&#039;m not thrilled either. However, I know we&#039;ll all give it a chance. The girls would watch it just to see Willow and Giles again. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My kids are Buffy snobs, they&#039;ll be most unhappy. I&#039;m not thrilled either. However, I know we&#039;ll all give it a chance. The girls would watch it just to see Willow and Giles again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flameyheadgear</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-226881</link>
		<dc:creator>flameyheadgear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-226881</guid>
		<description>My kids are Buffy snobs, they&#039;ll be most unhappy. I&#039;m not thrilled either. However, I know we&#039;ll all give it a chance. The girls would watch it just to see Willow and Giles again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My kids are Buffy snobs, they&#039;ll be most unhappy. I&#039;m not thrilled either. However, I know we&#039;ll all give it a chance. The girls would watch it just to see Willow and Giles again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omek</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-141501</link>
		<dc:creator>Omek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-141501</guid>
		<description>Boooooo... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boooooo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omek</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-226880</link>
		<dc:creator>Omek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-226880</guid>
		<description>Boooooo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boooooo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertFure</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-141469</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertFure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 08:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-141469</guid>
		<description>Never watched the TV show.  Watched the movie.  Enjoyed it.  Bring it on.  I&#039;m no Whedon fanboy (Firefly was awesome, Dollhouse is OK, didn&#039;t really care about his earlier movies) so I don&#039;t give two shits if he&#039;s involved or not.  Hot Cheerleader vampire slayer, please. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never watched the TV show.  Watched the movie.  Enjoyed it.  Bring it on.  I&#039;m no Whedon fanboy (Firefly was awesome, Dollhouse is OK, didn&#039;t really care about his earlier movies) so I don&#039;t give two shits if he&#039;s involved or not.  Hot Cheerleader vampire slayer, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertFure</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-226879</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertFure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 08:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-226879</guid>
		<description>Never watched the TV show.  Watched the movie.  Enjoyed it.  Bring it on.  I&#039;m no Whedon fanboy (Firefly was awesome, Dollhouse is OK, didn&#039;t really care about his earlier movies) so I don&#039;t give two shits if he&#039;s involved or not.  Hot Cheerleader vampire slayer, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never watched the TV show.  Watched the movie.  Enjoyed it.  Bring it on.  I&#039;m no Whedon fanboy (Firefly was awesome, Dollhouse is OK, didn&#039;t really care about his earlier movies) so I don&#039;t give two shits if he&#039;s involved or not.  Hot Cheerleader vampire slayer, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole_Abaius</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-141462</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole_Abaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 06:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-141462</guid>
		<description>What I meant was that trying to tie in a film to the already huge canon of the television show (or even trying to match it, especially if they are trying to make the tone way different) would be a mistake.  
 
But the biggest mistake is not including Whedon. Of course. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I meant was that trying to tie in a film to the already huge canon of the television show (or even trying to match it, especially if they are trying to make the tone way different) would be a mistake.  </p>
<p>But the biggest mistake is not including Whedon. Of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole_Abaius</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-226878</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole_Abaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 06:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-226878</guid>
		<description>What I meant was that trying to tie in a film to the already huge canon of the television show (or even trying to match it, especially if they are trying to make the tone way different) would be a mistake.  
 
But the biggest mistake is not including Whedon. Of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I meant was that trying to tie in a film to the already huge canon of the television show (or even trying to match it, especially if they are trying to make the tone way different) would be a mistake.  </p>
<p>But the biggest mistake is not including Whedon. Of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lita Moonsinger</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-141461</link>
		<dc:creator>Lita Moonsinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 06:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-141461</guid>
		<description>NO JOSS WHEDON?? 
 
...A Big Fat WORLD Of NO!! 
Whoever is even Dreaming of doing BUFFY Needs Joss or this is one fan who will Stake it where it stands. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO JOSS WHEDON?? </p>
<p>&#8230;A Big Fat WORLD Of NO!!<br />
Whoever is even Dreaming of doing BUFFY Needs Joss or this is one fan who will Stake it where it stands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lita Moonsinger</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-226877</link>
		<dc:creator>Lita Moonsinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 06:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-226877</guid>
		<description>NO JOSS WHEDON?? 
 
...A Big Fat WORLD Of NO!! 
Whoever is even Dreaming of doing BUFFY Needs Joss or this is one fan who will Stake it where it stands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO JOSS WHEDON?? </p>
<p>&#8230;A Big Fat WORLD Of NO!!<br />
Whoever is even Dreaming of doing BUFFY Needs Joss or this is one fan who will Stake it where it stands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: groonk</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-141460</link>
		<dc:creator>groonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 05:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-141460</guid>
		<description>a Whedon-less Buffy is not a Buffy I&#039;m willing to see. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a Whedon-less Buffy is not a Buffy I&#039;m willing to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: groonk</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-226876</link>
		<dc:creator>groonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 05:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-226876</guid>
		<description>a Whedon-less Buffy is not a Buffy I&#039;m willing to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a Whedon-less Buffy is not a Buffy I&#039;m willing to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tron</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-141458</link>
		<dc:creator>Tron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 05:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-141458</guid>
		<description>I love(d) buffy. (well season 1 - 5, 6 and 7 the writers clearly stopped trying). Various reasons for that, known to most any fan. 
 
but yea... seeing a whedonless buffy woudln&#039;t interest me. and i do agree that if anything they should go near the tv canon, as it&#039;ll (mostly) be fans of the tv show seeing a buffy movie. (odds are someone who hated the show.. NOT gonna see the movie, it&#039;s that simple). 
 
also. without whedon and ignoring the tv series i have grave fears that we&#039;re gonna get &#039;buffy.. now with emo wrist slitting action!&#039; (just look at twilight... but not for too long it may cause permanent blindness) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love(d) buffy. (well season 1 &#8211; 5, 6 and 7 the writers clearly stopped trying). Various reasons for that, known to most any fan. </p>
<p>but yea&#8230; seeing a whedonless buffy woudln&#039;t interest me. and i do agree that if anything they should go near the tv canon, as it&#039;ll (mostly) be fans of the tv show seeing a buffy movie. (odds are someone who hated the show.. NOT gonna see the movie, it&#039;s that simple). </p>
<p>also. without whedon and ignoring the tv series i have grave fears that we&#039;re gonna get &#039;buffy.. now with emo wrist slitting action!&#039; (just look at twilight&#8230; but not for too long it may cause permanent blindness)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tron</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-226875</link>
		<dc:creator>Tron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 05:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-226875</guid>
		<description>I love(d) buffy. (well season 1 - 5, 6 and 7 the writers clearly stopped trying). Various reasons for that, known to most any fan. 
 
but yea... seeing a whedonless buffy woudln&#039;t interest me. and i do agree that if anything they should go near the tv canon, as it&#039;ll (mostly) be fans of the tv show seeing a buffy movie. (odds are someone who hated the show.. NOT gonna see the movie, it&#039;s that simple). 
 
also. without whedon and ignoring the tv series i have grave fears that we&#039;re gonna get &#039;buffy.. now with emo wrist slitting action!&#039; (just look at twilight... but not for too long it may cause permanent blindness)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love(d) buffy. (well season 1 &#8211; 5, 6 and 7 the writers clearly stopped trying). Various reasons for that, known to most any fan. </p>
<p>but yea&#8230; seeing a whedonless buffy woudln&#039;t interest me. and i do agree that if anything they should go near the tv canon, as it&#039;ll (mostly) be fans of the tv show seeing a buffy movie. (odds are someone who hated the show.. NOT gonna see the movie, it&#039;s that simple). </p>
<p>also. without whedon and ignoring the tv series i have grave fears that we&#039;re gonna get &#039;buffy.. now with emo wrist slitting action!&#039; (just look at twilight&#8230; but not for too long it may cause permanent blindness)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-141451</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-141451</guid>
		<description>Buffy is nothing without Whedon. Look at the original movie.. it sucked... i think it is cute but it did suck. The television series was a hit.. hollywood needs to step back andlook at themselves. Without Whedon.. Buffy will be nothing.  
And  
&quot;But, as expected, it looks like the movie won&#8217;t touch on the television canon in any way. Probably a wise move.&quot;  
That is NOT a wise move at all. completely idiotic. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buffy is nothing without Whedon. Look at the original movie.. it sucked&#8230; i think it is cute but it did suck. The television series was a hit.. hollywood needs to step back andlook at themselves. Without Whedon.. Buffy will be nothing.<br />
And<br />
&quot;But, as expected, it looks like the movie won&rsquo;t touch on the television canon in any way. Probably a wise move.&quot;<br />
That is NOT a wise move at all. completely idiotic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/joss-whedon-not-involved-with-buffy-relaunch.php/comment-page-1#comment-226874</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43741#comment-226874</guid>
		<description>Buffy is nothing without Whedon. Look at the original movie.. it sucked... i think it is cute but it did suck. The television series was a hit.. hollywood needs to step back andlook at themselves. Without Whedon.. Buffy will be nothing.  
And  
&quot;But, as expected, it looks like the movie won&#8217;t touch on the television canon in any way. Probably a wise move.&quot;  
That is NOT a wise move at all. completely idiotic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buffy is nothing without Whedon. Look at the original movie.. it sucked&#8230; i think it is cute but it did suck. The television series was a hit.. hollywood needs to step back andlook at themselves. Without Whedon.. Buffy will be nothing.<br />
And<br />
&quot;But, as expected, it looks like the movie won&rsquo;t touch on the television canon in any way. Probably a wise move.&quot;<br />
That is NOT a wise move at all. completely idiotic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 593/609 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-13 22:59:59 -->
