<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early Edition: Who&#8217;s Revisiting Roger Rabbit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeeAnna</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php/comment-page-1#comment-138827</link>
		<dc:creator>LeeAnna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=41231#comment-138827</guid>
		<description>If they ruin Roger Rabbit I&#039;m going to kill someone. That is still one of my favorite movies and I have nostalgic memories of it teaching me how to use profanity as a small child. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they ruin Roger Rabbit I&#039;m going to kill someone. That is still one of my favorite movies and I have nostalgic memories of it teaching me how to use profanity as a small child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeeAnna</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php/comment-page-1#comment-224622</link>
		<dc:creator>LeeAnna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=41231#comment-224622</guid>
		<description>If they ruin Roger Rabbit I&#039;m going to kill someone. That is still one of my favorite movies and I have nostalgic memories of it teaching me how to use profanity as a small child.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they ruin Roger Rabbit I&#039;m going to kill someone. That is still one of my favorite movies and I have nostalgic memories of it teaching me how to use profanity as a small child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger_Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php/comment-page-1#comment-138825</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger_Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=41231#comment-138825</guid>
		<description>I was grabbed by the story from when I first read &quot;Who Censored Roger Rabbit&quot; in a pre-production copy of the book. I immediately thought that it would make the perfect movie. However, with all of the various characters pulled from the annals of animation I thought that it had no chance of making it. I was very glad to be wrong and thought it was incredible. CGI would take away from the 2 dimensional cartoon look that is critical to its origins, looks and feel. I don&#039;t think that there is room left for a sequel to the original movie. Although I wouldn&#039;t be opposed to the look being extended into other movies seeking the hard boiled private detective, film noir look and feel. Like the similar but not identical movies starring Bogart in the 40s. However the story has to be there to justify and make the cartoons instrumental in the plot and not just added in. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was grabbed by the story from when I first read &quot;Who Censored Roger Rabbit&quot; in a pre-production copy of the book. I immediately thought that it would make the perfect movie. However, with all of the various characters pulled from the annals of animation I thought that it had no chance of making it. I was very glad to be wrong and thought it was incredible. CGI would take away from the 2 dimensional cartoon look that is critical to its origins, looks and feel. I don&#039;t think that there is room left for a sequel to the original movie. Although I wouldn&#039;t be opposed to the look being extended into other movies seeking the hard boiled private detective, film noir look and feel. Like the similar but not identical movies starring Bogart in the 40s. However the story has to be there to justify and make the cartoons instrumental in the plot and not just added in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger_Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php/comment-page-1#comment-224621</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger_Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=41231#comment-224621</guid>
		<description>I was grabbed by the story from when I first read &quot;Who Censored Roger Rabbit&quot; in a pre-production copy of the book. I immediately thought that it would make the perfect movie. However, with all of the various characters pulled from the annals of animation I thought that it had no chance of making it. I was very glad to be wrong and thought it was incredible. CGI would take away from the 2 dimensional cartoon look that is critical to its origins, looks and feel. I don&#039;t think that there is room left for a sequel to the original movie. Although I wouldn&#039;t be opposed to the look being extended into other movies seeking the hard boiled private detective, film noir look and feel. Like the similar but not identical movies starring Bogart in the 40s. However the story has to be there to justify and make the cartoons instrumental in the plot and not just added in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was grabbed by the story from when I first read &quot;Who Censored Roger Rabbit&quot; in a pre-production copy of the book. I immediately thought that it would make the perfect movie. However, with all of the various characters pulled from the annals of animation I thought that it had no chance of making it. I was very glad to be wrong and thought it was incredible. CGI would take away from the 2 dimensional cartoon look that is critical to its origins, looks and feel. I don&#039;t think that there is room left for a sequel to the original movie. Although I wouldn&#039;t be opposed to the look being extended into other movies seeking the hard boiled private detective, film noir look and feel. Like the similar but not identical movies starring Bogart in the 40s. However the story has to be there to justify and make the cartoons instrumental in the plot and not just added in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie_S</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php/comment-page-1#comment-138728</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=41231#comment-138728</guid>
		<description>We need a movie where the hand-drawn toons and the computer animated toons wage war on each other.  And the hundred year old Eddie Valiant is stuck in the middle.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need a movie where the hand-drawn toons and the computer animated toons wage war on each other.  And the hundred year old Eddie Valiant is stuck in the middle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie_S</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php/comment-page-1#comment-224620</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=41231#comment-224620</guid>
		<description>We need a movie where the hand-drawn toons and the computer animated toons wage war on each other.  And the hundred year old Eddie Valiant is stuck in the middle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need a movie where the hand-drawn toons and the computer animated toons wage war on each other.  And the hundred year old Eddie Valiant is stuck in the middle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tex Avery</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php/comment-page-1#comment-138726</link>
		<dc:creator>Tex Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=41231#comment-138726</guid>
		<description>Who Framed Roger Rabbit is one of my favorite films ever-- I personally think it&#039;s better than Back to the Future. I don&#039;t think a sequel is necessary. It wouldn&#039;t be the same without Bob Hoskins and Christopher Lloyd, who made some really memorable characters (Judge Doom is one of the greatest villains ever). What worries me is your mention of a CGI Rodger (oh god no), and Zemeckis losing his touch with recent films like Beowulf. I really would like to see a film which employs 2D characters in live action footage, though.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who Framed Roger Rabbit is one of my favorite films ever&#8211; I personally think it&#039;s better than Back to the Future. I don&#039;t think a sequel is necessary. It wouldn&#039;t be the same without Bob Hoskins and Christopher Lloyd, who made some really memorable characters (Judge Doom is one of the greatest villains ever). What worries me is your mention of a CGI Rodger (oh god no), and Zemeckis losing his touch with recent films like Beowulf. I really would like to see a film which employs 2D characters in live action footage, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tex Avery</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php/comment-page-1#comment-224619</link>
		<dc:creator>Tex Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=41231#comment-224619</guid>
		<description>Who Framed Roger Rabbit is one of my favorite films ever-- I personally think it&#039;s better than Back to the Future. I don&#039;t think a sequel is necessary. It wouldn&#039;t be the same without Bob Hoskins and Christopher Lloyd, who made some really memorable characters (Judge Doom is one of the greatest villains ever). What worries me is your mention of a CGI Rodger (oh god no), and Zemeckis losing his touch with recent films like Beowulf. I really would like to see a film which employs 2D characters in live action footage, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who Framed Roger Rabbit is one of my favorite films ever&#8211; I personally think it&#039;s better than Back to the Future. I don&#039;t think a sequel is necessary. It wouldn&#039;t be the same without Bob Hoskins and Christopher Lloyd, who made some really memorable characters (Judge Doom is one of the greatest villains ever). What worries me is your mention of a CGI Rodger (oh god no), and Zemeckis losing his touch with recent films like Beowulf. I really would like to see a film which employs 2D characters in live action footage, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isamu</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php/comment-page-1#comment-138717</link>
		<dc:creator>Isamu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=41231#comment-138717</guid>
		<description>Good stuff you have here to look foward to. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff you have here to look foward to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isamu</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php/comment-page-1#comment-224618</link>
		<dc:creator>Isamu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=41231#comment-224618</guid>
		<description>Good stuff you have here to look foward to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff you have here to look foward to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php/comment-page-1#comment-138714</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=41231#comment-138714</guid>
		<description>37 - Neil, you  are great. &lt;heh&gt; 
 
I&#039;ve been looking forward to a Roger Rabbit sequel since I walked out of the theater after the first one. I&#039;d love nothing more than to revist Roger and Jessica. (And, honestly, most everyone else in that film.)  
 
I&#039;d be curious who he had in mind for the live action parts? (I presume it would be another mix of live action and animation? Otherwise HERESY!) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>37 &#8211; Neil, you  are great. &lt;heh&gt; </p>
<p>I&#039;ve been looking forward to a Roger Rabbit sequel since I walked out of the theater after the first one. I&#039;d love nothing more than to revist Roger and Jessica. (And, honestly, most everyone else in that film.)  </p>
<p>I&#039;d be curious who he had in mind for the live action parts? (I presume it would be another mix of live action and animation? Otherwise HERESY!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djjeffhall</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php/comment-page-1#comment-224617</link>
		<dc:creator>djjeffhall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=41231#comment-224617</guid>
		<description>37 - Neil, you  are great. &lt;heh&gt; 
 
I&#039;ve been looking forward to a Roger Rabbit sequel since I walked out of the theater after the first one. I&#039;d love nothing more than to revist Roger and Jessica. (And, honestly, most everyone else in that film.)  
 
I&#039;d be curious who he had in mind for the live action parts? (I presume it would be another mix of live action and animation? Otherwise HERESY!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>37 &#8211; Neil, you  are great. &lt;heh&gt; </p>
<p>I&#039;ve been looking forward to a Roger Rabbit sequel since I walked out of the theater after the first one. I&#039;d love nothing more than to revist Roger and Jessica. (And, honestly, most everyone else in that film.)  </p>
<p>I&#039;d be curious who he had in mind for the live action parts? (I presume it would be another mix of live action and animation? Otherwise HERESY!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertFure</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php/comment-page-1#comment-224616</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertFure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=41231#comment-224616</guid>
		<description>I dont think the Roger Rabbit animation was &quot;cheesy.&quot;  It was just drawn to mimic the early cartoons of the 50s.  No need for a remake on that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think the Roger Rabbit animation was &quot;cheesy.&quot;  It was just drawn to mimic the early cartoons of the 50s.  No need for a remake on that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertFure</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php/comment-page-1#comment-138701</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertFure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=41231#comment-138701</guid>
		<description>I dont think the Roger Rabbit animation was &quot;cheesy.&quot;  It was just drawn to mimic the early cartoons of the 50s.  No need for a remake on that one. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think the Roger Rabbit animation was &quot;cheesy.&quot;  It was just drawn to mimic the early cartoons of the 50s.  No need for a remake on that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tehshawn</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php/comment-page-1#comment-138697</link>
		<dc:creator>tehshawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=41231#comment-138697</guid>
		<description>Saw: When will it end? 
Bruce Willis: Always awesome 
Megan Fox: Always hot 
Roger Rabbit: I&#039;ll burn hollywood if they ruin that with CGI </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw: When will it end?<br />
Bruce Willis: Always awesome<br />
Megan Fox: Always hot<br />
Roger Rabbit: I&#039;ll burn hollywood if they ruin that with CGI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tehshawn</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/early-edition-whos-revisiting-roger-rabbit.php/comment-page-1#comment-224615</link>
		<dc:creator>tehshawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=41231#comment-224615</guid>
		<description>Saw: When will it end? 
Bruce Willis: Always awesome 
Megan Fox: Always hot 
Roger Rabbit: I&#039;ll burn hollywood if they ruin that with CGI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw: When will it end?<br />
Bruce Willis: Always awesome<br />
Megan Fox: Always hot<br />
Roger Rabbit: I&#039;ll burn hollywood if they ruin that with CGI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 508/514 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-13 22:44:22 -->
