Comments on: DVD Review: Atonement

By: Maggie Van Ostrand

Maggie Van Ostrand — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:23:58 +0000

I don’t think it deserved the award fuss either. It’s visually pleasing, but otherwise, I think it’s a snoozefest.

By: Maggie Van Ostrand

Maggie Van Ostrand — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:23:00 +0000

I don’t think it deserved the award fuss either. It’s visually pleasing, but otherwise, I think it’s a snoozefest.

By: H. Stewart

H. Stewart — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:04:05 +0000

I think Anthony Lane in the New Yorker really nailed what’s wrong with this movie:
http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/cinema/2007/12/10/071210crci_cinema_lane?currentPage=all

Also, not to be a nitpicker, but it’s Jane AustEn.

By: H. Stewart

H. Stewart — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:04:00 +0000

I think Anthony Lane in the New Yorker really nailed what’s wrong with this movie:
http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/cinema/2007/12/10/071210crci_cinema_lane?currentPage=all

Also, not to be a nitpicker, but it’s Jane AustEn.

By: Josh Radde

Josh Radde — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:14:54 +0000

More movies need to make clever usage of the c-bomb. I actually really enjoyed the early part of this movie and thought it would be much better if it stayed on the plantation and didn’t go to war.

By: Josh Radde

Josh Radde — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:14:00 +0000

More movies need to make clever usage of the c-bomb. I actually really enjoyed the early part of this movie and thought it would be much better if it stayed on the plantation and didn’t go to war.