Discuss: How Do You Feel About Blade Runner 2?

Posted by Neil Miller (neil@filmschoolrejects.com) on September 30, 2008

Harrison Ford in Blade Runner

Alright folks, it is time for another therapy session — time to talk about your feelings. It is time for those of you in the crowd who claim to be fans, geeks and what have you to open up and tell us what you think — or don’t. We’re going to be here either way.

Yesterday, our good friends over at Slashfilm reported some information about the possibility of a Blade Runner sequel. In fact, according to the quote below, Eagle Eye writer Travis Wright said at a Q&A that he and some other folks were working on a script. This from Slashfilm’s reader scoop:

“I recently attended a Q&A session with one of the writers of ‘Eagle Eye’ after a free screening organized by the magazine Creative Screenwriting. During the Q&A, the writer said that he and whomever it was that helped him co-write the ‘Eagle Eye’ screenplay were in the process of writing a sequel to Blade Runner, and had already contacted the producers of the original, etc., etc. This is probably a load of empty words/wishful thinking on his part, but I for one am appalled by just the notion of a Blade Runner sequel, and thought you’d be as well, so I thought perhaps you’d like to look into this yourself and perhaps use your soapbox to get some fanboys a little pissed, as well. If not, then at least you have a scoop.”

Of course, the mere possibility of a Blade Runner sequel has sent shockwaves through the sci-fi community (read: the 2 or 3 sci-fi sites I read in hopes of seeing scantily clad pictures of Grace Park). io9’s Charlie Jane Anders called the potential project a “prodigious waste of money,” saying that “some stories that just don’t need to be continued.” Even Slashfilm’s own head man Pete Sciretta was skeptical, saying “we certainly don’t need a sequel written by the second tier team of Eagle Eye.”

Even Alex Billington at First Showing, who has long been a bastion of optimism, isn’t feeling love for a Blade Runner sequel, saying “I have a lot of respect for it and can’t even fathom a sequel or anything even set in the same universe.”

So what gives, people? Why can’t we have faith that the guys who gratuitously ripped off every great modern sci-fi thriller to make Eagle Eye couldn’t use the same creativity-lacking skills to schlep together more tales of a dystopian world that is subtly being taken over by replicants? Who says that Harrison Ford can’t come back to revitalize one of his most iconic characters, bringing him into the 21st century and handily passing the torch off to a young, hotshot actor — possibly even Shia LaBeouf?

The mind wanders… But I digress. Your thoughts below…


Read more articles by Neil Miller

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • ummm...no.
  • Nevernude
    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!

    NO NO NO NO! DON'T PISS ME OFF MOTHERF**KERS! LEAVE BLADERUNNER ALONE! REMAKE EVERY MOVIE EVER MADE, DO A SEQUEL FOR EVERY MOVIE TO EVER FEATURE IN A TOP 10 LIST...CITIZEN KANE, THE GODFATHER, WIND IN THE WILLOWS..I DONT AND WONT EVER GIVE A S**T ABOUT THEM BUT YOU TOUCH BLADERUNNER AND YOU WILL HAVE TO ANSWER TO ME!

    noooo *sob sob* say it aint so hollywood....
  • T
    You can just picture how shit it would be- Josh Hartnett or some other new Hollywood goon reprising the Deckard role - SHUDDER!

    You don't get people painting the Mona Lisa 2 - BLADE RUNNER is a masterpiece too - LEAVE IT ALONE!!!


    T
  • Nish
    I could see a film set in the Blade Runner universe. A friend of Phillip K Dick has written several sequel books to resolve the differences between the film and Do Andriods Dream of Electric Sheep and any film adaptation of these books could be quite good. I think as long as Ridley Scott himself handled it and made it according to his vision, not the second-tier writers of Eagle Eye, then it could work, escpecially as the themes in the original film, globalisation, overpopulation, genetic engineering are still relavent today.
  • scott
    I don't think that there is enough information yet. If Ridley Scott has total creative control over the project, and the script is good, then yeah; a Bladerunner sequel could be awesome. I some how doubt that will happen though.
  • HempKnight757
    How about a stand-alone movie & no more sequel/remake garbage?
    Like for real what happen to originally because it seems to be dead in Hollywood.
    So if wanna go see something original go see Saw V. It won't be the same basic movie at all, I swear (not really).
  • mmmm to the "scantily clad pictures of Grace Park"... but what's Blade Runner?
  • BLADE RUNNER is my favorite movie of all time, and I would rank it as the second greatest science fiction film ever made, right behind 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY. Having said that, I think this is the last movie on the face of the Earth that needs a sequel. But if they do make a sequel, I think the Shia Lebouf idea is AWESOME. Because when I'm wondering who's Harrison Ford's equal in the current crop of Hollywood actors, the first name that comes to mind is Shia. 'Cause he's just all sorts of awesome. And manly. He doesn't come off as a snotty little kid at all. He commands the screen with his permanently-affixed expression of bewilderment.

    Anyway, I don't think this is worth raising a fuss over. I'd be shocked if it ever got off the ground.
  • big K
    A "Blade Runner" sequel? Sure, why not? While we're at it why don't we get started on the sequel to "Citizen Kane: Rosebud's Tale" or how about "To Kill A Mockingbird 2: The Revenge of Atticus"?

    Some times it's cool to leave the past in the past, man.
  • Yet another movie that has no need of a remake. On top of that, could we please find jobs for these two writers that involves an original idea (Eagle Eye doesn't count since it is in my mind an unofficial and illogical remake of WarGames)? Remaking Clash of the Titans could be fun because of the enhanced effects we have today, but half of the charm came from those stop motion animations. As for their new take on The Warriors, campy movies from the 70's should stay in the 70's.

    P.S. To Big K: I would totally buy a DVD of "The Revenge of Atticus". Do you think they could get Jason Statham?
blog comments powered by Disqus