<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discuss: Are R-Rated Blockbusters a Thing of the Past?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-135192</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-135192</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the reason Watchmen isn&#039;t making the bank of Dark Knight and Iron Man is Watchmen is not a very good movie and the later two are? 
 
As for R Rated Blockbusters, wasn&#039;t Titanic rated R? (I would think it had to be for the Kate Winslet naked drawing scene, but I don&#039;t recall?) As long as Titanic has the number one all time box office, there will be room for R Rated flicks. 
 
If a quality flick happens to be rated R, the studios are not going to step in. (Not that I loved Titanic in any way.) 
 
Comic Book&#039;s, and comic book movies, are targeted to kids. 11 year olds cannot get into an R Rated flick.  
 
Hollywood always look for the latest trend. In their mind one superhero movie is the same as any other. If Watchmen had been made by a good director and focused on some sort of relatable story in 2 hours it would have succeeded. I saw Watchmen and enjoyed it, but I cannot imagine really wanting to see it again. Nor can I imagine taking my girl to see it, or trying to talk my friends into seeing it. Iron Man and TDK both got multiple viewing in the theater from me, along with me taking dates and friends. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the reason Watchmen isn&#039;t making the bank of Dark Knight and Iron Man is Watchmen is not a very good movie and the later two are? </p>
<p>As for R Rated Blockbusters, wasn&#039;t Titanic rated R? (I would think it had to be for the Kate Winslet naked drawing scene, but I don&#039;t recall?) As long as Titanic has the number one all time box office, there will be room for R Rated flicks. </p>
<p>If a quality flick happens to be rated R, the studios are not going to step in. (Not that I loved Titanic in any way.) </p>
<p>Comic Book&#039;s, and comic book movies, are targeted to kids. 11 year olds cannot get into an R Rated flick.  </p>
<p>Hollywood always look for the latest trend. In their mind one superhero movie is the same as any other. If Watchmen had been made by a good director and focused on some sort of relatable story in 2 hours it would have succeeded. I saw Watchmen and enjoyed it, but I cannot imagine really wanting to see it again. Nor can I imagine taking my girl to see it, or trying to talk my friends into seeing it. Iron Man and TDK both got multiple viewing in the theater from me, along with me taking dates and friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djjeffhall</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-221709</link>
		<dc:creator>djjeffhall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-221709</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the reason Watchmen isn&#039;t making the bank of Dark Knight and Iron Man is Watchmen is not a very good movie and the later two are? 
 
As for R Rated Blockbusters, wasn&#039;t Titanic rated R? (I would think it had to be for the Kate Winslet naked drawing scene, but I don&#039;t recall?) As long as Titanic has the number one all time box office, there will be room for R Rated flicks. 
 
If a quality flick happens to be rated R, the studios are not going to step in. (Not that I loved Titanic in any way.) 
 
Comic Book&#039;s, and comic book movies, are targeted to kids. 11 year olds cannot get into an R Rated flick.  
 
Hollywood always look for the latest trend. In their mind one superhero movie is the same as any other. If Watchmen had been made by a good director and focused on some sort of relatable story in 2 hours it would have succeeded. I saw Watchmen and enjoyed it, but I cannot imagine really wanting to see it again. Nor can I imagine taking my girl to see it, or trying to talk my friends into seeing it. Iron Man and TDK both got multiple viewing in the theater from me, along with me taking dates and friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the reason Watchmen isn&#039;t making the bank of Dark Knight and Iron Man is Watchmen is not a very good movie and the later two are? </p>
<p>As for R Rated Blockbusters, wasn&#039;t Titanic rated R? (I would think it had to be for the Kate Winslet naked drawing scene, but I don&#039;t recall?) As long as Titanic has the number one all time box office, there will be room for R Rated flicks. </p>
<p>If a quality flick happens to be rated R, the studios are not going to step in. (Not that I loved Titanic in any way.) </p>
<p>Comic Book&#039;s, and comic book movies, are targeted to kids. 11 year olds cannot get into an R Rated flick.  </p>
<p>Hollywood always look for the latest trend. In their mind one superhero movie is the same as any other. If Watchmen had been made by a good director and focused on some sort of relatable story in 2 hours it would have succeeded. I saw Watchmen and enjoyed it, but I cannot imagine really wanting to see it again. Nor can I imagine taking my girl to see it, or trying to talk my friends into seeing it. Iron Man and TDK both got multiple viewing in the theater from me, along with me taking dates and friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-135191</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-135191</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the reason Watchmen isn&#039;t making the bank of Dark Knight and Iron Man is Watchmen is not a very good movie and the later two are?  
 
As for R Rated Blockbusters, wasn&#039;t Titanic rated R? (I would think it had to be for the Kate Winslet naked drawing scene, but I don&#039;t recall?) 
 
If a quality flick happens to be rated R, the studios are not going to step in. (Not that I loved Titanic in any way.) 
 
Comic Book&#039;s, and comic book movies, are targeted to kids. 11 year olds cannot get into an R Rated flick.  
 
Hollywood always look for the latest trend. In their mind one superhero movie is the same as any other. If Watchmen had been made by a good director and focused on some sort of relatable story in 2 hours it would have succeeded. I saw Watchmen and enjoyed it, but I cannot imagine really wanting to see it again. Nor can I imagine taking my girl to see it, or trying to talk my friends into seeing it. Iron Man and TDK both got multiple viewing in the theater from me, along with me taking dates and friends.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the reason Watchmen isn&#039;t making the bank of Dark Knight and Iron Man is Watchmen is not a very good movie and the later two are?  </p>
<p>As for R Rated Blockbusters, wasn&#039;t Titanic rated R? (I would think it had to be for the Kate Winslet naked drawing scene, but I don&#039;t recall?) </p>
<p>If a quality flick happens to be rated R, the studios are not going to step in. (Not that I loved Titanic in any way.) </p>
<p>Comic Book&#039;s, and comic book movies, are targeted to kids. 11 year olds cannot get into an R Rated flick.  </p>
<p>Hollywood always look for the latest trend. In their mind one superhero movie is the same as any other. If Watchmen had been made by a good director and focused on some sort of relatable story in 2 hours it would have succeeded. I saw Watchmen and enjoyed it, but I cannot imagine really wanting to see it again. Nor can I imagine taking my girl to see it, or trying to talk my friends into seeing it. Iron Man and TDK both got multiple viewing in the theater from me, along with me taking dates and friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djjeffhall</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-221708</link>
		<dc:creator>djjeffhall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-221708</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the reason Watchmen isn&#039;t making the bank of Dark Knight and Iron Man is Watchmen is not a very good movie and the later two are?  
 
As for R Rated Blockbusters, wasn&#039;t Titanic rated R? (I would think it had to be for the Kate Winslet naked drawing scene, but I don&#039;t recall?) 
 
If a quality flick happens to be rated R, the studios are not going to step in. (Not that I loved Titanic in any way.) 
 
Comic Book&#039;s, and comic book movies, are targeted to kids. 11 year olds cannot get into an R Rated flick.  
 
Hollywood always look for the latest trend. In their mind one superhero movie is the same as any other. If Watchmen had been made by a good director and focused on some sort of relatable story in 2 hours it would have succeeded. I saw Watchmen and enjoyed it, but I cannot imagine really wanting to see it again. Nor can I imagine taking my girl to see it, or trying to talk my friends into seeing it. Iron Man and TDK both got multiple viewing in the theater from me, along with me taking dates and friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the reason Watchmen isn&#039;t making the bank of Dark Knight and Iron Man is Watchmen is not a very good movie and the later two are?  </p>
<p>As for R Rated Blockbusters, wasn&#039;t Titanic rated R? (I would think it had to be for the Kate Winslet naked drawing scene, but I don&#039;t recall?) </p>
<p>If a quality flick happens to be rated R, the studios are not going to step in. (Not that I loved Titanic in any way.) </p>
<p>Comic Book&#039;s, and comic book movies, are targeted to kids. 11 year olds cannot get into an R Rated flick.  </p>
<p>Hollywood always look for the latest trend. In their mind one superhero movie is the same as any other. If Watchmen had been made by a good director and focused on some sort of relatable story in 2 hours it would have succeeded. I saw Watchmen and enjoyed it, but I cannot imagine really wanting to see it again. Nor can I imagine taking my girl to see it, or trying to talk my friends into seeing it. Iron Man and TDK both got multiple viewing in the theater from me, along with me taking dates and friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curt</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-135143</link>
		<dc:creator>curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-135143</guid>
		<description>the passion of the christ should not have been R. fuck that bullshit. fuck mel gibson </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the passion of the christ should not have been R. fuck that bullshit. fuck mel gibson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curt</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-221707</link>
		<dc:creator>curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-221707</guid>
		<description>the passion of the christ should not have been R. fuck that bullshit. fuck mel gibson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the passion of the christ should not have been R. fuck that bullshit. fuck mel gibson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curt</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-135142</link>
		<dc:creator>curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-135142</guid>
		<description>fuck PG-13. i only wanted to see this movie because christian bale is a beast but if it is not R there is no reason for me to see it </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fuck PG-13. i only wanted to see this movie because christian bale is a beast but if it is not R there is no reason for me to see it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curt</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-221706</link>
		<dc:creator>curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-221706</guid>
		<description>fuck PG-13. i only wanted to see this movie because christian bale is a beast but if it is not R there is no reason for me to see it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fuck PG-13. i only wanted to see this movie because christian bale is a beast but if it is not R there is no reason for me to see it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertFure</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-135141</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertFure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-135141</guid>
		<description>Live Free or Die PG-13 was not good.  Live Free or Die Unrated was good.  McClane curses.  His tag line is &quot;Yippi Ki Yay, Mother Fucker&quot; and they didn&#039;t even let him say it.  That is Blasphemy of the highest order. 
 
Terminator: Rated R, $40mil US. Terminator 2: Rated R, $200mil US. Terminator 3: Rated R, $150mil, US.  The studio should work on releasing a good movie.  How excited is the world about T4?  If it was rated NC-17 it would still make $100 million.   
 
What it comes down to, for me, is if a director/writer/production thinks the story needs to be told in a Rated-R manner, I want to see it.  If they make a Rated-R movie and it gets cut to a PG-13, that&#039;s basically like switching from Widescreen to Full Screen.  You&#039;re not getting the whole picture. 
 
If this movie is rated PG-13, I&#039;m going to pay a bum to sit outside the WB lot pooping. 
 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Live Free or Die PG-13 was not good.  Live Free or Die Unrated was good.  McClane curses.  His tag line is &quot;Yippi Ki Yay, Mother Fucker&quot; and they didn&#039;t even let him say it.  That is Blasphemy of the highest order. </p>
<p>Terminator: Rated R, $40mil US. Terminator 2: Rated R, $200mil US. Terminator 3: Rated R, $150mil, US.  The studio should work on releasing a good movie.  How excited is the world about T4?  If it was rated NC-17 it would still make $100 million.   </p>
<p>What it comes down to, for me, is if a director/writer/production thinks the story needs to be told in a Rated-R manner, I want to see it.  If they make a Rated-R movie and it gets cut to a PG-13, that&#039;s basically like switching from Widescreen to Full Screen.  You&#039;re not getting the whole picture. </p>
<p>If this movie is rated PG-13, I&#039;m going to pay a bum to sit outside the WB lot pooping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertFure</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-221705</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertFure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-221705</guid>
		<description>Live Free or Die PG-13 was not good.  Live Free or Die Unrated was good.  McClane curses.  His tag line is &quot;Yippi Ki Yay, Mother Fucker&quot; and they didn&#039;t even let him say it.  That is Blasphemy of the highest order. 
 
Terminator: Rated R, $40mil US. Terminator 2: Rated R, $200mil US. Terminator 3: Rated R, $150mil, US.  The studio should work on releasing a good movie.  How excited is the world about T4?  If it was rated NC-17 it would still make $100 million.   
 
What it comes down to, for me, is if a director/writer/production thinks the story needs to be told in a Rated-R manner, I want to see it.  If they make a Rated-R movie and it gets cut to a PG-13, that&#039;s basically like switching from Widescreen to Full Screen.  You&#039;re not getting the whole picture. 
 
If this movie is rated PG-13, I&#039;m going to pay a bum to sit outside the WB lot pooping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Live Free or Die PG-13 was not good.  Live Free or Die Unrated was good.  McClane curses.  His tag line is &quot;Yippi Ki Yay, Mother Fucker&quot; and they didn&#039;t even let him say it.  That is Blasphemy of the highest order. </p>
<p>Terminator: Rated R, $40mil US. Terminator 2: Rated R, $200mil US. Terminator 3: Rated R, $150mil, US.  The studio should work on releasing a good movie.  How excited is the world about T4?  If it was rated NC-17 it would still make $100 million.   </p>
<p>What it comes down to, for me, is if a director/writer/production thinks the story needs to be told in a Rated-R manner, I want to see it.  If they make a Rated-R movie and it gets cut to a PG-13, that&#039;s basically like switching from Widescreen to Full Screen.  You&#039;re not getting the whole picture. </p>
<p>If this movie is rated PG-13, I&#039;m going to pay a bum to sit outside the WB lot pooping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Van Fleet</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-135138</link>
		<dc:creator>James Van Fleet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-135138</guid>
		<description>Since when have R-rated blockbusters ever been a trend? 
 
They&#039;re anomalous, with most of the fare succeeding on the basis of offering something startlingly new (300, Wedding Crashers, The Passion of the Christ) or something that absolutely commands popular attention (Gran Torino, The Departed).   The only R-rated hits that anyone predicted in the last decade were the Matrix sequels. 
 
This commentary seems to be based on a false assumption. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when have R-rated blockbusters ever been a trend? </p>
<p>They&#039;re anomalous, with most of the fare succeeding on the basis of offering something startlingly new (300, Wedding Crashers, The Passion of the Christ) or something that absolutely commands popular attention (Gran Torino, The Departed).   The only R-rated hits that anyone predicted in the last decade were the Matrix sequels. </p>
<p>This commentary seems to be based on a false assumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Van Fleet</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-221704</link>
		<dc:creator>James Van Fleet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-221704</guid>
		<description>Since when have R-rated blockbusters ever been a trend? 
 
They&#039;re anomalous, with most of the fare succeeding on the basis of offering something startlingly new (300, Wedding Crashers, The Passion of the Christ) or something that absolutely commands popular attention (Gran Torino, The Departed).   The only R-rated hits that anyone predicted in the last decade were the Matrix sequels. 
 
This commentary seems to be based on a false assumption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when have R-rated blockbusters ever been a trend? </p>
<p>They&#039;re anomalous, with most of the fare succeeding on the basis of offering something startlingly new (300, Wedding Crashers, The Passion of the Christ) or something that absolutely commands popular attention (Gran Torino, The Departed).   The only R-rated hits that anyone predicted in the last decade were the Matrix sequels. </p>
<p>This commentary seems to be based on a false assumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _Christopher_M</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-135096</link>
		<dc:creator>_Christopher_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-135096</guid>
		<description>Live Free wasn&#039;t all that bad...Wiseman did a decent job all things considering....bad guys were still killed by McClane just not as gruesome...     
     
you have to admit that if a studio is spending 100-150million it&#039;s going to hard to get their money back in domestic box office...American moviegoers like their films PG-13 it comes down to numbers unfortunately..along with the fascist anti-sex MPAA having way too much power over films and how they are released....internationally people rarely look at ratings when it comes to profits...if it&#039;s a solid film R or PG-13 it will blow up DVD and Bluray sales so the studio will make their money back...  
  
     
when it comes to Terminator I don&#039;t want casual cursing and random nakedness...the reason for nudity/sex scene in the original Terminator was to show John&#039;s conception ...I&#039;m not sure how Moon&#039;s character is that important her nudity will effect the story...on the other hand why isn&#039;t there a sex scene between Bale and Bryce?..I think that would be more important... blood and gore is something I expect considering we&#039;re seeing Terminators unleashed and not covert/hiding among humans....the R rating is a standard in the franchise I&#039;m not questioning that...but I don&#039;t know if American audiences will be getting that in a theater cut....  
  
that said I can&#039;t wait for McG to start work on T5 and T6.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Live Free wasn&#39;t all that bad&#8230;Wiseman did a decent job all things considering&#8230;.bad guys were still killed by McClane just not as gruesome&#8230;     </p>
<p>you have to admit that if a studio is spending 100-150million it&#39;s going to hard to get their money back in domestic box office&#8230;American moviegoers like their films PG-13 it comes down to numbers unfortunately..along with the fascist anti-sex MPAA having way too much power over films and how they are released&#8230;.internationally people rarely look at ratings when it comes to profits&#8230;if it&#39;s a solid film R or PG-13 it will blow up DVD and Bluray sales so the studio will make their money back&#8230;  </p>
<p>when it comes to Terminator I don&#39;t want casual cursing and random nakedness&#8230;the reason for nudity/sex scene in the original Terminator was to show John&#39;s conception &#8230;I&#39;m not sure how Moon&#39;s character is that important her nudity will effect the story&#8230;on the other hand why isn&#39;t there a sex scene between Bale and Bryce?..I think that would be more important&#8230; blood and gore is something I expect considering we&#39;re seeing Terminators unleashed and not covert/hiding among humans&#8230;.the R rating is a standard in the franchise I&#39;m not questioning that&#8230;but I don&#39;t know if American audiences will be getting that in a theater cut&#8230;.  </p>
<p>that said I can&#39;t wait for McG to start work on T5 and T6&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _Christopher_M</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-221703</link>
		<dc:creator>_Christopher_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-221703</guid>
		<description>Live Free wasn&#039;t all that bad...Wiseman did a decent job all things considering....bad guys were still killed by McClane just not as gruesome...     
     
you have to admit that if a studio is spending 100-150million it&#039;s going to hard to get their money back in domestic box office...American moviegoers like their films PG-13 it comes down to numbers unfortunately..along with the fascist anti-sex MPAA having way too much power over films and how they are released....internationally people rarely look at ratings when it comes to profits...if it&#039;s a solid film R or PG-13 it will blow up DVD and Bluray sales so the studio will make their money back...  
  
     
when it comes to Terminator I don&#039;t want casual cursing and random nakedness...the reason for nudity/sex scene in the original Terminator was to show John&#039;s conception ...I&#039;m not sure how Moon&#039;s character is that important her nudity will effect the story...on the other hand why isn&#039;t there a sex scene between Bale and Bryce?..I think that would be more important... blood and gore is something I expect considering we&#039;re seeing Terminators unleashed and not covert/hiding among humans....the R rating is a standard in the franchise I&#039;m not questioning that...but I don&#039;t know if American audiences will be getting that in a theater cut....  
  
that said I can&#039;t wait for McG to start work on T5 and T6....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Live Free wasn&#039;t all that bad&#8230;Wiseman did a decent job all things considering&#8230;.bad guys were still killed by McClane just not as gruesome&#8230;     </p>
<p>you have to admit that if a studio is spending 100-150million it&#039;s going to hard to get their money back in domestic box office&#8230;American moviegoers like their films PG-13 it comes down to numbers unfortunately..along with the fascist anti-sex MPAA having way too much power over films and how they are released&#8230;.internationally people rarely look at ratings when it comes to profits&#8230;if it&#039;s a solid film R or PG-13 it will blow up DVD and Bluray sales so the studio will make their money back&#8230;  </p>
<p>when it comes to Terminator I don&#039;t want casual cursing and random nakedness&#8230;the reason for nudity/sex scene in the original Terminator was to show John&#039;s conception &#8230;I&#039;m not sure how Moon&#039;s character is that important her nudity will effect the story&#8230;on the other hand why isn&#039;t there a sex scene between Bale and Bryce?..I think that would be more important&#8230; blood and gore is something I expect considering we&#039;re seeing Terminators unleashed and not covert/hiding among humans&#8230;.the R rating is a standard in the franchise I&#039;m not questioning that&#8230;but I don&#039;t know if American audiences will be getting that in a theater cut&#8230;.  </p>
<p>that said I can&#039;t wait for McG to start work on T5 and T6&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole_Abaius</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-135091</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole_Abaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-135091</guid>
		<description>I saw boobs when I was a teenager and it destroyed me for the rest of my life. The MPAA is right to warn us all! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw boobs when I was a teenager and it destroyed me for the rest of my life. The MPAA is right to warn us all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole_Abaius</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-221702</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole_Abaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-221702</guid>
		<description>I saw boobs when I was a teenager and it destroyed me for the rest of my life. The MPAA is right to warn us all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw boobs when I was a teenager and it destroyed me for the rest of my life. The MPAA is right to warn us all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nomar</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-135087</link>
		<dc:creator>nomar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-135087</guid>
		<description>oh no! a teenager might (gasp) see boobs! are we seriously that backwards when it comes to nudity or blood? jeez  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh no! a teenager might (gasp) see boobs! are we seriously that backwards when it comes to nudity or blood? jeez</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nomar</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-221701</link>
		<dc:creator>nomar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-221701</guid>
		<description>oh no! a teenager might (gasp) see boobs! are we seriously that backwards when it comes to nudity or blood? jeez</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh no! a teenager might (gasp) see boobs! are we seriously that backwards when it comes to nudity or blood? jeez</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _Christopher_M</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-135051</link>
		<dc:creator>_Christopher_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-135051</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s true if a movie sets out to be violent and dark themed that&#039;s one thing.....but if Terminator Salvation only needs to cut &quot;one&quot; nude scene to get the PG-13 rating...and if that cut doesn&#039;t effect the story or tone what&#039;s the harm?...if they toned down the violence of the machines and gloom of a post-apocalyptic to get that rating that&#039;s another thing....if that nude scene is the only thing holding it back cut it...if the studio is talking about cutting more then I&#039;ll side with McG </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#39;s true if a movie sets out to be violent and dark themed that&#39;s one thing&#8230;..but if Terminator Salvation only needs to cut &quot;one&quot; nude scene to get the PG-13 rating&#8230;and if that cut doesn&#39;t effect the story or tone what&#39;s the harm?&#8230;if they toned down the violence of the machines and gloom of a post-apocalyptic to get that rating that&#39;s another thing&#8230;.if that nude scene is the only thing holding it back cut it&#8230;if the studio is talking about cutting more then I&#39;ll side with McG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _Christopher_M</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/discuss-are-r-rated-blockbusters-a-thing-of-the-past.php/comment-page-1#comment-221694</link>
		<dc:creator>_Christopher_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=37077#comment-221694</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s true if a movie sets out to be violent and dark themed that&#039;s one thing.....but if Terminator Salvation only needs to cut &quot;one&quot; nude scene to get the PG-13 rating...and if that cut doesn&#039;t effect the story or tone what&#039;s the harm?...if they toned down the violence of the machines and gloom of a post-apocalyptic to get that rating that&#039;s another thing....if that nude scene is the only thing holding it back cut it...if the studio is talking about cutting more then I&#039;ll side with McG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#039;s true if a movie sets out to be violent and dark themed that&#039;s one thing&#8230;..but if Terminator Salvation only needs to cut &quot;one&quot; nude scene to get the PG-13 rating&#8230;and if that cut doesn&#039;t effect the story or tone what&#039;s the harm?&#8230;if they toned down the violence of the machines and gloom of a post-apocalyptic to get that rating that&#039;s another thing&#8230;.if that nude scene is the only thing holding it back cut it&#8230;if the studio is talking about cutting more then I&#039;ll side with McG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 593/607 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-13 23:34:15 -->
