Disability Rights Coalition Issues Demands of ‘Tropic Thunder’

Posted by Robert Fure (robert@filmschoolrejects.com) on August 11, 2008

Tropic Thunder

You may have noticed a bit of controversy being stirred up around the movie Tropic Thunder, mostly regarding Ben Stiller’s portrayal of an actor who at one time portrays a mentally handicapped farmhand in a fake trailer.  So in a way, Stiller is the dude playin’ the dude who plays the dude who’s causin’ the controversy.

The Disability Rights Coalition, a group made up of representatives from across the spectrum of Disabled Rights groups met with Dreamworks over the content of the film recently and on Friday issued a list of demands.  The list in its entirety follows.  Now, I’m not going to bring up things like The First Amendment or Nazi Germany or Censorship or even try to draw some parallel to terrorists and how, in film, they also have lists of demands.  No, I’m not going to bring those up.

What I’m going to do is show you list of demands and ask you to tell us below how you feel about this.  Oh, and one more thing.  Noting that one of the demands is a screener for these groups, it would be safe to assume that most, if not all, of the people preparing to protest, have not seen the film.  And does anyone else find it unexpected that the controversy was supposed to be over Robert Downey Jr. and not a 30 second spot about Ben Stiller?  Anyway, without further ado:

The coalition demands included:

Film Screening: Arrange a film screening of “Tropic Thunder” for disability groups, paid for by the studio, in Los Angeles and in Washington, D.C. before the end of this week.

Public Apology: Make a public apology for the thoughtless use of the “R-word” and derogatory depictions of people with intellectual disability with a summary statement of the studio’s intent to curtail its damaging effect and its commitment to specific next steps (as laid out below).

Film Editing: Completely eliminate all direct mention of or reference to “retard” jokes, disability euphemisms, and disrespectful depictions from the film before it is distributed to theatres and released to DVD.

Film Promotion: Eliminate all trailers, web postings, and ads that focus on “retard” jokes, disability euphemisms, and disrespectful depictions, and reference the “R word.”

Specially Created Trailer: Fund and produce a trailer to air prior to each showing of “Tropic Thunder” that addresses the use of the R-word and the hurtful impact it has, even when people do not mean it that way.  This same trailer would also be included within the DVD packaging for after market sales.

National Campaign: Create and fund a comprehensive national educational and advertising social campaign to eliminate the pejorative use of the word retard from use in everyday language, and more importantly create a world of dignity, acceptance and inclusion for people with intellectual disability.  The campaign would be developed and vetted by an advisory council of representatives from the coalition. The campaign would also be designed to capitalize on social media and social networking to bring young people together and empower them as agents of change for the R-word campaign and involve appearances of those involved in the film’s creation.

Film Studio Summit: Convene the heads of all the major studios to address the appropriate portrayal of people with intellectual in future films and television programs.  The summit would also help reduce stigma surrounding one of the largest disability populations in the world while also raising the awareness of the extraordinary gifts and talents people with intellectual and developmental disabilities have to offer.

This comes from a memo created by Gail Williamson of the Down Syndrome Association of Los Angeles, dated August 8, 2008, and available here: PatriciaBauer.com

What are you thoughts on the character?  The controversy?  The demands?


Read more articles by Robert Fure

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Keith
    Ha ha ha ha ha.
  • Ok, now THAT's retarded.
  • This is BEYOND absurd.

    Anyone who has SEEN the movie knows that the whole Simple Jack element is poking fun at HOLLYWOOD, not people with disabilities. It's used as a device to skewer the movie industry in an accurate and often hilarious way. My own brother has disabilities and I wasn't even slightly offended by the movie. What offends me is when groups that are meant to protect people from actual harm, take up a cause that is completely unfounded and nonsensical, thereby giving themselves a fanatical reputation. If any of the group's leaders actually watched the film, they would know its harmless.
  • Another thought on this subject. If "mentally handicapped" people are offended by a minute-long trailer for Simple Jack, then shouldn't all Mexicans be offended by that horrendous excuse for a movie; Beverly Hills Chihuahua?
  • America has an uneasy relationship with Africa. The latest attack arrives in theatres this week with the new American film, "Tropic Thunder" in which a white man puts on blackface.

    There is nothing amusing about blackface. It is a highly racist and offensive depiction of Africans. Its sole purpose is to demean us and to propagate the stereotype that Africans are on this Earth merely for the amusement.

    http://truthfirstnow.blogspot.com
  • Homero, everyone is offended by Beverly Hills Chihuahua.

    Even I agree that a list of demands is a but beyond the pale for the issue, but the fact remains that a certain portion of the population is rightfully offended by an element in the movie.

    Neil, I love the fact that we keep highlighting the fact that these people haven't seen the movie, but they've seen the clip and read the dialog. If the argument is that within context the joke is non-offensive, what about all the people that are seeing the clip over and over again outside of context (and without getting checked for ID?)
  • Erm, that sweetly worded rhetorical question should be aimed at Fure I suppose since he keeps bolding that phrase. Sorry, man, I get you and Neil confused all the time because you look.beardedly similar.
  • Well Cole, they are trying to boycott the entire film and saying that the film (not the trailer) makes fun of those with disabilities. I guess if maybe they just aimed at the trailer, that'd be something different. Regardless, is it acceptable to judge something without having all the facts? Would those with disabled children want us to form an opinion on them based on a 15 second sound bite or is there more to it than that?

    Someone is always going to be offended by comedy. Where do we draw the line? If there were a group of people who were called "Rejects" in school or those who were Rejected from a film school and this website name offended them, should we change it? You can say that's stretching, but with a film that will probably sell 9 million tickets in its opening weekend, is the number of the offended outweighing the number of non-offended? This is a movie going democracy, and if by and large people are not offended by this and choose to go see the movie, then that's really that. That's how these things work. It takes a majority of people to make a change, not a minority. Should a vocal minority be able to dictate policy or should the silent majority be able to see the movie without being judged?

    Overweight people surely don't enjoy being made the butt of the joke. I'm sure Preppy Jocks don't appreciate always being moronic douchebags. Give an inch of your comedy ground in the name of not offending someone and you'll lose a mile.

    And can someone even be "wrongfully offended?" You're either offended or you're not. It's a personal thing. You're never going to please everyone.
  • @TruthFirst

    You should also probably check out the movie before making your judgment. Robert Downey Jr. does not play the role of a black man in the movie. Robert Downey Jr's character is a white Australian male. His role lampoons method actors, not a race. Please check out our further coverage on Tropic Thunder to hear what Downey himself has to say about the issue. But see the movie and you'll hopefully come to the realization that Downey is not in black face, Kirk Lazarus is.
  • JD
    Free publicity for Dreamworks, and by extension, Tropic THunder! Maybe this will be the movie that topples The Dark Knight.
blog comments powered by Disqus