There’s no secret to the fact that MGM and director Darren Aronofsky aren’t seeing eye-to-eye on their planned reboot of RoboCop. We’ve been covering the situation since March 2008, and it is clear that as the project has evolved, the two parties have distinctly different visions for what this franchise relaunch should look like. These problems have been amplified by the recent financial troubles of MGM, and have even allowed Aronofsky to go off and shoot his next film, Black Swan. But even now — two years later — both sides seem intent on making the film happen, despite obvious creative differences. In an interview with STYD, screenwriter David Self said that both he and Aronofsky are still attached to the project, and are looking to move forward sooner than later:

“I’m still involved with it and Darren Aronofsky’s still involved with it. He’s making another movie right now (Black Swan), but we’re waiting for MGM, to sort things out since they’re a large corporation and it’s a situation where we have to be practical. We’re waiting to continue with them, we hope that that happens soon and we can get back to it soon.”

To keep everything in perspective, here’s a quick cheat sheet on what these differences are:

Darren Aronofsky seems to want:

  • A hard R-rating, and a serious tone.
  • A bigger budget.
  • Not 3D.

MGM seems to want:

  • Something more financially conservative, so as to minimize risk.
  • To stay away from an R-rating, as it minimizes box office potential.
  • RoboCop in 3D.

All of this fits into the logical gaps between those who control the money and those who create the art. Of course Darren Aronofsky wants a serious, hard-R film that will play well with the franchise’s die hard fans. And of course he wants to be able to tell that story on a big scale, requiring a bigger budget. And his love loss for 3D is understandable. In many ways, it’s still nothing more than a gimmick.

And of course MGM wants to make it on the cheap, make it accessible and squeeze every dime out of the 3D fad. That’s the easiest way for them to make money. And we all know that they need the money.

Time will tell as to whether this project ever gets off the ground. If it does, there will be compromise, much of which will have to be made by the director.


ARTICLE TAGS
  Previous Article
Next Article  
Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!


Movie News After Dark Reject Radio Junkfood Cinema Boiling Point Culture Warrior This Week In DVD This Week In Blu-ray Criterion Files Foreign Objects The Reject Report

MOVIE NEWS | MOVIE TRAILERS | MOVIE REVIEWS | COMIC-CON 2011 | FEATURES | INTERVIEWS | SHORT FILMS | MEET THE REJECTS
Film School Rejects is the movie blog you've been waiting for. The ultimate commentary track on what's happening in Hollywood, FSR combines the freshest voices on the web and a swagger all its own to provide the best reviews, interviews and industry news coverage to millions of unique visitors from around the world every month.
Got a Tip? Send it here:
editors@filmschoolrejects.com
Publisher:
Neil Miller | Email
Managing Editor:
Cole Abaius | Email
Associate Editors:
Rob Hunter | Email

Robert Fure | Email

All Rights Reserved © 2006-2011 Reject Media, LLC | Site Credits | Privacy Policy
Design & Development by Face3