<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Despite Being a Bad Idea, The Birds Remake Moves Forward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/despite-being-a-bad-idea-the-birds-remake-moves-forward-rruin.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/despite-being-a-bad-idea-the-birds-remake-moves-forward-rruin.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:57:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/despite-being-a-bad-idea-the-birds-remake-moves-forward-rruin.php/comment-page-1#comment-153751</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 13:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=60112#comment-153751</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s an intangible quality to Hitchcock&#039;s movie&#039;s that will no one will ever be able to replicate, making any remake, rehash or re-envisioning of his work subpar by default. Someday there may come a storyteller on par with his talent, but that person won&#039;t have to rely on talent. Today, there is no director who can take Hitch&#039;s work and bring it back to life. That person simply does not exist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, this movie will likely be made at some point. And it will be moderately successful, at best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#39;s an intangible quality to Hitchcock&#39;s movie&#39;s that will no one will ever be able to replicate, making any remake, rehash or re-envisioning of his work subpar by default. Someday there may come a storyteller on par with his talent, but that person won&#39;t have to rely on talent. Today, there is no director who can take Hitch&#39;s work and bring it back to life. That person simply does not exist.</p>
<p>That said, this movie will likely be made at some point. And it will be moderately successful, at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/despite-being-a-bad-idea-the-birds-remake-moves-forward-rruin.php/comment-page-1#comment-151813</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 07:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=60112#comment-151813</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s an intangible quality to Hitchcock&#039;s movie&#039;s that will no one will ever be able to replicate, making any remake, rehash or re-envisioning of his work subpar by default. Someday there may come a storyteller on par with his talent, but that person won&#039;t have to rely on talent. Today, there is no director who can take Hitch&#039;s work and bring it back to life. That person simply does not exist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, this movie will likely be made at some point. And it will be moderately successful, at best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#39;s an intangible quality to Hitchcock&#39;s movie&#39;s that will no one will ever be able to replicate, making any remake, rehash or re-envisioning of his work subpar by default. Someday there may come a storyteller on par with his talent, but that person won&#39;t have to rely on talent. Today, there is no director who can take Hitch&#39;s work and bring it back to life. That person simply does not exist.</p>
<p>That said, this movie will likely be made at some point. And it will be moderately successful, at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackManJew</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/despite-being-a-bad-idea-the-birds-remake-moves-forward-rruin.php/comment-page-1#comment-151781</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackManJew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=60112#comment-151781</guid>
		<description>You write for FSR?? Does Neil know you are posting comments like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You write for FSR?? Does Neil know you are posting comments like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsi r4</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/despite-being-a-bad-idea-the-birds-remake-moves-forward-rruin.php/comment-page-1#comment-151776</link>
		<dc:creator>dsi r4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=60112#comment-151776</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Birds&quot; is a pretty good movie, I have had the opportunity to see the movie once. And I guess i am done now seeing more Alfred Hitchcock movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Birds&#8221; is a pretty good movie, I have had the opportunity to see the movie once. And I guess i am done now seeing more Alfred Hitchcock movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackManJew</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/despite-being-a-bad-idea-the-birds-remake-moves-forward-rruin.php/comment-page-1#comment-151768</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackManJew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 03:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=60112#comment-151768</guid>
		<description>3D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff R Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/despite-being-a-bad-idea-the-birds-remake-moves-forward-rruin.php/comment-page-1#comment-151763</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff R Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=60112#comment-151763</guid>
		<description>The only person who should be allowed to remake a Hitchcock film is Alfred Hitchcock. There is no way this can turn out well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only person who should be allowed to remake a Hitchcock film is Alfred Hitchcock. There is no way this can turn out well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: film fanatic</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/despite-being-a-bad-idea-the-birds-remake-moves-forward-rruin.php/comment-page-1#comment-151762</link>
		<dc:creator>film fanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=60112#comment-151762</guid>
		<description>HELL NO!&lt;br&gt;In my opinion, there should be some territories where some remakes should be untouchable.&lt;br&gt;1) Someone who died while filming the movie. (Brandon Lee in the Crow which sadly there are going to remake or &quot;reboot&quot; as the jackass producers are calling it and no doubt is going to suck)&lt;br&gt;2) Hitchcock Movies. Psycho anyone?&lt;br&gt;3) Stanley Kubrick Movies.&lt;br&gt;4) Every Movie in the IMDB 250 List&lt;br&gt;5) REMAKES, REBOOTS, REIMAGINING (WHY BOTHER WITH THE FANCY TITLES? IF IT LOOKS LIKE SHIT AND SMELLS LIKE SHIT, CHANCES ARE THAT&#039;S IT&#039;S SHIT RIGHT?! SURE YOU CAN FANCY IT UP BY CALLING IT FECES, EXCREMENTS, BODILY WASTE, CRAP, POO, POOP, BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY ITS STILL A PIECE OF SHIT!) REMAKES OR WHATEVER YOU WOULD LIKE TO CALL IT HAVE ONE THING IN COMMON: THERE ARE ALL AND WILL ALWAYS WILL BE UNNECESSARY. THAT&#039;S WHY THE REASON WHY WE CALL A MOVIE A CLASSIC. IT&#039;S PERFECT THE WAY IT IS. EVERYTHING ABOUT IT, THE STORY, ACTING, DIRECTING, CINEMATOGROPHY, SET DESIGNS, EVERYTHING IS PERFECT BUT ASSHOLES LIKE BRAD FULLER @ PLATINUM DUNES KEEP MAKING ALL THESE UNNECESSARY AND SHITTY REMAKES OR GARBAGE AND GET AWAY WITH IT. SIMPLY PUT, IT MAKES ME SICK!&lt;br&gt;GOOD DAY EVERYONE&lt;br&gt;HUGH SIGH OF RELIEF AND CATCHING OF BREATH&lt;br&gt;=)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HELL NO!<br />In my opinion, there should be some territories where some remakes should be untouchable.<br />1) Someone who died while filming the movie. (Brandon Lee in the Crow which sadly there are going to remake or &#8220;reboot&#8221; as the jackass producers are calling it and no doubt is going to suck)<br />2) Hitchcock Movies. Psycho anyone?<br />3) Stanley Kubrick Movies.<br />4) Every Movie in the IMDB 250 List<br />5) REMAKES, REBOOTS, REIMAGINING (WHY BOTHER WITH THE FANCY TITLES? IF IT LOOKS LIKE SHIT AND SMELLS LIKE SHIT, CHANCES ARE THAT&#39;S IT&#39;S SHIT RIGHT?! SURE YOU CAN FANCY IT UP BY CALLING IT FECES, EXCREMENTS, BODILY WASTE, CRAP, POO, POOP, BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY ITS STILL A PIECE OF SHIT!) REMAKES OR WHATEVER YOU WOULD LIKE TO CALL IT HAVE ONE THING IN COMMON: THERE ARE ALL AND WILL ALWAYS WILL BE UNNECESSARY. THAT&#39;S WHY THE REASON WHY WE CALL A MOVIE A CLASSIC. IT&#39;S PERFECT THE WAY IT IS. EVERYTHING ABOUT IT, THE STORY, ACTING, DIRECTING, CINEMATOGROPHY, SET DESIGNS, EVERYTHING IS PERFECT BUT ASSHOLES LIKE BRAD FULLER @ PLATINUM DUNES KEEP MAKING ALL THESE UNNECESSARY AND SHITTY REMAKES OR GARBAGE AND GET AWAY WITH IT. SIMPLY PUT, IT MAKES ME SICK!<br />GOOD DAY EVERYONE<br />HUGH SIGH OF RELIEF AND CATCHING OF BREATH<br />=)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 319/325 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-14 02:42:37 -->
