Share submit to reddit

hitchcock_birds

Once upon a time Daphne Du Maurier wrote a neat little short story about birds run amok called The Birds. In 1963 Alfred Hitchcock adapted the short story into a film starring Tippi Hedren. I saw it as a mere sprout when it was on  a small screen, in other words, television and had nightmares. By today’s standards some corpses missing their eyeballs is pretty tame stuff, but gore was never Hitchcock’s M.O.

It then came to pass that Martin Campbell, Casino Royale, was to direct Naomi Watts in a remake. I wonder if she was set to revive the icy cool blond with the blond updo that seemed never to get frazzled on Tippi even as she fled screaming from flocks of belligerent birds. Or was she to be a more down to earth bird plagued heroine.

Campbell has now left the project and it looks like Watts has as well. But no one wants to just let the Birds fly the coop. According to Pajiba, Platinum Dunes is in talks with Dennis Iliades (The Last House on the Left, 2009) to see if they want to take over and try to get the project off the ground, help it take flight, make it soar, okay, sorry, got carried away.

If Iliades takes over the news is they want to go from a PG-13 The Birds to an R rated  The Birds. Where Hitchcock did have some gore, he also had almost unbearable suspense as flocks of birds gathered on power lines. When would they strike? Would they strike? Some of those crows descendants are now lying their trade in Windex commercials.

Without Campbell there’s now speculation that Watts will leave the film. Never fear there’s always Scarlett Johansson who even more than Watts can play that  bottle blond running for her life.

Personally, in my opinion, remaking a Hitchcock film is for the birds. Sorry, that was irresistible.

What do you think? Is the world in need of a new version of The Birds?


RELATED ARTICLES
ARTICLE TAGS
  Previous Article
Next Article  
Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!
  • There's an intangible quality to Hitchcock's movie's that will no one will ever be able to replicate, making any remake, rehash or re-envisioning of his work subpar by default. Someday there may come a storyteller on par with his talent, but that person won't have to rely on talent. Today, there is no director who can take Hitch's work and bring it back to life. That person simply does not exist.

    That said, this movie will likely be made at some point. And it will be moderately successful, at best.
  • "The Birds" is a pretty good movie, I have had the opportunity to see the movie once. And I guess i am done now seeing more Alfred Hitchcock movies.
  • BlackManJew
    3D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Jeff R Hall
    The only person who should be allowed to remake a Hitchcock film is Alfred Hitchcock. There is no way this can turn out well.
  • film fanatic
    HELL NO!
    In my opinion, there should be some territories where some remakes should be untouchable.
    1) Someone who died while filming the movie. (Brandon Lee in the Crow which sadly there are going to remake or "reboot" as the jackass producers are calling it and no doubt is going to suck)
    2) Hitchcock Movies. Psycho anyone?
    3) Stanley Kubrick Movies.
    4) Every Movie in the IMDB 250 List
    5) REMAKES, REBOOTS, REIMAGINING (WHY BOTHER WITH THE FANCY TITLES? IF IT LOOKS LIKE SHIT AND SMELLS LIKE SHIT, CHANCES ARE THAT'S IT'S SHIT RIGHT?! SURE YOU CAN FANCY IT UP BY CALLING IT FECES, EXCREMENTS, BODILY WASTE, CRAP, POO, POOP, BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY ITS STILL A PIECE OF SHIT!) REMAKES OR WHATEVER YOU WOULD LIKE TO CALL IT HAVE ONE THING IN COMMON: THERE ARE ALL AND WILL ALWAYS WILL BE UNNECESSARY. THAT'S WHY THE REASON WHY WE CALL A MOVIE A CLASSIC. IT'S PERFECT THE WAY IT IS. EVERYTHING ABOUT IT, THE STORY, ACTING, DIRECTING, CINEMATOGROPHY, SET DESIGNS, EVERYTHING IS PERFECT BUT ASSHOLES LIKE BRAD FULLER @ PLATINUM DUNES KEEP MAKING ALL THESE UNNECESSARY AND SHITTY REMAKES OR GARBAGE AND GET AWAY WITH IT. SIMPLY PUT, IT MAKES ME SICK!
    GOOD DAY EVERYONE
    HUGH SIGH OF RELIEF AND CATCHING OF BREATH
    =)
  • BlackManJew
    You write for FSR?? Does Neil know you are posting comments like this?
blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow FILM SCHOOL REJECTS...


MOVIE NEWS | MOVIE TRAILERS | MOVIE REVIEWS | TV REVIEWS | FEATURES | INTERVIEWS | CONTESTS | ARCHIVES | ABOUT
Film School Rejects is the movie blog you've been waiting for. The ultimate commentary track on what's happening in Hollywood, FSR combines the freshest voices on the web and a swagger all its own to provide the best reviews, interviews and industry news coverage to millions of unique visitors from around the world every month.
FSR Team
Got a Tip? Send it here:
editors@filmschoolrejects.com
Publisher:
Neil Miller | Email
Managing Editor:
Cole Abaius | Email
Associate Editors:
Robert Fure | Email
Rob Hunter | Email
Contributors:
Adam Charles | Email
Amber Humphrey | Email
Brian Gibson | Email
Brian Salisbury | Email
Dustin Hucks | Email
Genevieve Blaber | Email
Contributors:
J.L. Sosa | Email
Jack Giroux | Email
Jeremy Kirk | Email
Jim Rohner | Email
Jorge Del Pinal | Email
Josh Radde | Email
Kevin Carr | Email
Contributors:
Landon Palmer | Email
Lauren Flanagan | Email
Paul Sileo | Email
Robert Levin | Email
Robin Ruinski | Email
Advertising:
sales@craveonline.com
All Rights Reserved © 2006-2010 Reject Media, LLC | Site Credits | Privacy Policy
Design & Development by Face3