Share submit to reddit

Now, it is my hope that industry professionals don’t read this and think I’m trying to shake up your world. This is just a letter to all of those people out there that think life should be fair and easy. Life is a bit different than that, especially since James Cameron decided to take us to Pandora. Since Avatar sunk the Titanic, everyone has been talking about box-office records, inflation, that scene from Teen Wolf, and 3-D glasses. It seems that everyone wants to make the argument that Avatar wouldn’t be such a big blue cash cow if it weren’t for those pesky plastic glasses. Even further, the film shouldn’t be considered record-breaking because the extra charge for 3-D creates an inflation effect on ticket pricing. So here is a bit of news that I dug up: The ticket price costs exactly what you are willing to pay. So get ready moviegoers, you might be paying a few extra dollars for your movies for a long time to come.

For the record, my headquarters is near Cleveland, Ohio. Joke if you need to, but I’m moving right along. Here in Cleveland, much like most of the Midwest, ticket prices are about $6 for a matinee and $9 in the evening. Ever since 3-D made a comeback, those tickets have been $12. So for the sake of my argument, I will be using those numbers. I keep hearing these arguments that you have to consider Avatar an exception due to “inflation.” And it’s preposterous to compare the film to Gone With the Wind, which has been rumored to have originally appeared on stone tablets, because several hundred adjustments to ticket prices have occurred. I can’t argue with that perspective because in today’s economy, Gone With the Wind would have made a lot of money. Now what I am having a problem with though, is that people are saying that Avatar should be penalized because you have to pay $3 extra for crappy glasses. Newsflash here though, it is only $3 extra because that is exactly what you paid to see the film in that way.

3-D has been considered a gimmick in the past, but is now quickly becoming a regular part of the movie-going experience. I remember sitting with Jeffery Katzenberg and listening to his crazy fantasy about a dozen or more 3-D films per year, per studio. He talked about people owning “movie glasses” the same way that people have driving gloves or running shoes. This all sounded like the ramblings of a madman, because this was before the improvements in the 3-D technology. I think Dreamworks really paved the way with Monsters Vs. Aliens. The film was truly under appreciated in my mind, not only for its own merits as a film…but also in the realm of trailblazing 3-D. Remember that Superbowl Ad? That was just last year folks. Monsters Vs. Aliens delivered 3-D back into our consciousness. So here is the point, 3-D is a luxury. You don’t have to see it in 3-D, you could just as easily go spend $3 less and see it in that boring old dinosaur 2-D stuff. So in my mind, it doesn’t matter if the film was only $3 extra, or double the normal admission fee. If people are willing to pay the price for that experience, then the film deserves every dollar that lands in the pot.

So now that 3-D is becoming a regular thing, especially with the news that Warner Brothers is joining in on the action, what can you expect? Mr. Katzenberg wasn’t so crazy. You will be going to see probably 50% more 3-D films this year. So expect to be paying at least $3 more for each one of those awesome (Tron Legacy) movies. So how about those glasses that Katzenberg spoke of? I had a conversation with Peter Sciretta from /Film right after we spoke to Katzenberg. Pete said that there is no way that people would be paying $50 for a pair of 3-D glasses. So I threw this situation at him: You walk into a theater and you see a sign advertising “Limited Edition Transformers 3 – Optimus Prime 3-D glasses: $50″. So what did Pete say? He just laughed and said that I probably had a point. Now here is the moral of the story. If someone has something that someone wants, a price can be set. If anyone is willing to pay that price, then it is a fair price. So far 61 million people have found these prices to be fair, so expect the inevitable. These new ticket prices may not just be a 3-D thing, because on the eve of 3-D becoming the next big thing… these ticket prices could become an everyday thing.


RELATED ARTICLES
ARTICLE TAGS
  Previous Article
Next Article  
Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!
  • Rohith
    People are smart ... They know which movies are worth watching in 3D.
    The Studios will soon realize that not everyone watches everything in 3D.

    Avatar is an exception, I don't know if there is any other movie out there that had 80% of its gross from 3D sales.
  • Meself
    What concerns me more is that Technicolor is proposing a film-based stopgap measure for those not willing to invest in digital projection as more and more 3D films pile up at the box office with insufficient screens. They boast improved optics and using the circular polarisation that Real D and other digital systems currently use, but it's really nothing more than a dressed-up version of the old SpaceVision format, which used Techniscope-height frames on a single strip. Am I going to pay the premium for this type of presentation? Definitely not, but it was already tested with The Final Destination in some markets and viewers rated it the same as digital 3D. Accept no substitutes.
  • dfds
    they are also opening themselfs up to people getting fed up and pirating more and more. avatar did good because it came out during the holidays and it was the must see movie. high ticket prices will also hurt a lot of non-big movies and make even more people just wait for the dvd to come out
  • Aleric
    Gone with the Wind still sold MORE tickets than Avatar.
  • adamcharles
    Gone With the Wind was also released theatrically 6 times.
  • finalcrisis2
    I don't see why we would have to continue to pay the extra $3 for the 3-D viewing if we already have glasses from seeing some other 3-D movie. Now the 3-D glasses may change, however slightly from city to city int their respective theaters, but why can't I bring my 3-D glasses to one of the same 3 theaters that I always go to and get $3 knocked off? I know it cost more to make the movie all 3-D, but I can go see a regular screening of the same movie that's being offered in 3-D for the regular price. If they're so dead-set on making us pay the extra $3 over and over and over, why not just release the movie in 3-D and not in regular 2-D? Makes no sense.
  • I agree with everything you said here. I think it's unfair to qualify Avatar's record-breaking status with an asterisks because of 3D. The gross is the gross regardless of ticket prices. If it were only because of 3D, every 3D movie would be near the top.

    And this is coming from someone who really didn't like Avatar.
  • I guest wrote on a blog last summer, and the guy who created the site focuses mainly on box-office data with insights. He's been critiquing this 3D phenomenon for a while now. He's made some pretty interesting youtube videos about the stuff as well.

    Theboxofficejunkie.com
  • As you point out, people are willing to pay extra for 3D theater tickets, but will 3D effects motivate people to buy DVDs too? I think studios are mainly hoping that people will be willing to pay extra for home entertainment in 3D (as it becomes available). Time will tell on that one.
  • Anrkist
    I've got some ocean front property in Arizona that I've been trying to sell for years now.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow FILM SCHOOL REJECTS...


MOVIE NEWS | MOVIE TRAILERS | MOVIE REVIEWS | TV REVIEWS | FEATURES | INTERVIEWS | CONTESTS | ARCHIVES | ABOUT
Film School Rejects is the movie blog you've been waiting for. The ultimate commentary track on what's happening in Hollywood, FSR combines the freshest voices on the web and a swagger all its own to provide the best reviews, interviews and industry news coverage to millions of unique visitors from around the world every month.
FSR Team
Got a Tip? Send it here:
editors@filmschoolrejects.com
Publisher:
Neil Miller | Email
Managing Editor:
Cole Abaius | Email
Associate Editors:
Robert Fure | Email
Rob Hunter | Email
Contributors:
Adam Charles | Email
Amber Humphrey | Email
Brian Gibson | Email
Brian Salisbury | Email
Dustin Hucks | Email
Genevieve Blaber | Email
Contributors:
J.L. Sosa | Email
Jack Giroux | Email
Jeremy Kirk | Email
Jim Rohner | Email
Jorge Del Pinal | Email
Josh Radde | Email
Kevin Carr | Email
Contributors:
Landon Palmer | Email
Lauren Flanagan | Email
Paul Sileo | Email
Robert Levin | Email
Robin Ruinski | Email
Advertising:
sales@craveonline.com
All Rights Reserved © 2006-2010 Reject Media, LLC | Site Credits | Privacy Policy
Design & Development by Face3