Comments on: Chuck Palahniuk Would F*ck a Giant Panda Before He’d Save Your Child’s Life

By: Chris

Chris — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:38:32 +0000

Once again, normal sized pandas get ignored. Typical Hollywood.

By: Chris

Chris — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:38:00 +0000

Once again, normal sized pandas get ignored. Typical Hollywood.

By: Sam

Sam — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:29:01 +0000

Who doesn’t want to fuck a giant panda. Wait. I mean.

By: Sam

Sam — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:29:00 +0000

Who doesn’t want to fuck a giant panda. Wait. I mean.

By: Rob Hunter

Rob Hunter — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:57:39 +0000

@ Chris, is your head so full of science that you’ve no room left for grammar or comprehension? Did I say ‘mammal’ was a species? If I had said “outside of their class” it would have made no sense as humans, pandas, and goats are all of the same class. That was the point. They went outside of their own species to choose a mammal other than human.

Now instead of criticizing your stab at wit I’ll only say relax. This is a posting about a guy wanting to fuck a giant panda, and therefore isn’t worth such deep ruminations.

By: Rob Hunter

Rob Hunter — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:57:00 +0000

Now instead of criticizing your stab at wit I’ll only say relax. This is a posting about a guy wanting to fuck a giant panda, and therefore isn’t worth such deep ruminations.

By: Chris Mackey

Chris Mackey — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:29:47 +0000

The word is not species, the actual taxonomic rank of mammal is class. Wit does not
become you my good man.

By: Chris Mackey

Chris Mackey — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:29:00 +0000

The word is not species, the actual taxonomic rank of mammal is class. Wit does not
become you my good man.