<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bull Durham Sequel Confirmed, Original Stars Still Not Interested</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/bull-durham-sequel-confirmed-original-stars-still-not-interested.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/bull-durham-sequel-confirmed-original-stars-still-not-interested.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:57:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lsnaptodd</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/bull-durham-sequel-confirmed-original-stars-still-not-interested.php/comment-page-1#comment-137188</link>
		<dc:creator>Lsnaptodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=18542#comment-137188</guid>
		<description>This is the worst idea ever.  Why take such a chance in screwing up the rep of a great original? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the worst idea ever.  Why take such a chance in screwing up the rep of a great original?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lsnaptodd</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/bull-durham-sequel-confirmed-original-stars-still-not-interested.php/comment-page-1#comment-206481</link>
		<dc:creator>Lsnaptodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=18542#comment-206481</guid>
		<description>This is the worst idea ever.  Why take such a chance in screwing up the rep of a great original?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the worst idea ever.  Why take such a chance in screwing up the rep of a great original?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reg</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/bull-durham-sequel-confirmed-original-stars-still-not-interested.php/comment-page-1#comment-114363</link>
		<dc:creator>Reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=18542#comment-114363</guid>
		<description>I agree w/ JMoney, no thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree w/ JMoney, no thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reg</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/bull-durham-sequel-confirmed-original-stars-still-not-interested.php/comment-page-1#comment-206480</link>
		<dc:creator>Reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=18542#comment-206480</guid>
		<description>I agree w/ JMoney, no thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree w/ JMoney, no thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMoney</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/bull-durham-sequel-confirmed-original-stars-still-not-interested.php/comment-page-1#comment-114360</link>
		<dc:creator>JMoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=18542#comment-114360</guid>
		<description>No</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMoney</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/bull-durham-sequel-confirmed-original-stars-still-not-interested.php/comment-page-1#comment-206479</link>
		<dc:creator>JMoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=18542#comment-206479</guid>
		<description>No</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 298/304 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-14 02:55:56 -->
