Share submit to reddit

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Science has released the list of the seven films that are in the final running for the Best Visual Effects Oscar. As it stands every year, this is the chance for populist films (such as those Michael Bay makes) and mediocre films (The Golden Compass comes to mind) to take a shot at a little gold statue. It is also a heavily contested category, fought out by bug summer blockbusters and science fiction epics. You can see why it resonates with the crowds that hang around the web.

This year is as congested as any, with seven equally interesting finalists that will eventually be whittled down to a final three, then to the ultimate one on Oscar night. Among the finalists are titans of special effects (that Titanic guy) and masters of the explosion (Bay), alongside effects-heavy British wizards, bumbling Terminators and the end of the world. The landscape is vast, but there are frontrunners. Which is why I’ve broken down each film’s chances for you below.

Avatar

James Cameron’s latest is the leader in the clubhouse, with a late-December release that is fresh in the hearts and minds of the Academy members and a film that may or may not have changed 3D as we know it. Humanizing aliens is nothing we haven’t seen before (see District 9 below), but doing it on such an immense scale for 3-hours is a skill Cameron keeps all to his own. If there’s a sweep for Avatar, this will go with it. But a more discerning vote from the Academy will see it glad to be nominated.

District 9

I’m unabashedly in love with this movie and everything it means for filmmaking in the wild, on a moderate budget, and doing with with fucking style. Neill Blomkamp and Peter Jackson’s WETA wizards did something rare: they made aliens that we believe could exist. Furthermore, they let these aliens roam around in our real world, not a distant planet with electro-trees. It was an accomplishment ahead of its time. About three months ahead, to be exact.

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Low thought the fruit may hang, director David Yates and team were not quick to grab. And like Alfonso Cuaron did with the third entry in the Potter set, number six was dark and gritty and magical. It was big and sweeping, as an Potter should be. But it wasn’t anything that stood out in the tall forest of visual effects Redwoods. Does that make sense? Sure it does. Potter isn’t going to win this year.

Star Trek

If you were to pick a darkhorse in this race, it would be the space epic of J.J. Abrams. It was the year’s great shiny toy, the first polished and pretty blockbuster of the year. But that doesn’t mean it wasn’t awesome. It was awesome. And there are few shots more breathtaking than the emergence of the U.S.S. Enterprise for the first time. If one shot could win you an Oscar (it’s been done before), that shot could win. Unfortunately for Star Trek, there was a slew of equally impressive sci-fi engagements that came out later in the year.

Terminator Salvation

No.

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen

I will just come right out with it. Michael Bay was robbed in 2007. Transformers should have earned him a statue. Everyone knows this to be true. Instead, it was whisked away from him by CGI polar bears of The Golden Compass. The whole situation was tragic. Even more tragic is the fact that Bay and the masters at ILM came back with a bigger, better gathering of transforming alien robots in 2009. Some people complain that Bay’s movies are all visual effects, that they lack story. This is probably true. But the effects are awesome. Sadly, the fate of Bay and ILM will be similar to 2007, but they should make it to the nomination stage.

2012

Have we not grown tired of seeing Roland Emmerich end the world as we know it? It’s become so redundant that these special effects feel like re-tweaked versions of those used to blast mother Earth in The Day After Tomorrow. All Digital Domain had to do was pull up files from 2004 and dust them off a bit. You get an A for effort, Mr. Emmerich. At least you keep trying. But repetition does not an Oscar nomination make. Go hug the one you won for Independence Day to help subdue the pain of not earning a nomination.

Who will win?

In all likelihood, Avatar will take home the prize. This year is shaping up to be the year of James Cameron, and the Oscars may very well follow suit. While District 9 would be a wonderful surprise, as would Star Trek, neither of these films has the sheer amount of force behind them that Cameron has built with Avatar. An unlikely but not surprising win for Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (a payback from the Academy to Michael Bay for their egregious mistake of 2007) is the only alternate scenario I see.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

RELATED ARTICLES
ARTICLE TAGS
  Previous Article
Next Article  
Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

Leave a Reply

  1. navibluecom says:

    That is cool and so is Avatar. This Avatar fansite is cool too. http://www.Naviblue.com

  2. nechoplex says:

    Avatar all the way! There is no competition.

  3. Merrill Barr says:

    Thank you for acknowledging that Bay was robbed in 07. At least it will be a deserving loss this year.

  4. avaela says:

    kinda surprised Watchmen didn't get a nomination =(

  5. Kangaroo Be Stoned says:

    I would argue that Manhattan looks pretty bad.

  6. Cole_Abaius says:

    Ugh. The blatant Raisin Bran product placement in this article makes me sick. How much did they pay you sell outs? 30 pieces of silver I bet.

  7. ana says:

    +10 points for the terminator evaluation. made me smile

  8. RobertFure says:

    Transformers 2 could beat Avatar if it wasn't a Michael Bay movie. Avatar, for the most part, is an animated film. It's hard to create, but not hard to blend. Transformers 2 put dozens of robots with hundreds of moving parts and thousands of individually designed pieces seamlessly into live action footage. The robots look real and they look like they belong in the environment.

  9. stevenkar says:

    What's wrong with the SFX of Terminator 4?

    I know it was an awful movie, but so were Trannies 1 and 2.

    I thought the SFX of T4 were quite good and believable, though they didn't show us anything new. Much like the SFX of T3.

    And if Trannies 1 lost, then why should Trannies 2 get the recognition, especially since it's more of the same. The SFX were pretty impressive though.

  10. PHiL McCrakin says:

    Cameron will get it, even though AVATAR is a good movie, not great, but good. The tech aspect alone would earn him an oscar. I didn't see Transformers 2 but I'm sure the FX are fantastic because those robots have serious FX alone. 2012, meh, I'm the FX are nice but I think it will come down to AVATAR or Transformers 2 and maybe Star Trek.

    I hope District 9 wins because those effects are noticeable but subtitle because it goes with the story NOT trying to throw the FX in your face.

  11. blazing6shooter says:

    well, Watchmen was at least above terminator salvation

  12. sgtzim says:

    It's the “hard to create” part that will get Avatar the Oscar. Who the hell cares if it's all animated and they don't have to integrate it with live action (for the most part). Blending live action and CG elements is nothing new and is done on almost every movie. They don't give VFX Oscars for great compositing, they give it to the film that has advanced the field of Visual Effects, which Avatar has. Organic, living breathing characters that you connect to will always trump giant robot that are basically the same as they were in the first Transformers movie.

    I actually wouldn't be surprised if TF2 didn't get nominated. I'm predicting the final three will be Avatar, 2012 and District 9, with Avatar's win being a guarantee.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow FILM SCHOOL REJECTS...


MOVIE NEWS | MOVIE TRAILERS | MOVIE REVIEWS | TV REVIEWS | FEATURES | INTERVIEWS | CONTESTS | ABOUT
Film School Rejects is the movie blog you've been waiting for. The ultimate commentary track on what's happening in Hollywood, FSR combines the freshest voices on the web and a swagger all its own to provide the best reviews, interviews and industry news coverage to millions of unique visitors from around the world every month.
FSR Team
Got a Tip? Send it here:
editors@filmschoolrejects.com
Publisher:
Neil Miller | Email
Managing Editor:
Cole Abaius | Email
Associate Editors:
Robert Fure | Email
Rob Hunter | Email
Contributors:
Adam Charles | Email
Amber Humphrey | Email
Brian Gibson | Email
Brian Salisbury | Email
Dustin Hucks | Email
Genevieve Blaber | Email
Contributors:
J.L. Sosa | Email
Jack Giroux | Email
Jeremy Kirk | Email
Jim Rohner | Email
Jorge Del Pinal | Email
Josh Radde | Email
Kevin Carr | Email
Contributors:
Landon Palmer | Email
Lauren Flanagan | Email
Paul Sileo | Email
Robert Levin | Email
Robin Ruinsky | Email
Advertising:
sales@craveonline.com
All Rights Reserved © 2006-2010 Reject Media, LLC | Site Credits | Privacy Policy
Design & Development by Face3