Blockbuster Sequels To Follow The Dark Knight’s IMAX Lead

Posted by Conrad Rothbaum (conrad@filmschoolrejects.com) on August 12, 2008

Transformers and Night at the Museum go IMAX

Well, perhaps it’s happened: the moons aligned, big budget blockbuster has met the character study, the hype has been satisfied, and the studio executives are taking the right cues.

The proverbial thermometer has officially burst: The Dark Knight has made over $700 million worldwide, a good portion of which comes from tickets sold at IMAX theaters. In its first two weekends, fans rabidly pursued any available seats at the major IMAX theaters, knowing that some of the film was shot specially on IMAX cameras (the first fiction film to ever be shot this way), and that the IMAX experience was the best way to see Dark Knight.

Do you remember that period of ten days when all of The Dark Knight IMAX show-times were sold out, every single one? I do. Ah, three weeks ago. It was a much simpler world back then.

Well, now that The Dark Knight is on its way to becoming the highest grossing movie of all time, studios have been eager to hop on that money-train, trying to isolate what The Dark Knight got so right—and though I would have preferred for them to realize that a complex, layered story and rich character arcs were the way to go– it seems that they have decided that a wide release on IMAX screens is the key to success.

Upcoming high-profile sequels with epic colons in their names Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen and Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian will see release on IMAX screens in mid-2009. While it doesn’t look like they will be shot on IMAX cameras, it probably won’t matter: their prequel counterparts had no trouble making big box office money (Transformers made $708 million worldwide at the end of its run in 2007, while NATM made $574 million when it bowed out of theaters).

While it’s not a great leap forward, it’s a start: The Dark Knight’s success could mean a change in approach for many studio executives.


Read more articles by Conrad Rothbaum

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • The only reason I've seen Dark Knight on the Imax screen is because it was shot with Imax cameras. Blowing up a standard film to a large format has been done so many times, it's hardly news anymore.
  • David
    Wow,has TDK really made that 700 mil already?? Holy Canoli Batman!!! ...sorry... i am shame-faced :|
  • Mr.Carl.Lee
    I frequent the IMAX theatre. I believe its a format that never really took off, because no one appropriately applied themselves to it. Christopher Nolan has and now we'll see some other directors follow. Many will fail miserably but hopefully Hollywood will be as stubborn as they've been in the past and wait it out--make it work.

    I suspect this change of heart is a direct result of Christopher Nolan's premiere speech before studio exec. and the animals out of their element.
  • Nevernude
    WTF! So the Dark Knight makes loads of money by being released in IMAX and every movie suddenly wants a bit of the action!...okay lets analyse this 4 a minute, yes TDK made money but it wasnt purely through being shot/released in IMAX. it was a good solid movie. If other movies want to follow suit, i would suggest going the "good solid movie" route rather than the IMAX route. I would personally watch a movie regardless of IMAX or not as long as it is great.
blog comments powered by Disqus