Share submit to reddit

awards-thehurtlocker

The wonderful group of fine professional film critics and journalists known as the Austin Film Critics Association — a group that includes the membership of yours truly and FSR Managing Editor Dr. Cole Abaius — has announced its award winners for the year 2009.

Within said winners are plenty of unsurprising results, including the unanimous support for Kathryn Bigelow’s The Hurt Locker, which took home Best Picture, Best Director and Best Cinematography. We also delivered the Best Actor award to Colin Firth, whose performance in A Single Man seems to have him right in the Oscar hunt with George Clooney (Up in the Air) and Jeff Bridges (Crazy Heart).

Among the surprises, Mélanie Laurent came out of nowhere to take Best Actress for her role in Inglourious Basterds, with co-star Christoph Waltz winning yet another Best Supporting Actor award (I wonder if he’ll win the Oscar…) Two fantastic choices (my votes, for sure) in the Best Foreign Film and Best Documentary categories, with Sin Nombre and Anvil! The Story of Anvil winning respectively.

And finally, there are the categories unique to AFCA. Best Austin Film went to Me and Orson Welles, which was directed by Austin native son Richard Linklater, and Best First Film went to Neill Blomkamp for District 9. As well, we at AFCA delivered our Best of the Decade list, with Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind taking best film of the aughts.

The complete listing of winners is below.

Best Film:
The Hurt Locker

Best Director:
Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker

Best Actor:
Colin Firth, A Single Man

Best Actress:
Mélanie Laurent, Inglourious Basterds

Best Supporting Actor:
Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds

Best Supporting Actress:
Anna Kendrick, Up in the Air

Best Original Screenplay:
Inglourious Basterds, Quentin Tarantino

Best Adapted Screenplay:
Up in the Air, Jason Reitman and Sheldon Turner

Best Cinematography:
The Hurt Locker, Barry Ackroyd

Best Original Score:
Up, Michael Giacchino

Best Foreign Language Film:
Sin Nombre, Cary Fukunaga

Best Documentary:
Anvil! The Story of Anvil

Best Animated Feature:
Up

Best First Film:
District 9, Neill Blomkamp

Breakthrough Artist Award:
Christian McKay, Me and Orson Welles

Austin Film Award:

Me and Orson Welles

Top 10 Films:
1. The Hurt Locker (Summit)
2. Star Trek (Paramount)
3. Up (Pixar)
4. A Serious Man (Focus)
5. Up in the Air (Paramount)
6. Avatar (20th Century Fox)
7. Inglourious Basterds (The Weinstein Co.)
8. District 9 (TriStar)
9. Where the Wild Things Are (Warner Bros.)
10. (tie) Moon (Sony Pictures Classic), The Messenger (Oscilloscope)

Top 10 Films of the Decade:
1. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004)
2. There Will Be Blood (2007)
3. The Lord of the Rings (2001-2003)
4. The Dark Knight (2008)
5. Requiem for a Dream (2000)
6. Kill Bill (2003/4)
7. No Country for Old Men (2007)
8. The Incredibles (2004)
9. Children of Men (2006)
10. (tie) Memento (2000), The Departed (2006)


RELATED ARTICLES
ARTICLE TAGS
  Previous Article
Next Article  
Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!
  • Jeff R Hall
    Dr. Abiuas - You are correct that money does not equal Oscar success, but has there ever been a best picture nod for a movie with such a low gross? (And presumably number of screens it played on?)

    The thing about big money films is exposure. I know that Oscar voters are offered screenings and DVDs to watch the nominees, but I'd also bet that most of the elegible voters don't watch or attend. (Not due to negligence, but real life priorites like family and work.)

    Frankly, I think The Hurt Locker was the best film of the year. I'm just hoping that enough Oscar voters agree with me.
  • adamcharles
    Letters from Iwo Jima only grossed 13 million domestically, and at the time the Academy Awards were announced in 2008 There Will Be Blood had only grossed about 16 million or so (it capped out at 40 mil). Frost/Nixon only grossed about 18 million.

    It's not so much that The Hurt Locker didn't make a lot of money and therefore may be affected come Oscar time because of it, it's that it has no names attached that really carry any kind of Oscar notoriety like the above films do, plus it came out during the summer and isn't as fresh on everyone's mind.

    Clint Eastwood, Ron Howard, and now even PT Anderson have all worked their way into the minds of Oscar voters and can get over a lackluster boxoffice intake to receive nominations. Kathryn Bigelow doesn't have the Oscar history to do the same. If The Hurt Locker had any kind of name attached to it in a major role nobody would question its likelihood to get nominated, but since it doesn't and doesn't have a big directorial name either it's not quite as likely. Though, still pretty damn likely considering there are 10 total nominees this year. I can't imagine which 10 movies are picked if The Hurt Locker isn't one of them.
  • Jeff R Hall
    Oooohhh, good points. I didn't realize Blood had grossed so little and had forgotten that Letters got a (well deserved) nod.

    A better point and one that I feel I echoed, but not nearly as eloquently, is the lack of name recognition in The Hurt Locker. It seems to have made such a small impact and you nailed exactly why. It was critically regonized as much as the other films mentioned, but it's not as "sexy." Oscar voters are NOT always the film geeks we are. They are just folks who are in the industry.

    The 10 slots will be the reason The Hurt Locker gets noted (Presuming it does of course) but I still doubt there is any way it will get a nod, no matter how deserving.
  • Jeff R Hall
    I'm glad to see that The Hurt Locker is getting notice, at least from the Austin critics. I'm curious if this film will even make the top ten Oscar list? Seeing that it has only grossed $12 Million dollars it's a good bet that most of the Oscar voters have not seen this film.
  • Cole_Abaius
    I would bet major money that The Hurt Locker has a solid showing at the Oscars. If it doesn't get a Best Picture nomination, I'd be dumbfounded.

    Plus, movies that don't gross much money have a track record of success with the Academy....
  • The group earns respect for placing The Hurt Locker at #1, but loses it all when they put Star Trek as the #2 film of the year. It was a fun movie, but come on people...

    Happily the AFCA regains that respect by naming Eternal Sunshine as #1 of the decade. Great choice!
  • I found the high placement of Star Trek to be interesting. I know I didn't have it that high, and wouldn't expect Abaius to place it up there. However, you do have to remember that we share voting rights with the Ain't It Cool kids... And they eat that shit up.

    That said, I loved Trek (obviously) and was surprised at the well-roundedness of our Decade list. That, and I voted for Melanie Laurent, goddamnit!
  • Cole_Abaius
    I didn't have it on my list at all. Because, you know, it's not one of the 10 Best of the year. Plus, I didn't have many slots since I put The Hurt Locker on there three times.
  • Now, now, now Neil, before the Reject kids start throwing stones at the Ain't it Cool kids, keep in mind that placement has everything to do with HOW MANY LISTS IT APPEARED ON and very little to do with how high it was. Many of us didn't bother to order our Top 10s. The fact that you put STAR TREK on your list is why it ranked so high, whereas several of these films didn't appear on some of our lists at all.

    Read more at Film School Rejects: Austin Film Critics Agree, The Hurt Locker is Best of ‘09 - Film School Rejects http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/austin-fi...
  • I propose a televised, back-alley fight... Jets v. Sharks style. We'll settle this turf war once and for all!

    Seriously though, I thought we were supposed to order those top tens. Either way, you're right. It probably wasn't the AICN kids, and likely has something to do with me laying down love for Trek at the AFCA pre-vote dinner. That said, I'm still surprised to see it go so high. That couldn't have been all me...
blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow FILM SCHOOL REJECTS...


MOVIE NEWS | MOVIE TRAILERS | MOVIE REVIEWS | TV REVIEWS | FEATURES | INTERVIEWS | CONTESTS | ARCHIVES | ABOUT
Film School Rejects is the movie blog you've been waiting for. The ultimate commentary track on what's happening in Hollywood, FSR combines the freshest voices on the web and a swagger all its own to provide the best reviews, interviews and industry news coverage to millions of unique visitors from around the world every month.
FSR Team
Got a Tip? Send it here:
editors@filmschoolrejects.com
Publisher:
Neil Miller | Email
Managing Editor:
Cole Abaius | Email
Associate Editors:
Robert Fure | Email
Rob Hunter | Email
Contributors:
Adam Charles | Email
Amber Humphrey | Email
Brian Gibson | Email
Brian Salisbury | Email
Dustin Hucks | Email
Genevieve Blaber | Email
Contributors:
J.L. Sosa | Email
Jack Giroux | Email
Jeremy Kirk | Email
Jim Rohner | Email
Jorge Del Pinal | Email
Josh Radde | Email
Kevin Carr | Email
Contributors:
Landon Palmer | Email
Lauren Flanagan | Email
Paul Sileo | Email
Robert Levin | Email
Robin Ruinski | Email
Advertising:
sales@craveonline.com
All Rights Reserved © 2006-2010 Reject Media, LLC | Site Credits | Privacy Policy
Design & Development by Face3