‘Atlas Shrugged’ to be Just as Boring in Film Form

Posted by Dr. Cole Abaius (cole.abaius@filmschoolrejects.com) on April 1, 2009

atlasshruggedbanner

That’s right, Masters candidates in literature, I said it. “Atlas Shrugged” is over 900 pages of boredom that Eric Blair could have written with one hand tied behind his back. In college, we used to haze pledges by making them stay awake while listening to a lecture Ayn Rand gave in San Francisco. So we weren’t the coolest fraternity ever. That’s true.

Feel free to debate the meaning or worth of the novel amongst yourselves. However, we may get to see what the masterwork will look like when chopped down into something palatable enough for the big screen.

According to a fantastic entry over at Variety’s Risky Business Blog, the long-dormant project might finally be getting some new life.

Baldwin Entertainment and Lionsgate have been involved for some time, but Relativity Media might hop on board to help with financing. This would put the wheels in motion just a bit further while the project attempts to nab a leading lady to play the main role of Dagny Taggart – the corporate executive desperate for true free-market competition and innovation in a world of stagnation. Variety claims that “serious interest” has been expressed by Angelina Jolie, Charlize Theron, Julia Roberts and Anne Hathaway, but it’s unclear what that vague term really means. At this point, it’s far too soon to tell who will end up with the role or whether the flick will ever get off the ground at all.

It’s stalled before. For, say, since the novel first hit the scene. But now the production is anxious to ramp up in order to take advantage of the current political climate (and to, more concretely, avoid having the rights revert back to Rand estate at the end of 2010). So there may be some fire there, but it seems obvious that Atlas Shrugged is still back behind the starting line.

I just hope that the film version has a totally dry 50-minute monologue in the middle of it explaining the nuances of Objectivism and explains why punching homeless people to steal their change is ethical in the world of free-market competition. Actually, it might be nice just to see a 50-minute long hobo fight instead. Plus, I can’t wait for casting news when every entertainment magazine and site ever has a headline that reads: “Who is John Galt? We Know!”

What do you think? Did you love/hate the novel? Did you realize that FSR doesn’t condone hobo fights because one of its editors was a hobo for a few months? Fun facts!


Read more articles by Dr. Cole Abaius

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Richard
    "Punching homeless people to steal their change" you blithering moron? Did you even read the book? Jeez- lying bastard.
  • exactly... that's Ayn Rand's philosophy.
  • I didn't read the book, but they talked about it on The Colbert Report and it looks awful!


    (veiled sarcasm there, btw)
  • Jon G
    This article needs an additional tag/topic of Reasons You Don't Come to FSR for Literature/Philosophy/Politics.

    Your statements show mild comedy masking heavy ignorance. Your information on the status of a film is welcome. Your commentary on a philosophy you really do not understand is most annoying and in fact reinforces much of what she says.

    And also, Atlas Shrugged was very poorly written compared to Fountainhead. There's some bait for the Randroids.
  • Mike Bay
    I hope Michael Bay gets cast as director!
  • Mbessgettios
    So... will half the movie just be a guy staring at the screen giving a monologue about Objectivism?
  • Fuck Ayn rand and fuck those people who love her ideas of greed, capitalism, and exploitation.
  • Samir
    I didn't read Atlas Shrugged or The Fountainhead or anything worth reading about Ayn Rynd. However, knowing how egotistical, ego-centric, and narcissitic the people are who enjoy and ascribe to her philosophical leanings almost makes me want to punch a hobo in the face and then give him a $5 bill for being a good sport.

    In any respect, her readings are just as worthless and trite as the many spin-offs of Sun Tzu's The Art of War for Executives or Managers or Women or Success. You can put dog shit and cat shit together and call it bread pudding for all I care, but at the end of the day you are still eating and regurgitating shit.
  • David G
    I like long walks on the beach. Cozing up by a small digital fire. Hot esspreso mocha in one hand, For the New Intellectual in the other. Ahh..beatnik bliss..
  • David G
    By the way, did you say hobo or homo? Just asking.
blog comments powered by Disqus