Comments on: A Sequel To ‘Hancock’ You Say? Aww Hell Meh…

By: michaeldance

michaeldance — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:09:29 +0000

I actually agree that Wolverine wasn't bad at all. I just liked Hancock a lot more than most people did.

By: Aleric

Aleric — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:06:37 +0000

I disagree with you on Terminator and Wolverine wasn't bad they simply tried to squeeze too much into one movie. But to each his own.

By: michaeldance

michaeldance — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:36:31 +0000

You know, the first hour of Hancock was so good that I gave the third act a pass. Everything up until “the twist” was a damn fine film. So the same team starting with a fresh script, and not one that's been kicking around Hollywood being constantly rewritten for a few years? I'll go with that.

I mean, honestly, let's count the movies from this summer that were worse than Hancock. Terminator… Transformers… G.I. Joe… Wolverine… I can't go on.

By: Aleric

Aleric — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:06:37 +0000

I disagree with you on Terminator and Wolverine wasn't bad they simply tried to squeeze too much into one movie. But to each his own.

By: michaeldance

michaeldance — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:36:31 +0000

I mean, honestly, let's count the movies from this summer that were worse than Hancock. Terminator… Transformers… G.I. Joe… Wolverine… I can't go on.

By: Rohith

Rohith — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:02:02 +0000

I hated the first movie and I will not watch a sequel for this useless movie.

By: merc_the_greatest

merc_the_greatest — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:39:37 +0000

Handcock was amusing exciting and an all around thrilling movie. its a shame to see people talk poorly of a movie i enjoyed so much. idk if a sequel is a good idea but i wouldnt miss it for the world.

By: Aleric

Aleric — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:22:14 +0000

And the fact that they marketed the movie as something it wasn't had nothing to do with the negative reviews did it? Nahhhh

It's basically Will Smith being the savior of the world……..again.

By: Icarus II

Icarus II — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:04:01 +0000

What they could have done is split the first movie into two parts and expand upon the story more for each as well as bump up the character development. Hancock just seemed a bit rushed after the first hour.

By: JayJayCAW

JayJayCAW — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:48:50 +0000

Hancock 2………………..yea I'll be skipping that one, gave the first one a chance and I went it thinking it would be bad and left being right lol

By: PHiL

PHiL — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:15:41 +0000

Hancock 2: The Soich For More Money!

By: finalcrisis2

finalcrisis2 — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:40:00 +0000

My favorite part of that movie was the end credits. As in, the movie was over. (Just in case you didn't get that)

By: Jim_Rohner

Jim_Rohner — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:13:06 +0000

My favorite part of the whole movie came in the scene during the credits when Hancock has moved onto NYC and the possibly coked up criminal sees him and says, “damn, it's hand job.” I lol'ed.