Reject Report: Bond’s Quantum of Box Office Success

Posted by John Cairns (jcairns@filmschoolrejects.com) on November 17, 2008

The Reject Report

Well, we all knew this was going to be a big weekend for James Bond in North America, since Quantum of Solace was smashing records all over the rest of the world for the last two weeks. How big was this Bond? Well, it was only the biggest domestic opening for an 007 movie in history. Quantum of Solace brought in $70 million in 3,451 theaters.

That showing compares favorably to the $69 million brought in by The Bourne Ultimatum, the last Jason Bourne flick. It’s also nearly $30 million more than what Casino Royale did for business its opening weekend. Overall, this latest Bond movie has grossed $322 million worldwide. It’s an absolute money train, this flick.

I gotta tell you, though, I have mixed feelings about this week’s box office haul. Sure, Daniel Craig was awesome again as Bond, but I have to share the view of folks like Roger Ebert who complained loudly in his review that James Bond is “not an action hero”, and that this flick was too much of a departure from the other James Bond movies. Where were the catchphrases, the gadgets, the larger-than-life villains? Where the heck was Q, and Moneypenny? Were they let go in cutbacks due to the economic situation? And why the heck didn’t Bond — this Bond — make much more of a play for Olga Kurylenko when he had the chance? Maybe because he was too broken up over Vesper Lynd? Who knows. You can bet Sean Connery’s and Roger Moore’s Bonds would have been all over her, guaranteed.

Maybe it’s a sign of the times, but Bond is just not a nice guy these days. He’s not enjoying life much at all and just isn’t himself. He’s not even into girls.

It seemed obvious to me and to a lot of other people that this latest flick went too far in the Bourne direction. What they really needed to do was find some sort of middle ground between the old Bond movies and this latest reboot of the franchise — and throw a bone to the audience occasionally to remind us from time to time that we’re watching a James Bond movie.

Well, the sad news for us die-hard fans is that the producers over at EON Productions are going to look at this $70 million dollar money train, the biggest Bond opening in history, and they’ll consider it an endorsement of the direction of the franchise. This movie made almost exactly the same amount of money that Bourne did in North America in its opening.

We’re going to get more Bond-as-Bourne movies, guaranteed, now. Some people will like that. Me, I need a drink.

Here’s a look at the box office totals and I dare everyone in Hollywood to cry about suffering from hard times after you read this:

1. Quantum of Solace $70.4 million
2. Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa $36.1 million
3. Role Models $11.7 million
4. High School Musical 3: Senior Year $5.8 million
5. Changeling
$4.2 million
6. Zack and Miri Make a Porno
$3.2 million
7. Soul Men $2.4 million
8. Saw V $2.4 million
9. The Secret Life of Bees $1.8 million
10. The Haunting of Molly Hartley $1.6 million

If the folks who work in the motion picture department at Sony get their Christmas bonuses cut this year, they will be getting ripped off, that’s for sure. The movie business is definitely NOT in recession, as far as I can tell from these figures. Maybe the TV and DVD business is going down the tubes, but not the movie business.

Stay tuned for what is sure to be another highly-anticipated weekend next week as Twilight and Bolt both roll out to what looks like big, blockbuster openings.


Read more articles by John Cairns

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • dos
    I'd like to think that James Bond is what Batman would be if Batman was a novel and not a comic book. With Batman, you constantly have a fanbase who are deep into the original material, and from day one know what Batman is supposed to be.

    If we became familiar with the Adam West Batman tv series first and never decided to look at the original material, which accounts for the general Bond fans who have never read the Bond books, you would constantly have this argument as to what Batman (or in this case Bond) is suppose to be.

    The same thing is going on with Star Trek and how the fans are reacting to the trailer. A lot of fans talk about how the trailer's cheap because it's filled with sexual themes, action, and pulpy space adventure, but if you think about the original series and what it was all about, you would realize that there was sex, action (well not much, remember that crappy fight scene that Ben Stiller was watching in Tropic Thunder?), and it was suppose to be a pulpy sci fi adventure.

    Maybe Wikipedia's lying to me (which it could be) but Roddenberry probably had Flash Gordon in mind (the same way Lucas had Flash Gordon in mind) when he decided to make the series.

    The main point I'm trying to state here is that we have a lot of people complaining about what things are suppose to be to the point where they would not be happy unless they directed their own beloved franchise and destroyed it on their own time. There are so many better things to argue about that could lead to a better solution to all of the world's problems, and if a franchise is worth so much to you, you have every right to go down to California and picket or flood the e-mails and write to your local congressman, or threaten sponsors or whatever.

    Screw this, I'm gonna read a book.
  • Patrick. T
    Just out of curiosity, if someone in the "know" could answer this but, do they factor in rising ticket prices. Because I work for Cineplex Entertainment (Canada's largest theater chain) and on Nov 1st our ticket prices went up .55cents. Now that may not be that substantial but it could definitely make a difference of a few million right? Especially when comparing bourne's opening to QoS.


    Just a thought I may be wrong, anyone?
  • leonkennedy
    lets think of it like this... batman begins came out in 2005 and this was a reboot of
    our franchise as batman fans from the tim burton direction and joel schushitter and
    this reboot made us happy followed by a successful sequel,

    now lets apply this to bond

    2006 casino royale came out... which was in a sense a different take and in a way a
    reboot of the franchise since the peirce brosnon ones went terribly down hill after
    golden eye which ironically is the same director as casino royale....

    all i am saying is people should stop nit picking and go with what is given, cause
    nothing is going to change, this isnt sean connery bonds, or roger moore bonds,
    cause thats been done... why do something or even take from something that has
    already been there.

    they have done a splendid and fantastic job tipping there hats to the old bonds
    already they kept money penny in there, and he still drinks like a alcoholic, and he
    still bangs girls like a pimp. Its just daniel craig is doing it more edgy and ruff and i
    personally think the more hardcore badass bond applies to real life more, then
    some over the top super agent who does everything all smooth and never once gets
    fucked up, sure you know daniel craig isnt gonna die but he does get messed up
    and is always in trouble.
  • leonkennedy
    not money penny i meant they kept M in there my bad

    Typo :)
  • Aren't the british accents enough to tell you your watching a bond film?
  • djjeffhall
    John - Why are you complaining? Both this and Casino Royale are great films. So what if they don't stick to every single tired and worn Bond cliche? I'll grant that I love hearing, "Bond. James Bond," but Quantum Of Solace is no less a film for not passing over using it.

    Be thankful that we have a pair of great films to enjoy. If that means that the makers skip a couple of the "usual suspects" we come to expect in a regular Bond film, I think the sacrifice is worth while.
blog comments powered by Disqus