<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 35 New Images to Prove that Wanted Will Kick Ass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adsl viettel</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-159047</link>
		<dc:creator>adsl viettel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-159047</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s awesome. I&#039;m very glad you posted this. So i have just given it a Digg :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s awesome. I&#39;m very glad you posted this. So i have just given it a Digg :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendell</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-96735</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 05:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-96735</guid>
		<description>Disliking a movie because it doesn&#039;t adhere to the &quot;laws of physics&quot; is almost as laughable as a person who takes that position of opinion behaving as if they know the laws of physics. that being said, ITS A MOVIE PEOPLE. We know its make believe, so how can you dislike something that is make believe because it is not &quot;real&quot; enough. As far as the &quot;bad CGI&quot; from what I have seen it looks very crisp and natural. I don&#039;t get the animosity, seems like negativity just for the sake of negativity, and thats just lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disliking a movie because it doesn&#8217;t adhere to the &#8220;laws of physics&#8221; is almost as laughable as a person who takes that position of opinion behaving as if they know the laws of physics. that being said, ITS A MOVIE PEOPLE. We know its make believe, so how can you dislike something that is make believe because it is not &#8220;real&#8221; enough. As far as the &#8220;bad CGI&#8221; from what I have seen it looks very crisp and natural. I don&#8217;t get the animosity, seems like negativity just for the sake of negativity, and thats just lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendell</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-192465</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 05:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-192465</guid>
		<description>Disliking a movie because it doesn&#039;t adhere to the &quot;laws of physics&quot; is almost as laughable as a person who takes that position of opinion behaving as if they know the laws of physics. that being said, ITS A MOVIE PEOPLE. We know its make believe, so how can you dislike something that is make believe because it is not &quot;real&quot; enough. As far as the &quot;bad CGI&quot; from what I have seen it looks very crisp and natural. I don&#039;t get the animosity, seems like negativity just for the sake of negativity, and thats just lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disliking a movie because it doesn&#8217;t adhere to the &#8220;laws of physics&#8221; is almost as laughable as a person who takes that position of opinion behaving as if they know the laws of physics. that being said, ITS A MOVIE PEOPLE. We know its make believe, so how can you dislike something that is make believe because it is not &#8220;real&#8221; enough. As far as the &#8220;bad CGI&#8221; from what I have seen it looks very crisp and natural. I don&#8217;t get the animosity, seems like negativity just for the sake of negativity, and thats just lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-96675</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-96675</guid>
		<description>@Chris - i saw some of those extended scenes as well at WonderCon earlier this year and they&#039;re what I&#039;m basing my opinion on. The entire car chase was absurd... I don&#039;t care about her steering with her legs, I care that for someone who can apparently control bullets she can&#039;t hit the bad guy&#039;s tires even once?  Don&#039;t get me started on the flip through the air onto the side of the bus... bad effects don&#039;t help.  I love action movies, just not stupid looking ones like Wanted, Crank, Shoot &#039;Em Up... As you said, opinions are opinions... it&#039;s just that mine are more accurate than yours apparently. (Relax, that&#039;s called a joke.) Read Fure&#039;s comments above as he explains the distinction pretty darn well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris &#8211; i saw some of those extended scenes as well at WonderCon earlier this year and they&#8217;re what I&#8217;m basing my opinion on. The entire car chase was absurd&#8230; I don&#8217;t care about her steering with her legs, I care that for someone who can apparently control bullets she can&#8217;t hit the bad guy&#8217;s tires even once?  Don&#8217;t get me started on the flip through the air onto the side of the bus&#8230; bad effects don&#8217;t help.  I love action movies, just not stupid looking ones like Wanted, Crank, Shoot &#8216;Em Up&#8230; As you said, opinions are opinions&#8230; it&#8217;s just that mine are more accurate than yours apparently. (Relax, that&#8217;s called a joke.) Read Fure&#8217;s comments above as he explains the distinction pretty darn well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-192464</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-192464</guid>
		<description>@Chris - i saw some of those extended scenes as well at WonderCon earlier this year and they&#039;re what I&#039;m basing my opinion on. The entire car chase was absurd... I don&#039;t care about her steering with her legs, I care that for someone who can apparently control bullets she can&#039;t hit the bad guy&#039;s tires even once?  Don&#039;t get me started on the flip through the air onto the side of the bus... bad effects don&#039;t help.  I love action movies, just not stupid looking ones like Wanted, Crank, Shoot &#039;Em Up... As you said, opinions are opinions... it&#039;s just that mine are more accurate than yours apparently. (Relax, that&#039;s called a joke.) Read Fure&#039;s comments above as he explains the distinction pretty darn well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris &#8211; i saw some of those extended scenes as well at WonderCon earlier this year and they&#8217;re what I&#8217;m basing my opinion on. The entire car chase was absurd&#8230; I don&#8217;t care about her steering with her legs, I care that for someone who can apparently control bullets she can&#8217;t hit the bad guy&#8217;s tires even once?  Don&#8217;t get me started on the flip through the air onto the side of the bus&#8230; bad effects don&#8217;t help.  I love action movies, just not stupid looking ones like Wanted, Crank, Shoot &#8216;Em Up&#8230; As you said, opinions are opinions&#8230; it&#8217;s just that mine are more accurate than yours apparently. (Relax, that&#8217;s called a joke.) Read Fure&#8217;s comments above as he explains the distinction pretty darn well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-96627</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 04:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-96627</guid>
		<description>prior to seeing the scenes at comic con, i agree. but after seeing them and seeing everything play out as it would in the movie, i dont. but its easy for me to say that when ive seen 3 5-8 minute long clips and most people have only seen the 2 minute trailers. 

itll be better then the trailers show trust me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prior to seeing the scenes at comic con, i agree. but after seeing them and seeing everything play out as it would in the movie, i dont. but its easy for me to say that when ive seen 3 5-8 minute long clips and most people have only seen the 2 minute trailers. </p>
<p>itll be better then the trailers show trust me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-192463</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 04:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-192463</guid>
		<description>prior to seeing the scenes at comic con, i agree. but after seeing them and seeing everything play out as it would in the movie, i dont. but its easy for me to say that when ive seen 3 5-8 minute long clips and most people have only seen the 2 minute trailers. 

itll be better then the trailers show trust me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prior to seeing the scenes at comic con, i agree. but after seeing them and seeing everything play out as it would in the movie, i dont. but its easy for me to say that when ive seen 3 5-8 minute long clips and most people have only seen the 2 minute trailers. </p>
<p>itll be better then the trailers show trust me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriels Burg</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-96622</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriels Burg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 03:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-96622</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; the entire plot isnt going to be told to you in the trailer

That&#039;s an interesting comment given how many trailers now give away so much of the movie that it kills the experience.

Personally, I can look past curving bullets and what not if it fits the world of the story.  My issue with Wanted is that it looks completely and totally charmless -- as if it lacks any redeeming sense of soul or character.  Perhaps it&#039;s just poor marketing/badly cut trailer, but the movie simply looks like an assembly-line action film.  I just don&#039;t see anything to care about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; the entire plot isnt going to be told to you in the trailer</p>
<p>That&#8217;s an interesting comment given how many trailers now give away so much of the movie that it kills the experience.</p>
<p>Personally, I can look past curving bullets and what not if it fits the world of the story.  My issue with Wanted is that it looks completely and totally charmless &#8212; as if it lacks any redeeming sense of soul or character.  Perhaps it&#8217;s just poor marketing/badly cut trailer, but the movie simply looks like an assembly-line action film.  I just don&#8217;t see anything to care about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriels Burg</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-192462</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriels Burg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 03:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-192462</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; the entire plot isnt going to be told to you in the trailer

That&#039;s an interesting comment given how many trailers now give away so much of the movie that it kills the experience.

Personally, I can look past curving bullets and what not if it fits the world of the story.  My issue with Wanted is that it looks completely and totally charmless -- as if it lacks any redeeming sense of soul or character.  Perhaps it&#039;s just poor marketing/badly cut trailer, but the movie simply looks like an assembly-line action film.  I just don&#039;t see anything to care about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; the entire plot isnt going to be told to you in the trailer</p>
<p>That&#8217;s an interesting comment given how many trailers now give away so much of the movie that it kills the experience.</p>
<p>Personally, I can look past curving bullets and what not if it fits the world of the story.  My issue with Wanted is that it looks completely and totally charmless &#8212; as if it lacks any redeeming sense of soul or character.  Perhaps it&#8217;s just poor marketing/badly cut trailer, but the movie simply looks like an assembly-line action film.  I just don&#8217;t see anything to care about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-96616</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-96616</guid>
		<description>neil miller has it down. its a movie and because it is a movie, we are watching that universe. whatever may happen in the movie is to be taken as possible in that universe, not the one we live in.

its kinda like Last Action Hero with arnold...there was a difference between before the kid went into the movie and when he was in it. when he was in it, everything was over the top action. out, it was back to normal life where 1 bullet can kill.

and dont base everything of a movie from the trailer. i know its hard not to because thats all you get to see before the movie is actually released, but i went to the NYC Comic Con with a buddy of mine and we saw some scenes from Wanted...more then the public has seen to date...and also heard the director speak/take q&amp;a...

prior to this i agree with some of you about the car scenes and some of the action, but after seeing these &quot;extended&quot; scenes, im totalling convinced this movie will kick major ass. granted, if you dont like the kind of &quot;over the top&quot; action that it presents, your not gunna like it. but dont say its not gunna be a good watch. it might not be your cup of tea but that doesnt mean you can say its crap. 

and crank/shoot em up were &quot;ridiculous?&quot; you dont like action movies huh Rob Hunter? or are you the kinda person that wants believable action?

please remember opinions are opinions. if you dont like something, you dont like it. i thought crank and shoot em up were pretty kick ass action movies....i LOVED the &quot;absurd&quot; over the top action. i felt they pulled it off just right.

i can see your basing your opinion SOLEY off of the trailer and its unforunate you do this. have more of an open mind. the entire plot isnt going to be told to you in the trailer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neil miller has it down. its a movie and because it is a movie, we are watching that universe. whatever may happen in the movie is to be taken as possible in that universe, not the one we live in.</p>
<p>its kinda like Last Action Hero with arnold&#8230;there was a difference between before the kid went into the movie and when he was in it. when he was in it, everything was over the top action. out, it was back to normal life where 1 bullet can kill.</p>
<p>and dont base everything of a movie from the trailer. i know its hard not to because thats all you get to see before the movie is actually released, but i went to the NYC Comic Con with a buddy of mine and we saw some scenes from Wanted&#8230;more then the public has seen to date&#8230;and also heard the director speak/take q&amp;a&#8230;</p>
<p>prior to this i agree with some of you about the car scenes and some of the action, but after seeing these &#8220;extended&#8221; scenes, im totalling convinced this movie will kick major ass. granted, if you dont like the kind of &#8220;over the top&#8221; action that it presents, your not gunna like it. but dont say its not gunna be a good watch. it might not be your cup of tea but that doesnt mean you can say its crap. </p>
<p>and crank/shoot em up were &#8220;ridiculous?&#8221; you dont like action movies huh Rob Hunter? or are you the kinda person that wants believable action?</p>
<p>please remember opinions are opinions. if you dont like something, you dont like it. i thought crank and shoot em up were pretty kick ass action movies&#8230;.i LOVED the &#8220;absurd&#8221; over the top action. i felt they pulled it off just right.</p>
<p>i can see your basing your opinion SOLEY off of the trailer and its unforunate you do this. have more of an open mind. the entire plot isnt going to be told to you in the trailer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-192461</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-192461</guid>
		<description>neil miller has it down. its a movie and because it is a movie, we are watching that universe. whatever may happen in the movie is to be taken as possible in that universe, not the one we live in.

its kinda like Last Action Hero with arnold...there was a difference between before the kid went into the movie and when he was in it. when he was in it, everything was over the top action. out, it was back to normal life where 1 bullet can kill.

and dont base everything of a movie from the trailer. i know its hard not to because thats all you get to see before the movie is actually released, but i went to the NYC Comic Con with a buddy of mine and we saw some scenes from Wanted...more then the public has seen to date...and also heard the director speak/take q&amp;a...

prior to this i agree with some of you about the car scenes and some of the action, but after seeing these &quot;extended&quot; scenes, im totalling convinced this movie will kick major ass. granted, if you dont like the kind of &quot;over the top&quot; action that it presents, your not gunna like it. but dont say its not gunna be a good watch. it might not be your cup of tea but that doesnt mean you can say its crap. 

and crank/shoot em up were &quot;ridiculous?&quot; you dont like action movies huh Rob Hunter? or are you the kinda person that wants believable action?

please remember opinions are opinions. if you dont like something, you dont like it. i thought crank and shoot em up were pretty kick ass action movies....i LOVED the &quot;absurd&quot; over the top action. i felt they pulled it off just right.

i can see your basing your opinion SOLEY off of the trailer and its unforunate you do this. have more of an open mind. the entire plot isnt going to be told to you in the trailer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neil miller has it down. its a movie and because it is a movie, we are watching that universe. whatever may happen in the movie is to be taken as possible in that universe, not the one we live in.</p>
<p>its kinda like Last Action Hero with arnold&#8230;there was a difference between before the kid went into the movie and when he was in it. when he was in it, everything was over the top action. out, it was back to normal life where 1 bullet can kill.</p>
<p>and dont base everything of a movie from the trailer. i know its hard not to because thats all you get to see before the movie is actually released, but i went to the NYC Comic Con with a buddy of mine and we saw some scenes from Wanted&#8230;more then the public has seen to date&#8230;and also heard the director speak/take q&amp;a&#8230;</p>
<p>prior to this i agree with some of you about the car scenes and some of the action, but after seeing these &#8220;extended&#8221; scenes, im totalling convinced this movie will kick major ass. granted, if you dont like the kind of &#8220;over the top&#8221; action that it presents, your not gunna like it. but dont say its not gunna be a good watch. it might not be your cup of tea but that doesnt mean you can say its crap. </p>
<p>and crank/shoot em up were &#8220;ridiculous?&#8221; you dont like action movies huh Rob Hunter? or are you the kinda person that wants believable action?</p>
<p>please remember opinions are opinions. if you dont like something, you dont like it. i thought crank and shoot em up were pretty kick ass action movies&#8230;.i LOVED the &#8220;absurd&#8221; over the top action. i felt they pulled it off just right.</p>
<p>i can see your basing your opinion SOLEY off of the trailer and its unforunate you do this. have more of an open mind. the entire plot isnt going to be told to you in the trailer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fure</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-96612</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-96612</guid>
		<description>There is a difference between Michael Bay explosions and Crank&#039;s absurdism or Shoot &#039;Em Up.  Things get adjusted for film to make them look better.  When hand grenades go off, there is no fire, just what looks to be dust.  But we do accept some things.

Commando is a perfect example.  Its pretty ridiculous.  Unlimited ammo in his guns, throwing saw blades, big explosions, one man army.  But he doesn&#039;t curve bullets or jump through shatter proof glass and fly 50 feet out of a street or whatever the hell is going on.

There is a difference between exaggeration and a complete disregard of the entire movie.  Some movies exaggerate well (Commando, Bad Boys II, Terminator 2, et al) and some movies step just far enough into the absurd it turns people off (Crank, Shoot Em Up, Wanted Trailer).

I will see this movie at some point, but honestly I dont like the look of it/the style so far, and bullet curving is just plain stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a difference between Michael Bay explosions and Crank&#8217;s absurdism or Shoot &#8216;Em Up.  Things get adjusted for film to make them look better.  When hand grenades go off, there is no fire, just what looks to be dust.  But we do accept some things.</p>
<p>Commando is a perfect example.  Its pretty ridiculous.  Unlimited ammo in his guns, throwing saw blades, big explosions, one man army.  But he doesn&#8217;t curve bullets or jump through shatter proof glass and fly 50 feet out of a street or whatever the hell is going on.</p>
<p>There is a difference between exaggeration and a complete disregard of the entire movie.  Some movies exaggerate well (Commando, Bad Boys II, Terminator 2, et al) and some movies step just far enough into the absurd it turns people off (Crank, Shoot Em Up, Wanted Trailer).</p>
<p>I will see this movie at some point, but honestly I dont like the look of it/the style so far, and bullet curving is just plain stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fure</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-192460</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-192460</guid>
		<description>There is a difference between Michael Bay explosions and Crank&#039;s absurdism or Shoot &#039;Em Up.  Things get adjusted for film to make them look better.  When hand grenades go off, there is no fire, just what looks to be dust.  But we do accept some things.

Commando is a perfect example.  Its pretty ridiculous.  Unlimited ammo in his guns, throwing saw blades, big explosions, one man army.  But he doesn&#039;t curve bullets or jump through shatter proof glass and fly 50 feet out of a street or whatever the hell is going on.

There is a difference between exaggeration and a complete disregard of the entire movie.  Some movies exaggerate well (Commando, Bad Boys II, Terminator 2, et al) and some movies step just far enough into the absurd it turns people off (Crank, Shoot Em Up, Wanted Trailer).

I will see this movie at some point, but honestly I dont like the look of it/the style so far, and bullet curving is just plain stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a difference between Michael Bay explosions and Crank&#8217;s absurdism or Shoot &#8216;Em Up.  Things get adjusted for film to make them look better.  When hand grenades go off, there is no fire, just what looks to be dust.  But we do accept some things.</p>
<p>Commando is a perfect example.  Its pretty ridiculous.  Unlimited ammo in his guns, throwing saw blades, big explosions, one man army.  But he doesn&#8217;t curve bullets or jump through shatter proof glass and fly 50 feet out of a street or whatever the hell is going on.</p>
<p>There is a difference between exaggeration and a complete disregard of the entire movie.  Some movies exaggerate well (Commando, Bad Boys II, Terminator 2, et al) and some movies step just far enough into the absurd it turns people off (Crank, Shoot Em Up, Wanted Trailer).</p>
<p>I will see this movie at some point, but honestly I dont like the look of it/the style so far, and bullet curving is just plain stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rik</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-96594</link>
		<dc:creator>Rik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-96594</guid>
		<description>the PHYSICS are unrealistic and this is why you are uninterested?  C&#039;mon now, 9 out of 10 action movies don&#039;t adhere to the laws of physics.  Cars don&#039;t REALLY burst into big flaming fireballs like they do in the movies, there&#039;s just not the much gasoline or oil contained in them.  Guns don&#039;t hold enough rounds to allow the &#039;hero&#039; or &#039;anti&#039;hero&#039; to mow down massive amounts of enemies without reloading once.  Christ, the whole point of an action flick IS to see something that shouldn&#039;t normally be possible.

I&#039;m not really that interested in this particular film, but it&#039;s not because of the non-adherence to the laws of physics.  It&#039;s more due to the fact that it&#039;s just another in a long line of graphic novel/comicbook movie interpretations that is going to fall far short of the original book version.  &#039;Course, that always happens when you make a book into a movie.

Complaining about the &quot;unrealism&quot; is absurd.  That&#039;s the whole point of the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the PHYSICS are unrealistic and this is why you are uninterested?  C&#8217;mon now, 9 out of 10 action movies don&#8217;t adhere to the laws of physics.  Cars don&#8217;t REALLY burst into big flaming fireballs like they do in the movies, there&#8217;s just not the much gasoline or oil contained in them.  Guns don&#8217;t hold enough rounds to allow the &#8216;hero&#8217; or &#8216;anti&#8217;hero&#8217; to mow down massive amounts of enemies without reloading once.  Christ, the whole point of an action flick IS to see something that shouldn&#8217;t normally be possible.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really that interested in this particular film, but it&#8217;s not because of the non-adherence to the laws of physics.  It&#8217;s more due to the fact that it&#8217;s just another in a long line of graphic novel/comicbook movie interpretations that is going to fall far short of the original book version.  &#8216;Course, that always happens when you make a book into a movie.</p>
<p>Complaining about the &#8220;unrealism&#8221; is absurd.  That&#8217;s the whole point of the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rik</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-192459</link>
		<dc:creator>Rik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-192459</guid>
		<description>the PHYSICS are unrealistic and this is why you are uninterested?  C&#039;mon now, 9 out of 10 action movies don&#039;t adhere to the laws of physics.  Cars don&#039;t REALLY burst into big flaming fireballs like they do in the movies, there&#039;s just not the much gasoline or oil contained in them.  Guns don&#039;t hold enough rounds to allow the &#039;hero&#039; or &#039;anti&#039;hero&#039; to mow down massive amounts of enemies without reloading once.  Christ, the whole point of an action flick IS to see something that shouldn&#039;t normally be possible.

I&#039;m not really that interested in this particular film, but it&#039;s not because of the non-adherence to the laws of physics.  It&#039;s more due to the fact that it&#039;s just another in a long line of graphic novel/comicbook movie interpretations that is going to fall far short of the original book version.  &#039;Course, that always happens when you make a book into a movie.

Complaining about the &quot;unrealism&quot; is absurd.  That&#039;s the whole point of the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the PHYSICS are unrealistic and this is why you are uninterested?  C&#8217;mon now, 9 out of 10 action movies don&#8217;t adhere to the laws of physics.  Cars don&#8217;t REALLY burst into big flaming fireballs like they do in the movies, there&#8217;s just not the much gasoline or oil contained in them.  Guns don&#8217;t hold enough rounds to allow the &#8216;hero&#8217; or &#8216;anti&#8217;hero&#8217; to mow down massive amounts of enemies without reloading once.  Christ, the whole point of an action flick IS to see something that shouldn&#8217;t normally be possible.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really that interested in this particular film, but it&#8217;s not because of the non-adherence to the laws of physics.  It&#8217;s more due to the fact that it&#8217;s just another in a long line of graphic novel/comicbook movie interpretations that is going to fall far short of the original book version.  &#8216;Course, that always happens when you make a book into a movie.</p>
<p>Complaining about the &#8220;unrealism&#8221; is absurd.  That&#8217;s the whole point of the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cricket</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-96571</link>
		<dc:creator>Cricket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-96571</guid>
		<description>Looks like a pretty interesting movies, i&#039;ll check it out for sure. I wasn&#039;t aware that it was based on a novel, that&#039;s cool. Even if this goes against physics i&#039;m still game to check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a pretty interesting movies, i&#8217;ll check it out for sure. I wasn&#8217;t aware that it was based on a novel, that&#8217;s cool. Even if this goes against physics i&#8217;m still game to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cricket</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-192458</link>
		<dc:creator>Cricket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-192458</guid>
		<description>Looks like a pretty interesting movies, i&#039;ll check it out for sure. I wasn&#039;t aware that it was based on a novel, that&#039;s cool. Even if this goes against physics i&#039;m still game to check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a pretty interesting movies, i&#8217;ll check it out for sure. I wasn&#8217;t aware that it was based on a novel, that&#8217;s cool. Even if this goes against physics i&#8217;m still game to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fure</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-96522</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-96522</guid>
		<description>I think the problem I have, and maybe some people have, is that if you&#039;re not familiar with some details of the comics, you don&#039;t think of these people as super-villains and super-people, but as normal people.  It is yet to be seen what parts of the comic translate, but the world in which they exist (in the comic) has super-heroes, people like Superman or Braniac, Scarecrow, etc.  A real Super-Powered world.  

The trailers dont hint at that at all, so I feel like maybe they cut it, and then the unrealistic stuff is just that - unrealistic in an otherwise &quot;normal&quot; world.

But if supervillians actually exist and they toss a nod to that there are super people, then I&#039;ll look past the CGI bullet bending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the problem I have, and maybe some people have, is that if you&#8217;re not familiar with some details of the comics, you don&#8217;t think of these people as super-villains and super-people, but as normal people.  It is yet to be seen what parts of the comic translate, but the world in which they exist (in the comic) has super-heroes, people like Superman or Braniac, Scarecrow, etc.  A real Super-Powered world.  </p>
<p>The trailers dont hint at that at all, so I feel like maybe they cut it, and then the unrealistic stuff is just that &#8211; unrealistic in an otherwise &#8220;normal&#8221; world.</p>
<p>But if supervillians actually exist and they toss a nod to that there are super people, then I&#8217;ll look past the CGI bullet bending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fure</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-192457</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-192457</guid>
		<description>I think the problem I have, and maybe some people have, is that if you&#039;re not familiar with some details of the comics, you don&#039;t think of these people as super-villains and super-people, but as normal people.  It is yet to be seen what parts of the comic translate, but the world in which they exist (in the comic) has super-heroes, people like Superman or Braniac, Scarecrow, etc.  A real Super-Powered world.  

The trailers dont hint at that at all, so I feel like maybe they cut it, and then the unrealistic stuff is just that - unrealistic in an otherwise &quot;normal&quot; world.

But if supervillians actually exist and they toss a nod to that there are super people, then I&#039;ll look past the CGI bullet bending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the problem I have, and maybe some people have, is that if you&#8217;re not familiar with some details of the comics, you don&#8217;t think of these people as super-villains and super-people, but as normal people.  It is yet to be seen what parts of the comic translate, but the world in which they exist (in the comic) has super-heroes, people like Superman or Braniac, Scarecrow, etc.  A real Super-Powered world.  </p>
<p>The trailers dont hint at that at all, so I feel like maybe they cut it, and then the unrealistic stuff is just that &#8211; unrealistic in an otherwise &#8220;normal&#8221; world.</p>
<p>But if supervillians actually exist and they toss a nod to that there are super people, then I&#8217;ll look past the CGI bullet bending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole Abaius</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/35-new-images-to-prove-that-wanted-will-kick-ass.php/comment-page-1#comment-96511</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole Abaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7297#comment-96511</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m totally baffled by the lack of faith in this movie. I could understand it if it were casting issues, the director not being vetted, etc. but the physics is what&#039;s throwing you off? You&#039;re unconvinced that a bullet can curve or that a woman can drive with her feet?

Women-can&#039;t-drive-with-their-hands jokes aside, if it takes that much suspension of disbelief to get into a movie, maybe you should be checking out biographies and Ken Burns&#039;s work instead.

The comparison to The Matrix is a good one, since Wanted is a lot like it. Boring drone job, secret history, awesome stunts. Plus, the main character is a lot like Bullseye with perfect aim.

Seriously, though, if we&#039;re going to start arguing that superhero (or supervillain in this case) movies should be &quot;realistic&quot;, we might as well pack up shop and head home. 

In the mean time, someone explain to me how everything is in Grayscale in Schindler&#039;s List. Now that&#039;s a trippy world. Colors don&#039;t exist! How unrealistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m totally baffled by the lack of faith in this movie. I could understand it if it were casting issues, the director not being vetted, etc. but the physics is what&#8217;s throwing you off? You&#8217;re unconvinced that a bullet can curve or that a woman can drive with her feet?</p>
<p>Women-can&#8217;t-drive-with-their-hands jokes aside, if it takes that much suspension of disbelief to get into a movie, maybe you should be checking out biographies and Ken Burns&#8217;s work instead.</p>
<p>The comparison to The Matrix is a good one, since Wanted is a lot like it. Boring drone job, secret history, awesome stunts. Plus, the main character is a lot like Bullseye with perfect aim.</p>
<p>Seriously, though, if we&#8217;re going to start arguing that superhero (or supervillain in this case) movies should be &#8220;realistic&#8221;, we might as well pack up shop and head home. </p>
<p>In the mean time, someone explain to me how everything is in Grayscale in Schindler&#8217;s List. Now that&#8217;s a trippy world. Colors don&#8217;t exist! How unrealistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 593/599 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-14 00:20:25 -->
