Movie News

300 and One? More Spartans on Horizon

Posted by Robert Fure (robert@filmschoolrejects.com) on March 11, 2008

300With 300’s epic bloodbath matched only by its own epic gross, it should come as no surprise that the studios want to get working on a sequel. Producer Mark Canton was all smiles and winks when talking about 300 and expressed a strong interest in working with director Zack Snyder again. Canton seemed to imply that all they were waiting for was the thumbs up from Warner Bros. which can’t be all that far off.

Most assuredly Frank Miller and Zack Snyder would be courted and lured back for this story or the flick would most assuredly suffer. No news on what the story would entail, what battles it would cover, or when it would take place, or with who. Sparta was a dominate player for a fairly long period of war and faced off against both the Persians and other Greek states. The sequel could chronologically move forward to either the Battle of Platea (pictured briefly at the end of the film) where the Spartans, at full force, crushed the Persians. The Spartans also played a large role in the Peloponnesian War and even went against, and defeated Athens, on land and at sea.

Stay tuned to Film School Rejects for more!

Source: SOS Hollywood


Read more articles by Robert Fure

Related Reading:

Discover More:
Movie News, , , ,


27 Comments

Jason says:

300 was amazing and I would love to see a longer, more epic 300 style movie.


Allynd Dudnikov says:

I wish they’d do a take on the Odyssey. That would be EPIC.


ike says:

what an absolutely awful idea


Rick Cain says:

Takes all the fun out of it when Spartans fight Greeks. No more hidden racist undertones in these battles. Will the greeks now be depicted as deformed monsters too?
BTW the Spartans eventually lost later wars and their influence withered to nothing. Its amazing how much infighting occurred on the greek peninsula.


Watch TeleVision says:

Well at the end of 300 they never show how Persia actually did manage to take over parts of Greece, they make it seem like Persia pushed forward but was met with the Spartan army and were then defeated which is obviously not true.

The main thing to note is that this is a movie, and it’s fictional and dramatized. It’s not so much a historical re-enactment as it is a movie loosely based on historic events. It’s just for entertainment, so continuity really doesn’t matter. Personally I think the Persian looked a lot cooler then the Spartans, the cosmetic/aesthetic design of the Persian army was much more interesting to me.


subcorpus says:

i can use some more 300 stuff …
but please dont make it a horrible tragedy …


Epiminondas says:

Epiminondas could kick Lenoidas’ ass and Thebes was thrice the city state that Sparta was. Sparta was a vicious dictatorship that enslaved all they conquered and butchered Mycenian Helots for sport. Even in the 300 comic, Miller’s Leonidas says “Leave democracy to the Athenians.” I would like to see a countersequel that shows how Epiminondas and the Thebans anihilated Sparta’s best at Leuctra, liberated all their slaves in a proto-United States Boetian League and took on all of Greece’s imperialist states and won against impossible odds only to give up because their leader Epiminondas was killed in the battle. I want a movie that shows fascists being defeated by real free men who liberate rather than conquer. That would be a worthy answer to 300. And yes I loved 300 for what it was, an ahistoric comic book legend.


LZ says:

Actually Watch TeleVision, the movie is quite accurate to the actual battle. But if you payed attention to the movie, you’ll see that the account given is Captian Blindeye McGee the whole time giving a speech to the other g-string totting spartan at Platea, so he’s telling a story, of something that happened a few years ago, to physc some fellas up to kill some other fellas.


Contraife says:

“Takes all the fun out of it when Spartans fight Greeks. No more hidden racist undertones in these battles. Will the greeks now be depicted as deformed monsters too?”

QFT. Don’t forget the skinny people with British accents were “weak-looking” athenians. It would be amazing to see an Iranian version of the same kind of story XD


Brian says:

What ever happened to making one kick ass movie and leaving it at that? Leave the 300 story line alone.


Whatever says:

Athenians were never pictured in the movie 300, seeing as they never helped the Spartans at the “Hot Gates”. I believe you meant the Thespians, who did send approximately 1000 men to aid the Spartans. This is for you Contraife, so you know.


ggamer25 says:

whos ever said the spartans were brutal dictators is an idiot!!!
sparta was a oligarchy and had two kings
the men who were born in sparta were trained ti fght
the helots did the farming and everyday life but since the spartans were always fighting the helots were basically free men
Spartans would fight their entire lives and if they lived to 60 they would retire and have land and everything.
Sparta was pretty much better than a democracy because there supposed slaves lived like they were equals
and the did conquer but they allied with them instead of killed them you loser
read you history better!!


J-Sub says:

This is absurd, 300 is the film adaptation of Frank’s novel. The movie covered everything and then some (with a few minor exceptions) there is no second book, to want to do a sequel is an abomination. I would loose all respect for Zach Snyder and especially Frank if they went on board for this.


oneguy says:

Im sorry ggamer but saying the helots were practically free is a gross overstatement. They were slaves. Plain and simple. They repeatedly tried for freedom even going so far as to revolt and countless numbers escaped to athens to seek freedom. It was not in any way a democracy as only the two kings had control. One in the military and one in the political aspects of the city


Cooldogs_1 says:

It is interesting where they can take this. There are a few ways they can. One is do the war where the persians loose. The war against mesopotania, where sparta was the last standing of the greek empires. I personally would want them to do the war involving King Phillip or Alexander the Great!


Macintiger says:

I think Miller in his comic and the people that made the movie said they were making them both from a non-objective point of view, that of the Spartans. And so, knowing how battles, etc. get spun into myth by the cultures that tell them, it is perfectly logical that they would have the Spartans see the Persians as monsters and their “god-king” as a little on the fem side.
In other word’s its not a contemporary or personal commentary by the makers of 300 on any one race.

>Rick Cain said:
>Takes all the fun out of it when Spartans fight Greeks. No more hidden racist >undertones in these battles. Will the greeks now be depicted as deformed >monsters too?
>BTW the Spartans eventually lost later wars and their influence withered to >nothing. Its amazing how much infighting occurred on the greek peninsula.


Epiminondas says:

ggamer25, you are either reading biased pro-Spartan history or you actually like the idea of dual dictatorship with one king ruling “Homeland Security” and the other permanently at war to enslave other peoples.

From “Thebes” in Wikipedia:
“the Spartan garrison was expelled and a democratic constitution was set up in place of the traditional oligarchy. In the consequent wars with Sparta, the Theban army, trained and led by Epaminondas and Pelopidas, proved itself the best in Greece (see also: Sacred Band of Thebes). Years of desultory fighting, in which Thebes established its control over all Boeotia, culminated in 371 BC in a remarkable victory over the pick of the Spartans at Leuctra. The winners were hailed throughout Greece as champions of the oppressed. They carried their arms into Peloponnesus and at the head of a large coalition, permanently crippled the power of Sparta, in part by freeing many helot slaves, the basis of the Spartan economy. Similar expeditions were sent to Thessaly and Macedon to regulate the affairs of those regions.”


Gianni says:

299 zombies.


Gordie says:

Debating which of the Greek nations was ‘better’ than the others is a bit silly; modern (Western) morality can’t comprehend the general misery and horror endemic to the everyday lives of even the most successful individuals who lived at the time. Slavery in Greece was widespread, and was rarely questioned. The Spartans were reviled for enslaving other Greeks– the Messenians– and were widely considered to be fanatical idiots. Films like ‘300′ are a nice fantasy, but the evidence seems to indicate that most Spartans were extremely corrupt, ignorant and violent. (FWIW, all Spartan warriors were also homosexual. Men lived strictly apart from their women, and sexual relationships were enforced among the ranks in order to promote cohesion and unity.)
Almost of the historical record for ‘300′ comes from Herodotus, who was writing 50 or so years after the events he describes. The Spartans were integral to the defense of the Greek peninsula, but they left most of the heavy lifting to the Athenians. All of the Peloponnesian Greeks insisted on withdrawing behind the Isthmus of Corinth…which would have been a disaster, had it happened. The Athenians insisted on making a naval attack at Salamis under Themistocles, which destroyed the Persian fleet and cut their supply lines. Mardonius stayed behind with the Persian land forces, and was destroyed at Plataea, but he certainly would have prevailed if the Persian naval force was still around.
The Spartans had very little to lose during the Persian Wars, aside from their slaves. Spartan forces were often wary of leaving home for too long, as the Helots took every opportunity to revolt against them. Athens was sacked and burned prior to the battle of Salamis, and the Athenian countryside was ravaged. During the subsequent Peloponnesian Wars, Sparta actually enlisted the help of the Persians against Athens, and this certainly contributed to the widespread hatred against them.


kyle says:

I welcome your crappy movie! I look forward to viewing it re-authored with a rifftrax
soundtrack. Thank you hollywood for your crap.


john says:

Will this become like the Matrix 2 and 3 all over again. The first was great. When studios get excited over sales to make a sequel it spells failure.


Ty says:

I think it would be kool to start rite at the exact point that 300 left off at, and make a second movie entirely on that battle, BUT…no more movies after that!


Billy says:

A possible 300 2, 300+1, 301…whatever you want to call a sequel…I thought the first one was ok, not all that great but still a good movie, but it is very rare for a sequel to be as good as the first movie.

I read something about the Matrix series in one of the previous comments, that is a great example! The first one was a great movie and still is, the sequel wasn’t to bad but when they came out with the 3rd one, I was glad it ended because the fight scenes just looked so animated and not real at all…I hope that isn’t the case if there’s a 300 part 2.


Jimmy says:

No more! No more! The first movie was bad enough.


Thucydides says:

“Actually Watch TeleVision, the movie is quite accurate to the actual battle.”

Actually, no it’s not. It’s only (vaguely) accurate to Herodotus’ account of the battle. Well, the problem with that is a) he wasn’t there to witness it, b) he’s a known liar, and c) his idea of history was that it was okay to bend the truth if it was more entertaining that way.

There is scant evidence that the Battle of Thermopylae happened at all, let alone that it happened how Herodotus said. It’s just as likely that Leonidas attempted to ally Sparta with Persia and was killed in the negotiations. Or that Leonidas committed ritual suicide at Thermopylae, and the Persians passed the site totally unopposed. There is no real corroborating evidence for Herodotus’ melodramatic crap, and Spartan might was more or less ALWAYS a legend, and not a reality.


Thucydides says:

Also, there’s no evidence that Spartiate men were typically homosexual. The Greek word “pederast” didn’t NECESSARILY mean the same thing to them as it does to us today.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spartan_pederasty

There are reliable sources that tell us that Spartan pederasty was never sexual in nature, and in fact tell us that anal penetration between two men was a crime in Sparta.


Thucydides says:

The Sacred Band of Thebes, however, was definitely homsexual. The rationale was that lovers fighting in pairs fought more fiercely, and were therefore better soldiers.


Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!