Comments on: 10 Actresses Worth Their Weight In Cash

By: anon

anon — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:29:50 +0000

aw bummer, that editor's note kills a little of the satire.

By: nickdenife

nickdenife — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 04:39:12 +0000

See, now this is why I lOVE this site. You don't go in for any politically correct bullshit, I can trust your reviews, and if someone has a problem with what you've done, you pretty much tell them to get a sense of humor. Even the name of the site is great!

LONG LIVE FILM SCHOOL REJECTS!

By: PaulSileo

PaulSileo — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 02:49:21 +0000

We have a magazine?

By: b.rae

b.rae — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 02:39:40 +0000

Dude, it's a joke. I *LOVE* Meryl Streep!

...Seriously, though. Did you happen to read the Forbes article? I couldn't stand the tone. If you looked at the formula ("it's up there, guys."), you'll see that they didn't take into account quality of film, only box office numbers. Also, an intentional omission of marketing totals in their formula suggests that these are, in some ways, Hollywood's cheapest women. And ROI is a terrible (but obviously, at times necessary) means to choose an actor for your film.

Anyway, it was meant as absolute satire. Obviously it was mis-presented, and that's my fault. If you think the FSR staff doesn't understand satire, then you've never seen our third grade school pictures.

By: Peter Donohue

Peter Donohue — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:12:04 +0000

Mmmmm, Rachel McAdams. I..uh…I'll be right back. *Runs to bathroom*

By: gingerliu

gingerliu — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:51:22 +0000

I have cancelled my email subscription to your magazine. Any magazine that presents the top ten actresses with images of their breasts, is pretty lame. For a woman to write this article it is shameful. Is this how far professional woman have come? I can see why you are film school rejects. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Networking the shame...

Goodbye.
Ginger Liu
Journalist, Photographer, Publicist

By: Christopher_M

Christopher_M — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:25:59 +0000

You'd think Hillary would have changed her last name before entering Hollywood.. considering it's similar to a low-grade smut magazine company..lol

By: Andy III

Andy III — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:39:22 +0000

It's certainly geekist, that's for sure.

By: RobHunter

RobHunter — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:26:57 +0000

That's a terribly sexist comment Andy.

By: Cole_Abaius

Cole_Abaius — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:10:17 +0000

Knowing Bethany as I do, she either did that because she really loves boobs, as an over-the-top satirical point about what we view as the true value of women, or both.

I'm guessing both.

By: PaulSileo

PaulSileo — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:49:21 +0000

We have a magazine?

By: b.rae

b.rae — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:45:00 +0000

that’s pretty much the definition of ROI.

By: b.rae

b.rae — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:39:40 +0000

By: Aleric

Aleric — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:14:37 +0000

The scary part is I could look at each of the actresses chest and recognize them without a head shot. lol

By: Peter Donohue

Peter Donohue — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:12:04 +0000

Mmmmm, Rachel McAdams. I..uh…I'll be right back. *Runs to bathroom*

By: gingerliu

gingerliu — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:51:22 +0000

By: Christopher_M

Christopher_M — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:25:59 +0000

You'd think Hillary would have changed her last name before entering Hollywood.. considering it's similar to a low-grade smut magazine company..lol

By: Andy III

Andy III — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:39:22 +0000

It's certainly geekist, that's for sure.

By: RobHunter

RobHunter — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:26:57 +0000

That's a terribly sexist comment Andy.

By: Cole_Abaius

Cole_Abaius — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:10:17 +0000

Knowing Bethany as I do, she either did that because she really loves boobs, as an over-the-top satirical point about what we view as the true value of women, or both.

I'm guessing both.