Comments on: WTF: My Name Is Sharon http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/wtf-my-name-is-sharon.php A Website About Movies Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Merlyn Setters http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/wtf-my-name-is-sharon.php/comment-page-1#comment-170252 Merlyn Setters Fri, 13 Aug 2010 04:24:14 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7046#comment-170252 enjoyed this writing! enjoyed this writing!

]]> By: JMoney http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/wtf-my-name-is-sharon.php/comment-page-1#comment-95498 JMoney Sat, 31 May 2008 02:33:13 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7046#comment-95498 she's an idiot. on a side note, i agree with that french lady, i think the moon landing was a hoax. why havn't we gone back since?or anywhere else for tha matter. given the immense speed of our technological advancement in every other area since the 1960s, dont you think if we able to land on the moon 40 years ago we should be a little more advanced in space technology then we are now? it took them like 10 years to get to the moon, but another 40 and we arn't much further. shouldn't there be like space stations on the moom by now? wtf? she’s an idiot.

on a side note, i agree with that french lady, i think the moon landing was a hoax. why havn’t we gone back since?or anywhere else for tha matter. given the immense speed of our technological advancement in every other area since the 1960s, dont you think if we able to land on the moon 40 years ago we should be a little more advanced in space technology then we are now? it took them like 10 years to get to the moon, but another 40 and we arn’t much further. shouldn’t there be like space stations on the moom by now? wtf?

]]> By: JMoney http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/wtf-my-name-is-sharon.php/comment-page-1#comment-191439 JMoney Sat, 31 May 2008 02:33:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7046#comment-191439 she's an idiot. on a side note, i agree with that french lady, i think the moon landing was a hoax. why havn't we gone back since?or anywhere else for tha matter. given the immense speed of our technological advancement in every other area since the 1960s, dont you think if we able to land on the moon 40 years ago we should be a little more advanced in space technology then we are now? it took them like 10 years to get to the moon, but another 40 and we arn't much further. shouldn't there be like space stations on the moom by now? wtf? she’s an idiot.

on a side note, i agree with that french lady, i think the moon landing was a hoax. why havn’t we gone back since?or anywhere else for tha matter. given the immense speed of our technological advancement in every other area since the 1960s, dont you think if we able to land on the moon 40 years ago we should be a little more advanced in space technology then we are now? it took them like 10 years to get to the moon, but another 40 and we arn’t much further. shouldn’t there be like space stations on the moom by now? wtf?

]]> By: maggie van ostrand http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/wtf-my-name-is-sharon.php/comment-page-1#comment-95221 maggie van ostrand Wed, 28 May 2008 15:15:01 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7046#comment-95221 She's not as stupid as we think. The purpose of celebrities is to keep their names in the paper, and Stone isn't getting good roles any more. She's desperate for attention and media coverage. Maybe that thing in her mouth wasn't a foot. She’s not as stupid as we think. The purpose of celebrities is to keep their names in the paper, and Stone isn’t getting good roles any more. She’s desperate for attention and media coverage.

Maybe that thing in her mouth wasn’t a foot.

]]> By: maggie van ostrand http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/wtf-my-name-is-sharon.php/comment-page-1#comment-191438 maggie van ostrand Wed, 28 May 2008 15:15:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7046#comment-191438 She's not as stupid as we think. The purpose of celebrities is to keep their names in the paper, and Stone isn't getting good roles any more. She's desperate for attention and media coverage. Maybe that thing in her mouth wasn't a foot. She’s not as stupid as we think. The purpose of celebrities is to keep their names in the paper, and Stone isn’t getting good roles any more. She’s desperate for attention and media coverage.

Maybe that thing in her mouth wasn’t a foot.

]]>