But hey, Harrison Ford only got a classic film franchise out of the deal whereas you got the honor of working with Sir Ted Danson and Academy Award…watcher Steve Guttenberg in Three Men and a Baby.
I’ve always had a thing for Dina Meyer, all the way back to the late 1990s when she was showing off her boobies in Starship Troopers. But her choices for movie roles pre-date even that guilty pleasure of mine. She began her film career with the bomb Johnny Mnemonic in 1995 and then continued with the disappointing Dragonheart in 1996. Following the fun but underperforming Starship Troopers in 1997, she wasn’t in a bona fide hit until the first Saw came out in 2004. And by that time, roles in movies like Bats and D-Tox poisoned her career, leaving no chance of recovery. Even her television choices were terrible, from the Batgirl Begins attempt known as Birds of Prey to most recently Scoundrels.
Dina Meyer is a beautiful woman, and she’s got a great screen presence, but it seems she’s cursed like King Tut’s tomb. If I were to change anything, I would go back in time and urge her to take pretty much anything else she was offered. Maybe if she would have taken different risks earlier on, she wouldn’t have squandered her younger years in bad movies.
I’d also point out that she shouldn’t believe the Hollywood formula. Because I’m sure a starring role alongside Keanu Reeves, a sci-fi action digital effects piece based on a popular Heinlein book and lead in a film with a dragon voiced by Sean Connery looked good on paper.
Mel Gibson has gotten it wrong so many times. Not only did he turn down James Bond TWICE (C’mon!) and Jim Garrison in JFK, but he also said no to Robin Hood in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves (y’know, the not terrible one?).
The movie I’d focus on, however, would be Gladiator. Mel turned down the leading role in the Roman epic, which eventually yielded a best actor oscar for Russell Crowe. Personally, I really dislike the movie, but I have a feeling that Gibson could have made it a heck of a lot more enjoyable. Seriously, What Women Want may have been a fun movie to make, but for Oscar gold, I’d have put it on hold for a bit.
As an unabashed fan of Mr. Kevin Costner (Yes, still. Even after The Postman), I always put stock into any performance he accepts. So it pained me to learn he was offered and turn down the role of Bill in Quentin Tarantino’s Kill Bill films. The role was turned down in favor of the Western lover opting to direct 2003′s Open Range, an incredible film in its own right.
Nonetheless, Open Range‘s merits aside, Kevin Costner would have been an amazing choice to play the diabolical and villainous Bill. As a well established leading man, he would have brought a sincerity to Bill’s necessary charm. If for nothing else, the two films would reteam Costner and Michael Madsen as brothers, something they previously did in 1994′s Wyatt Earp.
David Carradine was great as Bill. There’s no getting around that, and Tarantino is well known for reengaging certain actors’ careers by placing them in prominent roles. Carradine didn’t exactly turn over the same, post-Tarantino success someone like John Travolta pulled in, though. It would have been nice to see a Kevin Costner resurgance based on what he would have brought to the Kill Bill table.
Answer more burning cinematic questions with the Circle of Jerks