<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Men Who Knew Too Much</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/two-men-who-knew-too-much.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/two-men-who-knew-too-much.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:33:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert B.</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/two-men-who-knew-too-much.php/comment-page-1#comment-99620</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7874#comment-99620</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think we would have felt the same back then because there was no home video.  It had been 22 years since the first film, and there was a whole new generation who would never see the first one (unless a theater decided to do a run of a 22 year old not very popular movie... which isn&#039;t very likely).  

Nowadays, with home theater systems and DVDs of most major films available... it is pretty un-original to &quot;re-make&quot; a film.   I guess studios don&#039;t think film goers will go to see &quot;Friday the 13th: Part XXX.&quot; So they have to &quot;re-make&quot; the first one, and re-call it &quot;Friday the 13th&quot; (instead of &quot;Friday the 13th: The next Generation&quot;). Which of course leaves them open to making sequals with their slightly altered &quot;mythology.  &quot;Meh... At least they aren&#039;t renaming it and trying to release it as something new.  

 Remember &quot;A Perfect Murder&quot; in 1998.  Having read nothing about it prior to seeing it, I spent the whole time in the theater saying... &quot;I&#039;ve seen this before&quot; (for those that don&#039;t know, it is a remake of &quot;Alfred Hitchcock&#039;s Dial M for Murder&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think we would have felt the same back then because there was no home video.  It had been 22 years since the first film, and there was a whole new generation who would never see the first one (unless a theater decided to do a run of a 22 year old not very popular movie&#8230; which isn&#8217;t very likely).  </p>
<p>Nowadays, with home theater systems and DVDs of most major films available&#8230; it is pretty un-original to &#8220;re-make&#8221; a film.   I guess studios don&#8217;t think film goers will go to see &#8220;Friday the 13th: Part XXX.&#8221; So they have to &#8220;re-make&#8221; the first one, and re-call it &#8220;Friday the 13th&#8221; (instead of &#8220;Friday the 13th: The next Generation&#8221;). Which of course leaves them open to making sequals with their slightly altered &#8220;mythology.  &#8220;Meh&#8230; At least they aren&#8217;t renaming it and trying to release it as something new.  </p>
<p> Remember &#8220;A Perfect Murder&#8221; in 1998.  Having read nothing about it prior to seeing it, I spent the whole time in the theater saying&#8230; &#8220;I&#8217;ve seen this before&#8221; (for those that don&#8217;t know, it is a remake of &#8220;Alfred Hitchcock&#8217;s Dial M for Murder&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert B.</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/two-men-who-knew-too-much.php/comment-page-1#comment-194912</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7874#comment-194912</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think we would have felt the same back then because there was no home video.  It had been 22 years since the first film, and there was a whole new generation who would never see the first one (unless a theater decided to do a run of a 22 year old not very popular movie... which isn&#039;t very likely).  

Nowadays, with home theater systems and DVDs of most major films available... it is pretty un-original to &quot;re-make&quot; a film.   I guess studios don&#039;t think film goers will go to see &quot;Friday the 13th: Part XXX.&quot; So they have to &quot;re-make&quot; the first one, and re-call it &quot;Friday the 13th&quot; (instead of &quot;Friday the 13th: The next Generation&quot;). Which of course leaves them open to making sequals with their slightly altered &quot;mythology.  &quot;Meh... At least they aren&#039;t renaming it and trying to release it as something new.  

 Remember &quot;A Perfect Murder&quot; in 1998.  Having read nothing about it prior to seeing it, I spent the whole time in the theater saying... &quot;I&#039;ve seen this before&quot; (for those that don&#039;t know, it is a remake of &quot;Alfred Hitchcock&#039;s Dial M for Murder&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think we would have felt the same back then because there was no home video.  It had been 22 years since the first film, and there was a whole new generation who would never see the first one (unless a theater decided to do a run of a 22 year old not very popular movie&#8230; which isn&#8217;t very likely).  </p>
<p>Nowadays, with home theater systems and DVDs of most major films available&#8230; it is pretty un-original to &#8220;re-make&#8221; a film.   I guess studios don&#8217;t think film goers will go to see &#8220;Friday the 13th: Part XXX.&#8221; So they have to &#8220;re-make&#8221; the first one, and re-call it &#8220;Friday the 13th&#8221; (instead of &#8220;Friday the 13th: The next Generation&#8221;). Which of course leaves them open to making sequals with their slightly altered &#8220;mythology.  &#8220;Meh&#8230; At least they aren&#8217;t renaming it and trying to release it as something new.  </p>
<p> Remember &#8220;A Perfect Murder&#8221; in 1998.  Having read nothing about it prior to seeing it, I spent the whole time in the theater saying&#8230; &#8220;I&#8217;ve seen this before&#8221; (for those that don&#8217;t know, it is a remake of &#8220;Alfred Hitchcock&#8217;s Dial M for Murder&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howard green</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/two-men-who-knew-too-much.php/comment-page-1#comment-99618</link>
		<dc:creator>howard green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7874#comment-99618</guid>
		<description>The 1956 version is a neglected masterpiece. The tension that builds during the Albert Hall 
sequence is masterfully created.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1956 version is a neglected masterpiece. The tension that builds during the Albert Hall<br />
sequence is masterfully created.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howard green</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/two-men-who-knew-too-much.php/comment-page-1#comment-194911</link>
		<dc:creator>howard green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7874#comment-194911</guid>
		<description>The 1956 version is a neglected masterpiece. The tension that builds during the Albert Hall 
sequence is masterfully created.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1956 version is a neglected masterpiece. The tension that builds during the Albert Hall<br />
sequence is masterfully created.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/two-men-who-knew-too-much.php/comment-page-1#comment-99611</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7874#comment-99611</guid>
		<description>I love the 1956 version. It is Hitchcock&#039;s most underrated masterpiece</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the 1956 version. It is Hitchcock&#8217;s most underrated masterpiece</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/two-men-who-knew-too-much.php/comment-page-1#comment-194910</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=7874#comment-194910</guid>
		<description>I love the 1956 version. It is Hitchcock&#039;s most underrated masterpiece</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the 1956 version. It is Hitchcock&#8217;s most underrated masterpiece</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 299/305 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-13 18:46:43 -->
