<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Terminator Salvation: 20 Things We Didn&#8217;t Like, 10 We Did</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:57:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conrad</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-2#comment-154173</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-154173</guid>
		<description>Then why do they try to kill Connor&#039;s mother? Wouldn&#039;t that also prevent Connor&#039;s birth in &quot;another&quot; timeline? And who decides which time-travel theory the Terminator universe is subject to: i.e. one immutable time-line vs infinite branching time-lines?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then why do they try to kill Connor&#39;s mother? Wouldn&#39;t that also prevent Connor&#39;s birth in &#8220;another&#8221; timeline? And who decides which time-travel theory the Terminator universe is subject to: i.e. one immutable time-line vs infinite branching time-lines?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conrad</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-2#comment-151503</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-151503</guid>
		<description>Then why do they try to kill Connor&#039;s mother? Wouldn&#039;t that also prevent Connor&#039;s birth in &quot;another&quot; timeline? And who decides which time-travel theory the Terminator universe is subject to: i.e. one immutable time-line vs infinite branching time-lines?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then why do they try to kill Connor&#39;s mother? Wouldn&#39;t that also prevent Connor&#39;s birth in &#8220;another&#8221; timeline? And who decides which time-travel theory the Terminator universe is subject to: i.e. one immutable time-line vs infinite branching time-lines?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterckrieger</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-2#comment-146202</link>
		<dc:creator>peterckrieger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-146202</guid>
		<description>Yes, he should have had a different reaction, like &quot;Oh No here we go again&quot; or something like that....all in all it could have been much better had they simply ran the script BY ME for final approval.  After I was done with it you would have dancing bears, Giselle Bundchen portraying Richard Nixon and the cast of &#039;Hangover&#039; wandering the desert looking for Vegas.  But no, they didn&#039;t listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, he should have had a different reaction, like &#8220;Oh No here we go again&#8221; or something like that&#8230;.all in all it could have been much better had they simply ran the script BY ME for final approval.  After I was done with it you would have dancing bears, Giselle Bundchen portraying Richard Nixon and the cast of &#39;Hangover&#39; wandering the desert looking for Vegas.  But no, they didn&#39;t listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-2#comment-228982</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-228982</guid>
		<description>I think that Skynet deliberately sacrificed the hydrobots and the HK so that the Resistance would get some confidence in the signal.  Connor should have been more doubtful though - skepticism should come naturally when fighting machines.  Trap doors are left open for a reason. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Skynet deliberately sacrificed the hydrobots and the HK so that the Resistance would get some confidence in the signal.  Connor should have been more doubtful though &#8211; skepticism should come naturally when fighting machines.  Trap doors are left open for a reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Krieger</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-2#comment-228981</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Krieger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-228981</guid>
		<description>Great points.  If the opening sequence involved some combat, rather than a total &#039;white hat wipeout&#039; I would have liked it more.

Ideally, you would have had some platoons of Resistance fighters taking positions around the hole in the ground, Connor and crew making their way into the facility; obtaining information; rescuing civilians and fighting their way out.  

I was quite disappointed that the Hueys did not light up a formation of T-600&#039;s with their 5-inch rockets and miniguns, and calling in the Warthogs for air support.  Scenes like these would have established Connor as a leader, particularly if he saved Barnes&#039; brother and carried him to a Medevac helicopter.  The opening sequence should have reminded the viewer a bit of &quot;Saving Private Ryan&quot; more so than &quot;Independence Day.&quot;

Marcus and Blair should have had more interaction; implied nudity could have worked just as well as a pair of shapely lust-orbs.  Also, Marcus does not seem to realize there&#039;s something different about him; he treats his bashing of the three survivors with the same regard as finishing a cheeseburger.  

Also, why is he not in awe of his own survival?  Why does Kyle ask him &quot;Just what the hell are you talking about?  Were you lost for the past 15 years or something? I mean 3 billion people were VAPORIZED, and all you can say is WHAT HAPPENED HERE?&quot;   I mean, post J-Day survival is likely more on Kyle&#039;s mind that how someone else made it through unscathed; but didn&#039;t his survival instinct set cause him to question Marcus&#039; cluelessness? 

It is likely that Skynet was unable to successfully locate and attack Connor&#039;s Resistance base as they may not have had sufficient capacity.  According to &#039;From the Ashes&#039; they were still building up their numbers.   And Skynet had only ONE functional T-800?  Too much mustache twisting on the part of Skynet.  

Connor should have been beaten up, but not speared through the chest.  Marcus should have stayed on, after saving him from the T-800.  Not for nothing but the Project Angel script (see below)involved Connor dying and Marcus taking his place and skin - that would have mucked w/ the legend too much and alienated the audience. 

I always did wonder exactly how the resistance formed, how they obtained supplies (aviation fuel, food and water would not exactly be easily available post J-Day) and how the survivors first learned of Skynet&#039;s involvement.  Not enough exposition here.  Wasted opportunity.

There was a portion of a script floating around called &quot;Project Angel&quot; in which Helena Bonham Carter/Kogen was supposed to be a &#039;one-off&#039; Terminator similar to Marcus; they were supposed to have a conversation similar to what actually took place BUT that was booted and we had the mustache-twisting incarnation of Skynet instead.

Also, just how did Skynet know about Kyle Reese? I mean he wasn&#039;t involved in any campaigns from which to gain a reputation.  Did the machines sent into the past leave traces for future incarnations of Skynet to find?   They were a little too omniscient.

Connor should also have insistent on one element of the final attack plan: instead of broadcasting the message from the Command Sub, broadcast it from a decoy, and use air assets to take out the HK on approach.  That would have made Command a bit more aware of Connor&#039;s strategic thinking; it would have gummed up Skynet&#039;s plans by sowing seeds of doubt. 

Had Skynet&#039;s programming  Marcus been too obvious (&#039;Find him and kill him&#039;), he might not have been effective @ locating Connor and convincing him to break into Skynet Central.  The Kogen screen talking-head did say they had to think radically.....the script writers clearly did not emphasize that Skynet&#039;s thinking was strategic in nature - take out Connor and  the rest of the Resistance would falter.  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points.  If the opening sequence involved some combat, rather than a total &#8216;white hat wipeout&#8217; I would have liked it more.</p>
<p>Ideally, you would have had some platoons of Resistance fighters taking positions around the hole in the ground, Connor and crew making their way into the facility; obtaining information; rescuing civilians and fighting their way out.  </p>
<p>I was quite disappointed that the Hueys did not light up a formation of T-600&#8242;s with their 5-inch rockets and miniguns, and calling in the Warthogs for air support.  Scenes like these would have established Connor as a leader, particularly if he saved Barnes&#8217; brother and carried him to a Medevac helicopter.  The opening sequence should have reminded the viewer a bit of &#8220;Saving Private Ryan&#8221; more so than &#8220;Independence Day.&#8221;</p>
<p>Marcus and Blair should have had more interaction; implied nudity could have worked just as well as a pair of shapely lust-orbs.  Also, Marcus does not seem to realize there&#8217;s something different about him; he treats his bashing of the three survivors with the same regard as finishing a cheeseburger.  </p>
<p>Also, why is he not in awe of his own survival?  Why does Kyle ask him &#8220;Just what the hell are you talking about?  Were you lost for the past 15 years or something? I mean 3 billion people were VAPORIZED, and all you can say is WHAT HAPPENED HERE?&#8221;   I mean, post J-Day survival is likely more on Kyle&#8217;s mind that how someone else made it through unscathed; but didn&#8217;t his survival instinct set cause him to question Marcus&#8217; cluelessness? </p>
<p>It is likely that Skynet was unable to successfully locate and attack Connor&#8217;s Resistance base as they may not have had sufficient capacity.  According to &#8216;From the Ashes&#8217; they were still building up their numbers.   And Skynet had only ONE functional T-800?  Too much mustache twisting on the part of Skynet.  </p>
<p>Connor should have been beaten up, but not speared through the chest.  Marcus should have stayed on, after saving him from the T-800.  Not for nothing but the Project Angel script (see below)involved Connor dying and Marcus taking his place and skin &#8211; that would have mucked w/ the legend too much and alienated the audience. </p>
<p>I always did wonder exactly how the resistance formed, how they obtained supplies (aviation fuel, food and water would not exactly be easily available post J-Day) and how the survivors first learned of Skynet&#8217;s involvement.  Not enough exposition here.  Wasted opportunity.</p>
<p>There was a portion of a script floating around called &#8220;Project Angel&#8221; in which Helena Bonham Carter/Kogen was supposed to be a &#8216;one-off&#8217; Terminator similar to Marcus; they were supposed to have a conversation similar to what actually took place BUT that was booted and we had the mustache-twisting incarnation of Skynet instead.</p>
<p>Also, just how did Skynet know about Kyle Reese? I mean he wasn&#8217;t involved in any campaigns from which to gain a reputation.  Did the machines sent into the past leave traces for future incarnations of Skynet to find?   They were a little too omniscient.</p>
<p>Connor should also have insistent on one element of the final attack plan: instead of broadcasting the message from the Command Sub, broadcast it from a decoy, and use air assets to take out the HK on approach.  That would have made Command a bit more aware of Connor&#8217;s strategic thinking; it would have gummed up Skynet&#8217;s plans by sowing seeds of doubt. </p>
<p>Had Skynet&#8217;s programming  Marcus been too obvious (&#8216;Find him and kill him&#8217;), he might not have been effective @ locating Connor and convincing him to break into Skynet Central.  The Kogen screen talking-head did say they had to think radically&#8230;..the script writers clearly did not emphasize that Skynet&#8217;s thinking was strategic in nature &#8211; take out Connor and  the rest of the Resistance would falter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: butchermaggot</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-2#comment-228782</link>
		<dc:creator>butchermaggot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-228782</guid>
		<description>well, just saw the flick now (just came out recently where i live)... and i have to agree with close to everything pointed out in this article.

the one thing that struck me most though (apart maybe from screen-gems like a helicopter outflying a shroom cloud + blast before an absolute cheesefest of an ending and such) is missing in my opinion: where was the overpowering feeling that there is an actual, down to the core struggle for humanities very survival against an all powerful enemy with limitless technology and resources at his disposal going on?

2 kids killing robots (with conveniently placed railroad parts no less)? people strolling about the desert for days on end without being wiped clean off the sand? a headquarter with magnetic mines as the main defense (in a movie dominated by flying robots) and so on... where were the battlefields littered with human skulls? the crafty fighters that take down huge machines with just barely driving cars, high powered rifles and pipe bombs while just barely getting away with their life? 

the notion of utter destruction of the human race and the subtle hints to ways humans adapt to it - remember that scene from t1 where the kids watched the tube and were happy about the show that was on? priceless little detail and tip of the hat to coping with what remains, just before the whole place was torn to shreds by an ifiltrator. where did all that stuff go? 

all that apart from the fact that, evidently, these killing machines - built for one purpose only mind you - will wait for their target to recognise the threat, give them a second or two of terror and only then start shooting. and to top it off they are equipped with about the same grade of accuracy that bad guys in any given a-team episode have at their disposal. theyre killing machines for crying out loud. cold, mathematically steered killing machines. that, and only that, made them so menacing to begin with. 

and whilst a robot able to safely navigate through rubble, &quot;cut&quot; himself loose from slingtraps and recognize facial attributes to safely identify single targets in a sheer herd of people, doesnt seem to be able to calculate where an object moving at speed x is going to be by time y to aim a chaingun in the general direction z, a high speed bike detached from a robot&#039;s legs (the one place you would not want to place stuff that doesnt stabilize the machine) can easily calculate its  drift&#039;n&#039;slide through a bunch of flying cars... 

dont get me wrong. i actually enjoyed that bike scene a lot. it was one of the few that actually showed off what kind of awesome machinery is trying to take down humanity.

at any rate, the absolute lack of any feeling of danger really messed this movie up for me. also: pg13 is alright for spongebob, harry potter and the like... NOT a terminator movie. how come sly seems to be the only one to remember these days: movies about war need violence, blood and terror. its in these things that war manifests itself.

but with many flicks in the last bunch of years one huge question imposes itself: where did the writers, directors &amp; producers that actually had a pair go after the golden era?

ps: awesome site! love the shouting matches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, just saw the flick now (just came out recently where i live)&#8230; and i have to agree with close to everything pointed out in this article.</p>
<p>the one thing that struck me most though (apart maybe from screen-gems like a helicopter outflying a shroom cloud + blast before an absolute cheesefest of an ending and such) is missing in my opinion: where was the overpowering feeling that there is an actual, down to the core struggle for humanities very survival against an all powerful enemy with limitless technology and resources at his disposal going on?</p>
<p>2 kids killing robots (with conveniently placed railroad parts no less)? people strolling about the desert for days on end without being wiped clean off the sand? a headquarter with magnetic mines as the main defense (in a movie dominated by flying robots) and so on&#8230; where were the battlefields littered with human skulls? the crafty fighters that take down huge machines with just barely driving cars, high powered rifles and pipe bombs while just barely getting away with their life? </p>
<p>the notion of utter destruction of the human race and the subtle hints to ways humans adapt to it &#8211; remember that scene from t1 where the kids watched the tube and were happy about the show that was on? priceless little detail and tip of the hat to coping with what remains, just before the whole place was torn to shreds by an ifiltrator. where did all that stuff go? </p>
<p>all that apart from the fact that, evidently, these killing machines &#8211; built for one purpose only mind you &#8211; will wait for their target to recognise the threat, give them a second or two of terror and only then start shooting. and to top it off they are equipped with about the same grade of accuracy that bad guys in any given a-team episode have at their disposal. theyre killing machines for crying out loud. cold, mathematically steered killing machines. that, and only that, made them so menacing to begin with. </p>
<p>and whilst a robot able to safely navigate through rubble, &#8220;cut&#8221; himself loose from slingtraps and recognize facial attributes to safely identify single targets in a sheer herd of people, doesnt seem to be able to calculate where an object moving at speed x is going to be by time y to aim a chaingun in the general direction z, a high speed bike detached from a robot&#8217;s legs (the one place you would not want to place stuff that doesnt stabilize the machine) can easily calculate its  drift&#8217;n'slide through a bunch of flying cars&#8230; </p>
<p>dont get me wrong. i actually enjoyed that bike scene a lot. it was one of the few that actually showed off what kind of awesome machinery is trying to take down humanity.</p>
<p>at any rate, the absolute lack of any feeling of danger really messed this movie up for me. also: pg13 is alright for spongebob, harry potter and the like&#8230; NOT a terminator movie. how come sly seems to be the only one to remember these days: movies about war need violence, blood and terror. its in these things that war manifests itself.</p>
<p>but with many flicks in the last bunch of years one huge question imposes itself: where did the writers, directors &amp; producers that actually had a pair go after the golden era?</p>
<p>ps: awesome site! love the shouting matches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legomaker</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-2#comment-141732</link>
		<dc:creator>legomaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 03:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-141732</guid>
		<description>spread the word - &lt;a href=&quot;http://chud.com/articles/articles/19577/1/EXCLUSIVE-WHAT-WENT-WRONG-WITH-TERMINATOR-SALVATION/Page1.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://chud.com/articles/articles/19577/1/EXCLUSI...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>spread the word &#8211; <a href="http://chud.com/articles/articles/19577/1/EXCLUSIVE-WHAT-WENT-WRONG-WITH-TERMINATOR-SALVATION/Page1.html" target="_blank">http://chud.com/articles/articles/19577/1/EXCLUSI&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legomaker</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-2#comment-226819</link>
		<dc:creator>legomaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 03:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-226819</guid>
		<description>spread the word - &lt;a href=&quot;http://chud.com/articles/articles/19577/1/EXCLUSIVE-WHAT-WENT-WRONG-WITH-TERMINATOR-SALVATION/Page1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://chud.com/articles/articles/19577/1/EXCLUSI...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>spread the word &#8211; <a href="http://chud.com/articles/articles/19577/1/EXCLUSIVE-WHAT-WENT-WRONG-WITH-TERMINATOR-SALVATION/Page1.html" rel="nofollow">http://chud.com/articles/articles/19577/1/EXCLUSI&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vikoy</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-2#comment-141648</link>
		<dc:creator>vikoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 19:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-141648</guid>
		<description>On Bad Thing #17: That blowing up of the forest was not needless at all. They couldn&#039;t have allowed Marcus to get away, he&#039;s metal for crissakes.. They were infiltrated, they were thinking SkyNet had already found them.. So might as well destroy him (Marcus) before he actually goes back and inform SkyNet their exact coordinates.. 
(What bothered me was why there were hydrobots there?) 
 
On Bad Thing #7: He&#039;s a terminator.. So yeah.. He could make that shot.. 
(Although the T-600 had lousy aim.. So i don&#039;t know..) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Bad Thing #17: That blowing up of the forest was not needless at all. They couldn&#039;t have allowed Marcus to get away, he&#039;s metal for crissakes.. They were infiltrated, they were thinking SkyNet had already found them.. So might as well destroy him (Marcus) before he actually goes back and inform SkyNet their exact coordinates..<br />
(What bothered me was why there were hydrobots there?) </p>
<p>On Bad Thing #7: He&#039;s a terminator.. So yeah.. He could make that shot..<br />
(Although the T-600 had lousy aim.. So i don&#039;t know..)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vikoy</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-2#comment-226818</link>
		<dc:creator>vikoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-226818</guid>
		<description>On Bad Thing #17: That blowing up of the forest was not needless at all. They couldn&#039;t have allowed Marcus to get away, he&#039;s metal for crissakes.. They were infiltrated, they were thinking SkyNet had already found them.. So might as well destroy him (Marcus) before he actually goes back and inform SkyNet their exact coordinates.. 
(What bothered me was why there were hydrobots there?) 
 
On Bad Thing #7: He&#039;s a terminator.. So yeah.. He could make that shot.. 
(Although the T-600 had lousy aim.. So i don&#039;t know..)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Bad Thing #17: That blowing up of the forest was not needless at all. They couldn&#039;t have allowed Marcus to get away, he&#039;s metal for crissakes.. They were infiltrated, they were thinking SkyNet had already found them.. So might as well destroy him (Marcus) before he actually goes back and inform SkyNet their exact coordinates..<br />
(What bothered me was why there were hydrobots there?) </p>
<p>On Bad Thing #7: He&#039;s a terminator.. So yeah.. He could make that shot..<br />
(Although the T-600 had lousy aim.. So i don&#039;t know..)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole_Abaius</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-2#comment-141605</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole_Abaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 06:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-141605</guid>
		<description>The electronic interrupter worked, and was something developed completely by the military - with no possible interference by Skynet. Their opening up full comm lines was the mistake that led Skynet to finding the command sub, not the electronic interrupter.  
 
Had IT been a trap set by Skynet, then when Connor used it at his base, Skynet would have know his location and been able to attack him. Or when Connor used it in the field to take down the HK, Skynet would have known his location and been able to kill him.  
 
Don&#039;t worry - I had my eye on the story no matter how thin it got. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The electronic interrupter worked, and was something developed completely by the military &#8211; with no possible interference by Skynet. Their opening up full comm lines was the mistake that led Skynet to finding the command sub, not the electronic interrupter.  </p>
<p>Had IT been a trap set by Skynet, then when Connor used it at his base, Skynet would have know his location and been able to attack him. Or when Connor used it in the field to take down the HK, Skynet would have known his location and been able to kill him.  </p>
<p>Don&#039;t worry &#8211; I had my eye on the story no matter how thin it got.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole_Abaius</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-2#comment-226817</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole_Abaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 06:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-226817</guid>
		<description>The electronic interrupter worked, and was something developed completely by the military - with no possible interference by Skynet. Their opening up full comm lines was the mistake that led Skynet to finding the command sub, not the electronic interrupter.  
 
Had IT been a trap set by Skynet, then when Connor used it at his base, Skynet would have know his location and been able to attack him. Or when Connor used it in the field to take down the HK, Skynet would have known his location and been able to kill him.  
 
Don&#039;t worry - I had my eye on the story no matter how thin it got.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The electronic interrupter worked, and was something developed completely by the military &#8211; with no possible interference by Skynet. Their opening up full comm lines was the mistake that led Skynet to finding the command sub, not the electronic interrupter.  </p>
<p>Had IT been a trap set by Skynet, then when Connor used it at his base, Skynet would have know his location and been able to attack him. Or when Connor used it in the field to take down the HK, Skynet would have known his location and been able to kill him.  </p>
<p>Don&#039;t worry &#8211; I had my eye on the story no matter how thin it got.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kunu</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-2#comment-141598</link>
		<dc:creator>Kunu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 05:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-141598</guid>
		<description>um cole, what do you mean plot device that was brought up and never mentioned again? you realize that was the signal that was supposed to shut them down, but was in fact a trap set by the machines right? I&#039;d say it was brought up again when skynet used it to track down the resistance leaders and blow them up. but i guess you were too busy needlessly hating the movie to pay attention to what little story it had </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um cole, what do you mean plot device that was brought up and never mentioned again? you realize that was the signal that was supposed to shut them down, but was in fact a trap set by the machines right? I&#039;d say it was brought up again when skynet used it to track down the resistance leaders and blow them up. but i guess you were too busy needlessly hating the movie to pay attention to what little story it had</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kunu</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-2#comment-226816</link>
		<dc:creator>Kunu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 05:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-226816</guid>
		<description>um cole, what do you mean plot device that was brought up and never mentioned again? you realize that was the signal that was supposed to shut them down, but was in fact a trap set by the machines right? I&#039;d say it was brought up again when skynet used it to track down the resistance leaders and blow them up. but i guess you were too busy needlessly hating the movie to pay attention to what little story it had</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um cole, what do you mean plot device that was brought up and never mentioned again? you realize that was the signal that was supposed to shut them down, but was in fact a trap set by the machines right? I&#039;d say it was brought up again when skynet used it to track down the resistance leaders and blow them up. but i guess you were too busy needlessly hating the movie to pay attention to what little story it had</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jedimind_rick</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-2#comment-141539</link>
		<dc:creator>jedimind_rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-141539</guid>
		<description>McG went with what he know&#039;s best - spectacle over substance and that&#039;s why this movie isn&#039;t that great although,  I found it entertaining.  T4 was alright, good enough to garner discussions such as these.  After reading everybody&#039;s posts, I kinda want to watch it again but, I know I&#039;ll wait til it hits DVD. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McG went with what he know&#039;s best &#8211; spectacle over substance and that&#039;s why this movie isn&#039;t that great although,  I found it entertaining.  T4 was alright, good enough to garner discussions such as these.  After reading everybody&#039;s posts, I kinda want to watch it again but, I know I&#039;ll wait til it hits DVD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jedimind_rick</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-2#comment-226815</link>
		<dc:creator>jedimind_rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-226815</guid>
		<description>McG went with what he know&#039;s best - spectacle over substance and that&#039;s why this movie isn&#039;t that great although,  I found it entertaining.  T4 was alright, good enough to garner discussions such as these.  After reading everybody&#039;s posts, I kinda want to watch it again but, I know I&#039;ll wait til it hits DVD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McG went with what he know&#039;s best &#8211; spectacle over substance and that&#039;s why this movie isn&#039;t that great although,  I found it entertaining.  T4 was alright, good enough to garner discussions such as these.  After reading everybody&#039;s posts, I kinda want to watch it again but, I know I&#039;ll wait til it hits DVD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davebaxter1989</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-1#comment-141522</link>
		<dc:creator>Davebaxter1989</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-141522</guid>
		<description>Ahh I had half another message written out but we are making a lot of the same points so I shall wrap this up on my end and say I agree heartily with what you say Coleit is a lot of heavy lifting and time travel shouldn&#039;t mean anything is explained away but much like &#039;alternate timeline&#039; it is used that way.  
 
Rare though to have such a well thought out argument on the internet though so thank you Jmoney. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh I had half another message written out but we are making a lot of the same points so I shall wrap this up on my end and say I agree heartily with what you say Coleit is a lot of heavy lifting and time travel shouldn&#039;t mean anything is explained away but much like &#039;alternate timeline&#039; it is used that way.  </p>
<p>Rare though to have such a well thought out argument on the internet though so thank you Jmoney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davebaxter1989</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-1#comment-226814</link>
		<dc:creator>Davebaxter1989</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-226814</guid>
		<description>Ahh I had half another message written out but we are making a lot of the same points so I shall wrap this up on my end and say I agree heartily with what you say Coleit is a lot of heavy lifting and time travel shouldn&#039;t mean anything is explained away but much like &#039;alternate timeline&#039; it is used that way.  
 
Rare though to have such a well thought out argument on the internet though so thank you Jmoney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh I had half another message written out but we are making a lot of the same points so I shall wrap this up on my end and say I agree heartily with what you say Coleit is a lot of heavy lifting and time travel shouldn&#039;t mean anything is explained away but much like &#039;alternate timeline&#039; it is used that way.  </p>
<p>Rare though to have such a well thought out argument on the internet though so thank you Jmoney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMoney</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-1#comment-141506</link>
		<dc:creator>JMoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-141506</guid>
		<description>I just re-read your answer and you&#039;re incorrect in that second paragraph. they sent people back to kill connor because he defeats them in the future, it has nothing to do with who his father is. that is my entir point of my argument. nowhere throughout any of the four movies does Skynet know that Kyle Reese fathers John Connor. they are just trying to kill John Connor because he eventually leads the resistence to victory. 
 
Now if in TS Marcus was actually a terminator from the future sent back to kill reese and connor, then that would have made some sense and would have been a way better movie. it would have explained why there was this plot to kill them and it would have explained the advanced cyborg that marcus was. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just re-read your answer and you&#039;re incorrect in that second paragraph. they sent people back to kill connor because he defeats them in the future, it has nothing to do with who his father is. that is my entir point of my argument. nowhere throughout any of the four movies does Skynet know that Kyle Reese fathers John Connor. they are just trying to kill John Connor because he eventually leads the resistence to victory. </p>
<p>Now if in TS Marcus was actually a terminator from the future sent back to kill reese and connor, then that would have made some sense and would have been a way better movie. it would have explained why there was this plot to kill them and it would have explained the advanced cyborg that marcus was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMoney</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/terminator-salvation-20-things-we-didnt-like-10-we-did.php/comment-page-1#comment-226813</link>
		<dc:creator>JMoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=43271#comment-226813</guid>
		<description>I just re-read your answer and you&#039;re incorrect in that second paragraph. they sent people back to kill connor because he defeats them in the future, it has nothing to do with who his father is. that is my entir point of my argument. nowhere throughout any of the four movies does Skynet know that Kyle Reese fathers John Connor. they are just trying to kill John Connor because he eventually leads the resistence to victory. 
 
Now if in TS Marcus was actually a terminator from the future sent back to kill reese and connor, then that would have made some sense and would have been a way better movie. it would have explained why there was this plot to kill them and it would have explained the advanced cyborg that marcus was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just re-read your answer and you&#039;re incorrect in that second paragraph. they sent people back to kill connor because he defeats them in the future, it has nothing to do with who his father is. that is my entir point of my argument. nowhere throughout any of the four movies does Skynet know that Kyle Reese fathers John Connor. they are just trying to kill John Connor because he eventually leads the resistence to victory. </p>
<p>Now if in TS Marcus was actually a terminator from the future sent back to kill reese and connor, then that would have made some sense and would have been a way better movie. it would have explained why there was this plot to kill them and it would have explained the advanced cyborg that marcus was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 610/658 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-14 01:00:01 -->
