Comments on: Shouting Match: Who’s More Badass, Movie or Comic Wolverine?

By: m3 real

m3 real — Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:59:36 +0000

Only thing I'll disagree on is the bones. The adamantium made it so that he was Tonka Tough©. Sure, he could regenerate from anything, but his bones couldn't support any more than a normal guy. Afterwards he was pretty much indestructable. Plus him just getting metal claws doesn't make a lot of sense, but having claws that are coated makes more considering the skeleton. But all semantics, this movies blows.

By: Hatshepsu

Hatshepsu — Wed, 06 May 2009 19:40:34 +0000

I agree with the tie theory. The movies needed to be sold, so they made him a more versitile version of our loved psychotic prick the Wolverine. It seasm like in the movie, he is more concerned with finding out his past then fighting, like the comics sugest he loves.
Firstly you need to find a common ground on your term of "badass" then stop using low blows to try, unsuccessfully cripple your opponent. ie. "You keep a collection of your mama's panties under your bed." It's stupid.
The writer has free reign with his ideas and his imagination, where as the movies didn't focus on what you originally wanted.
I agree, Wolverine in the movies was a complete pansy, it made something in my heart crack a little, but my feminine side congratulates the director on a job well done of at least trying to go with this in another direction, but he could have made him tougher, more brutal -to a point-, and have more loner moments, instead of him connecting with just about everyone in that school on some level -pathetic!-

By: Hatshepsu

Hatshepsu — Wed, 06 May 2009 19:40:00 +0000

By: PaulSileo

PaulSileo — Mon, 04 May 2009 16:18:46 +0000

They are most pleasant. Enjoy!

By: PaulSileo

PaulSileo — Mon, 04 May 2009 16:18:00 +0000

They are most pleasant. Enjoy!

By: Josh_Radde

Josh_Radde — Mon, 04 May 2009 15:48:47 +0000

Consensus seems to be that we should've argued "Interesting" over "Badass." Apparently "Badass" is a wash. I'm gonna give myself a Paul Sileo-patented rim job right now.

By: Josh_Radde

Josh_Radde — Mon, 04 May 2009 15:48:00 +0000

Consensus seems to be that we should've argued "Interesting" over "Badass." Apparently "Badass" is a wash. I'm gonna give myself a Paul Sileo-patented rim job right now.

By: PaulSileo

PaulSileo — Mon, 04 May 2009 07:17:29 +0000

Thanks. :) Hit 'em with a one-two!

By: PaulSileo

PaulSileo — Mon, 04 May 2009 07:17:00 +0000

Thanks. :) Hit 'em with a one-two!

By: Voltron

Voltron — Mon, 04 May 2009 03:55:21 +0000

"Prepare yourself, because I’m about to blow your goddamn mind."

classic. you win this match by K.O.

By: Voltron

Voltron — Mon, 04 May 2009 03:55:00 +0000

"Prepare yourself, because I’m about to blow your goddamn mind."

classic. you win this match by K.O.

By: SexyWolvie09

SexyWolvie09 — Sun, 03 May 2009 20:19:36 +0000

in my opinion Hugh Jackman can never come close to be the actual disturbed loveable mutant we love. But I do admit we can never find any actor who can portray the character than Mr. Jackman himself (unless someone else have any opinions).
He perfected the character at its best (the look, the growl, the claws (boney or metallized), and the sexiness). The character in the comics is more feral, loaner, a savage beast in the wild, I sometimes don't feel that this Wolverine have no emotions. I've been reading Wolverine for a long time and what he does best is digging his problems with his metal claws. In my vote, the movie version.

By: SexyWolvie09

SexyWolvie09 — Sun, 03 May 2009 20:19:00 +0000

By: John Strickland

John Strickland — Sun, 03 May 2009 17:35:55 +0000

You know what's truly badass? The in-article advertisements in this article.

"You can find the best deals on MUTILATION in your area by clicking THIS!"

"You can find the best deals for FUCKING in your area just by clicking THIS!"

By: John Strickland

John Strickland — Sun, 03 May 2009 17:35:00 +0000

You know what's truly badass? The in-article advertisements in this article.

"You can find the best deals on MUTILATION in your area by clicking THIS!"

"You can find the best deals for FUCKING in your area just by clicking THIS!"

By: Jackie

Jackie — Sun, 03 May 2009 16:04:04 +0000

Well said, it's always difficult to bring comic book traits to a human character. Would the public be totaly turned off by a Wolverine covered in hair? There will always be facets of the character that just does not transfer over to a human equivelent. This is where the characters assasination begins. The human equivelent will never live up to the story. A director will never be allowed to take that type of character to it's full origins. They are two busy trying to "taylor- fit" the movie to a PG-13 ratings system.

By: jack2jack

jack2jack — Sun, 03 May 2009 16:04:00 +0000

By: nicky_cavella

nicky_cavella — Sun, 03 May 2009 05:01:57 +0000

there was a satifiying punisher hes called RAY STEVENSON, thomas lame a no no, should of just shot himself begin so depressed and shirtless.

By: nicky_cavella

nicky_cavella — Sun, 03 May 2009 05:01:00 +0000

there was a satifiying punisher hes called RAY STEVENSON, thomas lame a no no, should of just shot himself begin so depressed and shirtless.

By: BillBrasky

BillBrasky — Sun, 03 May 2009 03:19:36 +0000

I just played the demo of the XBOX360 Wolverine game, and it seems that the Wolverine is a combination of both of your arguments. You look like Hugh, saving people, but there is blood spilled everywhere in the game. It seems like it will be a lot of fun to tear people apart and cut some damn heads off!