Print to Projector: Superman: Red Son

Posted by Dr. Cole Abaius (cole.abaius@filmschoolrejects.com) on February 6, 2010 Share

As the only literate Reject, it’s my duty to find the latest, the greatest and the untouched classics that would make great source material for film adaptations. I read so you don’t have to. This week, Print to Projector presents:

Superman: Red Son

by Mark Millar

Art by Dave Johnson and Kilian Plunkett

“In the middle of the twentieth century, the telephones started ringing all across America as rumors of my existence started circulating.”

Synopsis

What if Superman didn’t crash-land his Kryptonian self in the flowing fields of Kansas but in a farm commune in Soviet Russia instead? This is the central premise of “Superman: Red Son,” an impressively creative comic book that gives enough taste of the original character alongside what is a very, very alien world.

Print

In a lot of ways, this comic book is a feat. For one, it takes that central question and extrapolates it as far as it will go. They are, after all, dealing with a bona fide superhero – the most powerful man on the planet. That man just happens to be championing Communism and Stalin’s way instead of apple pie. For two, it includes so much rich history that it rounds out the story while giving it a librarian’s depth alongside explosive action and tight dialogue.

Supes grows up with the ideals of state sharing instilled into him, but when the Soviets announce his arrival on the scene, the Americans see it as the announcement of a new weapon of mass destruction. It becomes a political split where the Americans find themselves on the losing end – but Lex Luthor, the world’s smartest man, sees no reason why he can’t top the Man of Soviet Steel.

There are familiar faces, like Batman, who was also born in the Soviet Union as a direct result of the KGB’s actions. He’s more of a Joker figure in this story – an agent of chaos fighting against Superman with ingenuity and ninja-like skills. Luthor sends an entire cadre of failed experiments (like Brainiac) to subdue Superman, and even Wonder Woman appears as a sort of societal mate.

But the beauty of the whole thing is that it takes us from the mid-1900s to around 2000 after Superman has risen to power. We get to see it from an outside perspective, but every once in a while we get a glimpse at how he’s really a lonely man trying desperately to make the world perfect. It’s an impossible task, but he either doesn’t know it or refuses to believe it.

And as a bonus, Millar manages to keep several Christ allegories in his version of Superman’s life – specifically a time where Superman helps out the Americans in order to prove that he wasn’t placed on the earth only to save the lives of one group or nationality. That’s symbolic icing on the cake for a rich, fantastically well-told story about one of the most recognizable figures in fiction history.

Potential Problems

The only real problem I see would be a studio not having the bravery to tell this story. It’s rife for adaptation on its own.

The Pitch

This is my challenge to the studio system. You want a reboot of the Superman franchise? Here’s your chance to do something daring, unique and phenomenal. Instead of rehashing an origin story that we already know by heart (and only really serves to introduce us to your actors and not the characters themselves), tell us a new story. Put the power and budget of a major release behind an origin story that most haven’t heard yet.

Writing:

It’s a difficult task for any writer to take something well known and change it so drastically, which is why part of me would love to suggest that Mark Millar adapt his own work. Unfortunately, even with the buzz Kick-Ass is getting, he’s never written a screenplay before. With that in mind, I turn to the one, tried and true writer who can handle both the political and the intimate, a writer who can introduce a larger-than-life figure and make them seem human: Aaron Sorkin.

Directing:

In the greatest bout of wishful thinking in my life (hey, this is dreamcasting after all), I would love to see Christopher Nolan at the helm. He’s already resurrected one iconic superhero, and he’s proven he can create a fresh take on origin stories that audiences will go crazy for. This might be a different animal altogether, but I can’t imagine any other director having the credibility to draw tickets on his name the way Nolan can at this point. Plus, he’d get to work with Batman again.

Last year, James McTeigue claimed to be in talks to direct a reboot, but so did the Wachowskis. And so did McG. And Bryan Singer is still involved. Millar himself actually teamed with Matthew Vaughn to pitch a massive three-film series, but so far there’s no actual movement on nailing down a director.

Starring:

There are several core roles that would make the film shine.

An Unknown as Superman: I think it’s obvious that you need an unknown to play Superman in order to recreate the character completely anew. Either that, or anyone but Brandon Routh at this point.

No offense to him as an actor, but he’s weighed down by the albatross of Superman Returns, and an audience would never buy him as a Soviet Supes. In fact, now that I think about it, you almost need someone a bit more built. A bit more, well, Soviet.

Ralph Fiennes as Lex Luthor: In the book, Luthor is still a pompous dick, but he’s also portrayed playing dozens of chess games simultaneously while solving complex societal problems because his brains works so damned fast. Several actors have gone bald lately for villain roles, but Luthor keeps most of his hair throughout “Red Son,” a good fact because the bald thing is really limiting.

Call it a cop out, but I really don’t want to dreamcast while figuring out if an actor would look silly without hair. I just want to choose a brilliant actor – like Ralph Fiennes (who, coincidentally, looks pretty frightening bald).

Nora Zehetner as Lois Lane: Lois plays a very different role in these comics. Her relationship toward Superman is…almost non-existent. It’s a smaller role, but it demands a certain type of actress to pull it off (and to age up).

If Marion Cotillard could do an American accent, I’d choose her in a heartbeat, but my friend Ryan Walters (the man who introduced me to the comic book) mentioned an inspired choice of Brick and Brothers Bloom actress Nora Zehetner.

Rade Serbedzija as Stalin: The big man’s got some serious weight to throw around in this story – and his arch is one of a powerful man who brings a creation to life that eventually (and organically) overtakes him. He is only a man, and every man must die. It’s a powerful part that’s encased in a historical figure that’s already hated.

Only an actor like Rade Serbedzija could both look and sound like Stalin while bringing a strong acting background to the table. He can be ruthless and earn compassion all at the same time.

Konstantin Khabensky as Pyotr Roslov: Roslov is Stalin’s son and the head of the KGB in the story. A pretty standard role of a scorned offspring who sees his rise to ultimate power stunted by an outsider who is hungry to rule the world. As standard as it is, it’s a significant part of the story, and Roslov is a major catalyst for the creation of Batman, as well as the true immediate foil of Superman while they spar for position in Moscow.

He’s a forgotten child who gets pushed aside when Superman comes on the scene, and who better than Daywatch and Wanted actor Konstantin Khabensky?

Viggo Mortensen as Batman: As I said before, this really isn’t the Batman that we know, love, and secretly wish we were. He is not the Bruce Wayne figure with flaunted wealth. He’s a beleaguered soul ruined by the loss of his parents, a figure of revolution and destruction, a terrorist. I’d like to throw out the name Viggo Mortensen for no other reason than it’s Viggo.

I don’t see a need to justify it beyond that. The guy is a genius. He also had a pretty solid Russian accent going for Eastern Promises.

Who Owns It:

Warners owns the rights to make the next Superman film, but to my knowledge, no one has specifically bought the rights to adapt “Red Son.” I imagine it’s because of the tangled web of legal issues surrounding the main character.

Projection

What a ridiculous movie this would make. I fully realize that it has the potential to please about 18 people and leave millions pissed off, but it also has the potential to swing the door wide for other alternative superhero films.

The genre has grown stale and restless. Reboots are coming only a few years after the final films in original series, and all we’re hearing creatively is that new directors and writers want to tell the same old origin stories over again. We’ve seen them. We’ve known them by heart. It’s time to wow us with something new and daring, and this is the starting point.

Editor’s Note: This entry could not have been completed without the help of comic book aficionado Ryan Walters who introduced the comic book to me and suggested several of the cast members.

Related Posts with Thumbnails


Read more articles by Dr. Cole Abaius

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Have to consider American abhorrence to anything related to Communism; taking one of its most iconic heroes and throwing a hammer and sickle on him would be anathema. Unless they Hollywooded that shit up and had Soops champion capitalism and democracy in the end...directed by Brett Ratner. Honk!
  • Winnie_T
    I think Quentin Tarantino would do a great job out of this. He already kicked ass with the Basterds (an alternate universe concept as well). I wouldn't mind if they did this in a hybrid A Scanner Darkly/Sin City style too.
  • I'm intrigued. I would definitely watch that film... But lets face it, Hollywood doesn't have the balls to even considering adapting this comic into a film.
  • Hmmm... I love Red Son, and if it means getting a Superman movie I'd be all for it. I don't think a studio will touch this; it isn't franchise material. But it's a creative idea, perhaps left best for the quite good animated Direct to DVD features DC has been putting out.
  • sarasorrentino
    That's exactly what I mean. The studio would never go for something that would; 1. Not translate to a sequel or Justice League movie in the future. 2. Possibly confuse audiences and cause a negative media reaction, and 3. Recast Batman. Again, confusing audiences and taking away from the success that is The Dark Knight.

    But I still love the idea.
  • Nothing pisses me off more than the 'confuse the audience' argument. Like when James Bond switched actors my head exploded and I couldn't comprehend what was going on...

    But if my choices were traditional Superman or Superman: Red Son, I'd have to go with Traditional Supes. Ideally, I'd be all for both.
  • C.R. Stemple
    Just as a bit of clarification on the ownership of the rights:

    Every comic book movie based on a DC comic is Warner Brothers -- as Warner Brothers owns DC Comics.
  • Cole_Abaius
    An excellent point that I should have thought of. Thanks!
  • Meself
    Line me up to see an adaptation of this. The Superhero genre definitely needs this kind of kick in the ol' cojones.
  • Jeff R Hall
    Dr. Abiaus,
    While I've never been a Superman fan this books sounds awfully interesting. (Personally I perfer Miracleman to Superman. I think that is a far better take on the "Uber-Man" concept.)

    Nora Zehetner is an inspired choice. In the two roles I've seen her play (Brothers Bloom and Brick) she plays a definite femme fatale. I think the femme fatale character would reflect the paranoia and back stabbing of Stalinist Russia. You might want to get in her arms, but you have to expect to see a sharp dagger in either hand. At least that is always how I envisioned Stalin's Russia.

    Off Topic - If anyone ever decided to remake Double Imdemnity <again> I think she would make an excellent Barbara Stanwyck. Not overtly hot (Though she is easy on the eyes.) and making up for any deficiency in looks with sheer suduction.

    Since I haven't read this book I don't know if Lavrentiy Beria is portraited? From your description it appears Millar uses Stalin's son instead. Historically, Beria made Himmler look like a pastry cook. Perhaps Beria might make a better movie character? (Again, I haven't read the comic so perhaps Millar incorporated the best (Worst?) aspects of Beria into the character of Stalin's son.)

    I think a really interesting take on this book would be to have Superman work under Beria in the NKVD. A kind of Russian Super Assassin. Perhaps his first "origin" mission might be to track down Trotsky? A take on the opening of Casino Royale showing Bonds first kill. This could be the Red Superman's first kill thereby establishing that this IS NOT your average Superman. (Who could be slimy enough to portrait Beria? Perhaps Ricardo Darín? Granted he is Argentinian and not Russian but with the rest of the cast <With the exception of Konstantin Khabensky.> being American I'm sure Darin could learn the English.) Darin plays a conniving conman in Nine Queens (One of my personal favorite films.) with just the right mix of smile-as-I-stab-you-in-the-back charm and brazen disregard for the rest of humanity.

    Before you protest, yes, I just realize I turned the movie into yet another Bourne-esque film. I love the Bourne films.

    A good call on Konstantin Khabensky. Despite any flaws that Night Watch and Day Watch might have (And I love both films.) I think the acting is generally excellent. I'd love to see these actors get more U.S. exposure.

    Again, thanks for an excellent column.
blog comments powered by Disqus