Share submit to reddit

“God will understand, my lord. And if he doesn’t, then he is not God and we need not worry.”

Synopsis

Following the suicide of his wife, a blacksmith – Balian of Ibelin – receives a visit from his estranged father, a knight in the kingdom of Jerusalem.  Balian flees his home to unite with his father and his fellow knights on a trek back to The Holy Land in the hopes of finding himself closer to God.  Upon arrival, Balian instead finds a kingdom on the verge of inner political turmoil at the hands of a Prince who is all too bloodthirsty to wage war against the 200,000 strong Muslim army, led by Saladin who himself feels responsible as Muslim leader to regain control of Jerusalem.  Despite the current King of Jerusalem’s ability to retain peace through denominational acceptance of all forms of prayer in The Holy Land it’s only a matter of time before he loses his own life and has to pass the reign on to a new, less understandable King.

Why We Love It

Let’s first make something as clear as absolutely possible – the Director’s Cut of Kingdom of Heaven is the only version of this film that should exist.  I’m not sure if needless film cutting at the hands of the studio of this magnitude has ever been done before, but the theatrical cut of Kingdom of Heaven is not only inferior, it’s bad – whereas the original Director’s Cut of the film is not only good, it may be amongst the top films Ridley Scott has ever made.  So, part of the reason why we love this movie is simply because it exists when it very easily might not have.  It’s a crime that the Director’s Cut version of the film did not make it into theaters, but it would have been a monumental loss if this cut had never been able to see the light of day ever.

As to why we love the film on its own merits all the trademarks of superior Ridley Scott filmmaking are here.  Great sets, great cinematography, great music, and a great story performed by some great actors (Edward Norton, David Thewlis, Liam Neeson, Jeremy Irons…) doing great work and some actors you wouldn’t think capable of great work (Orlando Bloom and former World’s Strongest Man Jouko Ahola) performing on par with the seasoned veterans.  There are few things about the film that are not exceptional, but it’s the characters that truly make it memorable.

Finding an abundance of heroes, or protagonists in film to be synonymous with what one would consider to be a great man is challenging – or at least more than you might think.  It’s absolutely common to have heroes, and especially secondary characters, have their moral shades of gray or lack of principles to both make them appear more human and allow for growth.  There are very few Atticus Finch’s, Mahatma Gandhi’s, or Juror #8’s on this planet and even fewer on the big screen.  Kingdom of Heaven probably has no less than two great men per scene and they’re represented on both the Christian and Muslim sides of the story.  They’re men that are unconsumed by greed, vengeance, and vanity and uncompromised by a false sense of righteousness in the name of God.

Not perfect men, but men who try not to allow their love of God to conflict with their innate sense of right and wrong; which sometimes appears an insurmountable temptation to do wrong in the name of God and not hiding behind their religion when they do wrong knowingly.  They know it’s bad to kill, but worse to believe that it was done because it was God’s will – that there is in fact a difference between what is permissible and what is right; and trying to live your life to do what you should do in the service of man and not what you are allowed to do in the perceived eyes of God.

Some films attempt similar approaches to the portrayals of admirable men to the detriment of the film because they focus on the message too much.  They come across as if they’re either on a moral high horse, or feel dishonest.  Kingdom of Heaven feels more focused on its telling of the story that the displays of aptitude in moral practice are refreshing and not preachy; even during the moments when men don’t yield to the enticements that the audience might wish that they would.

Moment We Fell in Love

Balian awaits a ship to take to the Holy Land at the port of Messina and Guy de Lusignan (the bloodthirsty prince of the synopsis) formally introduces himself as Balian eats lunch.  As Balian eats Guy pecks at him with his riding stick as he talks about the day when the King of Jerusalem will die and the open arms of the Holy Land to all forms of religion will end.  Balian gets annoyed by the pecking of the stick and yanks it out of Guy’s hands and sets it next to his plate, then continues to eat his meal.  Guy tries to save face and tells Balian to keep it as if he’s not even slightly embarrassed.  Balian, not allowing Guy the small satisfaction of walking away with a smidgen of pride, asks how he plans to be able to ride if he has no stick to beat his horse – and then throws the stick back to Guy.

Final Thoughts

In the grand fashion of classic Hollywood, Kingdom of Heaven – The Director’s Cut is in every way an exceptional epic.  If viewing the 4 disc dvd version of the film it opens with an Overture and cuts in the middle with an Intermission, both accompanied with a gorgeous musical score.  Sadly, the single-disc blu-ray, while in every way a phenomenal transfer, lacks the Intermission of the standard-def counterpart which does slightly diminish the feel of the experience.  It’s the kind of feel you get if you were watching Ben-Hur or Seven Samurai.  It’s that feeling of grandeur. Regardless, whether you see the dvd or blu-ray there is probably no greater example in the past 20 years of epic filmmaking (not even the almighty Lord of the Rings trilogy).  It has gorgeous photography, a sweeping musical score, an involving storyline that takes its time in establishing the right kind of affection, intrigue, or disdain for the characters so that it can build to its gruesome conflicts.

If the country had been able to see this film in its truest form there would be strong debate as to which of Ridley Scott’s historical epics of the 2000s was his best.


RELATED ARTICLES
ARTICLE TAGS
  Previous Article
Next Article  
Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!
  • Clay
    Wow, I had no Idea about the cutting. I'll definitely have to watch the director's cut. This reminds me a lot of Antoine Fuqua's King Arthur. Others may not agree, but the director's cut of that film is way better then the crap they released in theaters. Though that was due to a late decision to go from a hard R to pg-13...ohh the crap we endure for the sake of the teenager demographic...
  • it was painful to watch the theatrical cut...but I warmed up to the director's cut which is a much better film...I'm shocked that Ridley still isn't able to release his films the way he wants...I'm wishful that Robin Hood isn't cut down this much...
  • Jeff R Hall
    I've still never seen the directors cut of this film. It's always been "next" on my DVD purchase list. I really enjoyed the thearical cut. No, it wasn't perfect, but the story carried me along and it certainly looks grandious.

    Thanks for the write up, I think this just got bumped up on my proverbial "purchase" list.
  • nicogirling
    have to agree wholeheartedly with this article - when i saw it in the cinema it was plain average yet i heard good things about the director's cut. I picked up the 4 disc dvd set for about 10 quid and was astounded at the difference that it made - i now love this movie
  • Subotai
    I own the Director's Cut and it's the only version I've ever seen. It really is a fantastic film.

    But near the start of the review you said you weren't sure dramatic studio re-cutting like this had ever been done before, and I just had to chip in and say: Once Upon a Time in America. That amazing film was completely gutted before the restored director's cut emerged.
  • adamcharles
    You are absolutely right, I had forgotten about Once Upon A Time in America mainly because I was only a few years old when the film was released theatrically and I never had the opportunity to see that cut, but heard it was roughly around an hour and half shorter - which is unbelievable considering the scope and density of the cut that played at Cannes.

    Very good call on that, and now that I think about it I believe Brazil received the same treatment, but again I've only seen Gilliam's Director's Cut.
  • Subotai
    I'm only 21 myself, so I think I can let you off for missing it first time around. :) Great article, btw. I only sat through this a few months back and I already feel like seeing it again. Good sign.
  • man, is someone paying u to write this? that movie sucked!!
  • Kyle
    Uhhh, I would hope someone is paying him or else he shouldn't be writing these great articles for free, ass! The theatrical version sucked and I have a feeling that's the only version you saw. The director's cut is hands down my favorite film of all-time. Who knew that cutting an hours worth of plot and character development would ruin a film? Well, I'm sure we all did except for Fox. Seriously, did they even watch the director's cut or did they just look at the running time and balk. People talk about how bad X3, AVP 1&2 and Die Hard 4 were but the biggest travesty Fox ever committed was butchering this modern epic.

    I bet my life that the D.C of the film would've cleaned up during awards season in 2005 and made some serious bank. This is Ridley Scott's best film and Fox fucked it over, it's unforgivable! I own both the 4-disc dvd with the awesome intermission and the beautiful looking blu-ray version. It's the only film I have twice in my collection, it's that good. It also has one of the best and most haunting scores from Harry Gregson-Williams that I've ever heard.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow FILM SCHOOL REJECTS...


MOVIE NEWS | MOVIE TRAILERS | MOVIE REVIEWS | TV REVIEWS | FEATURES | INTERVIEWS | CONTESTS | ARCHIVES | ABOUT
Film School Rejects is the movie blog you've been waiting for. The ultimate commentary track on what's happening in Hollywood, FSR combines the freshest voices on the web and a swagger all its own to provide the best reviews, interviews and industry news coverage to millions of unique visitors from around the world every month.
FSR Team
Got a Tip? Send it here:
editors@filmschoolrejects.com
Publisher:
Neil Miller | Email
Managing Editor:
Cole Abaius | Email
Associate Editors:
Robert Fure | Email
Rob Hunter | Email
Contributors:
Adam Charles | Email
Amber Humphrey | Email
Brian Gibson | Email
Brian Salisbury | Email
Dustin Hucks | Email
Genevieve Blaber | Email
Contributors:
J.L. Sosa | Email
Jack Giroux | Email
Jeremy Kirk | Email
Jim Rohner | Email
Jorge Del Pinal | Email
Josh Radde | Email
Kevin Carr | Email
Contributors:
Landon Palmer | Email
Lauren Flanagan | Email
Paul Sileo | Email
Robert Levin | Email
Robin Ruinski | Email
Advertising:
sales@craveonline.com
All Rights Reserved © 2006-2010 Reject Media, LLC | Site Credits | Privacy Policy
Design & Development by Face3