Lesson Learned: Don’t Expect Perfection from Superhero Films

Posted by Adam Sweeney (adam@filmschoolrejects.com) on May 5, 2009

lesson-wolverine

X-Men Origins: Wolverine clawed its way to an outstanding opening weekend, proving that fans love the X-Men franchise, and that it’s best to lower our expectations for comic book films.

“It may sound absurd…but don’t be naive
Even heroes have the right to bleed.”

“Superman”- Five for Fighting

When I first heard word that there was going to be a Wolverine origin film, I was thrilled, maybe even a bit giddy. Any comic book lover can tell you that Logan’s story is one of the true treasures of the fanboy. They’d also likely tell you that the X-Men films so far have been a mixed bag. How you go from Bryan Singer to Brett Ratner is beyond me, but then again some people would point out that Superman Returns wasn’t the second coming of The Usual Suspects, so I digress.

In spite of the fact that the original X-Men film already brought a sort of Wolverine origin tale, because you have to admit that the film centered around him, X-Men Origins still raked in $85.1 million this past weekend, good enough for the 5th best comic book opening ever. I’d like to credit a lot of that to Hugh Jackman, but most of the allure was in the adamantium laced character himself. If you have a character that people love, they’ll go see the film even if it has second-rate special effects. I submit Spawn as evidence that a character can overcome a horrible film. It had a 19 million dollar opening.

X-Men Origins: Wolverine was ripped by critics for being cliche and overly complicated, the latter of which I would argue is a reason we love Wolverine to begin with, but maybe we should accept the fact that the Wolverine story is better the less we know about it. Wolverine’s story is kind of like that girl or guy at a party that stands in the corner of the room while everyone else parties and acts obnoxiously. You wonder what is so special to them. What makes them different? Then you take them on a date, find out that they live at home with their mother, they cut themselves and are almost religiously devoted to watching Friends episodes. At some point, you say, “Okay, I wish I didn’t know. Please go away and return to your My Chemical Romance/Lady Gaga led paradise.

But should some of the blame be placed on us, the fans, for our expectations of comic book adaptations? How many truly great comic book films have ever been made? I could probably name 10 to 15 that I would watch again. How may could you name, and be honest with yourself. Films like Spiderman 2 qualify as great, in my opinion, but the original Spiderman doesn’t. Were any of the X-Men films truly exceptional now that we have had time to digest them? I’m not so sure.

For every The Dark Knight, there is The Spirit, and that isn’t likely to change. It’d be great if the movie industry would take a lesson from Christopher Nolan or the depth of Jon Favreau’s Iron Man in finally understanding that comic book films can actually transcend the genres and, gasp, just be flat out amazing films. Instead, it is more likely that Hollywood is going to suck the genre dry until it has bled it and us of our money and originality. Maybe I’m wrong, but the more times I see adaptations of my favorite characters botched, the less naive I become, but I don’t blame the characters. Part of me doesn’t even want to blame the comic book companies, though I should know better.

In a perfect world, I’d say that we should boycott bad comic films and only give our money to the cream of the crop. The Dark Knight nearly became the top grossing film of all-time, and I’d gladly give another 20 dollars to it if they re-released it…again. It’s just that good. But we have to be realistic. The majority of Americans are going to keep going to see films like The Fantastic Four because they don’t necessarily care about quality. They want to just see superheroes, the ones they have grown to love, even if they’re less than perfect. In the end, the characters on-screen are only as good as the imprerfect creators of them. Even with superpowers, they’re just human. That’s the main reason we gravitate to them. Maybe it should be the reason that we shouldn’t expect too much out of them.


Read more articles by Adam Sweeney

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Of course it's not the fault of expectations. It's ridiculous to believe that all comic films are going to be of a TDK caliber, but it's reasonable to expect a decent film with so much great source material.

    Come to think of it, why would we go into any film expecting it to be bad? I would hope that any story that's presented would at least be presented decently. Wolverine was just plain bad. Awful story - choppy and boring. Wolverine was a boring character somehow. The dialog was all exposition and no action. I could go on, but damn did they mess it up.

    Just as it's silly to expect genius work every time, it's also pointless to expect terrible quality every time.

    And some blame should go to comic companies and the studios - a lot of characters just aren't meant for the screen.
  • Yeah, every comic book movie doesn't have to be a masterpiece. But try just telling a story instead of trying to cram as many cameos into a movie so you can either sell more toys or setup spinoff movies.

    Since Wolverine made so much money, this will likely remain unchanged.

    Dennis
  • Kyle
    Wolverine felt like Elektra.
  • Gambit didn't even have a Cajun accent! Enough said.
  • You quoted Five for Fighting in your column.

    You and I are done professionally, man.
  • Also "Were any of the X-Men films truly exceptional now that we have had time to digest them?" Yes. X2 remains f*cking brilliant. Still the most entertaining superhero movie with a good plot and character development to boot.
  • X2 was brilliant AND the most entertaining superhero movie to boot? Josh, has Swine Flu spread to Chicago? NO WAY.
  • d0x
    **SPOILERS IN LAST 2 PARAGRAPHS!!***

    The problem with a movie like Wolverine (which I actually enjoyed) is they rewrite the origin story to make it easier to swallow for the masses. Wolverines real origin story would make an amazing movie. Hell just the weapon x story would have been an amazing movie but Hollywood always feels the need to make up their own stories which makes fans angry cause we expect one thing and get another.

    I went into this movie expecting to hate it. I know his real origin story. I know alot about the character and how he acts. I was amazed to find myself enjoying the movie despite its pg-13 rating and random events. It was a well made movie with a good story. The only real dislike I had was what they did to Deadpool at the end. I thought it was kind of a cop out of an ending that just didnt fit the movie very well despite the fact that it did have some truths to it. I dunno it was just a wierd way to finish it off.

    I also didnt like Gambit. He shouldnt have been in the movie at all. First off he's younger than Cyclops in the comics but in the movie he's gotta be at least 5-10 years older. Second the guy playing him did a terrible job and third it just didnt feel like Gambit at all. I also wasnt a big fan of having Cyclops in the movie. It didnt make sense for him to be there and I understand they wanted to tie him and Professor X into the whole story but they could have gotten Xavier in without Cyclops.

    Lastly wtf is with Wolverine being shot in the head with Adamantium bullets? If that were the case he would permanently have holes in his skull. That aside the bullets shouldnt have gone through anyways because we have seen Wolverine fight plenty of people with Adamantium and how claws cannot cut them so having a bullet be able to break through is nonsense Hollywood and you should be ashamed of the lame way you setup his memory loss!
  • Jack Nicholson
    Of course we should lower our expectations. Why? The comic book fanboys. Most can't tell the difference between good and bad movies, or why it would be a bad idea to translate certain things to the silver screeb (i.e. Wolverine's yellow suit).

    Go check out the SuperHeroHype message boards sometime. "Make a Namor the Submariner movie!". These are the same idiots who bitched and cried until Sam Raimi was forced to put Venom in what would have otherwise been a decent flick.

    They are also the reason Marvel felt they had to reboot Hulk. Hulk was a brilliant movie, and if you didn't like it than you are the reason I didn't get a sequel. Eat a fat one.

    The Dark Knight is good because Chris Nolan knows how to make a good movie, not a word for word adaptation of your precious twelve issue arc of Superfriends. If these Fanboys have it their way, they will destroy any hopes of comic book to film legitimacy.
  • djjeffhall
    Adam - You mention 10-15 films that you can watch over and over, and you make a gret point. (I think my list would be far shorter.)

    Ultimately I want a good film first and a good superhero film on top of that.

    By the way, what would your entire list consist of?
blog comments powered by Disqus