I Love You, Man: 10 Things I Liked, 5 I Didn’t

Posted by Robert Fure (robert@filmschoolrejects.com) on March 24, 2009

ilym-2

While I’m not man enough to confess my love to another male, I can talk about I Love You, Man while still feeling secure in my sexuality.  The Rudd-Segel buddy pic did alright over the weekend, coming second to the surprisingly alright Knowing.  While I could do a 10 and 5 for the Nic Cage vehicle (I liked it) it would basically be me loving the Earth dying and all the religious allegory.

For I Love You, Man, there were a few more things that stuck out to me – and here they are. Warning: This article may contain mild spoilers.

10 Things I Liked

10. Paul Rudd. Rudd is the perfect non-threatening boyfriend type character.  That said, he’s quickly becoming overexposed.  He makes the “Liked” list this time.

9. Realistic Relationship. The relationship between Peter and Zooey was pretty realistic and they seemed like real people.

8. JK Simmons. He should probably have a small part in every movie.

7. Dude Lingo. Most of the time, they way they talked was entertaining and, unfortunately, relatable.

6. Andy Samberg. If only Hot Rod didn’t suck.  Samberg is awesome and under-used in this, but his few moments are great.

5. Rashida Jones. Beautiful girl and her character is down to Earth.

4. Projectile Vomit. It really exists!  Funniest scene in the movie.

3. Thomas Lennon. Yeah, so basically I really liked the cast.

2. Lou Ferrigno. How awesome is having The Hulk in your movie playing himself?  His parts were great, especially when he choked out Segel.

1. Zooey is an Awesome Girlfriend. My favorite part of the movie is that, for once, the girlfriend character was awesome.  She wasn’t having any sort of crisis, she wasn’t a slut, she wasn’t insane.  She was just the perfect girlfriend.  It was nice to see that kind of an understanding character.

5 Things I Didn’t Like

5. Lack of Samberg. Simply put, needs more Samberg.

4. Joe Lo Truglio. His character was annoying (but supposed to be) and his talent was wasted.

3. Predictable. Of course we know what’s going to happen, but at no point in the movie did I ever think for even a moment that things wouldn’t end exactly as they did.  Zooey and Peter were like the perfect couple – their breakup was not believable in the slightest.

2.  Repetitive. The ’sweet sweet hangin’ section of the movie was tired and repetitive and a bit too long.

1.  Same Cast. I’ve been bitching about this for a long time and will keep bitching about it – I’m tired of seeing the same corral of actors in every movie.  There are dozens of talented, working comedic actors, but it seems like all we get are the same few over and over.  I love Paul Rudd, but come on, I’ve had enough.  Jason Segel is funny and all, but I’ve had enough.  Give me more Seann William Scott or Steve Carrell or, hell, bring back Pauly Shore.  Just give me something different.

There you have it.  I thought I Love You, Man was a pretty sweet, relaxed buddy flick.  Nothing too deep, a couple of good laughs, though it got a little repetitive.  I really, really liked Rashida Jones and her character.

What did you like and/or hate about I Love You, Man?  Do you love me, man?


Read more articles by Robert Fure

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Mez
    How have you had enough of Jason Segel? This is only his second big role. I could understand the Rudd over kill, but Segel is the freshest of all those guys.
  • Yeah, how can you have Segel overkill then say "oh, but I'd love some more Seann William Scott." I don't care if these quality comedies aren't Seann's thing...
  • My tiredness over Segel may be a bit pre-emptive. I just don't really like the Apatow bait and switch. Introduce an actor in a minor role (Knocked Up) bump him into a starring vehicle (Forgetting Sarah Marshall) and then he's a star who will be everywhere in no time. Plus he's on a fairly long running TV show, so I just feel like I see his face everywhere.

    Don't get me wrong - he's hilarious. Forgetting Sarah Marshall was a top 4 comedy from 2008. Possibly top 3 or above. Just want some variety. As for SWS, what has he been in lately other than Role Models? Exactly.
  • a little movie i like to call Mr. Woodcock.
  • Yeah, that was in theaters 2 years ago. "Balls Out" was funny and went straight to DVD in early 2009. Fun fact about Mr. Woodcock - SWS hates it. But I can always go for more SWS.
  • it's a terrible movie, but he's great. role models was awesome.
  • Otis Jefferson
    Seems like you could use a nice picture of Rashida/Zooey in a bikini... but then again, we all could
  • Arou101
    Your entire column's integrity went out the window when you said to bring back Pauly Shore.
  • I think the Pauly Shore comment was meant as a joke. I did love Encino Man, however.
  • It was 90% joke. Encino Man, Son in Law, and In the Army Now are all pretty funny. Also, his trailer for "Adopted" looks hilarious. He goes to Africa and wants to adopt a kid, but of course, goes about it in a completely inappropriate way.

    If Van Damme an be cool again, so can Shore.
blog comments powered by Disqus