<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hollywood Trades are Clearly in the Tank for Frost/Nixon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/hollywood-trades-are-clearly-in-the-tank-for-frostnixon.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/hollywood-trades-are-clearly-in-the-tank-for-frostnixon.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alericc</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/hollywood-trades-are-clearly-in-the-tank-for-frostnixon.php/comment-page-1#comment-125998</link>
		<dc:creator>Alericc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=26548#comment-125998</guid>
		<description>Ok there is one person, now we have to find backing for this script I have. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok there is one person, now we have to find backing for this script I have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob_Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/hollywood-trades-are-clearly-in-the-tank-for-frostnixon.php/comment-page-1#comment-126006</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob_Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=26548#comment-126006</guid>
		<description>I think that film would suck. 
 
(Waits a beat.) 
 
Clinton lying about sex was more salacious, but utterly inoffensive and excusable as it wasn&#039;t anybody&#039;s business.  Nixon broke laws that actually matter.  And no, I&#039;m neither a liberal nor a democrat. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that film would suck. </p>
<p>(Waits a beat.) </p>
<p>Clinton lying about sex was more salacious, but utterly inoffensive and excusable as it wasn&#039;t anybody&#039;s business.  Nixon broke laws that actually matter.  And no, I&#039;m neither a liberal nor a democrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob_Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/hollywood-trades-are-clearly-in-the-tank-for-frostnixon.php/comment-page-1#comment-126012</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob_Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=26548#comment-126012</guid>
		<description>Marketing of a movie to possibly affect the Oscar race doesn&#039;t start at Oscar time.  A film&#039;s marketing budget from the very beginning plays a huge part as well.  So if you&#039;re going to say that studios shouldn&#039;t be allowed to put out &quot;For Your Consideration&quot; ads then where do you stop?  A movie in the public eye is still in the industry&#039;s eye... so the movie with the most money behind it will always have a better chance. 
Unless your little movie comes out at the end of the year, is really really good, and gets some buzz behind it early... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marketing of a movie to possibly affect the Oscar race doesn&#039;t start at Oscar time.  A film&#039;s marketing budget from the very beginning plays a huge part as well.  So if you&#039;re going to say that studios shouldn&#039;t be allowed to put out &quot;For Your Consideration&quot; ads then where do you stop?  A movie in the public eye is still in the industry&#039;s eye&#8230; so the movie with the most money behind it will always have a better chance.<br />
Unless your little movie comes out at the end of the year, is really really good, and gets some buzz behind it early&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davebaxter1989</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/hollywood-trades-are-clearly-in-the-tank-for-frostnixon.php/comment-page-1#comment-126023</link>
		<dc:creator>Davebaxter1989</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=26548#comment-126023</guid>
		<description>Well I&#039;m a staunch Democrat and I think there&#039;s a story there that while salacious would be hilarious. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#039;m a staunch Democrat and I think there&#039;s a story there that while salacious would be hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole_Abaius</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/hollywood-trades-are-clearly-in-the-tank-for-frostnixon.php/comment-page-1#comment-126024</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole_Abaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=26548#comment-126024</guid>
		<description>Come on, Hunter. That&#039;s absurd even for you. This trend of buying the Oscars started in earnest - or ramped up - about a decade ago, and it&#039;s changed the game ever since. Hand shaking in back rooms turned into massive campaigns where the dollar is king. It&#039;s hurt the awards to such a degree that the public can even tell that it&#039;s basically rigged. Simply put, buying the Oscars has delegitamized the whole show. 
 
Also, Nixon is far more interesting than Clinton.  
 
Also, also, &quot;in the tank?&quot; Someone read Wonkette! Kudos, Neil. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, Hunter. That&#039;s absurd even for you. This trend of buying the Oscars started in earnest &#8211; or ramped up &#8211; about a decade ago, and it&#039;s changed the game ever since. Hand shaking in back rooms turned into massive campaigns where the dollar is king. It&#039;s hurt the awards to such a degree that the public can even tell that it&#039;s basically rigged. Simply put, buying the Oscars has delegitamized the whole show. </p>
<p>Also, Nixon is far more interesting than Clinton.  </p>
<p>Also, also, &quot;in the tank?&quot; Someone read Wonkette! Kudos, Neil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alericc</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/hollywood-trades-are-clearly-in-the-tank-for-frostnixon.php/comment-page-1#comment-125987</link>
		<dc:creator>Alericc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=26548#comment-125987</guid>
		<description>Liberal media Trade publications and MSM Papers all over a movie critical of a Republican President who faced impeachment?? I find that hard to believe. 
 
How much do you want to bet that a movie never garners the same type of coverage of Clinton and the Lewenski scandel and his lying to a Fedral Judge, thus causing impeachment to be attempted, something that never happened to Nixon? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal media Trade publications and MSM Papers all over a movie critical of a Republican President who faced impeachment?? I find that hard to believe. </p>
<p>How much do you want to bet that a movie never garners the same type of coverage of Clinton and the Lewenski scandel and his lying to a Fedral Judge, thus causing impeachment to be attempted, something that never happened to Nixon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davebaxter1989</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/hollywood-trades-are-clearly-in-the-tank-for-frostnixon.php/comment-page-1#comment-125995</link>
		<dc:creator>Davebaxter1989</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=26548#comment-125995</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d actually bet that it would. A film based on that would be freaking awesome. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d actually bet that it would. A film based on that would be freaking awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alericc</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/hollywood-trades-are-clearly-in-the-tank-for-frostnixon.php/comment-page-1#comment-213185</link>
		<dc:creator>Alericc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=26548#comment-213185</guid>
		<description>Liberal media Trade publications and MSM Papers all over a movie critical of a Republican President who faced impeachment?? I find that hard to believe. 
 
How much do you want to bet that a movie never garners the same type of coverage of Clinton and the Lewenski scandel and his lying to a Fedral Judge, thus causing impeachment to be attempted, something that never happened to Nixon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal media Trade publications and MSM Papers all over a movie critical of a Republican President who faced impeachment?? I find that hard to believe. </p>
<p>How much do you want to bet that a movie never garners the same type of coverage of Clinton and the Lewenski scandel and his lying to a Fedral Judge, thus causing impeachment to be attempted, something that never happened to Nixon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davebaxter1989</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/hollywood-trades-are-clearly-in-the-tank-for-frostnixon.php/comment-page-1#comment-213186</link>
		<dc:creator>Davebaxter1989</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=26548#comment-213186</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d actually bet that it would. A film based on that would be freaking awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d actually bet that it would. A film based on that would be freaking awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alericc</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/hollywood-trades-are-clearly-in-the-tank-for-frostnixon.php/comment-page-1#comment-213187</link>
		<dc:creator>Alericc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=26548#comment-213187</guid>
		<description>Ok there is one person, now we have to find backing for this script I have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok there is one person, now we have to find backing for this script I have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob_Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/hollywood-trades-are-clearly-in-the-tank-for-frostnixon.php/comment-page-1#comment-213188</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob_Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=26548#comment-213188</guid>
		<description>I think that film would suck. 
 
(Waits a beat.) 
 
Clinton lying about sex was more salacious, but utterly inoffensive and excusable as it wasn&#039;t anybody&#039;s business.  Nixon broke laws that actually matter.  And no, I&#039;m neither a liberal nor a democrat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that film would suck. </p>
<p>(Waits a beat.) </p>
<p>Clinton lying about sex was more salacious, but utterly inoffensive and excusable as it wasn&#039;t anybody&#039;s business.  Nixon broke laws that actually matter.  And no, I&#039;m neither a liberal nor a democrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob_Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/hollywood-trades-are-clearly-in-the-tank-for-frostnixon.php/comment-page-1#comment-213189</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob_Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=26548#comment-213189</guid>
		<description>Marketing of a movie to possibly affect the Oscar race doesn&#039;t start at Oscar time.  A film&#039;s marketing budget from the very beginning plays a huge part as well.  So if you&#039;re going to say that studios shouldn&#039;t be allowed to put out &quot;For Your Consideration&quot; ads then where do you stop?  A movie in the public eye is still in the industry&#039;s eye... so the movie with the most money behind it will always have a better chance. 
Unless your little movie comes out at the end of the year, is really really good, and gets some buzz behind it early...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marketing of a movie to possibly affect the Oscar race doesn&#039;t start at Oscar time.  A film&#039;s marketing budget from the very beginning plays a huge part as well.  So if you&#039;re going to say that studios shouldn&#039;t be allowed to put out &quot;For Your Consideration&quot; ads then where do you stop?  A movie in the public eye is still in the industry&#039;s eye&#8230; so the movie with the most money behind it will always have a better chance.<br />
Unless your little movie comes out at the end of the year, is really really good, and gets some buzz behind it early&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davebaxter1989</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/hollywood-trades-are-clearly-in-the-tank-for-frostnixon.php/comment-page-1#comment-213190</link>
		<dc:creator>Davebaxter1989</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=26548#comment-213190</guid>
		<description>Well I&#039;m a staunch Democrat and I think there&#039;s a story there that while salacious would be hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#039;m a staunch Democrat and I think there&#039;s a story there that while salacious would be hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole_Abaius</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/hollywood-trades-are-clearly-in-the-tank-for-frostnixon.php/comment-page-1#comment-213191</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole_Abaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=26548#comment-213191</guid>
		<description>Come on, Hunter. That&#039;s absurd even for you. This trend of buying the Oscars started in earnest - or ramped up - about a decade ago, and it&#039;s changed the game ever since. Hand shaking in back rooms turned into massive campaigns where the dollar is king. It&#039;s hurt the awards to such a degree that the public can even tell that it&#039;s basically rigged. Simply put, buying the Oscars has delegitamized the whole show. 
 
Also, Nixon is far more interesting than Clinton.  
 
Also, also, &quot;in the tank?&quot; Someone read Wonkette! Kudos, Neil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, Hunter. That&#039;s absurd even for you. This trend of buying the Oscars started in earnest &#8211; or ramped up &#8211; about a decade ago, and it&#039;s changed the game ever since. Hand shaking in back rooms turned into massive campaigns where the dollar is king. It&#039;s hurt the awards to such a degree that the public can even tell that it&#039;s basically rigged. Simply put, buying the Oscars has delegitamized the whole show. </p>
<p>Also, Nixon is far more interesting than Clinton.  </p>
<p>Also, also, &quot;in the tank?&quot; Someone read Wonkette! Kudos, Neil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 467/473 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-13 21:54:35 -->
