Drag Me To Hell: 10 Things I Liked, 5 I Didn’t

Posted by Robert Fure (robert@filmschoolrejects.com) on June 1, 2009

tenandfive-dragmetohell

Editor’s Note: As with many of our Ten and Five articles, this article does contain spoilers. This article may also attempt to be overly humorous, repeatedly rip out clumps of your hair, gum your face, and vomit in your mouth.  Consider yourself warned.

They would have you believe that Sam Raimi is back.  But did he ever leave?  And if he did, has he really returned?  In terms of his absence, someone who makes like a billion dollars with Spider-Man can’t really be said to be gone.  Instead of whacking [It's "waxing" Robert] phallicsophal [Did you mean philosophical?] I could just cut the games and get to it – is the Sam Raimi of old, the Sam Raimi of Evil Dead back?  Yes and no, but we’ll get to that.  In short order, Drag Me To Hell is getting blowjobs, aka good reviews, from pretty much every critic on the face of the planet, most of whom apparently don’t remember Evil Dead or even know what a horror film is.  That said, there were 10 things I liked and half as many I didn’t.  Let’s do this.

10 Things I Liked

10.  Justin Long and his iPhone

Some other sites may not like Just Long, but I think he’s funny.  Not quite “Professor” material, but I like him.  Plus, as the Apple guy, seeing the iPhone was a fun wink.

9.  Sam Raimi’s Oldsmobile Delta

This “inside joke” is so far on the outside that if you didn’t know the old Gypsy’s car has been in every Sam Raimi film, then you have no standing to talk about this film.  Heck, it was even in The Quick and the Dead, though it was hidden underneath some stuff.

8.  Some of the Humor

I don’t mind some humor in my horror, it’s fun.  There were plenty of silly things here that worked in an Evil Dead 2 kind of way.

7.  The Sound

This was a very, very loud movie and that is fun.

6.  Shadows

I liked the way the demon was shown through shadows and his goat-like design was cool.

5.  Blood Spray

The scene where Christine’s nose starts gushing blood was a good example of silly, bloody gore laughs.

4.  Here kitty, kitty

While you may be surprised what you’d do to escape the demon, I won’t be.  Though I wouldn’t kill my own cat – I’d just go buy a lobster and sacrifice it.  Then eat it.

3.  Dead kid

You may remember my last rant about children always coming out alive – not this time!  The film starts off right by sending a mostly innocent young child to hell, where he will burn for all eternity.

2.  Alison Lohman

Not sexy hot, but very next door cute. I approve.

1.  Talking Goat

The goat had the look of Evil Dead 2 and the foul mouth of Freddy Krueger.  While, like the rest of the movie, it was very silly, I found this image stuck with me most.

tenandfive-dragmetohell2

5 Things I Didn’t

5.  The Script

I had a lot of issues with the script, actually, some of which will be covered in their own points.  But there were some parts that just didn’t flow seamlessly.  One example – we see Christine can’t get the money to pay for the exorcism (or whatever) and then Clay reveals he already paid for it – but no one told him about it.  Also, if Christine is lactose intolerant, how did 2 ice cream sundaes and a half-gallon of chocolate ice cream not give her absolutely bowel destroying amounts of diarrhea?  Thirdly – there are no scares in the script, only forced jump scares through audio cues.  This movie didn’t scare you, it just told you when to scream.

4.  Utter Stupidity of the Characters

The helper during the seance is a complete and utter tool bag.  First, why bring a machete to the table to kill a demon?  I would pick a shotgun.  Second, all he had to do was kill a damn goat but he got outsmarted by a demon goat.  It was tied to a table!  The only way to screw that up was to cut the goat loose and guess what?  Yup.  Second, if your entire immortal existence depended on getting rid of the button, would you not just double check to make sure you were getting rid of the button and not say, a coin or an empty envelope?  I mean, seriously.  Your immortal soul is on the line here.

3.  Vomit

You can also add hair pulling and denture loss here, but come on, man.  What the hell?  The old woman manages to throw up on Christine like 4 or 5 times.  We get it, Sam, you think its funny, I think its repetitive.  Where was the horror, again?

2.  The Ending

You can read this weeks boiling point, but basically this innocent girl does everything in her power and chooses to do the right things at the end and still goes to HELL for ETERNITY.  Let’s be honest – the gypsy woman is a thieving bitch.  She stole a whole tray of candies from the bank desk.  She failed to pay her mortgage and had two extensions already.  She claims all this economic hardship, but clearly her extended gypsy family has enough money to throw a big party after her death.  And don’t we think she over reacted?  I mean, losing a house and having to live with your close knit family versus going to HELL for ETERNITY.  Christine didn’t even do the “wrong” thing by denying the extension.  They were already kind to this woman twice over.  She did the right thing by not passing the button off on some stranger.

1.  The Three Stooges Go to Hell

Calling this movie a horror movie is like calling my shit a pile of sweet chocolate cake.  Sure, my shit is in a pile, but that’s where the similarities end.  This movie had like, a vague horror theme, but it was more Repossesed than The Exorcist. If this movie scared you, you’re a giant sissy and have never seen a scary movie in your life.  If you think this is “good horror” you don’t understand what the word horror means.  This was a fun slaspstick movie, but was more along the lines of Scary Movie 5 than Evil Dead. See, Sam Raimi hasn’t returned to his Evil Dead self.  He may have returned to that level of writing – that is, with a few plot holes and a not necessarily impressive script, but he didn’t capture the same menace.  Evil Dead was  a horror movie.  Evil Dead 2 was a horror movie with comedy elements that tied into the main characters psychosis which developed because of his experiences.  Drag Me To Hell was a slap-stick comedy with a horror theme.

There it is.  My thoughts on Drag Me To Hell.  Honestly, I could have come up with another five dislikes, but overall I enjoyed the film and wanted to give it a mostly positive slant.  The bashing can begin now as I’m one of apparently only two people not to think that the Holy Ghost ejaculated this film onto celluloid.  The other nay sayer is fellow Reject and sometimes replacement Coroner Rob Hunter.  The two site horror experts.  The two boys on this site who loved the film, Neil and Cole, both wept open tears of terrified hysteria at My Little Pony and each sleeps with a night light.  Though to be fair, they sleep in the same room, so it’s really only one night light.  Take from that what you will.


Read more articles by Robert Fure

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Chris
    Christine had the chance to do right (Jacks told her it was "her call"), but instead chose to turn her back on her values to impress her future in laws with a high profile position. It can also be argued that Christine may have been responsible for Ganush's death as well (though, exhaustion may have factored into it, seein' how the two had a Hellova fight. Even then, would she have been exhausted had she been in the position to fight in the first place?).

    The further she went in the film, the more she seemed to not really take responsibility for that initial action. When she showed at Ganush's house, she offered a flimsy apology. She tried to pass the buck of her problems off on not only her co-worker, but any person she came upon in the diner.

    Yeah, being sent to Hell is excessive, that's what many instantly think when wronged. Somebody cuts you off in traffic, you wish them dead. There's no rhyme or reason to emotion when you feel as if you've been wronged.

    That's what I found great about this flick. There's a moral grey area with Christine, but it's a debatable issue.
  • It was her call on the old lady, but the old lady had defaulted twice already. The bank is a business. The old lady stole from (candy) and then assaulted her and then cursed her to hell. She didn't have any responsibility to take - while she didn't do a good deed, she didn't do any evil. Is that all it takes to be a villain now, is to not do good? She also didn't pass the buck onto her coworker (who was a thief, backstabber, and liar) and didn't pass it on to anyone at the diner, despite thinking about it. She did the right thing.

    Let's also not forget that this gypsy is presumably the same one who sentenced the child to hell for eternity after he stole a necklace - which he tried to return.
  • All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing, Fure.
  • That's true. But what about when good (wo)men do everything in their power to vanquish evil but evil cast a cheat spell?

    Also, don't forget that really that quote is in no way related to me saying that to be considered evil all one has to do is not do good. What happened to being neutral?
  • Chris
    Those are some good points, Robert. I definitely agree with what you're saying. But Cole summed it up better than my longwinded rant did. While it's true she didn't pass the buck to Stu, or any of the diner patrons, she still thought about it. If you're a religious person, the mere thought of committing a sin is a sin. Again, worthy of being sent to Hell? Not in this lapsed Catholic's opinion. But clearly in the gypsy belief system. She felt humiliated and shamed, that was reason enough for Ganush.

    You wondered if all it took to be a villian now was to not do good... I have to say yes on that, but only in the sense that if you had the choice to do good in the first place. Yeah, she defaulted on her mortgage twice, but Christine's reasoning to not help her is what, in my opinion, damned her. Not because she didn't want to, but because it was for selfish reasoning.

    I'm liking this debate. :)
  • Kendal
    heyy this is a quote it kinda has nothing to do with the movie.
  • I approve.
  • Judson
    I'm pretty sure when something loud makes you jump that means it scared you. I think the term "frightening" is what you're looking for. Was I frightened? No. Did I get scared a few times, yeah. This movie was completely enjoyable from cover to cover, never boring, always funny and absurd, and delivered everything it promised. One of the few instances where a movie lives up to its expectations.
  • ‘Let's also not forget that this gypsy is presumably the same one who sentenced the child to hell for eternity after he stole a necklace - which he tried to return’ -that’s what I assumed had happened too and it made the ending difficult to accept. Looking at it from one perspective it the ending was at the very least entertaining because it was different and well staged but taken in the context of the overall film it’s at the very least... troubling. No matter how hard Christine struggled it ultimately proved futile as she fell victim to a vindictive bitch who couldn’t accept that she had defaulted too many times on her payments and who felt her pride wounded because she decided to make a scene.

    It felt as though there was no resolution as Mrs Ganush died before any retribution was extracted by Christine and so she escaped any punishment within the structure of the film. Of course Mrs Ganush conceivably could have been sent to hell for practicing the dark arts, invoking demons and being prideful (illustrated both by her hurt pride after begging and her refusal to live with relatives) but it’s never alluded to.
  • To me the ending just didn’t fit into the overall context of the film. I could understand the unhappy ending in Justine or the Misfortunes of Virtue/ Les infortunes de la vertu by the Marquis de Sade as the finale was connected with the philosophy of the novella which illustrated a series of negative episodes happening to a good person but in Drag Me To Hell I struggled to find the reason. Christine ultimately seemed to be a good person who was tormented and punished harshly and unnecessarily for no satisfactory reason.

    Also, I agree with what was said about the audio cues, I thought that they set a lot of tension which wasn’t followed through with anything to actually make you jump. Those complaints aside I did enjoy the film and thought that the performances of Alison Lohman, Justin Long, Lorna Raver and Dileep Rao where great.
blog comments powered by Disqus