<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discuss: Is Pixar Sexist?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-1#comment-171056</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-171056</guid>
		<description>Nick, you are being childish and unreasonable.  It is a problem that as the premiere creator of children&#039;s movies, in 10 films there has not only not been a female lead, but none of the films has had an even remotely realistic m:f character ratio (in fact in many of them it&#039;s been about 6:1, which is absurd).  Not only that, but female characters are almost always relegated to one of three roles:  emotionally impacting sacrifice, love interest, and sassy brow-beater - the first two primarily serve to deepen the male characters with added conflict, while the last is just an unimaginative cliche.  There is a very strong message of male = normal and female = special case.  It probably isn&#039;t malicious, but it is definitely irresponsible, in addition to just being plain cheesy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, you are being childish and unreasonable.  It is a problem that as the premiere creator of children&#8217;s movies, in 10 films there has not only not been a female lead, but none of the films has had an even remotely realistic m:f character ratio (in fact in many of them it&#8217;s been about 6:1, which is absurd).  Not only that, but female characters are almost always relegated to one of three roles:  emotionally impacting sacrifice, love interest, and sassy brow-beater &#8211; the first two primarily serve to deepen the male characters with added conflict, while the last is just an unimaginative cliche.  There is a very strong message of male = normal and female = special case.  It probably isn&#8217;t malicious, but it is definitely irresponsible, in addition to just being plain cheesy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-2#comment-161135</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-161135</guid>
		<description>hmm, interesting, just on the basis that most of the movies they make revovle around male characters.. makes them sexist?...... Guess what, watching movies with males as lead roles is just more interesting and fun to watch, unless its one badass girl.  you wanna know whats ruining little girls today? britney  spears, miley cirus, lindsay lohan, and all the other slut american teen idols.  leave pixar alone, they make great movies. people like you read to far into things.... companys make movies to MAKE MONEY... if they see one idea made alot of money, theyll copy it... thats all the biz is about, MAKING MONEY. claiming disney is racist or pixar is sexist would imply that they have put some concious thought into the movies by not making movies centered around women because they hate women(although ill admit that remus cartoon was a little too far) , so no i dont agree, making princess movies is only appealing to one crowd, while the others are for everyone of all ages, hence more money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, interesting, just on the basis that most of the movies they make revovle around male characters.. makes them sexist?&#8230;&#8230; Guess what, watching movies with males as lead roles is just more interesting and fun to watch, unless its one badass girl.  you wanna know whats ruining little girls today? britney  spears, miley cirus, lindsay lohan, and all the other slut american teen idols.  leave pixar alone, they make great movies. people like you read to far into things&#8230;. companys make movies to MAKE MONEY&#8230; if they see one idea made alot of money, theyll copy it&#8230; thats all the biz is about, MAKING MONEY. claiming disney is racist or pixar is sexist would imply that they have put some concious thought into the movies by not making movies centered around women because they hate women(although ill admit that remus cartoon was a little too far) , so no i dont agree, making princess movies is only appealing to one crowd, while the others are for everyone of all ages, hence more money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaye</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-2#comment-159571</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-159571</guid>
		<description>Simple storytelling device. Male leads are relatable for both genders, whereas females leads tend to only be relatable to females. It narrows your audience. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the record, I am female, but I usually prefer watching male leads. A good female character is hard to shoot for; males are a safer bet, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple storytelling device. Male leads are relatable for both genders, whereas females leads tend to only be relatable to females. It narrows your audience. </p>
<p>For the record, I am female, but I usually prefer watching male leads. A good female character is hard to shoot for; males are a safer bet, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toongirl</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-2#comment-159573</link>
		<dc:creator>Toongirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-159573</guid>
		<description>With few exceptions, Pixar&#039;s success has been due to it&#039;s &quot;Buddy Picture&quot; formula.  Whether it&#039;s Toy Story, Nemo, Cars, A Bug&#039;s Life, Monsters Inc, Ratatouille, or Up, Pixar has done the Buddy Picture exceedingly well.  But even Pixar is realizing it&#039;s running out of angles for this formula.  It may take hiring a woman animation director to jump this hump.  If Pixar can hire Brad Bird for some new blood, they can also take a chance on Sue Kroyer.  Or how about Kathy Zielinski?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With few exceptions, Pixar&#39;s success has been due to it&#39;s &#8220;Buddy Picture&#8221; formula.  Whether it&#39;s Toy Story, Nemo, Cars, A Bug&#39;s Life, Monsters Inc, Ratatouille, or Up, Pixar has done the Buddy Picture exceedingly well.  But even Pixar is realizing it&#39;s running out of angles for this formula.  It may take hiring a woman animation director to jump this hump.  If Pixar can hire Brad Bird for some new blood, they can also take a chance on Sue Kroyer.  Or how about Kathy Zielinski?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toongirl</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-2#comment-229058</link>
		<dc:creator>Toongirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-229058</guid>
		<description>While I can understand the &quot;write about what you know&quot; angle, it&#039;s also bullshit.  It&#039;s never stopped Studio Ghibli from making outstanding female characters for their films, and most of them are NOT princesses to boot!  

John Lasseter worships Miyazaki, so what&#039;s holding him back?  Answer: He knows the average American audience too well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I can understand the &#8220;write about what you know&#8221; angle, it&#8217;s also bullshit.  It&#8217;s never stopped Studio Ghibli from making outstanding female characters for their films, and most of them are NOT princesses to boot!  </p>
<p>John Lasseter worships Miyazaki, so what&#8217;s holding him back?  Answer: He knows the average American audience too well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HidanE</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-1#comment-143792</link>
		<dc:creator>HidanE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-143792</guid>
		<description>To that first part. 
Why not just switxh it around? It&#039;s not written in stone that the girls MUST only like the princess stories and the boys MUST only like adventures. It can be vis versa anyway you see fit. The movies are for anyone who shows intrest in the certain genra. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To that first part.<br />
Why not just switxh it around? It&#039;s not written in stone that the girls MUST only like the princess stories and the boys MUST only like adventures. It can be vis versa anyway you see fit. The movies are for anyone who shows intrest in the certain genra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HidanE</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-1#comment-227665</link>
		<dc:creator>HidanE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-227665</guid>
		<description>To that first part. 
Why not just switxh it around? It&#039;s not written in stone that the girls MUST only like the princess stories and the boys MUST only like adventures. It can be vis versa anyway you see fit. The movies are for anyone who shows intrest in the certain genra.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To that first part.<br />
Why not just switxh it around? It&#039;s not written in stone that the girls MUST only like the princess stories and the boys MUST only like adventures. It can be vis versa anyway you see fit. The movies are for anyone who shows intrest in the certain genra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambi Valent</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-2#comment-143434</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambi Valent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-143434</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s more an American movie problem than a Pixar problem. I think Pixar created several good strong female characters who can be themselves instead of being a magical girlfriend for the protagonist, and I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s the case with several US shows with women who are strong and competent. 
 
I&#039;m a German, and we get lots of dubbed movies from other nations, and I just can&#039;t imagine a lot of German and foreign movies with girl protagonists getting successfully remade in the US, because critics would reject them for these girls being bad role models, the movie would be called girly, and it&#039;s very hard to make changes that both please the critics, and get the boys to watch the movie, so ultimately, a remake will paint the movie pink to get the girls to view it, and most likely ruin it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#039;s more an American movie problem than a Pixar problem. I think Pixar created several good strong female characters who can be themselves instead of being a magical girlfriend for the protagonist, and I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s the case with several US shows with women who are strong and competent. </p>
<p>I&#039;m a German, and we get lots of dubbed movies from other nations, and I just can&#039;t imagine a lot of German and foreign movies with girl protagonists getting successfully remade in the US, because critics would reject them for these girls being bad role models, the movie would be called girly, and it&#039;s very hard to make changes that both please the critics, and get the boys to watch the movie, so ultimately, a remake will paint the movie pink to get the girls to view it, and most likely ruin it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambi Valent</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-2#comment-227664</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambi Valent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-227664</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s more an American movie problem than a Pixar problem. I think Pixar created several good strong female characters who can be themselves instead of being a magical girlfriend for the protagonist, and I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s the case with several US shows with women who are strong and competent. 
 
I&#039;m a German, and we get lots of dubbed movies from other nations, and I just can&#039;t imagine a lot of German and foreign movies with girl protagonists getting successfully remade in the US, because critics would reject them for these girls being bad role models, the movie would be called girly, and it&#039;s very hard to make changes that both please the critics, and get the boys to watch the movie, so ultimately, a remake will paint the movie pink to get the girls to view it, and most likely ruin it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#039;s more an American movie problem than a Pixar problem. I think Pixar created several good strong female characters who can be themselves instead of being a magical girlfriend for the protagonist, and I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s the case with several US shows with women who are strong and competent. </p>
<p>I&#039;m a German, and we get lots of dubbed movies from other nations, and I just can&#039;t imagine a lot of German and foreign movies with girl protagonists getting successfully remade in the US, because critics would reject them for these girls being bad role models, the movie would be called girly, and it&#039;s very hard to make changes that both please the critics, and get the boys to watch the movie, so ultimately, a remake will paint the movie pink to get the girls to view it, and most likely ruin it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-2#comment-143419</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-143419</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been wondering about this exact same thing since seeing the trailers for Up. I&#039;m sure it&#039;s a great movie. But all this talk about needing a lead who will relate to an audience, thus a male, bothers me. Sure we see &quot;hero&quot; as male, but can&#039;t that be changed? Shouldn&#039;t it be? I don&#039;t want my daughter to grow up thinking she&#039;s destined to be a supporting character in the world, albeit a strong and important one, just because she wasn&#039;t born a boy. 
 
And then there are all those who gripe about &quot;the PC police&quot; and roll their eyes... I agree that political correctness can get out of hand, but trying to include all kinds of people is more than just PC. It&#039;s equality. I&#039;m glad that a person of colour finally made it into a lead role in a Pixar film. I&#039;m glad Disney finally has an African-American princess. It isn&#039;t &quot;sad&quot; or succumbing to criticisms to include people who are different from the norm, it&#039;s inclusive and progressive!  
 
I&#039;m withholding judgement on the princess thing until I see what kind of princess she&#039;ll be, but I&#039;d really like to see the idea that men can&#039;t relate to female characters thrown out. If women can do it, why can&#039;t we? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve been wondering about this exact same thing since seeing the trailers for Up. I&#039;m sure it&#039;s a great movie. But all this talk about needing a lead who will relate to an audience, thus a male, bothers me. Sure we see &quot;hero&quot; as male, but can&#039;t that be changed? Shouldn&#039;t it be? I don&#039;t want my daughter to grow up thinking she&#039;s destined to be a supporting character in the world, albeit a strong and important one, just because she wasn&#039;t born a boy. </p>
<p>And then there are all those who gripe about &quot;the PC police&quot; and roll their eyes&#8230; I agree that political correctness can get out of hand, but trying to include all kinds of people is more than just PC. It&#039;s equality. I&#039;m glad that a person of colour finally made it into a lead role in a Pixar film. I&#039;m glad Disney finally has an African-American princess. It isn&#039;t &quot;sad&quot; or succumbing to criticisms to include people who are different from the norm, it&#039;s inclusive and progressive!  </p>
<p>I&#039;m withholding judgement on the princess thing until I see what kind of princess she&#039;ll be, but I&#039;d really like to see the idea that men can&#039;t relate to female characters thrown out. If women can do it, why can&#039;t we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-2#comment-227663</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-227663</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been wondering about this exact same thing since seeing the trailers for Up. I&#039;m sure it&#039;s a great movie. But all this talk about needing a lead who will relate to an audience, thus a male, bothers me. Sure we see &quot;hero&quot; as male, but can&#039;t that be changed? Shouldn&#039;t it be? I don&#039;t want my daughter to grow up thinking she&#039;s destined to be a supporting character in the world, albeit a strong and important one, just because she wasn&#039;t born a boy. 
 
And then there are all those who gripe about &quot;the PC police&quot; and roll their eyes... I agree that political correctness can get out of hand, but trying to include all kinds of people is more than just PC. It&#039;s equality. I&#039;m glad that a person of colour finally made it into a lead role in a Pixar film. I&#039;m glad Disney finally has an African-American princess. It isn&#039;t &quot;sad&quot; or succumbing to criticisms to include people who are different from the norm, it&#039;s inclusive and progressive!  
 
I&#039;m withholding judgement on the princess thing until I see what kind of princess she&#039;ll be, but I&#039;d really like to see the idea that men can&#039;t relate to female characters thrown out. If women can do it, why can&#039;t we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve been wondering about this exact same thing since seeing the trailers for Up. I&#039;m sure it&#039;s a great movie. But all this talk about needing a lead who will relate to an audience, thus a male, bothers me. Sure we see &quot;hero&quot; as male, but can&#039;t that be changed? Shouldn&#039;t it be? I don&#039;t want my daughter to grow up thinking she&#039;s destined to be a supporting character in the world, albeit a strong and important one, just because she wasn&#039;t born a boy. </p>
<p>And then there are all those who gripe about &quot;the PC police&quot; and roll their eyes&#8230; I agree that political correctness can get out of hand, but trying to include all kinds of people is more than just PC. It&#039;s equality. I&#039;m glad that a person of colour finally made it into a lead role in a Pixar film. I&#039;m glad Disney finally has an African-American princess. It isn&#039;t &quot;sad&quot; or succumbing to criticisms to include people who are different from the norm, it&#039;s inclusive and progressive!  </p>
<p>I&#039;m withholding judgement on the princess thing until I see what kind of princess she&#039;ll be, but I&#039;d really like to see the idea that men can&#039;t relate to female characters thrown out. If women can do it, why can&#039;t we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bunny</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-2#comment-143217</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-143217</guid>
		<description>I would say that Pixar are not sexist.  That isn&#039;t to say they don&#039;t sometimes fall guilty of some sexist behaviour, but they are certainly far more progressive than the animators I grew up with. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that Pixar are not sexist.  That isn&#039;t to say they don&#039;t sometimes fall guilty of some sexist behaviour, but they are certainly far more progressive than the animators I grew up with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bunny</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-2#comment-227662</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-227662</guid>
		<description>I would say that Pixar are not sexist.  That isn&#039;t to say they don&#039;t sometimes fall guilty of some sexist behaviour, but they are certainly far more progressive than the animators I grew up with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that Pixar are not sexist.  That isn&#039;t to say they don&#039;t sometimes fall guilty of some sexist behaviour, but they are certainly far more progressive than the animators I grew up with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bunny</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-2#comment-143216</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-143216</guid>
		<description>Okay, scratch the above I am an idiot.  Monsters vs Aliens was Dreamworks (oops). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, scratch the above I am an idiot.  Monsters vs Aliens was Dreamworks (oops).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bunny</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-2#comment-227661</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-227661</guid>
		<description>Okay, scratch the above I am an idiot.  Monsters vs Aliens was Dreamworks (oops).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, scratch the above I am an idiot.  Monsters vs Aliens was Dreamworks (oops).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bunny</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-1#comment-143215</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-143215</guid>
		<description>What about girls that want to have adventures?  This &quot;princesses are for girls, adventures are for boys&quot; stuff is exactly the problem.   
 
And why not make a movie about a prince?  It could be cool.  A prince who gets rescued by a peasant girl, who saves the day. 
 
How about, instead of insisting it must be ALL empowered women or ALL little-princesses we could have a variety of exciting, varied and interesting characters for children of both genders and all races and colours?  Then everyone can be happy. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about girls that want to have adventures?  This &quot;princesses are for girls, adventures are for boys&quot; stuff is exactly the problem.   </p>
<p>And why not make a movie about a prince?  It could be cool.  A prince who gets rescued by a peasant girl, who saves the day. </p>
<p>How about, instead of insisting it must be ALL empowered women or ALL little-princesses we could have a variety of exciting, varied and interesting characters for children of both genders and all races and colours?  Then everyone can be happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bunny</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-1#comment-227660</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-227660</guid>
		<description>What about girls that want to have adventures?  This &quot;princesses are for girls, adventures are for boys&quot; stuff is exactly the problem.   
 
And why not make a movie about a prince?  It could be cool.  A prince who gets rescued by a peasant girl, who saves the day. 
 
How about, instead of insisting it must be ALL empowered women or ALL little-princesses we could have a variety of exciting, varied and interesting characters for children of both genders and all races and colours?  Then everyone can be happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about girls that want to have adventures?  This &quot;princesses are for girls, adventures are for boys&quot; stuff is exactly the problem.   </p>
<p>And why not make a movie about a prince?  It could be cool.  A prince who gets rescued by a peasant girl, who saves the day. </p>
<p>How about, instead of insisting it must be ALL empowered women or ALL little-princesses we could have a variety of exciting, varied and interesting characters for children of both genders and all races and colours?  Then everyone can be happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bunny</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-1#comment-143214</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-143214</guid>
		<description>I know a hell of a lot of little girls who don&#039;t want to be princesses.  At least... not at first.  Watched my baby cousins talk about being explorers and spacemen and doing awesome things and being all kinds of cool, and loving lizards and bugs.  Then they started school and after &quot;not fitting in&quot; for a while... started showing more interested in more typical &quot;girl&quot; stuff like princesses.  And pink.  And referring to dinosaurs as &quot;boy stuff&quot;. 
 
Some girls like princesses.  Some girls like robots.  Or lizards.  Or dinosaurs.  Some boys want to be cowboys.  Some actually prefer dolls and dress-up to meccano, but when was the last time you met a parent who wouldn&#039;t react somwewhat negatively to little Timmy playing with his sisters tutus? 
 
I wanted to be a mad scientist/artist/rock star/archaeologist/vet when I was a kid.  All at once.  With superpowers.  Just because.  Princesses didn&#039;t enter into it.  We don&#039;t tumble out of the womb with a special preference for gendered things like cowboys and princesses hardwired into our brains.  Such things are at least partially about conditioning.  It is probably no coincidence that I developed a desire for archaeology with an Uncle who loved going beach combing, digging and generally looking-for-interesting-rocks, or loved The Doors after another uncle practically forced me to listen to them every time I visited him! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know a hell of a lot of little girls who don&#039;t want to be princesses.  At least&#8230; not at first.  Watched my baby cousins talk about being explorers and spacemen and doing awesome things and being all kinds of cool, and loving lizards and bugs.  Then they started school and after &quot;not fitting in&quot; for a while&#8230; started showing more interested in more typical &quot;girl&quot; stuff like princesses.  And pink.  And referring to dinosaurs as &quot;boy stuff&quot;. </p>
<p>Some girls like princesses.  Some girls like robots.  Or lizards.  Or dinosaurs.  Some boys want to be cowboys.  Some actually prefer dolls and dress-up to meccano, but when was the last time you met a parent who wouldn&#039;t react somwewhat negatively to little Timmy playing with his sisters tutus? </p>
<p>I wanted to be a mad scientist/artist/rock star/archaeologist/vet when I was a kid.  All at once.  With superpowers.  Just because.  Princesses didn&#039;t enter into it.  We don&#039;t tumble out of the womb with a special preference for gendered things like cowboys and princesses hardwired into our brains.  Such things are at least partially about conditioning.  It is probably no coincidence that I developed a desire for archaeology with an Uncle who loved going beach combing, digging and generally looking-for-interesting-rocks, or loved The Doors after another uncle practically forced me to listen to them every time I visited him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bunny</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-1#comment-227659</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-227659</guid>
		<description>I know a hell of a lot of little girls who don&#039;t want to be princesses.  At least... not at first.  Watched my baby cousins talk about being explorers and spacemen and doing awesome things and being all kinds of cool, and loving lizards and bugs.  Then they started school and after &quot;not fitting in&quot; for a while... started showing more interested in more typical &quot;girl&quot; stuff like princesses.  And pink.  And referring to dinosaurs as &quot;boy stuff&quot;. 
 
Some girls like princesses.  Some girls like robots.  Or lizards.  Or dinosaurs.  Some boys want to be cowboys.  Some actually prefer dolls and dress-up to meccano, but when was the last time you met a parent who wouldn&#039;t react somwewhat negatively to little Timmy playing with his sisters tutus? 
 
I wanted to be a mad scientist/artist/rock star/archaeologist/vet when I was a kid.  All at once.  With superpowers.  Just because.  Princesses didn&#039;t enter into it.  We don&#039;t tumble out of the womb with a special preference for gendered things like cowboys and princesses hardwired into our brains.  Such things are at least partially about conditioning.  It is probably no coincidence that I developed a desire for archaeology with an Uncle who loved going beach combing, digging and generally looking-for-interesting-rocks, or loved The Doors after another uncle practically forced me to listen to them every time I visited him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know a hell of a lot of little girls who don&#039;t want to be princesses.  At least&#8230; not at first.  Watched my baby cousins talk about being explorers and spacemen and doing awesome things and being all kinds of cool, and loving lizards and bugs.  Then they started school and after &quot;not fitting in&quot; for a while&#8230; started showing more interested in more typical &quot;girl&quot; stuff like princesses.  And pink.  And referring to dinosaurs as &quot;boy stuff&quot;. </p>
<p>Some girls like princesses.  Some girls like robots.  Or lizards.  Or dinosaurs.  Some boys want to be cowboys.  Some actually prefer dolls and dress-up to meccano, but when was the last time you met a parent who wouldn&#039;t react somwewhat negatively to little Timmy playing with his sisters tutus? </p>
<p>I wanted to be a mad scientist/artist/rock star/archaeologist/vet when I was a kid.  All at once.  With superpowers.  Just because.  Princesses didn&#039;t enter into it.  We don&#039;t tumble out of the womb with a special preference for gendered things like cowboys and princesses hardwired into our brains.  Such things are at least partially about conditioning.  It is probably no coincidence that I developed a desire for archaeology with an Uncle who loved going beach combing, digging and generally looking-for-interesting-rocks, or loved The Doors after another uncle practically forced me to listen to them every time I visited him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bunny</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/discuss-is-pixar-sexist.php/comment-page-2#comment-143213</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=44609#comment-143213</guid>
		<description>I would say that Pixar are not sexist.  That isn&#039;t to say they don&#039;t sometimes fall guilty of some sexist behaviour, but they are certainly far more progressive than the animators I grew up with. 
 
Pixar have very few female leads, but they do have them.  I believe Monsters Vs Aliens was a Pixar move; in which a strong woman gets superpowers that, subconsciously, are not the sort of thing we would epxect for a woman - she gets HUGE!  SUPERBIG!  And of course strong with it.  Women are not supposed to take up space - physical, social, political, that is what we are usually told.  But this woman does, she kicks arse, and she has the guts ot kick her ex out on his ear when he comes crawling back. 
 
Mrs Incredible was not the lead but was a strong, independent, capable and feisty woman all on her own right, and did not sit back waiting to be rescued or watching her man be heroic; she took action herself. 
 
Pixar rarely produce princess-type women, and even when they do their princesses do not fit the standard mold; just look at Shrek.  Okay, not a lead, but pretty damn good.  I think Disney (oldschool) is far more guilty.  Growing up, the strongest female character I remember is Mrs Dibley from The Secret of Nimh; Mulan was a little too late for me, and the other Disney princesses just... sucked.  They suck even more now, though, since they were made more &quot;marketable&quot;. (read, bland). 
 
Really, I think the issue now is Pixar clearly know that strong female characters sell well, they just are only slowly getting brave enough to risk putting one in as the central character.  I have no doubt they are trying to though, and expect to see more female leads in the future. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that Pixar are not sexist.  That isn&#039;t to say they don&#039;t sometimes fall guilty of some sexist behaviour, but they are certainly far more progressive than the animators I grew up with. </p>
<p>Pixar have very few female leads, but they do have them.  I believe Monsters Vs Aliens was a Pixar move; in which a strong woman gets superpowers that, subconsciously, are not the sort of thing we would epxect for a woman &#8211; she gets HUGE!  SUPERBIG!  And of course strong with it.  Women are not supposed to take up space &#8211; physical, social, political, that is what we are usually told.  But this woman does, she kicks arse, and she has the guts ot kick her ex out on his ear when he comes crawling back. </p>
<p>Mrs Incredible was not the lead but was a strong, independent, capable and feisty woman all on her own right, and did not sit back waiting to be rescued or watching her man be heroic; she took action herself. </p>
<p>Pixar rarely produce princess-type women, and even when they do their princesses do not fit the standard mold; just look at Shrek.  Okay, not a lead, but pretty damn good.  I think Disney (oldschool) is far more guilty.  Growing up, the strongest female character I remember is Mrs Dibley from The Secret of Nimh; Mulan was a little too late for me, and the other Disney princesses just&#8230; sucked.  They suck even more now, though, since they were made more &quot;marketable&quot;. (read, bland). </p>
<p>Really, I think the issue now is Pixar clearly know that strong female characters sell well, they just are only slowly getting brave enough to risk putting one in as the central character.  I have no doubt they are trying to though, and expect to see more female leads in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 594/621 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-13 16:51:11 -->
