<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Culture Warrior: Found Footage Filmmaking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/culture-warrior-found-footage-filmmaking-lpalm.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/culture-warrior-found-footage-filmmaking-lpalm.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:57:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landon_Palmer</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/culture-warrior-found-footage-filmmaking-lpalm.php/comment-page-1#comment-153845</link>
		<dc:creator>Landon_Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=55743#comment-153845</guid>
		<description>Here are the last two paragraphs from my original draft, excised for publication: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;In a way, Paranormal Activity operates on a simple filmgoing notion which has proved successful for decades in even more conventional filmmaking: that of suspense of disbelief. We treat Paranormal Activity as a fiction film rather than a piece of evidence, but for the duration of the film we momentarily allow ourselves to accept and take at face value what the narrative demands that it pretends to be, just like any fiction film that we allow ourselves to get lost in.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I’ve adopted the term found footage filmmaking from Karina Longworth. She didn’t use the term for the horror movies I’ve described above, but in her New York Film Fest review for Kids scribe and Gummo writer-director Harmony Korine’s new film Trash Humpers. Trash Humpers is about exactly what you’d expect from the title and the name Korine attached, following a non-narrative observation of antisocial middle American misfits engaging in increasingly appalling antisocial behavior that starts at humping trash cans and escalates from there. The movie is grittily captured through pre-digital home video cameras—analog warts and all—posing as found footage that Korine described as something of a derelict treasure caught on VHS one could happen across in a trash can or stored intentionally in a desk drawer. Longworth basically calls Trash Humpers an interesting if dumbfounding piece of art, but a failure—in its artful embrace of the macabre—as a convincing piece of found footage. But in the aesthetic of found footage filmmaking today, from populist horror to challenging experimental projects, the degree that something which is evidently fake comes off as convincingly real is irrelevant, rather what matters is the intent of the aesthetic itself—not something meant to trick us with the false impression of the real, but to engage us with the stylized familiarity of the real.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the last two paragraphs from my original draft, excised for publication: </p>
<p>&#8220;In a way, Paranormal Activity operates on a simple filmgoing notion which has proved successful for decades in even more conventional filmmaking: that of suspense of disbelief. We treat Paranormal Activity as a fiction film rather than a piece of evidence, but for the duration of the film we momentarily allow ourselves to accept and take at face value what the narrative demands that it pretends to be, just like any fiction film that we allow ourselves to get lost in.</p>
<p>I’ve adopted the term found footage filmmaking from Karina Longworth. She didn’t use the term for the horror movies I’ve described above, but in her New York Film Fest review for Kids scribe and Gummo writer-director Harmony Korine’s new film Trash Humpers. Trash Humpers is about exactly what you’d expect from the title and the name Korine attached, following a non-narrative observation of antisocial middle American misfits engaging in increasingly appalling antisocial behavior that starts at humping trash cans and escalates from there. The movie is grittily captured through pre-digital home video cameras—analog warts and all—posing as found footage that Korine described as something of a derelict treasure caught on VHS one could happen across in a trash can or stored intentionally in a desk drawer. Longworth basically calls Trash Humpers an interesting if dumbfounding piece of art, but a failure—in its artful embrace of the macabre—as a convincing piece of found footage. But in the aesthetic of found footage filmmaking today, from populist horror to challenging experimental projects, the degree that something which is evidently fake comes off as convincingly real is irrelevant, rather what matters is the intent of the aesthetic itself—not something meant to trick us with the false impression of the real, but to engage us with the stylized familiarity of the real.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landon_Palmer</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/culture-warrior-found-footage-filmmaking-lpalm.php/comment-page-1#comment-149465</link>
		<dc:creator>Landon_Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=55743#comment-149465</guid>
		<description>Here are the last two paragraphs from my original draft, excised for publication: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;In a way, Paranormal Activity operates on a simple filmgoing notion which has proved successful for decades in even more conventional filmmaking: that of suspense of disbelief. We treat Paranormal Activity as a fiction film rather than a piece of evidence, but for the duration of the film we momentarily allow ourselves to accept and take at face value what the narrative demands that it pretends to be, just like any fiction film that we allow ourselves to get lost in.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I’ve adopted the term found footage filmmaking from Karina Longworth. She didn’t use the term for the horror movies I’ve described above, but in her New York Film Fest review for Kids scribe and Gummo writer-director Harmony Korine’s new film Trash Humpers. Trash Humpers is about exactly what you’d expect from the title and the name Korine attached, following a non-narrative observation of antisocial middle American misfits engaging in increasingly appalling antisocial behavior that starts at humping trash cans and escalates from there. The movie is grittily captured through pre-digital home video cameras—analog warts and all—posing as found footage that Korine described as something of a derelict treasure caught on VHS one could happen across in a trash can or stored intentionally in a desk drawer. Longworth basically calls Trash Humpers an interesting if dumbfounding piece of art, but a failure—in its artful embrace of the macabre—as a convincing piece of found footage. But in the aesthetic of found footage filmmaking today, from populist horror to challenging experimental projects, the degree that something which is evidently fake comes off as convincingly real is irrelevant, rather what matters is the intent of the aesthetic itself—not something meant to trick us with the false impression of the real, but to engage us with the stylized familiarity of the real.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the last two paragraphs from my original draft, excised for publication: </p>
<p>&#8220;In a way, Paranormal Activity operates on a simple filmgoing notion which has proved successful for decades in even more conventional filmmaking: that of suspense of disbelief. We treat Paranormal Activity as a fiction film rather than a piece of evidence, but for the duration of the film we momentarily allow ourselves to accept and take at face value what the narrative demands that it pretends to be, just like any fiction film that we allow ourselves to get lost in.</p>
<p>I’ve adopted the term found footage filmmaking from Karina Longworth. She didn’t use the term for the horror movies I’ve described above, but in her New York Film Fest review for Kids scribe and Gummo writer-director Harmony Korine’s new film Trash Humpers. Trash Humpers is about exactly what you’d expect from the title and the name Korine attached, following a non-narrative observation of antisocial middle American misfits engaging in increasingly appalling antisocial behavior that starts at humping trash cans and escalates from there. The movie is grittily captured through pre-digital home video cameras—analog warts and all—posing as found footage that Korine described as something of a derelict treasure caught on VHS one could happen across in a trash can or stored intentionally in a desk drawer. Longworth basically calls Trash Humpers an interesting if dumbfounding piece of art, but a failure—in its artful embrace of the macabre—as a convincing piece of found footage. But in the aesthetic of found footage filmmaking today, from populist horror to challenging experimental projects, the degree that something which is evidently fake comes off as convincingly real is irrelevant, rather what matters is the intent of the aesthetic itself—not something meant to trick us with the false impression of the real, but to engage us with the stylized familiarity of the real.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobHunter</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/culture-warrior-found-footage-filmmaking-lpalm.php/comment-page-1#comment-149437</link>
		<dc:creator>RobHunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=55743#comment-149437</guid>
		<description>Hi. Long time reader, first time commenter. This marks the second of your posts that I&#039;ve read beginning to end, so yay! &lt;br&gt;And now two points... I would argue that Blair Witch would still have been a success today for the same reason Paranormal is. People walked out of the theater claiming it was incredibly scary and rushed to tell their friends. Period. The advertising pretending it was all real didn&#039;t play that big a role in it&#039;s success. Yes it tried and it was a big part of the promotion, but people went to see it because their friends said it was scary.&lt;br&gt;Second point is more of an observation... Blair Witch is the complete opposite of Paranormal when it comes to the scare structure. Blair Witch was lame until the final few minutes which were fantasticly terrifying. Paranormal is scary throughout and only loses major appeal in it&#039;s final seconds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Long time reader, first time commenter. This marks the second of your posts that I&#39;ve read beginning to end, so yay! <br />And now two points&#8230; I would argue that Blair Witch would still have been a success today for the same reason Paranormal is. People walked out of the theater claiming it was incredibly scary and rushed to tell their friends. Period. The advertising pretending it was all real didn&#39;t play that big a role in it&#39;s success. Yes it tried and it was a big part of the promotion, but people went to see it because their friends said it was scary.<br />Second point is more of an observation&#8230; Blair Witch is the complete opposite of Paranormal when it comes to the scare structure. Blair Witch was lame until the final few minutes which were fantasticly terrifying. Paranormal is scary throughout and only loses major appeal in it&#39;s final seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 236/242 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-14 01:10:43 -->
