<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attention Christopher Nolan: Here&#8217;s A List of Good Third Movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php</link>
	<description>A Website About Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:57:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-159925</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 02:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-159925</guid>
		<description>I see not much of a movie buff or even a movie watcher in general.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I thought fanboys had at least seen the Good the Bad and the Ugly. I guess not.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S.- Goldfinger the best third movie ever?  Ha! It&#039;s not even the best Bond movie within the first three, it&#039;s just the most well known.  That honor goes to From Russia with Love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see not much of a movie buff or even a movie watcher in general.</p>
<p>I thought fanboys had at least seen the Good the Bad and the Ugly. I guess not.  </p>
<p>P.S.- Goldfinger the best third movie ever?  Ha! It&#39;s not even the best Bond movie within the first three, it&#39;s just the most well known.  That honor goes to From Russia with Love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bu6oof</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-131207</link>
		<dc:creator>bu6oof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-131207</guid>
		<description>can h play by thes bage </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can h play by thes bage</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bu6oof</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-208532</link>
		<dc:creator>bu6oof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-208532</guid>
		<description>can h play by thes bage</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can h play by thes bage</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-118439</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-118439</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a huge Harry Potter fan, and far and away the third movie was the worst. It&#039;s terrible story telling and steers the franchise towards the weird instead of relying on the actual story. I&#039;ve read all the books and I liked all the movies, understanding fully how hard it is to translate literature to film, but the 3rd harry potter missed the mark terribly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a huge Harry Potter fan, and far and away the third movie was the worst. It&#8217;s terrible story telling and steers the franchise towards the weird instead of relying on the actual story. I&#8217;ve read all the books and I liked all the movies, understanding fully how hard it is to translate literature to film, but the 3rd harry potter missed the mark terribly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-208531</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-208531</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a huge Harry Potter fan, and far and away the third movie was the worst. It&#039;s terrible story telling and steers the franchise towards the weird instead of relying on the actual story. I&#039;ve read all the books and I liked all the movies, understanding fully how hard it is to translate literature to film, but the 3rd harry potter missed the mark terribly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a huge Harry Potter fan, and far and away the third movie was the worst. It&#8217;s terrible story telling and steers the franchise towards the weird instead of relying on the actual story. I&#8217;ve read all the books and I liked all the movies, understanding fully how hard it is to translate literature to film, but the 3rd harry potter missed the mark terribly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amol</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-118217</link>
		<dc:creator>Amol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-118217</guid>
		<description>... And yes, I agree with &#039;Bloppy&#039;, Sergio Leone’s &#039;The Man With No Name&#039; Trilogy was Awesome including the Third part - &#039;The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly(1966)&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; And yes, I agree with &#8216;Bloppy&#8217;, Sergio Leone’s &#8216;The Man With No Name&#8217; Trilogy was Awesome including the Third part &#8211; &#8216;The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly(1966)&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amol</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-208530</link>
		<dc:creator>Amol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-208530</guid>
		<description>... And yes, I agree with &#039;Bloppy&#039;, Sergio Leoneâ€™s &#039;The Man With No Name&#039; Trilogy was Awesome including the Third part - &#039;The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly(1966)&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; And yes, I agree with &#8216;Bloppy&#8217;, Sergio Leoneâ€™s &#8216;The Man With No Name&#8217; Trilogy was Awesome including the Third part &#8211; &#8216;The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly(1966)&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amol</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-118216</link>
		<dc:creator>Amol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-118216</guid>
		<description>1. (&quot; If you have any weaknesses as a filmmaker, it’s in defining spatial relationships during action scenes. There’s not a single fight scene in either Batman Begins or Dark Knight where we can tell what the hell is going on through all the fast cutting and micro-editing. It’s a small point, and the films are so good, they overcome that weakness.&quot;)

What you call a &#039;weakness&#039;, it is the ultimate definition of The Batman.
Even though Batman is a highly trained guy, his main combat weapon is... (you guessed it)... SURPRISE. Just like it is for a real Bat. The main objective of The Batman is to finish it off quickly IN THE DARK by subdueing his opponents AT CLOSE RANGE without letting them know what hit them. Just to blank them out fast enough.

And in order to experience the clarity of the fights long enough, the opponent should also be some sort of martial art expert to stand up long enough to The Batman. Otherwise it is finished as soon as it has started ...which is ... most of the times for the untrained opponents of The Batman.

The critically acclaimed Graphic novels of Batman also define his fights in a spooky way (with the exception of perhaps &#039;The Cult(1988)&#039;) which is the way it should be.
&#039;Batman Begins (2005)&#039; had the fight scenes correctly depicted. But I, a movie-fan and a Batfan, was disappointed to see a talented director like Nolan to give way to some demands of the so-called &#039;Batfans(?)&#039; and to show the Batman fighting clearly in TDK which is not correct. Nolan should not have compromised on his own clear vision. 

MY POINT: Batman is not just an ordinary martial art expert like Bruce Lee but is also a STEALTH fighter with Ninza-trainings. Period.

2. And this is a personal opinion of a &#039;Nobody&#039; like me (atleast NOT from the film industry) but... Harry Potter movies suck. James Bond movies suck (Except may be Craig&#039;s Casino Royale(2006)).

3. ROTK is a Very Good movie but NOT a &#039;THIRD&#039; Good movie. All LOTR parts branch out from a single story. Period.

4. Examples of a THIRD GREAT movies could be :

I) Shyamalan&#039;s &#039;SIGNS(2002)&#039; if we just consider that it, alongwith, &#039;SIXTH SENSE, THE(1999)&#039; and &#039;UNBREAKABLE(2000)&#039; make together a top-class Shyamalan SPOOK trilogy.

II) Ratner&#039;s &#039;RED DRAGON, THE(2003)&#039; of the brilliant &#039;Hannibal Lecter&#039; Trilogy. (The fourth part did not really live up to the expectations.)

5. Examples of a THIRD GOOD movies could be :

I) Mission Impossible-3. (Atleast better than the Woo&#039;s Second Part)

II) Jurassic Park III (1999 OR 2001 - I can&#039;t recall the year.) - Technically brilliant. A really thrilling movie made with the Dinos as stars.

III) Terminator-3(2003) was also a &#039;Third&#039; Good movie but hugely dissappointing in terms of what we expected from a successor of masterpieces like T-1(1984) and T2(1991). 

6. A Batman is different than a Spiderman. A Batman has a very strong dramatic character and a room for development/expansion unlike other superheroes. So any ordinary efforts on Batman by the standards of an extra-ordinary helmer like Christopher Nolan will still result in a &#039;Very Good&#039; Batman movie.

But it would be good for everybody if Nolan takes a break from Batman for a while, cleans his mind-slate and gives us an another &#039;Memento&#039;, &#039;Imsomnia&#039;, or &#039;The Prestige&#039; before jumping to Batman-3(2011 ?).

For now, Let&#039;s just wait for Angels and Demons(2009).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. (&#8221; If you have any weaknesses as a filmmaker, it’s in defining spatial relationships during action scenes. There’s not a single fight scene in either Batman Begins or Dark Knight where we can tell what the hell is going on through all the fast cutting and micro-editing. It’s a small point, and the films are so good, they overcome that weakness.&#8221;)</p>
<p>What you call a &#8216;weakness&#8217;, it is the ultimate definition of The Batman.<br />
Even though Batman is a highly trained guy, his main combat weapon is&#8230; (you guessed it)&#8230; SURPRISE. Just like it is for a real Bat. The main objective of The Batman is to finish it off quickly IN THE DARK by subdueing his opponents AT CLOSE RANGE without letting them know what hit them. Just to blank them out fast enough.</p>
<p>And in order to experience the clarity of the fights long enough, the opponent should also be some sort of martial art expert to stand up long enough to The Batman. Otherwise it is finished as soon as it has started &#8230;which is &#8230; most of the times for the untrained opponents of The Batman.</p>
<p>The critically acclaimed Graphic novels of Batman also define his fights in a spooky way (with the exception of perhaps &#8216;The Cult(1988)&#8217;) which is the way it should be.<br />
&#8216;Batman Begins (2005)&#8217; had the fight scenes correctly depicted. But I, a movie-fan and a Batfan, was disappointed to see a talented director like Nolan to give way to some demands of the so-called &#8216;Batfans(?)&#8217; and to show the Batman fighting clearly in TDK which is not correct. Nolan should not have compromised on his own clear vision. </p>
<p>MY POINT: Batman is not just an ordinary martial art expert like Bruce Lee but is also a STEALTH fighter with Ninza-trainings. Period.</p>
<p>2. And this is a personal opinion of a &#8216;Nobody&#8217; like me (atleast NOT from the film industry) but&#8230; Harry Potter movies suck. James Bond movies suck (Except may be Craig&#8217;s Casino Royale(2006)).</p>
<p>3. ROTK is a Very Good movie but NOT a &#8216;THIRD&#8217; Good movie. All LOTR parts branch out from a single story. Period.</p>
<p>4. Examples of a THIRD GREAT movies could be :</p>
<p>I) Shyamalan&#8217;s &#8216;SIGNS(2002)&#8217; if we just consider that it, alongwith, &#8216;SIXTH SENSE, THE(1999)&#8217; and &#8216;UNBREAKABLE(2000)&#8217; make together a top-class Shyamalan SPOOK trilogy.</p>
<p>II) Ratner&#8217;s &#8216;RED DRAGON, THE(2003)&#8217; of the brilliant &#8216;Hannibal Lecter&#8217; Trilogy. (The fourth part did not really live up to the expectations.)</p>
<p>5. Examples of a THIRD GOOD movies could be :</p>
<p>I) Mission Impossible-3. (Atleast better than the Woo&#8217;s Second Part)</p>
<p>II) Jurassic Park III (1999 OR 2001 &#8211; I can&#8217;t recall the year.) &#8211; Technically brilliant. A really thrilling movie made with the Dinos as stars.</p>
<p>III) Terminator-3(2003) was also a &#8216;Third&#8217; Good movie but hugely dissappointing in terms of what we expected from a successor of masterpieces like T-1(1984) and T2(1991). </p>
<p>6. A Batman is different than a Spiderman. A Batman has a very strong dramatic character and a room for development/expansion unlike other superheroes. So any ordinary efforts on Batman by the standards of an extra-ordinary helmer like Christopher Nolan will still result in a &#8216;Very Good&#8217; Batman movie.</p>
<p>But it would be good for everybody if Nolan takes a break from Batman for a while, cleans his mind-slate and gives us an another &#8216;Memento&#8217;, &#8216;Imsomnia&#8217;, or &#8216;The Prestige&#8217; before jumping to Batman-3(2011 ?).</p>
<p>For now, Let&#8217;s just wait for Angels and Demons(2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amol</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-208529</link>
		<dc:creator>Amol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-208529</guid>
		<description>1. (&quot; If you have any weaknesses as a filmmaker, itâ€™s in defining spatial relationships during action scenes. Thereâ€™s not a single fight scene in either Batman Begins or Dark Knight where we can tell what the hell is going on through all the fast cutting and micro-editing. Itâ€™s a small point, and the films are so good, they overcome that weakness.&quot;)

What you call a &#039;weakness&#039;, it is the ultimate definition of The Batman.
Even though Batman is a highly trained guy, his main combat weapon is... (you guessed it)... SURPRISE. Just like it is for a real Bat. The main objective of The Batman is to finish it off quickly IN THE DARK by subdueing his opponents AT CLOSE RANGE without letting them know what hit them. Just to blank them out fast enough.

And in order to experience the clarity of the fights long enough, the opponent should also be some sort of martial art expert to stand up long enough to The Batman. Otherwise it is finished as soon as it has started ...which is ... most of the times for the untrained opponents of The Batman.

The critically acclaimed Graphic novels of Batman also define his fights in a spooky way (with the exception of perhaps &#039;The Cult(1988)&#039;) which is the way it should be.
&#039;Batman Begins (2005)&#039; had the fight scenes correctly depicted. But I, a movie-fan and a Batfan, was disappointed to see a talented director like Nolan to give way to some demands of the so-called &#039;Batfans(?)&#039; and to show the Batman fighting clearly in TDK which is not correct. Nolan should not have compromised on his own clear vision. 

MY POINT: Batman is not just an ordinary martial art expert like Bruce Lee but is also a STEALTH fighter with Ninza-trainings. Period.

2. And this is a personal opinion of a &#039;Nobody&#039; like me (atleast NOT from the film industry) but... Harry Potter movies suck. James Bond movies suck (Except may be Craig&#039;s Casino Royale(2006)).

3. ROTK is a Very Good movie but NOT a &#039;THIRD&#039; Good movie. All LOTR parts branch out from a single story. Period.

4. Examples of a THIRD GREAT movies could be :

I) Shyamalan&#039;s &#039;SIGNS(2002)&#039; if we just consider that it, alongwith, &#039;SIXTH SENSE, THE(1999)&#039; and &#039;UNBREAKABLE(2000)&#039; make together a top-class Shyamalan SPOOK trilogy.

II) Ratner&#039;s &#039;RED DRAGON, THE(2003)&#039; of the brilliant &#039;Hannibal Lecter&#039; Trilogy. (The fourth part did not really live up to the expectations.)

5. Examples of a THIRD GOOD movies could be :

I) Mission Impossible-3. (Atleast better than the Woo&#039;s Second Part)

II) Jurassic Park III (1999 OR 2001 - I can&#039;t recall the year.) - Technically brilliant. A really thrilling movie made with the Dinos as stars.

III) Terminator-3(2003) was also a &#039;Third&#039; Good movie but hugely dissappointing in terms of what we expected from a successor of masterpieces like T-1(1984) and T2(1991). 

6. A Batman is different than a Spiderman. A Batman has a very strong dramatic character and a room for development/expansion unlike other superheroes. So any ordinary efforts on Batman by the standards of an extra-ordinary helmer like Christopher Nolan will still result in a &#039;Very Good&#039; Batman movie.

But it would be good for everybody if Nolan takes a break from Batman for a while, cleans his mind-slate and gives us an another &#039;Memento&#039;, &#039;Imsomnia&#039;, or &#039;The Prestige&#039; before jumping to Batman-3(2011 ?).

For now, Let&#039;s just wait for Angels and Demons(2009).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. (&#8221; If you have any weaknesses as a filmmaker, itâ€™s in defining spatial relationships during action scenes. Thereâ€™s not a single fight scene in either Batman Begins or Dark Knight where we can tell what the hell is going on through all the fast cutting and micro-editing. Itâ€™s a small point, and the films are so good, they overcome that weakness.&#8221;)</p>
<p>What you call a &#8216;weakness&#8217;, it is the ultimate definition of The Batman.<br />
Even though Batman is a highly trained guy, his main combat weapon is&#8230; (you guessed it)&#8230; SURPRISE. Just like it is for a real Bat. The main objective of The Batman is to finish it off quickly IN THE DARK by subdueing his opponents AT CLOSE RANGE without letting them know what hit them. Just to blank them out fast enough.</p>
<p>And in order to experience the clarity of the fights long enough, the opponent should also be some sort of martial art expert to stand up long enough to The Batman. Otherwise it is finished as soon as it has started &#8230;which is &#8230; most of the times for the untrained opponents of The Batman.</p>
<p>The critically acclaimed Graphic novels of Batman also define his fights in a spooky way (with the exception of perhaps &#8216;The Cult(1988)&#8217;) which is the way it should be.<br />
&#8216;Batman Begins (2005)&#8217; had the fight scenes correctly depicted. But I, a movie-fan and a Batfan, was disappointed to see a talented director like Nolan to give way to some demands of the so-called &#8216;Batfans(?)&#8217; and to show the Batman fighting clearly in TDK which is not correct. Nolan should not have compromised on his own clear vision. </p>
<p>MY POINT: Batman is not just an ordinary martial art expert like Bruce Lee but is also a STEALTH fighter with Ninza-trainings. Period.</p>
<p>2. And this is a personal opinion of a &#8216;Nobody&#8217; like me (atleast NOT from the film industry) but&#8230; Harry Potter movies suck. James Bond movies suck (Except may be Craig&#8217;s Casino Royale(2006)).</p>
<p>3. ROTK is a Very Good movie but NOT a &#8216;THIRD&#8217; Good movie. All LOTR parts branch out from a single story. Period.</p>
<p>4. Examples of a THIRD GREAT movies could be :</p>
<p>I) Shyamalan&#8217;s &#8216;SIGNS(2002)&#8217; if we just consider that it, alongwith, &#8216;SIXTH SENSE, THE(1999)&#8217; and &#8216;UNBREAKABLE(2000)&#8217; make together a top-class Shyamalan SPOOK trilogy.</p>
<p>II) Ratner&#8217;s &#8216;RED DRAGON, THE(2003)&#8217; of the brilliant &#8216;Hannibal Lecter&#8217; Trilogy. (The fourth part did not really live up to the expectations.)</p>
<p>5. Examples of a THIRD GOOD movies could be :</p>
<p>I) Mission Impossible-3. (Atleast better than the Woo&#8217;s Second Part)</p>
<p>II) Jurassic Park III (1999 OR 2001 &#8211; I can&#8217;t recall the year.) &#8211; Technically brilliant. A really thrilling movie made with the Dinos as stars.</p>
<p>III) Terminator-3(2003) was also a &#8216;Third&#8217; Good movie but hugely dissappointing in terms of what we expected from a successor of masterpieces like T-1(1984) and T2(1991). </p>
<p>6. A Batman is different than a Spiderman. A Batman has a very strong dramatic character and a room for development/expansion unlike other superheroes. So any ordinary efforts on Batman by the standards of an extra-ordinary helmer like Christopher Nolan will still result in a &#8216;Very Good&#8217; Batman movie.</p>
<p>But it would be good for everybody if Nolan takes a break from Batman for a while, cleans his mind-slate and gives us an another &#8216;Memento&#8217;, &#8216;Imsomnia&#8217;, or &#8216;The Prestige&#8217; before jumping to Batman-3(2011 ?).</p>
<p>For now, Let&#8217;s just wait for Angels and Demons(2009).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrazyDude</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-118004</link>
		<dc:creator>CrazyDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-118004</guid>
		<description>Lord of the rings was shot as one long film, so ROTK is not really a third movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lord of the rings was shot as one long film, so ROTK is not really a third movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrazyDude</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-208528</link>
		<dc:creator>CrazyDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-208528</guid>
		<description>Lord of the rings was shot as one long film, so ROTK is not really a third movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lord of the rings was shot as one long film, so ROTK is not really a third movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Third films</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-117988</link>
		<dc:creator>Third films</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-117988</guid>
		<description>What about Nightmare on Elm Street 3? I think that would have been better to mention than Indiana Jones 3.

or even Army of Darkness? That was a good third movie. Or Star Trek 3 with the fooking search for Spock damn it!

of all the movies that you could have listed...yeesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Nightmare on Elm Street 3? I think that would have been better to mention than Indiana Jones 3.</p>
<p>or even Army of Darkness? That was a good third movie. Or Star Trek 3 with the fooking search for Spock damn it!</p>
<p>of all the movies that you could have listed&#8230;yeesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Third films</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-208527</link>
		<dc:creator>Third films</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-208527</guid>
		<description>What about Nightmare on Elm Street 3? I think that would have been better to mention than Indiana Jones 3.

or even Army of Darkness? That was a good third movie. Or Star Trek 3 with the fooking search for Spock damn it!

of all the movies that you could have listed...yeesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Nightmare on Elm Street 3? I think that would have been better to mention than Indiana Jones 3.</p>
<p>or even Army of Darkness? That was a good third movie. Or Star Trek 3 with the fooking search for Spock damn it!</p>
<p>of all the movies that you could have listed&#8230;yeesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-117965</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-117965</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you on all of those except RotJ.

Don&#039;t get me wrong - I&#039;m a massive Star Wars fan, but RotJ was the first glimpse that George Lucas had lost his damn mind. Ewoks instead of Wookies? The complete removal of Chewbacca&#039;s backstory? This was the point where Lucas stopped making scifi/fantasy epics for adults and started making merchandising films for children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you on all of those except RotJ.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; I&#8217;m a massive Star Wars fan, but RotJ was the first glimpse that George Lucas had lost his damn mind. Ewoks instead of Wookies? The complete removal of Chewbacca&#8217;s backstory? This was the point where Lucas stopped making scifi/fantasy epics for adults and started making merchandising films for children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-208526</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-208526</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you on all of those except RotJ.

Don&#039;t get me wrong - I&#039;m a massive Star Wars fan, but RotJ was the first glimpse that George Lucas had lost his damn mind. Ewoks instead of Wookies? The complete removal of Chewbacca&#039;s backstory? This was the point where Lucas stopped making scifi/fantasy epics for adults and started making merchandising films for children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you on all of those except RotJ.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; I&#8217;m a massive Star Wars fan, but RotJ was the first glimpse that George Lucas had lost his damn mind. Ewoks instead of Wookies? The complete removal of Chewbacca&#8217;s backstory? This was the point where Lucas stopped making scifi/fantasy epics for adults and started making merchandising films for children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-117928</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-117928</guid>
		<description>Return of the Jedi sucked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Return of the Jedi sucked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-208525</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-208525</guid>
		<description>Return of the Jedi sucked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Return of the Jedi sucked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-117916</link>
		<dc:creator>matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-117916</guid>
		<description>Why can&#039;t we all just chill out and let Nolan make up his mind? Even if he doesn&#039;t make a third he still made two really fantastic, solid, stand-alone movies. Everyone just needs to leave him alone for about a year. He&#039;ll come around. Just don&#039;t force it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t we all just chill out and let Nolan make up his mind? Even if he doesn&#8217;t make a third he still made two really fantastic, solid, stand-alone movies. Everyone just needs to leave him alone for about a year. He&#8217;ll come around. Just don&#8217;t force it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-208524</link>
		<dc:creator>matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-208524</guid>
		<description>Why can&#039;t we all just chill out and let Nolan make up his mind? Even if he doesn&#039;t make a third he still made two really fantastic, solid, stand-alone movies. Everyone just needs to leave him alone for about a year. He&#039;ll come around. Just don&#039;t force it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t we all just chill out and let Nolan make up his mind? Even if he doesn&#8217;t make a third he still made two really fantastic, solid, stand-alone movies. Everyone just needs to leave him alone for about a year. He&#8217;ll come around. Just don&#8217;t force it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: six</title>
		<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/christopher-nolan-gets-pwned-by-our-list-of-good-third-movies.php/comment-page-2#comment-117915</link>
		<dc:creator>six</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=20873#comment-117915</guid>
		<description>I would point out, that except for Indiana Jones, they were all originally conceived as multi-part stories before the 3rd was even made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would point out, that except for Indiana Jones, they were all originally conceived as multi-part stories before the 3rd was even made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 593/599 objects using memcached

Served from: www.filmschoolrejects.com @ 2012-02-14 03:01:09 -->
