Boiling Point: Unrated Edition

Posted by Robert Fure (robert@filmschoolrejects.com) on March 23, 2009

bp-unrated

No, I’m not going to curse more than usual, because that’s offensive and mother fucking crude.  Still, children should be kept away from my and my writing – it’s subversive and too Michale Bay (translation: AWESOME) for their tiny little brains.  No, when I’m talking about Unrated Editions, there are two very different topics (well, not that different) that get me equally riled up.  So I’m going to hit both of them at the same time, with verbal rocks, until they die.

First, let’s talk about the Rated edition.  For theatrical movies, they’re fine and good. It’s just the normal movie – most films don’t need an unrated edition to their names.  For a movie to be played in the widest venue possible, it needs to have an MPAA approved rating.  This isn’t a legal issue, but a monetary one, as most theaters won’t play unrated films.  That is a Boiling Point for a different day.  The rub comes in direct to DVD or TV movies.  For the Sci-Fi channel or some other regular cable outlet, no heavy cursing or nudity.  But for direct to Showtime or HBO or Cinemax, the gloves are off.  For straight to DVD movies, no need for a rating.  Just let it all hang out.  I say that if a movie isn’t going to be released in theaters, it shouldn’t even be submitted for review.  It’s a waste of time.  Make a ballsy film, put it all out there, stick it to the MPAA where they can’t touch you and release your film without a rating.  A straight to DVD romantic comedy obviously doesn’t have much to gain from here, but what’s the point in submitting it for a rating?  Don’t give the MPAA any more responsibility than it already has.

For a non-theatrical horror, sci-fi, or action movie, never give it a rating.  Or at least, don’t give it an official MPAA rating.  Why bind yourself?  Most producers will realize going into a project that if you have $5 million or less, the odds of you going into theaters is very low.  In the rare instances when you will go, submit for a rating and then make whatever changes are necessary to get bank.  But the fact of the matter is, you’ll make more money by releasing an unrated film to DVD.  Rental chains don’t restrict Unrated films because – hey, they’re unrated!  It could be an unrated cartoon about a loving family of raccoons adopting a skunk or a film about a serial rapist getting his brains ripped out of his nostrils with a red hot poker.  If you film is submitted with a rating to a rental agency, the age effect of the rating goes into place – 16 year olds can’t rent your horror film.  Add to that fact that no one gets excited by PG-13 horror in theaters, much less on DVD.

The second facet of the Unrated DVD that riles me up is the completely unwarranted release.  There is no qualification for Unrated other than that it hasn’t been rated by the MPAA.  They could add in 4 seconds of static teddy bears hugging, not release the new cut for a rating, and call it Unrated and Extended!  Which would be absolutely true, but completely bullshit.

This is most heinous in horror DVDs that want to trick you into thinking some awesome, balls out, disgusting, brain exploding brilliance is about to happen, but really all they added was some CGI Gophers or something.  An example of doing it right – My Bloody Valentine Unrated added in basically nothing but gore and kills.  Live Free or Die Hard added a bunch of cursing and blood.  Righteous.  On the opposing spectrum is something like Seed of Chucky which added in a minute and a half of bullshit that was neither bloody or sexy.  The first American Pie also released an Unrated edition that wasn’t really much different from the theatrical version.  This is just a way to steal your money, not earn it, but we figured out long ago that’s what Hollywood is about.

So you can see my dilemma.  My left hand wants to bitchslap anyone who releases a Rated movie direct to DVD.  There’s no reason to do it and you can get away with so much more without it, so why not?  But my right hand wants to ball tap the studios who release Unrated editions that are just cheap, underhanded gimmicks designed to con suckers like myself.  Either way, in either instance, I’m past my boiling point.

What Unrated DVDs have proven to be completely tame?


Read more articles by Robert Fure

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Didn't read. I'll just do it when they release the Unrated version of this article.
  • I don't have a need to buy any version of American Pie or Seed of Chucky...so I can't really identify with that problem...I do however love director's cuts if they're done properly Ridley Scott is a great example of someone who releases a decent DVD without just trying to make money...

    I have a lot of issues when it comes to the MPAA although they don't have any effect on film ratings where I am....the studios still distribute the theater version/rated/unrated copies of DVDs here and it's annoying....on TV here they can curse, have softcore porn flicks on regular cable...so censorship isn't a big problem but I've never understood why studios just don't sell copies of DVDs with both versions on it....a lot of new comedies like Sarah Marshall do that and it's great....

    what I have an issue with is that how so many single edition DVDs don't even come with the usual commentary track now...they've now put the commentary only the special edition...I usually could careless about the extras but I always enjoy hearing the commentary....I don't think it's worth the extra $10 though...you'd think with DVD now having to compete with DVDrips and now Bluray they'd come down on the price of the special editions....
  • joshi38
    The issue with releasing straight to DVD films unrated is that certain parents won't go near them, for fear of what they'd be showing their children (because when you're holding two DVD's in your hand, one with a fluffy bunny on the cover and the other with a severed head, things can get damn confusing without that magical G or R slapped in the corner).

    And frankly, for stuff like straight to DVD horror, it may be better for a film-maker to put everything they want in, submit it for a rating, get an NC-17 and then put it on the shelves, as that way, people looking for a horror that won't cut back on the gore and shock inducing terror will know that the NC-17 stuff is probably what they want. Having a movie marked as unrated doesn't necessarily mean it'll be that daring.
  • I gotta agree with MOST cases for the UNRATED DVD. However there are a few that are good. Most of the ones I can think of right now are the Judd Apatow movies, Knocked Up & Superbad, both have so much more in the UNRATED versions that makes it hilarious and worth the buy. I also say that Sex Drive deserves the buy just to see the intro with the filmmakers telling you not to buy the DVD and instead go get the theatrical edition because all you're going to get are a few extra curse words and more cock and tits in screen. It's hilarious.

    However I wholeheartedly agree with you when we talk about UNRATED dvds in the most general sense of the word.
  • i agree dude. the Apatow Unrated usually adds 5-10 minutes, 3-7 of those actually being worth anything.

    an i love your point about the SexDrive unrated cut, but you kind of got it wrong. the filmmakers' intro on the unrated cut tells the viewer that watching that cut of the film will just confuse and anger the viewer because it includes outtakes, line-o-rama, and just random naked people, along with the extra scenes. watching the unrated cut first just wouldn't make sense for that particular movie. i'm not saying this is the smartest flick out there, but the unrated cut is pretty fucked. i do love that it's like 22 minutes longer than the theatrical cut though.
  • rcpro
    NC-17 does have a nice ring to it.
  • I just keep opening this article to look at those breasts.
  • You know I hate agreeing with you, but I watched the Unrated Role Models today, and it just left me wondering why it was unrated...
  • curt
    it doesn't matter if it is bad or not, if it says unrated anywhere on it you must be 17 years old to rent it at blockbuster. i'd go for nc-17
  • curt
    yes sir that is a nice fucking rack
blog comments powered by Disqus