Boiling Point: Happy Endings

Posted by Robert Fure (robert@filmschoolrejects.com) on June 1, 2009

bp-happyendings2

What happened to the love you and I once shared, cinema?  I would give you the one thing you loved (my money) and you would reward me with splendid tales of good overcoming evil, right smiting wrong, and Michael Bay blowing things up.  Now a days it seems as though you’re all the willing to take my money, but content in telling me stories with no morals, no point, and no happy ending.  When did you turn so cynical?

I’m a sucker for a happy ending, I’ll admit it.  Sometimes I even pay extra for it. But let’s be clear on just what a happy ending is.  I don’t want rainbows and unicorns fucking dolphins and birthing cupcakes.  If a psycho killer (Quest que cest, fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa) [+1 for getting the joke] murders an entire orphanage and half a dozen care takers, but in the end one strong girl bares her breasts and slashes down the slasher, that is a happy ending.  No matter how bad evil got, evil got a bad end.  These days, we get to the end, ready for some heroics or a moment of triumph where all our hero’s hard work pays off and what do we get?  Jack.  And Shit.  And Jack just left town.

These examples will contain spoilers, so check yo’ self before I wreck your movie going experience.  First, one from way back – Man on Fire. Talk about a downer.  Denzel goes through hell and back and at the end, what is his reward – a happy life having saved the girl?  No, he decides not to bust out all his mad-ass killer skills and just hands his life over.  Lame.  This summer’s absolutely atrocious Observe and Report didn’t have a happy ending.  It didn’t even have an ending.  It just ended.  Our hero learned nothing.  Scratch hero.  That fat, slovenly bastard learned nothing – and was rewarded for it.  This weekend’s sweet baby-child Drag Me To Hellour innocent heroine fights for her life and puts it all on the line, then gets sucked into hell for an eternity of suffering because some thieving gypsy whore says so.  Take that to the bank and fuck it, no thanks.  Where’s my happy ending?  The Breakup - we spend the whole time waiting for these people to get back together and what?  Nothing.  Thanks for wasting my time.  Lost in Translation? I’ll tell you what was lost in translation – that whole damn movie.

There in is the real problem of the non-happy ending.  Many times it means things aren’t resolved.  It means all you just watched doesn’t matter.  Like we need a reminder every day that most of what we do is pointless?  We all tread water every day, we don’t go to theaters to watch characters spin their wheels and end up breaking down.  Sure, a movie can definitely have a sad ending that proves a point.  American History X did not have a happy ending, it had a smart ending that added to the story and slammed the point home.  A real point.  Most movies that have bad endings are slamming home the point that “no matter what you do life is sucky and all your hard work means jack shit.”  Thanks a lot, Hollywood, suck a boat load of [Editor's note:  Too much cursing already, but if you're curious it was about donkeys and their genitalia.]

When I go to a movie, I want to see something get accomplished.  I want to be reminded that hard work and determination can save your soul.  I want to know that if fight the good fight, I win the girl.  Because that’s not how the real world is.  So we escape.  Movies have always been referred to as the greatest form of escapism on earth.  Who are these filmmakers to take that away from us?  It’s rather cruel, when it serves no point other than to shake a finger at the audience at remind us life blows.  Christine Brown may have been dragged to hell, but I’ve been pushed to my boiling point.

What say you?


Read more articles by Robert Fure

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • I'm all for happy endings. But I completely dislike the notion that a character has to learn something for an ending to be happy.

    I call that realism. Stupid bastards usually stay stupid bastards.
  • B.Shet
    I thought Man on Fire had a happy ending? I remember him saving the girl then handing himself over to the bad guys and you think "oh shit this sucks." Just then you see his wound and realize that he will die before ever being tortured by the bad guys, thus giving you your happy ending.
  • Otis Jefferson
    run run run run, run run run away...
  • david
    screw happy endings most turn out to be really cheesy more than happy
  • Finding out that you're both a total softy and a Talking Heads fan is happy ending enough for me.
  • srsly
    I think this rant is specious.

    You speak as if there are no happy endings in movies these days at all. Star Trek - happy ending, UP - happy ending, Night at the Museum - happy ending.... 3 of the top 5 movies out right at this very second - happy endings all.

    You also make it seem like EVERY movie should have a happy ending. What would be the point of great movies where morally ambiguous or completely non-happy endings are critical to the point like Resevoir Dogs, Do the Right Thing, and the mother of all un-happy endings - Old Yeller?

    I agree with you that vacuous non-ending suck and if the director is going to take us on trip, there should be SOME kind of fulfillment at the end of the journey or else it feels like a complete waste of time but the idea that it has to be a "happy" ending is utterly ridiculous.. Ergo, i think the point of this rant should be about fulfillment rather then happiness.
  • srsly
    BTW - American History X hardly had a bad ending with a smart point. It was cliche and hackneyed. As for Lost in Translation, it did have a happy ending albeit ambiguously so.
  • HappyPalooza
    That's dumb. A movie doesn't HAVE to have a happy ending. Unhappy endings open up possibilities for different, more interesting storytelling. Sure, there should be a conclusion, but it doesn't always have to make you feel all warm inside. There shouldn't be any limitations on what a movie HAS to have at all, as a matter of fact.
  • "fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa"=Silence of the lambs?

    I don't mind unhappy endings, depending on the film. Take The Break-Up. of course that's a film I want to have a happy ending. I want those two back together. yeah, yeah it's hinted, they wink at each other, I don't give a fuck, let's see them slobber all over each others faces as music plays and the camera pulls away revealing the crowded city that continues to move around them as they smooch. BAM! Romance. Good.

    But nothing pisses me off more than pointless endings, and I'm beginning to loathe the 'second movie cliff hanger.' This is when there was a great standalone first movie, and then it got green lit for a trilogy. So the second movie ends with... nothing. See: The matrix reloaded, Pirates of the Caribbean... GIve me a standalone movie. Empire Strikes Back did it perfectly. Shit was bad, yeah, the story wasn't over, but I felt like that particular narrative was complete.

    And on Lost in Translation, I really liked the ending to that movie... But that's just me.
  • bob123321
    I like cheese
blog comments powered by Disqus