Comments on: Boiling Point: Box Office Blowjobs http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php A Website About Movies Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:06:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: TaiLung http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-141190 TaiLung Sat, 23 May 2009 09:22:39 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-141190 Couldn't agree more with everything you just said. Couldn't agree more with everything you just said.

]]> By: TaiLung http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-224213 TaiLung Sat, 23 May 2009 09:22:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-224213 Couldn't agree more with everything you just said. Couldn't agree more with everything you just said.

]]> By: TaiLung http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-224214 TaiLung Sat, 23 May 2009 09:22:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-224214 Couldn't agree more with everything you just said. Couldn't agree more with everything you just said.

]]> By: TaiLung http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-141189 TaiLung Sat, 23 May 2009 09:20:42 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-141189 Don't you mean: Swash(belt)buckle?¨ :P Don't you mean: Swash(belt)buckle?¨

:P

]]> By: TaiLung http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-224212 TaiLung Sat, 23 May 2009 09:20:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-224212 Don't you mean: Swash(belt)buckle?¨ :P Don't you mean: Swash(belt)buckle?¨

:P

]]> By: Grazer http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-140155 Grazer Thu, 14 May 2009 07:15:05 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-140155 The only people who need to be worried about box office figures are studios and directors. So if box office figures are not a measure of a movies quality, what is? What a critic says? If so which one? Sorry, capable of making my own judgement on a movie, don't need to be spoon fed my opinion. All a critic is, is a person with an opinion and gets paid for it. Just because they think its a good movie, doesn't mean I will agree. If I'm supporting movies that people find crap, tuff shit. You're probably doing the same to me. The only people who need to be worried about box office figures are studios and directors.

So if box office figures are not a measure of a movies quality, what is? What a critic says? If so which one? Sorry, capable of making my own judgement on a movie, don't need to be spoon fed my opinion. All a critic is, is a person with an opinion and gets paid for it. Just because they think its a good movie, doesn't mean I will agree.

If I'm supporting movies that people find crap, tuff shit. You're probably doing the same to me.

]]> By: Grazer http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-224211 Grazer Thu, 14 May 2009 07:15:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-224211 The only people who need to be worried about box office figures are studios and directors. So if box office figures are not a measure of a movies quality, what is? What a critic says? If so which one? Sorry, capable of making my own judgement on a movie, don't need to be spoon fed my opinion. All a critic is, is a person with an opinion and gets paid for it. Just because they think its a good movie, doesn't mean I will agree. If I'm supporting movies that people find crap, tuff shit. You're probably doing the same to me. The only people who need to be worried about box office figures are studios and directors.

So if box office figures are not a measure of a movies quality, what is? What a critic says? If so which one? Sorry, capable of making my own judgement on a movie, don't need to be spoon fed my opinion. All a critic is, is a person with an opinion and gets paid for it. Just because they think its a good movie, doesn't mean I will agree.

If I'm supporting movies that people find crap, tuff shit. You're probably doing the same to me.

]]> By: GuiltyTrace http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-139769 GuiltyTrace Mon, 11 May 2009 04:32:46 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-139769 Agreed. "Ooh, Drumline made 55 mil at the box? Better go get it on DVD!" Shit... Agreed. "Ooh, Drumline made 55 mil at the box? Better go get it on DVD!" Shit…

]]> By: GuiltyTrace http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-224209 GuiltyTrace Mon, 11 May 2009 04:32:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-224209 Agreed. "Ooh, Drumline made 55 mil at the box? Better go get it on DVD!" Shit... Agreed. "Ooh, Drumline made 55 mil at the box? Better go get it on DVD!" Shit…

]]> By: GuiltyTrace http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-224210 GuiltyTrace Mon, 11 May 2009 04:32:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-224210 Agreed. "Ooh, Drumline made 55 mil at the box? Better go get it on DVD!" Shit... Agreed. "Ooh, Drumline made 55 mil at the box? Better go get it on DVD!" Shit…

]]> By: danney http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-138515 danney Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:57:50 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-138515 It's called lazy reporting. Box office numbers are eazy to report and no one has to give an opinion. In this day and age of metrics and the number of widgets per hour, how much box office, number of screens per film, and box office by screens is too easy to quantify. With the number of critics decreasing and many papers only carrying reviews published by wire services, we are increasingly relying on places like FSR to give us an honest opinion of whether the film blows or is worth seeing. My choices may not always be the same as what the reviews may be, but an honest opinion is worth reading. It's called lazy reporting. Box office numbers are eazy to report and no one has to give an opinion. In this day and age of metrics and the number of widgets per hour, how much box office, number of screens per film, and box office by screens is too easy to quantify.

With the number of critics decreasing and many papers only carrying reviews published by wire services, we are increasingly relying on places like FSR to give us an honest opinion of whether the film blows or is worth seeing. My choices may not always be the same as what the reviews may be, but an honest opinion is worth reading.

]]> By: danney http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-224208 danney Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:57:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-224208 It's called lazy reporting. Box office numbers are eazy to report and no one has to give an opinion. In this day and age of metrics and the number of widgets per hour, how much box office, number of screens per film, and box office by screens is too easy to quantify. With the number of critics decreasing and many papers only carrying reviews published by wire services, we are increasingly relying on places like FSR to give us an honest opinion of whether the film blows or is worth seeing. My choices may not always be the same as what the reviews may be, but an honest opinion is worth reading. It's called lazy reporting. Box office numbers are eazy to report and no one has to give an opinion. In this day and age of metrics and the number of widgets per hour, how much box office, number of screens per film, and box office by screens is too easy to quantify.

With the number of critics decreasing and many papers only carrying reviews published by wire services, we are increasingly relying on places like FSR to give us an honest opinion of whether the film blows or is worth seeing. My choices may not always be the same as what the reviews may be, but an honest opinion is worth reading.

]]> By: Jeff R Hall http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-138480 Jeff R Hall Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:36:13 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-138480 Frankly, I couldn't care less about how much a movie grosses. Yes, it's fun to see a film you enjoy do well, but ultimately, it means nothing. I love the movie New Suit. I saw it in the theaters, bought the DVD when it came out. Total gross: $71,743 (USA) (28 November 2003) Does that make it a bad film? No, just and under appreciated film. By the way, weren't the Wizard Of OZ and Citizen Kane relative flops at the box office when they were first released? I think history has proven both to be classics. Frankly, I couldn't care less about how much a movie grosses. Yes, it's fun to see a film you enjoy do well, but ultimately, it means nothing.

I love the movie New Suit. I saw it in the theaters, bought the DVD when it came out. Total gross: $71,743 (USA) (28 November 2003) Does that make it a bad film? No, just and under appreciated film.

By the way, weren't the Wizard Of OZ and Citizen Kane relative flops at the box office when they were first released? I think history has proven both to be classics.

]]> By: djjeffhall http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-224207 djjeffhall Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:36:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-224207 Frankly, I couldn't care less about how much a movie grosses. Yes, it's fun to see a film you enjoy do well, but ultimately, it means nothing. I love the movie New Suit. I saw it in the theaters, bought the DVD when it came out. Total gross: $71,743 (USA) (28 November 2003) Does that make it a bad film? No, just and under appreciated film. By the way, weren't the Wizard Of OZ and Citizen Kane relative flops at the box office when they were first released? I think history has proven both to be classics. Frankly, I couldn't care less about how much a movie grosses. Yes, it's fun to see a film you enjoy do well, but ultimately, it means nothing.

I love the movie New Suit. I saw it in the theaters, bought the DVD when it came out. Total gross: $71,743 (USA) (28 November 2003) Does that make it a bad film? No, just and under appreciated film.

By the way, weren't the Wizard Of OZ and Citizen Kane relative flops at the box office when they were first released? I think history has proven both to be classics.

]]> By: tmccar20 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-138468 tmccar20 Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:09:07 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-138468 Box office numbers started to matter when Spielberg made Jaws and it made over a 100 million, it was the first real blockbuster. Today, the box office has become more important because there are hundreds if thousands of sites trying to give some more insight into a films and its dealings with money. Even this site does it, every week in fact, you even make estimates. This not a bad thing, first impressions of a film are very important, if it is able to having staying power over more than a few weeks at least the film has got to be decent, or have a good marketing compaign. People care more about films more than ever, and we want to greater knowledge of a film and its workings. This is just part of it. Star Trek is the first big summer film besides wolveine, of course money is on the brain. Plus it compounded by the fact that Dark Knight made a Billion and this is the first summer of the recession. Money is subject number right now. Box office numbers started to matter when Spielberg made Jaws and it made over a 100 million, it was the first real blockbuster. Today, the box office has become more important because there are hundreds if thousands of sites trying to give some more insight into a films and its dealings with money. Even this site does it, every week in fact, you even make estimates. This not a bad thing, first impressions of a film are very important, if it is able to having staying power over more than a few weeks at least the film has got to be decent, or have a good marketing compaign. People care more about films more than ever, and we want to greater knowledge of a film and its workings. This is just part of it. Star Trek is the first big summer film besides wolveine, of course money is on the brain. Plus it compounded by the fact that Dark Knight made a Billion and this is the first summer of the recession. Money is subject number right now.

]]> By: tmccar20 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-224206 tmccar20 Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:09:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-224206 Box office numbers started to matter when Spielberg made Jaws and it made over a 100 million, it was the first real blockbuster. Today, the box office has become more important because there are hundreds if thousands of sites trying to give some more insight into a films and its dealings with money. Even this site does it, every week in fact, you even make estimates. This not a bad thing, first impressions of a film are very important, if it is able to having staying power over more than a few weeks at least the film has got to be decent, or have a good marketing compaign. People care more about films more than ever, and we want to greater knowledge of a film and its workings. This is just part of it. Star Trek is the first big summer film besides wolveine, of course money is on the brain. Plus it compounded by the fact that Dark Knight made a Billion and this is the first summer of the recession. Money is subject number right now. Box office numbers started to matter when Spielberg made Jaws and it made over a 100 million, it was the first real blockbuster. Today, the box office has become more important because there are hundreds if thousands of sites trying to give some more insight into a films and its dealings with money. Even this site does it, every week in fact, you even make estimates. This not a bad thing, first impressions of a film are very important, if it is able to having staying power over more than a few weeks at least the film has got to be decent, or have a good marketing compaign. People care more about films more than ever, and we want to greater knowledge of a film and its workings. This is just part of it. Star Trek is the first big summer film besides wolveine, of course money is on the brain. Plus it compounded by the fact that Dark Knight made a Billion and this is the first summer of the recession. Money is subject number right now.

]]> By: HempKnight 757 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-138414 HempKnight 757 Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:27:37 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-138414 I got a blowjob in the first pirates movie & I still thought it blew. SWOOSH! I got a blowjob in the first pirates movie & I still thought it blew. SWOOSH!

]]> By: HempKnight 757 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-224205 HempKnight 757 Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:27:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-224205 I got a blowjob in the first pirates movie & I still thought it blew. SWOOSH! I got a blowjob in the first pirates movie & I still thought it blew. SWOOSH!

]]> By: phrenetik http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-138396 phrenetik Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:54:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-138396 Box office numbers are more of a trick of getting the marketing strategy and timing right. Obsessed made it because there was simply no better movie in the cinemas that could appease the adults (the tweens were captured by 17 Again and Hannah Montana). Plus the impression the poster gave was that it could somehow be the next Fatal Attraction. That all adds up somehow. O.O Box office numbers are more of a trick of getting the marketing strategy and timing right. Obsessed made it because there was simply no better movie in the cinemas that could appease the adults (the tweens were captured by 17 Again and Hannah Montana). Plus the impression the poster gave was that it could somehow be the next Fatal Attraction. That all adds up somehow. O.O

]]> By: phrenetik http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/boiling-point-box-office-blowjobs.php/comment-page-1#comment-224204 phrenetik Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:54:00 +0000 http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/?p=40787#comment-224204 Box office numbers are more of a trick of getting the marketing strategy and timing right. Obsessed made it because there was simply no better movie in the cinemas that could appease the adults (the tweens were captured by 17 Again and Hannah Montana). Plus the impression the poster gave was that it could somehow be the next Fatal Attraction. That all adds up somehow. O.O Box office numbers are more of a trick of getting the marketing strategy and timing right. Obsessed made it because there was simply no better movie in the cinemas that could appease the adults (the tweens were captured by 17 Again and Hannah Montana). Plus the impression the poster gave was that it could somehow be the next Fatal Attraction. That all adds up somehow. O.O

]]>