Appaloosa: 10 Things I Liked, 5 I Didn’t

Posted by Robert Fure (robert@filmschoolrejects.com) on October 7, 2008

Viggo Mortensen in Appaloosa

Editor’s Note: As with many of our Ten and Five articles, this article does contain spoilers. You’ve been warned, partner.

While Westerns may be a rare thing in theaters these days, luckily we’ve had a few in the recent years that were good. Joining that list is the Ed Harris helmed Appaloosa, which co-stars Viggo Mortensen and captures the essence of the historical West while keeping true to the roots of the fictional world of stand up shoot outs and wise cracking, whiskey swillin’ Lawmen.

10 Things I Liked

10. End Credits – The end credit sequence was awesome, with beautiful high resolution photography serving as backdrops with some great music played over top – first Tom Petty, then Ed Harris himself crooning.

9. The Visuals – Ed Harris can direct, no doubt about it. The shots he selects in this film are great, channeling classic western inspiration from past greats while keeping it fresh.

8. Virgil & Everett – The relationship between these two characters rings true and illustrates a realistic friendship between two men in America’s frontier.

7. The Guns – I love firearms and Appaloosa brings a lot of good looking iron to the screen, from Colt Peacemakers to Winchester 1873 Rifles.

6. The Ensemble Cast – There are a lot of great people assembled for this film: Lance Henriksen, Viggo Mortensen, Ed Harris, and Jeremy Irons.

5. Brevity of Gun Fights – In sticking with some of the more realistic elements, gunfights in the old West often only last a few seconds. Even the gunfight at the O.K. Corral was under 40 seconds. This film portrays shoot outs accurately.

4. The Script – This isn’t the movie most were expecting – There were classic Western themes, which we want, but also there are large doses of wit and humor which were unexpected and welcome.

3. Acting – Almost across the board, everyone did a great job. Mortensen, Irons, and Harris are all in top form portraying their characters, though we don’t expect anything less.

2. The Score – This is a great, classic Western score, which I purchased immediately. It includes two songs sung by Ed Harris, both of which relate to the film and are very enjoyable.

1. The Details – There are a lot of little details that I took note of and enjoyed. A lot of attention was paid to the small things, from glassware to weapons. My favorite detail was the well worn leather recoil pad sewn into Everett’s coat jacket, which complements his impressive 10 8 gauge shotgun. Also, awesome period correct mustaches.

5 Things I Didn’t

5. Lack of Advertising – Where is the support for this film? I love it, yet have only seen a handful of advertisements. This film could have used a bigger push.

4. The Bumbling Town Elders – The guys who seemingly ran the town of Appaloosa were just a touch too comical at the times, like the Three Stooges. Really, not that big of a stumbling block though – and I do love James Gammon no matter what he’s doing on screen.

3. Multiple Endings – This has been going around a lot lately and Appaloosa fakes you out with one climax only to continue onwards. Though, what follows is good, so I’m nitpicking a little.

2. Continuity Errors – I did notice a continuity error or two – a glass refills itself and Viggo’s shotgun switches between being open and closed in some shots.

1. Renee Zellweger – When she’s first introduced, all I could think was “This is Renee Zellweger,” and it took me a little bit out of the film. She was also a tad annoying, but about halfway through the film I was on board. Still, I think perhaps there were better choices for the role.


| MovieBlips: vote it up! | Read more articles by Robert Fure

Related Reading:

Your Ad Here

Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!

  • Alericc
    I agree with a lot of your likes and dislikes Robert. I did catch one mistake you made though, Viggo carries an 8 gauge Shotgun not a 10 gauge. Surprised the hell out of me too as I couldn't believe the barrels on that monster.

    The attention to detail of the movie was truly impressive, even down to the period pocket knives they carried. Not to mention the weapons and the smoke from the black powder rounds they were still using at that time, not the smokeless powder we are used to today.

    I did have a problem with the pacing of the movie though. It tended to slow down way too much at times and there was not a lot of action in the classical sense. After all Jeremy Irons character had 20 hands at his ranch that were basically forgotten after they got him on the train. Even when Jeremy Irons returned they never showed up in town again. They could have had a couple more stand offs and possibly a few more shootings.

    Basically though if you love westerns you will enjoy this movie for the visuals alone.
  • Thanks for catching my typo on the shotgun gauge. Fixed it in the article. It was an awesome gun that was virtually a character itself.

    As for pacing, I can see wanting more action because action is awesome, though I think the slow pace accurately reflected the speed of life and it didn't bother me. Thanks for the comment!
  • Alericc
    Thank you for the fine review, but don't misunderstand me. I wasn't advocating a western with the Jerry Bruckheimer type shoot outs, but a little more action in my opinion would have helped. Possibly one more 2 minute exchange of some lead, no more.
  • Nate
    I really didn't like the first half of this movie. Too slow, too many scenes of awkward dialogue between the main characters, too many cliches and poor on-liners. I felt like Harris was aiming too low, going for one of those 'odes to classics' throwbacks but not bothering with making Appaloosa stand apart. Harris and Zwelleger were also very lackadasical. As mundane as the first half was though, the second half (everything from the train sequence on in) was the polar opposite and couldn't have been much more impressive. Mortensen was excellent and I particularly liked the ending because it goes against the grain just enough that I might just call it bold.
    P.S. There are no such things as multiple endings. A film may trick you into thinking you're at the end, but each film can only have one. And I agree that the shotgun is like a character. Do we ever see Mortensen without it?
  • cam
    i totally agree about Renee Zellweger, i was shocked that she was actually cast. She is definitely not what I picture to a "Western beauty" to me, furthermore (as was stated) she was annoying and I could NOT stand her character at all. I just felt that character was poorly cast and under developed as she is a rather 2 dimensional character (ok she has sex with any guy who has power, fantastic! what else havent I seen??..) I was almost hoping/wishing she'd be offed during the movie (for those who have seen the movie, you can probably guess the scene). other than that though, I have nothing other than praise. I love the realtionship between Everrett/Virgil and the fact that you can understand it just from their facial expressions and mannerisms, brilliant! Also the gunfights were a huge, welcomed relief from the typical "Hollywood western." My final complaint though, now that I think of it, is what the hell happened to Irons' gang? He just shows up as owner of the saloon and not a gang member seen nor mentioned. I dont know if was lazy writing or it did not just occur to Harris that he had a plot hole but it was kind of...disappointing for lack of a better adjective. other than that though, 8/10. Solid, old fashioned western. bravo harris/viggo/irons
blog comments powered by Disqus